.svg)
.avif)
Black Friday has long served as a reliable anchor in the retail calendar. But some retailers place less weight on the post-Thanksgiving rush – or even opt out of it altogether – in favor of promotional windows that better align with their customers or brand values.
We analyzed foot traffic patterns at two such retailers, REI and IKEA, to see how alternative promotional strategies can shape visit performance throughout the year.
Mission-driven REI’s decision to close on Black Friday is a deliberate break from retail tradition. The brand’s long-running #OptOutside initiative reflects its commitment to outdoor activity and to the well-being of its employees, who get the day off to spend with friends and family.
The graph below highlights the foot traffic impact of the decision: while the traditional apparel and recreational & sporting goods categories experienced a sharp surge during the week of Black Friday, REI’s visits dropped below its 2025 YTD average.
Even so, the data indicates that REI still captures seasonal momentum. The retailer’s pre-Thanksgiving Holiday Sale delivered a modest visit lift that partially offset its voluntary pause on one of the category’s highest-traffic days. And REI’s post-Black Friday sales – Cyber Monday and last-minute gifts sale – appeared to do some heavy lifting for the brand, while the anticipated end-of-year sale is likely to provide an additional foot traffic boost as shoppers gear up for winter activities.
And beyond the holidays, REI follows a distinct promotional rhythm of its own, leaning into moments – like the start of summer – that reflect the seasonal outdoor needs of its customers. The retailer’s annual Anniversary Sale in May delivered the largest weekly visit spike of 2025, with demand for warm-weather gear sustaining elevated traffic in the weeks that followed. And unlike traditional apparel and recreational and sporting goods retailers, which saw a pronounced back-to-school visit surge in early August, the brand saw a smaller bump during its end-of-summer Labor Day sale.
REI’s alternative holiday cadence sets up an interesting comparison with other retailers – like IKEA – that hold Black Friday sales events but rely less heavily on the milestone than their wider category.
As shown in the graph below, the furniture and home furnishings segment received its largest visit boost of the year in the weeks leading up to and including Black Friday, as consumers likely took advantage of big sales events to spruce up their spaces in anticipation of hosting family and friends for the holidays. IKEA, however, saw just a modest November lift, with weekly visits remaining below the chain’s year-to-date average.
Instead, IKEA anchors its promotional calendar around several event-driven periods throughout the year – most notably its summer sale window from June through August, when the brand capitalizes on home furnishing demand during the peak moving season. Other events, such as IKEA’s winter clearance sale from December 2024 through early January 2025 helped stabilize post-holiday traffic at a moment when category visits softened.
REI and IKEA’s visit trends underscore the value of a promotional calendar built around brand alignment rather than conventional retail expectations. Neither retailer maximizes Black Friday in the way their respective categories do, yet both demonstrate how targeted seasonal events can cultivate consistent demand outside of traditional peak periods.
For more retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Luxury apparel retailers have long been central to the holiday experience, carrying premium gifts for the special people in our lives and offering intricate window displays to admire while out and about. And more recently, thrift stores have also entered the holiday shopping conversation as budget-conscious and sustainability-minded consumers increasingly turn to this segment.
We dove into the data for the luxury apparel and thrift store segments to explore the trends defining each space this holiday season.
Bifurcation in apparel, which has been one of the defining themes of 2025, remains a factor during the holiday season thus far. Many consumers continue to prioritize value as inflation weighs on household budgets, while high-end segments are sustained by affluent shoppers less affected by near-term economic headwinds.
The graph below shows the latest visit trends for thrift stores and luxury apparel retailers, highlighting this bifurcation. Thrift stores have posted consistent double-digit visit growth through the second half of 2025, suggesting that economic pressure, sustainability concerns, and the appeal of the treasure-hunt experience are pushing more consumers toward secondhand shopping. And even though thrift store visits don’t generally surge during the holidays (consumers, it seems, prefer gifting from traditional retail channels), Black Friday traffic to the segment surged this year – highlighting the category's growth potential this holiday season.
