.svg)
The widespread adoption of hybrid work continues to be one of the most significant paradigm shifts since the COVID pandemic. As employees visit offices less frequently, or not at all, corporate users are opting for less but better space which is driving office vacancy rates to record highs.
But even as utilization for many office buildings remains below capacity, some buildings are clearly prospering. So what sets these thriving properties apart from the pack? We looked at outperforming office buildings in four major metro areas – New York, Chicago, San Francisco, and Dallas – to find out.
The post-pandemic office recovery has been uneven across the country. As of February 2024, a significantly larger share of workers in the New York-Newark-Jersey City and Dallas-Fort Worth CBSAs were back in the office, while office visits in the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin and San Francisco-Oakland-Berkeley CBSAs remained subdued.
But throughout the country, the reality is much more nuanced as some office buildings struggle to maintain occupancy,others are thriving. We identified four office buildings in four major metropolitan areas where the recovery in utilization was significantly stronger than the respective metro:
What sets these buildings apart from the pack?
One factor that isn’t driving the office recovery at these high-occupancy office buildings is different weekly visitation patterns.
Location intelligence for offices nationwide indicates that hybrid workers appear to prefer coming to the office mid-week: The bulk of weekly visits occur on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays, with fewer visits taking place on Monday and even less visits on Fridays. And this was also the weekly visitation pattern in the four CBSAs analyzed as well as in the high-occupancy office buildings. In fact, the outperforming office buildings had even more of their visits concentrated mid-week compared to the visit patterns in the wider CBSA.
It seems, then, that the higher visits to these outperforming offices is not due to more employees coming in on typical WFH days. Instead, more workers are likely coming in mid-week to make up for the lull on Mondays and Fridays.
So who are these visitors? And could they hold the key to these buildings' strong recovery numbers?
Focusing on the period between March 2023 and February 2024 reveals that in all the labor catchment areas of the analyzed Office Indexes, the share of one-person households was larger than the nationwide share of 27.5%. And during the same period, the share of one-person households in the catchment areas of the high-performing office buildings was even greater – almost 50% of households in the captured market of 2010 Flora St. in Dallas consisted of one-person households.
On the other hand, families with children were underrepresented in the catchment areas of the office indexes relative to the nationwide average of 27.1% – and the share of households with children was even lower in the catchment areas of the high-occupancy office buildings.
This indicates that those with young children at home were generally less likely to go into the office – and so the office buildings seeing the strongest post-COVID recovery are those that serve a large contingent of single employees. On the flip side, there is often a motivation for young singles to visit the office more frequently, whether driven by the desire for training and mentorship or the prospect of meeting a significant other in or around the workplace.
Much has been written on the challenging impact that return-to-office mandates can have on working parents – and especially on working mothers – so it may not come as a surprise that employees from family households are underrepresented in office buildings in 2024.
But the fact that one-person households are even more prevalent in the labor markets of the overperforming buildings (as compared to the wider CBSA Office Index) indicates that businesses and office assets can thrive even without wooing working parents back to the office.
So who are these singles driving the return to the office? Some of this segment may be made up of Gen-Zers seeking the networking and mentorship opportunities provided by an in-person office setting. But it’s not just younger workers leading the return to the office – the data indicates that executives and managers also make up an outsized portion of the outperforming buildings’ catchment areas. In all four CBSAs analyzed, the catchment area of the high-occupancy building included a significantly larger share of people in a managerial or executive role compared to the average catchment area composition of the wider CBSA Office Index.
Many of these executives are likely choosing – rather than being forced – to work on-site. Some might be looking to encourage their staff to return to the office by leading by example, while many are likely leveraging their space to host clients, driving foot traffic to these locations higher. But whatever factors are driving the trend – it appears that office buildings looking to bounce back in the new normal need to make sure they are drawing back the managerial ranks.
Analyzing the popular industries and occupations in the catchment areas of the office buildings and industries also reveals that the overperforming buildings serve a much higher share of employees working in finance, insurance, and real estate. A larger share of the catchment area population of the high-occupancy office complexes also works in professional services – including high-tech jobs – compared to the office index in the wider CBSA.