At the same time, luxury retailers are also maintaining their footing, outperforming traditional apparel. With the exception of a few softer months, luxury visits have hovered near or above 2024 levels for most of the year, as higher-income shoppers continue to stabilize the segment’s performance.
With the core holiday period in full swing, both ends of the apparel spectrum appear positioned to succeed in the current bifurcated retail landscape.
The bifurcation in apparel and its impact on consumer behavior becomes even more apparent when analyzing the trade area median household income (HHI) of the thrift and luxury segments.
The chart below shows that since 2022, the median HHI of luxury apparel retailers’ captured markets has continued to rise – reinforcing the category’s growing dependence on higher-income shoppers as prices climb and more aspirational consumers shift to other segments.
And this trend is also impacting holiday consumer dynamics. Historically, the median household income (HHI) for luxury retailers dips in October and November as middle-income shoppers enter the market for gifts. However, as the sector's baseline affluence rises, the holiday audience is following suit, with the income gap between year-round and seasonal shoppers narrowing. This suggests that the traditional middle-income splurge is waning, replaced by a holiday consumer who increasingly mirrors the high-income profile of the core luxury client.
On the opposite side of the apparel spectrum, the thrift segment appears to be benefitting from the economic headwinds that have put luxury out of reach for many average-income consumers. The data shows that the segment’s captured market median HHI has inched upward since 2022 (although still below the nationwide median of $79.6K) – suggesting that some higher-income consumers are seeking price relief by trading down to thrift stores.
And while the segment's captured market median HHI also decreases slightly in October and November, the decline is less marked than for the luxury segment, indicating only limited leakage of higher-income thrift visitors during the holiday season. These trends suggest that the thrift segment is benefiting from a more price-sensitive consumer base, as its trade area continues to broaden to include a greater share of higher-income households.
Foot traffic and consumer trends across the luxury and thrift segments reveal deeper shifts in the apparel industry. For luxury retailers, a core affluent audience continues to anchor year-round performance, while the aspirational holiday shopper who once traded up for premium gifts appears less engaged than in previous years. Meanwhile, the thrift segment – and other segments traditionally catering to lower-income shoppers – seem to be benefitting from an increasingly bifurcated landscape that has expanded their reach among a wider range of consumers.
While luxury retailers can’t control macroeconomic conditions, they can double-down on the authentic, premium experiences that sustain high-income loyalty and have historically drawn aspirational shoppers during the holidays. At the same time, thrift stores can’t simply introduce premium merchandise to attract higher-income shoppers, but they can continue to invest in store operations in ways that enhance the treasure-hunting experience and strengthen their overall value proposition.
For more holiday retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
The Sacramento-Roseville-Folsom metro area is emerging as one of California’s most resilient growth stories. Between 2021 and 2023, the region added residents at a steady, if modest, pace, even as the state overall faced declining or stagnant population trends. And by 2024, the CBSA pulled ahead of the national metro average for year-over-year (YoY) population growth, outpacing major California peers including Los Angeles, San Francisco, and San Diego.
What’s driving this momentum? And how is Sacramento’s rise shaping local retail and dining trends?
One factor behind Sacramento’s rise may be its economic diversity. The metro area is over-indexed for a broad cross-section of audience segments, ranging from wealthy and upper suburban families earning more than $100K to young urban singles and professionals bringing in less than $75K. And though the area’s median household income (HHI) sits below the California baseline, the diversity of household types – each contributing different spending patterns – creates a strong foundation for continued economic growth.
Location analytics also show that Sacramento’s expanding, economically diverse population is fueling a flourishing retail scene. From May through October 2025, overall retail visits in the CBSA rose YoY, outperforming California’s state average and keeping pace with national trends. In several key categories – including discount and dollar stores, home furnishings, superstores, and traditional apparel – the metro area exceeded both state and national benchmarks, underscoring Sacramento’s rising consumer strength and regional momentum.
Greater Sacramento’s dining scene is also thriving. Fast-casual and quick-service chains overperformed during the analyzed period, reflecting the region’s growing base of young professionals, urban singles, and families who may favor convenient, affordable dining choices. And while full-service chain visits dipped slightly below 2024 levels, they represented only 12.2% of total traffic across the three dining segments for the period.
Sacramento’s broader rise is also closely tied to the vitality of the city itself. The chart below shows that out-of-market visits – defined here as visits by people who neither live nor work in the city – rose 3.5% YoY over the past 6 months. This influx includes visitors from across the metro and beyond – and HHI data indicates that, on average, they tend to be more affluent than local residents.
These visitors are drawn to Sacramento’s concentration of independent restaurants, bars, retail, and cultural hubs, including its bustling Midtown neighborhood. And a growing calendar of major annual events, from Aftershock to Farm to Fork, is also helping to supercharge local tourism and cement the city’s regional appeal.
Bolstered by investments in major new semiconductor plants and medical centers, the Sacramento CBSA was recently ranked among LinkedIn’s 25 fastest-growing U.S. metro areas for jobs and new talent. And the region’s demographic breadth, strong retail and dining performance, and increasingly magnetic urban core position it for continued growth.
For more data-driven analyses of the trends shaping America’s cities follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Retail corridors have long been central to the holiday experience, offering festive spaces for shopping and intricate window displays to admire. But retail corridors can vary significantly – some cluster large global flagship stores, while others lean into smaller regional formats and boutique-style shops, creating a more lifestyle-oriented setting for spending time with friends and family.
We dove into the data for these two types of retail corridors to explore the foot traffic trends defining each space this holiday season.
Flagship-led corridors such as SoHo in New York City and Union Square in San Francisco typically see their visitation peak in December, when consumers come to browse elegant window displays, holiday lights, and seasonal attractions – often turning a shopping trip into a full outing with friends or family. Union Square’s towering Macy’s Christmas tree, outdoor ice rink, and “Winter Walk” draw crowds looking for a quintessential holiday atmosphere. And SoHo, home to numerous high-end flagship stores, remains one of Manhattan’s most sought-after luxury shopping districts during the holidays.
Both corridors have seen rising visits throughout 2025, suggesting that their December 2025 lifts could exceed last year’s levels.
However, retail corridors that center on boutiques, independent retailers, and lifestyle-oriented offerings rather than global luxury flagships – like Back Bay in Boston and South Congress Avenue in Austin – follow a different seasonal rhythm. Rather than peaking at year-end, visits to these districts spike earlier in the calendar.
Back Bay perhaps benefits from “Open Newbury,” the summer program that closes Newbury Street to vehicular traffic and turns the corridor into a pedestrian promenade, while South Congress sees heightened activity in the spring, before the Texas heat arrives. Both have also seen solid visit growth in 2025, indicating the potential for a healthy December – even if holiday foot traffic plays a smaller role in their overall annual performance compared to flagship-led districts.
As both flagship-led and lifestyle-driven corridors head into December with solid year-to-date momentum, high street retailers have a clear opportunity to capitalize on distinct seasonal strengths. Flagship districts should be prepared for an especially pronounced holiday surge, while lifestyle-oriented corridors can focus on converting growing spring and summer foot traffic bumps into sustained engagement year-round.
For more foot traffic insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
Traffic for manufacturing facilities included in the Placer.ai Manufacturing Index declined 3.5% year over year (YoY) in November 2025, indicating reduced operational intensity that may reflect fewer production shifts, lower output volumes, or scaled-back facility utilization. While part of the decline reflects calendar shifts – November 2025 contained one fewer working day than the prior year – the broader trend aligns with official data. The ISM Manufacturing PMI remained in contraction during the month, underscoring a subdued end to 2025 for the U.S. manufacturing sector.
But even as macro headwinds weighed on other parts of the economy – particularly goods production – e-commerce operators seem to be scaling capacity, expanding hiring, and investing in distribution efficiency. This momentum is reflected in visit gains to e-commerce fulfillment facilities nationwide, with November posting the strongest growth of 2025 at 6.6% YoY.