Many financial institutions and tech companies have asked employees to return to the office at least three days a week, which could explain why these industries are overrepresented in the catchment area of the high-occupancy buildings. This data may indicate, then, that while some of the foot traffic is coming from executives choosing to return to their pre-COVID work habits, the return-to-office mandates – whether full or part-time – are likely also helping these buildings stay ahead of the curve.
Although the proliferation of office vacancies across the country can make it seem like the return to office battle has already been lost, several buildings are bucking the trend. Location intelligence indicates that a combination of partial return-to-office mandates along with a larger-than-usual share of visitors from executives and non-parental households is helping these office complexes thrive.
Sweetgreen and First Watch both went public in 2021 and have since steadily increased in popularity – and in store count. So with 2024 well underway, we checked in with the two brands to see how they fared in Q1 and to explore some of the factors underlying their success.
Despite the dining challenges of much of 2023 and early 2024, sweetgreen posted impressive visits between April 2023 and March 2024, with the chain’s YoY traffic increases ranging from 21.4% to 51.6%.
The remarkable visit surge was partially driven by the sweetgreen’s significant expansion, which could explain the slight dips in average visits per location for much of 2023 while consumers around sweetgreen’s newer restaurantes familiarized themselves with the brand’s offerings. But since December 2023, YoY visits per location have been positive – with the exception of a weather-induced slump in January – indicating that the chain’s newer venues have established themselves within their community.
This narrowing of the gap between visits and visits per location may also signal the success of sweetgreen’s strategic shift towards prioritizing "quality over quantity” – slowing down expansion and investing in an enhanced customer experience.
As a salad and grain-bowl chain, sweetgreen holds special appeal for wellness-focused younger consumers, including singles and members of the coveted Gen Z demographic. But as the chain has expanded, it has also succeeded in reaching new audiences.
Sweetgreen has been explicit about its goal of reaching Gen Z consumers. And analyzing the demographic makeup of the chain’s captured market reveals that sweetgreen’s trade area includes a relatively large share of one-person households (that tend to be on the younger side) But analyzing shifts in the chain’s captured market composition over the past five years also reveals that the share of one-person households has been decreasing – while remaining above the nationwide average of 28.0% – and the share of households with children has increased. So even as sweetgreen continues serving its core consumers, the chain’s expansion has also allowed sweetgreen to reach new audiences.
First Watch is also in expansion mode, and with plans to open some 50 more restaurants this year the chain shows no signs of slowing down. And, like sweetgreen, First Watch’s expansion has driven significant growth to the chain’s overall visits – and the chain’s average visits per location numbers are up as well, indicating that the new venues are finding a receptive audience.
By staying nimble on its feet and continually changing up its menu offerings, First Watch has succeeded in differentiating itself from other breakfast chain giants – and appears poised to enjoy continued success throughout the year.
First Watch’s expansion has also helped the company reach new types of diners even as the chain continues catering to its core audience. The share of the Spatial.ai: PersonaLive’s “Upper Suburban Diverse Families” segment in First Watch’s captured market has held steady over the past five years, even as the share of the “Blue Collar Suburbs” and “Urban Low Income” segments increased. It seems, then, that First Watch has also succeeded in leveraging its store fleet expansion to reach new audience segments – without sacrificing its core patrons.
.avif)
Sweetgreen and First Watch’s expansions have helped the companies increase visits and reach new segments – without sacrificing their core audiences. What does the rest of 2024 have in store for the chains?
Visit our blog at placer.ai to find out.
Dining took a hit over the past few years, with major challenges from COVID to rising costs weighing on the category. And perhaps no food-away-from-home segment was more impacted than Full Service Restaurants (FSR) – which stagnated as consumers traded down and sought out more affordable ways to treat themselves.
But new years present new opportunities – and there are signs that sit-down restaurants may be springing back to life. So with 2024 underway, we dove into the data to explore the current state of FSR. Is cooling inflation prompting a rise in Full Service Restaurant activity? How did FSR leaders like Dine Brands (owner of casual dining favorites Applebee’s and IHOP), Bloomin’ Brands (owner of popular grill and steak chains like Outback Steakhouse and Carrabba’s Italian Grill along with high-end Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar), and Texas Roadhouse fare in Q1?
With some 1500 locations nationwide, Applebee’s has long been a mainstay of the American casual dining scene. Like other FSR chains, Applebee’s experienced a setback during the pandemic and has since faced industry-wide headwinds. But even though the brand’s store fleet shrunk by around 30 stores last year, overall YoY visits to Applebee’s declined just slightly between October 2023 and February 2024 (January’s weather-driven slump aside). And in March, the chain saw a promising 3.8% YoY visit uptick.
Breakfast leader IHOP also experienced negative YoY visits in October and November 2023, but in December – when the pancake chain traditionally enjoys a major holiday boost – visits jumped 2.8% YoY. Like Applebee’s, IHOP felt the effects of January’s Arctic blast, but saw its visits recover quickly in February and March 2024.
Bloomin’ Brands’ leading casual dining chains Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, and Bonefish Grill appear to be following largely similar trajectories.
Though the brands experienced YoY visit gaps through most of Q3 2023 – and were whalloped by January’s inclement weather – all three chains experienced YoY visit increases in March 2024. Given the fact that the restaurants’ store counts didn’t change significantly last year, this visit growth appears to portend good things for Bloomin’s fast casual portfolio in the year ahead.
But it is Bloomin’ Brands’ fine dining concept, Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar, that really seems to be hitting it out of the park. While Fleming’s also saw visit gaps between October 2023 and January 2024, the chain experienced 9.6% and 7.5% visit growth, respectively, in February and March 2024 – closing out Q1 with a bang.
Fleming’s particularly robust recent performance may be due in part to its relatively affluent customer base. Nearly one-third of households in Fleming’s captured market have an annual income of $150K or more – compared to just 18.6% to 23.7% for Bloomin’s casual dining concepts. Though a night out at the fine-dining steakhouse can be expensive, Fleming’s well-heeled visitor base is better positioned to absorb price increases than other consumers.
Appealing to affluent consumers, however, isn’t the only way to go. Texas Roadhouse is firmly in the casual dining space and tends to cater to average-income diners. (In Q1 2024, just 15.2% of its captured market had a household income ≥$150K.) But the steakhouse’s strategy of satisfying steak lovers with high-quality, affordable offerings is working: Throughout Q1, Texas Roadhouse experienced strongly positive YoY visit growth. And while some of this growth is attributable to the brand’s increasing unit count, the average number of visits per location is generally keeping pace – showing that Texas Roadhouse’s expansion continues to meet strong demand.
Though more affordable Dining segments like QSR and Fast Casual began to spring back to life last year, FSR has yet to fully recover from the double whammy of COVID and inflation. But if March 2024’s promising numbers are any indication, the category may be in for a turnaround. How will FSR continue to perform as 2024 progresses?
Follow Placer.ai’s Dining deep dives to find out.
Restaurants continue to face headwinds, from still-high food-away-from-home prices to rising labor costs. But despite these challenges, there are promising signs that the industry may be in for an upturn. And increasingly, chains are leaning into breakfast and late night offerings to maximize revenue and foster customer loyalty.
So with Q1 2024 under our belts, we checked in with Wendy’s and Denny’s, two dining leaders with very different offerings in the breakfast space. How did they weather the first quarter of 2024 (pun intended)? And which dayparts experienced the biggest visit boosts in Q1?
After a tough Q4 2023 – and a January 2024 dragged down by cold and stormy weather – YoY visits to Wendy’s and Denny’s began to pick up in February and March 2024. And even accounting for January’s Arctic blast, Wendy’s and Denny’s came out ahead on a quarterly basis, with YoY visits up 0.7% and 1.0% respectively.
Wendy’s first launched its breakfast menu in March 2020, just before COVID sent the dining industry into a tailspin. But despite a rocky start, Wendy’s doubled down on the morning daypart, continually tweaking its breakfast offerings and investing ad dollars to boost breakfast sales.