The consistent upward trajectory in foot traffic indicates that digital retail channels remain a key engine of economic activity, with robust consumer demand fueling the growth of fulfillment networks despite broader industrial softness. The steady gains through the fall in particular suggest that operators are expecting strong holiday demand and are well prepared to handle it.
The softness of the Industrial Index combined with the strength of the E-Commerce Distribution Index highlights a growing paradox: manufacturing activity is weakening even as consumer demand remains firm.
This divergence is likely due to a confluence of factors. Consumer spending may be flowing toward lower-cost online goods and everyday essentials rather than the higher-priced durable goods that drive factory output. Retailers may also be working through excess inventories and placing fewer new orders, while high interest rates make it more expensive for businesses to invest in equipment or expand production. Together, these dynamics point to a two-speed economy heading into 2026 – one powered by resilient consumption and digital commerce, while traditional production continues to recalibrate.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
With budgets stretched and food inflation lingering, many dining concepts assume that value – specifically, a compelling price-per-food-item ratio – is the key to driving traffic in 2025. And this approach may work: chains like Chili's have shown that an array of deals – such as the 3 For Me and the Triple Dipper Deal – has helped the casual dining brand significantly outpace the wider dining category for more than a year.
But looking at recent QSR traffic trends suggests a more nuanced story. At both McDonald’s and Burger King, the strongest visit lifts in recent months came from experiential promotions and culturally resonant LTOs – not from discounts.
McDonald’s reintroduced its Extra Value Meals on September 8, 2025 – but despite substantial promotional support, the rollout produced only a modest uptick in visits that week. And while traffic improved slightly in the weeks that followed, analyzing recent foot traffic trends highlights that the real inflection points came from experiential activations.
The return of Monopoly, which gave registered app users the chance to win prizes ranging from free food to high-value rewards, sustained elevated visits for weeks through gamification. Boo Buckets sparked a Halloween-season surge driven by nostalgia and collectability and drove a 10.8% increase in weekly visits compared to the January to August weekly visit average. And The Grinch Meal generated the strongest spike of the entire period by tapping into holiday IP and playful packaging. This data highlights that while consumers may appreciate affordability, moments that feel fun, shareable, and culturally relevant may sometimes be more effective at bringing them through the door.
Burger King’s recent performance shows a similar pattern. The rollout of the limited-time Monster Menu generated a stronger visit lift than either Treat Week or Perks Week, both of which focused on giveaways and discounts. The debut of the chain’s nearly $20 Advent Calendar also outperformed Treat Week and Perks Week, underscoring how novelty and excitement may have a greater impact than price-based incentives.
And the strongest surge came with the debut of the SpongeBob Menu, which produced the strongest spike of the entire period and pushed weekly visits well above the January to August average. By pairing a beloved character franchise with themed packaging, kids’ meal tie-ins, and a sense of occasion, Burger King tapped into the same emotional drivers fueling McDonald’s biggest wins.
While price sensitivity will likely continue to influence dining decisions in 2026, recent QSR data underscores an important point: Consumers may be watching their wallets, but price alone doesn’t determine where they choose to eat. Chili’s success shows that a compelling value platform can be a powerful differentiator in full-service dining, where the experience is already baked into the visit. But the same strategy doesn’t automatically translate to the QSR landscape, where affordability is expected and price-based promotions quickly blur together.
Consumers still care about value – but value now spans both price and experience. For full-service restaurants, this means leaning harder into the affordability side of that equation. With ambiance, service, and hospitality already part of the offering, emphasizing everyday value or reliable deal structures may help guests justify dining out more often.
For QSR brands, the calculus is different, and price alone may not be enough to unlock meaningful incremental traffic. Instead, traffic data shows that the strongest results in the QSR space come from experience-driven LTOs, cultural tie-ins, and moments that feel fun, collectible, or social. In other words, fast-food chains may need to focus less on matching grocery-store economics and more on delivering the kind of excitement consumers simply can’t get at home.
As budgets remain tight and expectations continue to evolve, the brands that win won’t be those that chase the lowest price – but those that understand how to deliver the right kind of value for their category: affordability where it matters, and memorable experiences where it counts.