Drilling down into hourly visit data shows that this strategy is paying off. Visits to Wendy’s during the morning daypart (between 6:00 AM and 11:00 AM) jumped 9.3% in Q1 2024 compared to Q1 2023. The chain’s nighttime daypart – which the burger giant began advertising in 2023 for the first time in four years – also saw a YoY boost. Meanwhile, Wendy’s traditional lunch and dinner time slots held steady, with just minor quarterly visit gaps, indicating that the chain’s overall YoY visit growth in Q1 was driven by its breakfast and nighttime push.
Denny’s has always been all about breakfast. And with some 75.0% of Denny’s locations open 24/7 (even on Christmas), hungry diners frequent the chain day and night to satisfy their cravings for hash browns, eggs, pancakes, and other breakfast favorites.
Unsurprisingly, the chain gets most of its visits in the morning and early afternoon. But in Q1 2024, it was the late night daypart that experienced the biggest YoY visit bump – perhaps driven in part by Denny’s push last year to increase the number of locations open in the wee hours.
But Denny’s busiest time slot, between 11:00 AM and 3:00 PM, also experienced a YoY visit increase – showing that even as the chain cements its role as a go-to nighttime destination, it continues to face healthy demand during more traditional dining dayparts.
Breakfast and late night dining offerings have emerged as important drivers of dining success. How will these dayparts continue to fare as the year wears on? And which other brands will make inroads into the breakfast and nighttime dining game?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven dining analyses to find out.
At a time when retail loyalty appears to be low, warehouse clubs remain the exception. Bulk is big business in the U.S. retail market, and clubs have found a way to deliver on a combination of value, convenience and experience, and sometimes $1.50 hot dogs. The allure of the warehouse club defies some current consumer logic; U.S. households are not growing according to the U.S. Census Bureau. But, clubs also represent much of what is good in retail today: a broad combination of goods and services, inherent value and high quality private labels.
These factors have aided warehouses in growing store traffic compared to their mass merchant counterparts, particularly in the first quarter of 2024. Clubs--including BJ’s Wholesale Club, Sam’s Club and Costco Wholesale--saw visits increase by almost 8% year-over-year, almost double the combined growth of Walmart and Target during the same period. Mass merchants have been squeezed by other value sectors, clubs have been able to hold their own and continue to provide “perceived” value to shoppers, contributing to their traffic volumes.
Beneath the umbrella of growth, each chain has some surprising competitive advantages, and it’s clear that each club serves a distinct purpose to its visitors. In reviewing daily visits, Sam’s Club owns Saturdays, with 22% of visits occurring that day (as shown below), the highest percentage of visits compared to its competition. In contrast, Costco sees a higher percentage of visits on weekdays, specifically Tuesday through Thursday, compared to the other chains.
While Sam’s Club and Costco stand out in terms of their daily visits, BJ’s excels in the time of day that it attracts higher levels of visitors to its locations. BJ’s draws 7% of visits between 8:00-10:00 AM (show below), which is two points higher than Sam’s Club and more than double Costco’s percentage of visits. Not only does BJ’s attract the morning shopper, but also the afterhours customer. BJ’s over indexes in the percentage of visits between 7:00-10:00 PM, with almost 11% of visits occurring during those later hours. BJ’s locations tend to open earlier and stay open later than their Sam’s Club and Costco counterparts, which vary in operational hours for the clubs themselves outside of gas stations. This creates a distinct advantage for BJ’s, especially in areas of direct competition, as visitors looking to shop at off-hours are likely to visit BJ’s.
It’s clear that each club chain has its key day and time to attract visitors that doesn’t overlap too much with its competitors. Warehouse clubs are doing a fantastic job at meeting their consumers where they are and when they prefer to shop. Clubs benefit from increased loyalty due to membership, but it appears that visitors flock to these clubs no matter the day or time. Maybe it’s time to bring breakfast to the Costco & Sam’s Club food courts?
Arrowhead Towne Centre in Glendale, AZ recently opened the newest family fun entertainment center with both a ROUND1 Bowling & Arcade as well as a Spo-Cha. Taking over an erstwhile Mervyn’s, the former includes eight bowling lanes, a variety of favorite games like a claw machine, and two party/karaoke rooms. Upstairs is Spo-Cha, short for Sports Challenge, which is an indoor sports complex where one pays a flat fee for 90 minutes to access activities like riding a mechanical bull, batting cages, a trampoline park, basketball, different sport courts, and billiards.