For more data-driven insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
As consumer sentiment hovers near historic lows and the cost of goods remains elevated, value has become a defining theme across the dining industry. Yet within the sector's diverse restaurant categories – and for individual brands – the question is no longer whether consumers are seeking value, but what value actually means. A closer look at chains across the industry suggests that, amid ongoing economic pressure, perceptions of value are evolving. For some consumers, value may be tied to affordability and promotions; for others, it may come from quality, convenience, or experience. The result is a market with multiple paths to winning consumer traffic.
After an uneven but largely resilient 2025, dining traffic in 2026 tipped into a sustained decline.
Monthly visits to the overall dining industry have trailed year-ago levels throughout 2026, with February standing as the lone exception. That month saw a 3.7% year-over-year (YoY) increase in visits, driven in part by comparisons to the period of initial tariff announcements in early 2025. But broader trends remained challenged, and May's 2.5% YoY decline marked the steepest monthly drop of the past twelve months as rising gas prices and weakening consumer sentiment appear to have added pressure to an industry already navigating a difficult environment.
These headwinds, though, have not landed evenly. Across the dining sector, some segments have faced more intense pressure than others, with much of the divide coming down to how consumers are perceiving value against experience.
Over the past several years, inflation and rising menu prices have gradually weakened a cost-based value proposition that has long been central to the QSR segment. More recently, elevated gas prices have added another deterrent, making a trip through the drive-thru a less compelling choice for some consumers.
Strong performance at grocery stores and superstores suggests that competition for share-of-stomach is increasingly extending beyond traditional restaurant rivals. With expanding selections of ready-to-eat and pre-prepared meals, these channels are offering consumers a combination of value, convenience, and quality that can increasingly match limited-service dining options. At the same time, ongoing pressure on household budgets appears to be driving more consumers toward lower-cost meals made at home, creating additional headwinds for the QSR segment.
Yet for many consumers, there is still a time and place for dining out, and in the face of mounting economic pressure, several dining formats have found foot traffic success. Fine dining has posted traffic growth in nearly every month of 2026, with March standing as the lone exception. That decline was likely influenced by a calendar shift, as March 2026 contained one fewer Saturday than March 2025 – a meaningful headwind for full-service restaurants given the outsized role weekends play in driving visits. The segment's sustained growth points to the resilience of higher-income consumers and the enduring appeal of premium, occasion-driven dining experiences.
Fast casual and casual dining have also proven relatively resilient. The fast casual category saw positive YoY foot traffic in every month of 2026 so far, while casual dining's performance has rebounded since the March calendar shift that likely weighed on YoY traffic. A second calendar shift in May 2026 led to an extra Saturday in the month, which likely helped the segment's overall trend. These trends suggest that both fast casual and casual dining occupy an increasingly attractive middle ground where value is defined as a combination of affordability and experience. At the same time, years of menu price hikes at QSR chains have altered the cost equation in fast casual and casual dining's favor, narrowing the price gap between fast food and more elevated dining formats. As that gap has narrowed, consumers may be placing greater emphasis on experience and quality when deciding where to dine.
The balance between price and elevated experience has made fast casual a favorite for value in the dining industry in 2026. A closer look at two of the segment's largest players, CAVA, a relatively young concept, and Chipotle, a legacy chain navigating operational challenges, shows how brands can deliver on that value proposition in different ways and win in today’s dining landscape.
Chipotle's traffic trends in 2026 have improved compared to 2025, with the brand offering a clear example of how fast casual brands can create value by pairing menu innovation with loyalty perks.
Chipotle outpaced the broader fast casual category in YoY visits nearly every week of 2026 so far. And the graph below shows that the chain's strongest traffic gains tended to coincide with major menu launches and loyalty initiatives – a key component of its ongoing "Recipe for Growth" strategy.