Spo-Cha is currently in five mall locations in the United States, with plans for more. Overall foot traffic at the malls where it’s currently operational has been positive year-over-year for the month of March.
In addition to the mechanical bull, there is also a Kids Spo-Cha climbing gym and obstacle course.
Source: Spo-Cha
Source: Spo-Cha
At an overall chain level, Round1 Entertainment tends to attract Near Urban Diverse Families and Wealthy Suburban Families the most.
.avif)
As consumer sentiment hovers near historic lows and the cost of goods remains elevated, value has become a defining theme across the dining industry. Yet within the sector's diverse restaurant categories – and for individual brands – the question is no longer whether consumers are seeking value, but what value actually means. A closer look at chains across the industry suggests that, amid ongoing economic pressure, perceptions of value are evolving. For some consumers, value may be tied to affordability and promotions; for others, it may come from quality, convenience, or experience. The result is a market with multiple paths to winning consumer traffic.
After an uneven but largely resilient 2025, dining traffic in 2026 tipped into a sustained decline.
Monthly visits to the overall dining industry have trailed year-ago levels throughout 2026, with February standing as the lone exception. That month saw a 3.7% year-over-year (YoY) increase in visits, driven in part by comparisons to the period of initial tariff announcements in early 2025. But broader trends remained challenged, and May's 2.5% YoY decline marked the steepest monthly drop of the past twelve months as rising gas prices and weakening consumer sentiment appear to have added pressure to an industry already navigating a difficult environment.
These headwinds, though, have not landed evenly. Across the dining sector, some segments have faced more intense pressure than others, with much of the divide coming down to how consumers are perceiving value against experience.
Over the past several years, inflation and rising menu prices have gradually weakened a cost-based value proposition that has long been central to the QSR segment. More recently, elevated gas prices have added another deterrent, making a trip through the drive-thru a less compelling choice for some consumers.
Strong performance at grocery stores and superstores suggests that competition for share-of-stomach is increasingly extending beyond traditional restaurant rivals. With expanding selections of ready-to-eat and pre-prepared meals, these channels are offering consumers a combination of value, convenience, and quality that can increasingly match limited-service dining options. At the same time, ongoing pressure on household budgets appears to be driving more consumers toward lower-cost meals made at home, creating additional headwinds for the QSR segment.
Yet for many consumers, there is still a time and place for dining out, and in the face of mounting economic pressure, several dining formats have found foot traffic success. Fine dining has posted traffic growth in nearly every month of 2026, with March standing as the lone exception. That decline was likely influenced by a calendar shift, as March 2026 contained one fewer Saturday than March 2025 – a meaningful headwind for full-service restaurants given the outsized role weekends play in driving visits. The segment's sustained growth points to the resilience of higher-income consumers and the enduring appeal of premium, occasion-driven dining experiences.
Fast casual and casual dining have also proven relatively resilient. The fast casual category saw positive YoY foot traffic in every month of 2026 so far, while casual dining's performance has rebounded since the March calendar shift that likely weighed on YoY traffic. A second calendar shift in May 2026 led to an extra Saturday in the month, which likely helped the segment's overall trend. These trends suggest that both fast casual and casual dining occupy an increasingly attractive middle ground where value is defined as a combination of affordability and experience. At the same time, years of menu price hikes at QSR chains have altered the cost equation in fast casual and casual dining's favor, narrowing the price gap between fast food and more elevated dining formats. As that gap has narrowed, consumers may be placing greater emphasis on experience and quality when deciding where to dine.
The balance between price and elevated experience has made fast casual a favorite for value in the dining industry in 2026. A closer look at two of the segment's largest players, CAVA, a relatively young concept, and Chipotle, a legacy chain navigating operational challenges, shows how brands can deliver on that value proposition in different ways and win in today’s dining landscape.
Chipotle's traffic trends in 2026 have improved compared to 2025, with the brand offering a clear example of how fast casual brands can create value by pairing menu innovation with loyalty perks.
Chipotle outpaced the broader fast casual category in YoY visits nearly every week of 2026 so far. And the graph below shows that the chain's strongest traffic gains tended to coincide with major menu launches and loyalty initiatives – a key component of its ongoing "Recipe for Growth" strategy.
The return of fan-favorite Chicken al Pastor in the week of February 9, 2026 helped drive a 16.6% YoY increase in visits. Two months later, the launch of "Rewards on Repeat" – a refreshed loyalty program offering freebies upon sign-up – generated the period's largest weekly traffic gain, with visits rising 18.2% YoY. And the introduction of Honey Chicken on April 28 provided another boost, as the chain continued to rotate limited-time protein offerings and give customers reasons to return.
These performance peaks suggest that Chipotle has been particularly effective at pairing menu novelty with loyalty perks to reinforce a value proposition anchored by quality and experience.
Year-over-Year Change in Weekly Visits, Chipotle vs. Fast Casual, Jan.–Jun. 2026
Dashed lines mark key Chipotle promotional launch dates. Week-of dates shown; launches may have occurred mid-week.
If Chipotle illustrates the power of menu innovation and loyalty-driven engagement, CAVA highlights a different approach to creating value – one rooted in variety, customization, and a consistently differentiated dining experience.
CAVA's overall visits climbed well above 20% YoY in every month of 2026, a pace largely driven by aggressive unit expansion. Meanwhile, same-store visits, which measure traffic at locations open for at least twelve months, sustained positive YoY growth – evidence of genuine demand at existing restaurants alongside a rapidly growing footprint.
While Chipotle leans on limited-time offers, CAVA's growth rests on a consistent, customizable experience. A deep roster of proteins paired with a wide range of bases, dips, and toppings, gives the chain built-in variety that helps keep the concept feeling fresh. In addition, CAVA's Mediterranean-inspired menu offers flavors and combinations that are less easily replicated at home, helping the brand maintain a differentiated experiential value proposition and drive growth.
O Though Chipotle and CAVA are at different points in their evolution and have taken different paths to growth, both highlight the enduring appeal of fast casual's balance of value and quality. In a dining environment where consumers are increasingly weighing cost against experience, the segment's ability to deliver on both has helped make it one of the industry's strongest-performing formats.
Fast casual isn't the only dining segment benefiting from consumers' evolving perception of value. In 2026, several casual dining chains have found success by pairing accessible price points with the elevated experience of a sit-down meal.
Brands such as BJ's Restaurant & Brewhouse, Chili's Grill & Bar, Bonefish Grill, Cicis, and The Cheesecake Factory all posted positive YoY visit growth in multiple months this year, demonstrating that even in a challenging economic environment, diners are motivated when they feel they are getting more in return. These results are particularly notable given the impact of calendar shifts, which weighed on March 2026 comparisons – and provided a tailwind to May performance.
Unlike many fast casual chains, these brands have not relied heavily on a steady stream of limited-time offers to drive traffic. While menu innovation remains part of the playbook, promotions often serve as ticket builders or engagement tools rather than primary traffic catalysts. Instead, these successful casual dining chains have focused on creating everyday value that diners can depend on, narrowing the price gap between limited-service restaurants and full-service dining.
The result is a value equation that encompasses table service, a more relaxed dining environment, and a place to socialize or celebrate an occasion. In an environment where consumers are increasingly weighing cost against overall experience, that combination appears to be helping several casual dining chains maintain positive traffic momentum.
Although dining traffic has softened in 2026, the industry's performance suggests that consumers have not stopped spending on restaurants altogether. Instead, they have become more selective about where they dine and what they expect in return.
Across segments, the strongest performers have found different ways to deliver value. For some brands, that means menu innovation, loyalty engagement, and differentiated experiences. For others, it means dependable affordability paired with the service and atmosphere of a sit-down meal. As economic pressures continue to shape consumer behavior, the data suggests that value is no longer defined by price alone, but by the balance of cost, convenience, quality, and experience.
During the pandemic and its aftermath, Americans were on the move. Millions left expensive coastal markets for lower-cost destinations across the Sun Belt, while boomtowns such as Bozeman, Boise, and Austin struggled to keep pace with the influx of new residents.