The return of fan-favorite Chicken al Pastor in the week of February 9, 2026 helped drive a 16.6% YoY increase in visits. Two months later, the launch of "Rewards on Repeat" – a refreshed loyalty program offering freebies upon sign-up – generated the period's largest weekly traffic gain, with visits rising 18.2% YoY. And the introduction of Honey Chicken on April 28 provided another boost, as the chain continued to rotate limited-time protein offerings and give customers reasons to return.
These performance peaks suggest that Chipotle has been particularly effective at pairing menu novelty with loyalty perks to reinforce a value proposition anchored by quality and experience.
Year-over-Year Change in Weekly Visits, Chipotle vs. Fast Casual, Jan.–Jun. 2026
Dashed lines mark key Chipotle promotional launch dates. Week-of dates shown; launches may have occurred mid-week.
If Chipotle illustrates the power of menu innovation and loyalty-driven engagement, CAVA highlights a different approach to creating value – one rooted in variety, customization, and a consistently differentiated dining experience.
CAVA's overall visits climbed well above 20% YoY in every month of 2026, a pace largely driven by aggressive unit expansion. Meanwhile, same-store visits, which measure traffic at locations open for at least twelve months, sustained positive YoY growth – evidence of genuine demand at existing restaurants alongside a rapidly growing footprint.
While Chipotle leans on limited-time offers, CAVA's growth rests on a consistent, customizable experience. A deep roster of proteins paired with a wide range of bases, dips, and toppings, gives the chain built-in variety that helps keep the concept feeling fresh. In addition, CAVA's Mediterranean-inspired menu offers flavors and combinations that are less easily replicated at home, helping the brand maintain a differentiated experiential value proposition and drive growth.
O Though Chipotle and CAVA are at different points in their evolution and have taken different paths to growth, both highlight the enduring appeal of fast casual's balance of value and quality. In a dining environment where consumers are increasingly weighing cost against experience, the segment's ability to deliver on both has helped make it one of the industry's strongest-performing formats.
Fast casual isn't the only dining segment benefiting from consumers' evolving perception of value. In 2026, several casual dining chains have found success by pairing accessible price points with the elevated experience of a sit-down meal.
Brands such as BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse, Chili's Grill & Bar, Bonefish Grill, Cicis, and The Cheesecake Factory all posted positive YoY visit growth in multiple months this year, demonstrating that even in a challenging economic environment, diners are motivated when they feel they are getting more in return. These results are particularly notable given the impact of calendar shifts, which weighed on March 2026 comparisons – and provided a tailwind to May performance.
Unlike many fast casual chains, these brands have not relied heavily on a steady stream of limited-time offers to drive traffic. While menu innovation remains part of the playbook, promotions often serve as ticket builders or engagement tools rather than primary traffic catalysts. Instead, these successful casual dining chains have focused on creating everyday value that diners can depend on, narrowing the price gap between limited-service restaurants and full-service dining.
The result is a value equation that encompasses table service, a more relaxed dining environment, and a place to socialize or celebrate an occasion. In an environment where consumers are increasingly weighing cost against overall experience, that combination appears to be helping several casual dining chains maintain positive traffic momentum.
Although dining traffic has softened in 2026, the industry's performance suggests that consumers have not stopped spending on restaurants altogether. Instead, they have become more selective about where they dine and what they expect in return.
Across segments, the strongest performers have found different ways to deliver value. For some brands, that means menu innovation, loyalty engagement, and differentiated experiences. For others, it means dependable affordability paired with the service and atmosphere of a sit-down meal. As economic pressures continue to shape consumer behavior, the data suggests that value is no longer defined by price alone, but by the balance of cost, convenience, quality, and experience.
During the pandemic and its aftermath, Americans were on the move. Millions left expensive coastal markets for lower-cost destinations across the Sun Belt, while boomtowns such as Bozeman, Boise, and Austin struggled to keep pace with the influx of new residents.
That wave of relocation has since cooled, as return-to-office mandates, higher mortgage rates, and a shrinking affordability gap between coastal cities and many COVID-era hotspots have dampened the incentive to move. But even in a slower market, domestic migration remains one of the most powerful forces shaping local economies, housing markets, and consumer demand.