That wave of relocation has since cooled, as return-to-office mandates, higher mortgage rates, and a shrinking affordability gap between coastal cities and many COVID-era hotspots have dampened the incentive to move. But even in a slower market, domestic migration remains one of the most powerful forces shaping local economies, housing markets, and consumer demand.
This report leverages AI-powered location analytics to examine the relocation patterns reshaping the United States in 2026 – where Americans are moving, the demographic and economic forces driving those decisions, and how retailers, investors, developers, and policymakers can respond to the opportunities and challenges created by these shifts.
Which major metros are attracting the most new residents? Which pandemic-era standouts have seen growth stall or reverse? And what factors best predict a large metro area's domestic migration growth potential in 2026?
The latest statewide migration data shows that the slower relocation pace observed in 2024 persisted into 2025. No state recorded net inflows or outflows exceeding 0.7% of its starting population. And while several smaller states continued to attract new residents at meaningful rates, none of the nation's six most populous states saw net in-migration exceed 0.2%.
Among those smaller states, South Carolina and Delaware led the nation with net in-migration equal to 0.7% of their populations, followed by Idaho (0.6%), Maine (0.5%), Tennessee (0.4%), and North Carolina (0.3%). For most of these states, migration accelerated relative to 2024, though Delaware's inflow rate moderated slightly and North Carolina held steady.
Despite their differences, these states tend to offer a similar mix of lifestyle amenities, relatively low congestion, and opportunities for growth. Many also benefit from business-friendly climates, favorable tax policies, or housing costs that remain attractive relative to the higher-cost markets from which they draw new residents.
At the other end of the spectrum was Vermont, which saw the nation’s largest net outflow as share of population in 2025, losing 0.4% of its population to domestic relocation. The decline deepens a reversal that first emerged in 2024, when the state swung to a net loss of 0.2%, after attracting inflows of 0.8% and 0.5% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Vermont's reversal likely reflects a combination of factors, including return-to-office mandates and the waning appeal of remote work. Housing undersupply in the state may have also contributed, illustrating how important infrastructure investments are to sustaining migration gains over time.
Among the nation's six most populous states, Florida was the only one to see accelerating net in-migration in 2025, attracting new residents equal to 0.2% of its starting population, up from 0.1% the year before. Texas, by contrast, slowed from 0.1% net in-migration in 2024 to essentially flat in 2025, highlighting the cooling of what was once one of the country's strongest pandemic-era migration magnets.
Meanwhile, the legacy "exodus" states continue to lose residents, but at a slower pace than in previous years. Illinois and California have seen their migration deficits steadily narrow, with further improvement in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, Illinois moved from -0.8% → -0.2% → -0.2% → -0.1%, while California moved from -0.9% → -0.4% → -0.3% → -0.2%. And though New York has held steady at -0.2% over the past two years, this marks a significant moderation from 2022, when the state experienced net outmigration equal to 1.1% of its population.
Statewide trends reveal important shifts, but a closer look at the nation's ten largest metropolitan areas suggests that broader interstate averages increasingly mask diverging local realities. Several metros are attracting residents through interstate domestic migration even when their states as a whole are experiencing little or no net migration growth.
Phoenix (+0.3%), for example, stood out as the nation's top-performing large metro in 2025, despite Arizona's absence from the list of leading migration destinations – with the majority of its inflow coming from out of state.
Dallas (+0.2%) ranked second, continuing its rebound from -0.1% in 2023 even as Texas' statewide migration gains cooled. Like Phoenix, Dallas drew a majority of its new residents from outside the state, underscoring its growing appeal as a national migration destination. Houston, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, falling from 0.1% net in-migration in 2023 to -0.1% in 2025. While it is too early to call this a sustained reversal, the divergence between the two metros may reflect Dallas's growing pull as a corporate magnet alongside rising housing costs and weather-related challenges in Houston.
Metro-level data also suggests that the pandemic-era "big-city exodus" narrative is continuing to fade. Los Angeles improved from -0.8% in 2023 to -0.3% in 2025, while New York held steady at -0.3% after improving in 2024. Even Miami (-0.6%), which ranked last among major metros despite Florida's continued statewide gains, saw its outflows moderate from 2023 levels. And while Illinois continued to post net outmigration, Chicago (0.0%) reached migration neutrality in 2025 after recording losses in both 2023 and 2024.