This report leverages AI-powered location analytics to examine the relocation patterns reshaping the United States in 2026 – where Americans are moving, the demographic and economic forces driving those decisions, and how retailers, investors, developers, and policymakers can respond to the opportunities and challenges created by these shifts.
Which major metros are attracting the most new residents? Which pandemic-era standouts have seen growth stall or reverse? And what factors best predict a large metro area's domestic migration growth potential in 2026?
The latest statewide migration data shows that the slower relocation pace observed in 2024 persisted into 2025. No state recorded net inflows or outflows exceeding 0.7% of its starting population. And while several smaller states continued to attract new residents at meaningful rates, none of the nation's six most populous states saw net in-migration exceed 0.2%.
Among those smaller states, South Carolina and Delaware led the nation with net in-migration equal to 0.7% of their populations, followed by Idaho (0.6%), Maine (0.5%), Tennessee (0.4%), and North Carolina (0.3%). For most of these states, migration accelerated relative to 2024, though Delaware's inflow rate moderated slightly and North Carolina held steady.
Despite their differences, these states tend to offer a similar mix of lifestyle amenities, relatively low congestion, and opportunities for growth. Many also benefit from business-friendly climates, favorable tax policies, or housing costs that remain attractive relative to the higher-cost markets from which they draw new residents.
At the other end of the spectrum was Vermont, which saw the nation’s largest net outflow as share of population in 2025, losing 0.4% of its population to domestic relocation. The decline deepens a reversal that first emerged in 2024, when the state swung to a net loss of 0.2%, after attracting inflows of 0.8% and 0.5% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Vermont's reversal likely reflects a combination of factors, including return-to-office mandates and the waning appeal of remote work. Housing undersupply in the state may have also contributed, illustrating how important infrastructure investments are to sustaining migration gains over time.
Among the nation's six most populous states, Florida was the only one to see accelerating net in-migration in 2025, attracting new residents equal to 0.2% of its starting population, up from 0.1% the year before. Texas, by contrast, slowed from 0.1% net in-migration in 2024 to essentially flat in 2025, highlighting the cooling of what was once one of the country's strongest pandemic-era migration magnets.
Meanwhile, the legacy "exodus" states continue to lose residents, but at a slower pace than in previous years. Illinois and California have seen their migration deficits steadily narrow, with further improvement in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, Illinois moved from -0.8% → -0.2% → -0.2% → -0.1%, while California moved from -0.9% → -0.4% → -0.3% → -0.2%. And though New York has held steady at -0.2% over the past two years, this marks a significant moderation from 2022, when the state experienced net outmigration equal to 1.1% of its population.
Statewide trends reveal important shifts, but a closer look at the nation's ten largest metropolitan areas suggests that broader interstate averages increasingly mask diverging local realities. Several metros are attracting residents through interstate domestic migration even when their states as a whole are experiencing little or no net migration growth.
Phoenix (+0.3%), for example, stood out as the nation's top-performing large metro in 2025, despite Arizona's absence from the list of leading migration destinations – with the majority of its inflow coming from out of state.
Dallas (+0.2%) ranked second, continuing its rebound from -0.1% in 2023 even as Texas' statewide migration gains cooled. Like Phoenix, Dallas drew a majority of its new residents from outside the state, underscoring its growing appeal as a national migration destination. Houston, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, falling from 0.1% net in-migration in 2023 to -0.1% in 2025. While it is too early to call this a sustained reversal, the divergence between the two metros may reflect Dallas's growing pull as a corporate magnet alongside rising housing costs and weather-related challenges in Houston.
Metro-level data also suggests that the pandemic-era "big-city exodus" narrative is continuing to fade. Los Angeles improved from -0.8% in 2023 to -0.3% in 2025, while New York held steady at -0.3% after improving in 2024. Even Miami (-0.6%), which ranked last among major metros despite Florida's continued statewide gains, saw its outflows moderate from 2023 levels. And while Illinois continued to post net outmigration, Chicago (0.0%) reached migration neutrality in 2025 after recording losses in both 2023 and 2024.
Despite Miami's struggles – and Florida’s relatively modest 0.2% inflow – a look beyond the top 10 large metros reveals that the Sunshine State is home to six of the nation's eight fastest-growing large metros nationwide.
Those top-performing metros, defined as CBSAs with 500K+ residents that added at least 0.8% of their population through net domestic migration over the past year, share a similar profile: lower housing costs, retiree appeal, suburban density, and an easy drive to a larger economic hub.
Much of the growth of these Florida metro areas, however, is being fueled from within Florida itself. While major out-of-state metros such as New York (6.1%) and Chicago (2.0%) remained important sources of new residents, nearly half of the net migration into Florida's top destination metros came from elsewhere in the state. In 2025, Miami (22.5%), Orlando (13.0%), Tampa (5.8%), and Naples (4.2%) together accounted for 45.5% of the net positive migration feeding these fast-growing markets.
The migration flows feeding the nation’s fastest-growing large metros suggest that affordability remains a powerful driver of domestic relocation.
In 2025, seven of the eight top destination metros analyzed above had lower typical home values than their largest feeder markets. Lakeland–Winter Haven, FL, for example, had a typical home value of $313.4K in December 2024, compared with $404.9K in Orlando and $380.2K in Tampa – its two largest sources of net migration. Even North Port–Bradenton–Sarasota, FL – the most expensive Florida metro in this group – drew its largest share of net migration from the New York metro area, where home values are substantially higher.
The lone exception was Charleston–North Charleston, SC, whose largest source of net migration was Baltimore – a market with lower typical home values than the destination. Even in Charleston, however, affordability appears to have played a role. New York, a significantly more expensive market, ranked a close second in 2025, accounting for 6.5% of net positive migration into Charleston, just behind Baltimore’s 6.8%.
While housing costs are only one factor influencing migration decisions, the data suggests that households continue to gravitate toward markets where homeownership is comparatively more attainable than in the places they leave behind.
Typical Home Values* in Top Feeder Markets to Destination Hubs, 2025
*Typical home value based on Zillow Research’s Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) for Dec. 2024, immediately preceding the analyzed migration period (Jan.–Dec. 2025).
But as important as affordability is in explaining today’s domestic migration patterns, age appears to be an even stronger determinant of where people choose to relocate.
Among mid-sized and large metros (250K+ residents) experiencing significant population shifts – defined as gaining or losing at least 1.0% of their starting population through domestic migration over the past two years – households are increasingly moving toward older, more established communities.
The data reveals a clear negative relationship between migration performance and age differential – a metric calculated by subtracting the median age of the destination market from the weighted median age of its feeder markets. Negative values indicate movement toward older communities, while positive values indicate movement toward younger ones. In other words, the metros attracting the strongest migration inflows tend to be older than the markets sending them residents.
The data also shows a clear positive relationship between migration performance and retiree concentration. Metros with larger shares of residents aged 65 and older generally saw stronger migration gains over the past two years, while younger metros tended to attract fewer newcomers. This suggests that retiree-driven relocation has become an increasingly important driver of migration. At the same time, the influx of younger residents points to the broader appeal of these communities, which offer a mix of affordability, amenities, and lifestyle advantages.
Net Migration as Share of Starting Population, 2024–2025*
*Analysis includes metro areas with 250K+ residents and domestic migration gains or losses of at least 1.0% during the study period. Weighted Age Differential compares the destination market’s median age with the weighted median age of origin markets, with positive values indicating migration toward younger markets and negative values indicating migration toward older markets. Age data: Census ACS 2020–2024.
The pandemic-era urban exodus is giving way to a more nuanced migration landscape. Large urban markets are stabilizing, while growth is increasingly concentrated in smaller states, secondary metros, and intra-state corridors. Affordability remains a powerful pull, but retirees, lifestyle considerations, and local market dynamics are also playing an increasingly important role in where Americans choose to live.
To capitalize on these shifts in 2026, civic leaders, commercial real estate (CRE) investors, retailers, and developers should:
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