Despite Miami's struggles – and Florida’s relatively modest 0.2% inflow – a look beyond the top 10 large metros reveals that the Sunshine State is home to six of the nation's eight fastest-growing large metros nationwide.
Those top-performing metros, defined as CBSAs with 500K+ residents that added at least 0.8% of their population through net domestic migration over the past year, share a similar profile: lower housing costs, retiree appeal, suburban density, and an easy drive to a larger economic hub.
Much of the growth of these Florida metro areas, however, is being fueled from within Florida itself. While major out-of-state metros such as New York (6.1%) and Chicago (2.0%) remained important sources of new residents, nearly half of the net migration into Florida's top destination metros came from elsewhere in the state. In 2025, Miami (22.5%), Orlando (13.0%), Tampa (5.8%), and Naples (4.2%) together accounted for 45.5% of the net positive migration feeding these fast-growing markets.
The migration flows feeding the nation’s fastest-growing large metros suggest that affordability remains a powerful driver of domestic relocation.
In 2025, seven of the eight top destination metros analyzed above had lower typical home values than their largest feeder markets. Lakeland–Winter Haven, FL, for example, had a typical home value of $313.4K in December 2024, compared with $404.9K in Orlando and $380.2K in Tampa – its two largest sources of net migration. Even North Port–Bradenton–Sarasota, FL – the most expensive Florida metro in this group – drew its largest share of net migration from the New York metro area, where home values are substantially higher.
The lone exception was Charleston–North Charleston, SC, whose largest source of net migration was Baltimore – a market with lower typical home values than the destination. Even in Charleston, however, affordability appears to have played a role. New York, a significantly more expensive market, ranked a close second in 2025, accounting for 6.5% of net positive migration into Charleston, just behind Baltimore’s 6.8%.
While housing costs are only one factor influencing migration decisions, the data suggests that households continue to gravitate toward markets where homeownership is comparatively more attainable than in the places they leave behind.
Typical Home Values* in Top Feeder Markets to Destination Hubs, 2025
*Typical home value based on Zillow Research’s Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) for Dec. 2024, immediately preceding the analyzed migration period (Jan.–Dec. 2025).
But as important as affordability is in explaining today’s domestic migration patterns, age appears to be an even stronger determinant of where people choose to relocate.
Among mid-sized and large metros (250K+ residents) experiencing significant population shifts – defined as gaining or losing at least 1.0% of their starting population through domestic migration over the past two years – households are increasingly moving toward older, more established communities.
The data reveals a clear negative relationship between migration performance and age differential – a metric calculated by subtracting the median age of the destination market from the weighted median age of its feeder markets. Negative values indicate movement toward older communities, while positive values indicate movement toward younger ones. In other words, the metros attracting the strongest migration inflows tend to be older than the markets sending them residents.
The data also shows a clear positive relationship between migration performance and retiree concentration. Metros with larger shares of residents aged 65 and older generally saw stronger migration gains over the past two years, while younger metros tended to attract fewer newcomers. This suggests that retiree-driven relocation has become an increasingly important driver of migration. At the same time, the influx of younger residents points to the broader appeal of these communities, which offer a mix of affordability, amenities, and lifestyle advantages.
Net Migration as Share of Starting Population, 2024–2025*
*Analysis includes metro areas with 250K+ residents and domestic migration gains or losses of at least 1.0% during the study period. Weighted Age Differential compares the destination market’s median age with the weighted median age of origin markets, with positive values indicating migration toward younger markets and negative values indicating migration toward older markets. Age data: Census ACS 2020–2024.
The pandemic-era urban exodus is giving way to a more nuanced migration landscape. Large urban markets are stabilizing, while growth is increasingly concentrated in smaller states, secondary metros, and intra-state corridors. Affordability remains a powerful pull, but retirees, lifestyle considerations, and local market dynamics are also playing an increasingly important role in where Americans choose to live.
To capitalize on these shifts in 2026, civic leaders, commercial real estate (CRE) investors, retailers, and developers should:
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
