This report was produced in collaboration by Placer.ai and Colliers. Because the underlying foot traffic data excludes international visitors, the findings reflect the tournament’s impact on domestic (U.S.) visitation rather than total event-driven traffic.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup brought millions of fans to eleven host markets across the United States – and with them, high expectations of a summer boom for local retailers, restaurants, and property owners.
While the tournament delivered a substantial economic boost, foot traffic data reveals a more nuanced picture. Rather than generating broad-based gains, the tournament concentrated demand in the categories, locations, and experiences most closely tied to the fan journey – stadium-adjacent blocks over metro-wide corridors, bars over full-service restaurants, and sporting goods over general apparel.
This report uses location analytics to unpack where World Cup value actually materialized – and what those patterns mean for retail, dining, and real estate stakeholders. It examines which businesses and locations were best positioned to capture event-driven demand, and what cities and brands can learn as they prepare for the next major event.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup resulted in only a slight overall retail visit lift at the metro level, with YoY brick-and-mortar retail visits in host markets outperforming non-host markets by just 0.1 percentage points throughout the tournament period.
Dining saw a more pronounced relative boost, but as discussed later in this report, those gains appear to have been highly localized and concentrated in specific venues and occasions.
Diving into the dining data indicates that the modest metro-wide dining lift during the overall tournament window was far from broad-based. Bars and pubs were the clear outlier, averaging an 8.0% increase on match-day across host markets. QSR, meanwhile, was flat and coffee/dessert and full-service restaurants averaged slightly negative.
Retail performance also varied significantly across categories. In addition to bars and pubs, sporting goods retailers posted consistent match-day gains across every host market, while apparel stores and superstores saw far more mixed results.
The pattern suggests that major events do not create a broad retail tailwind, even on match days; instead, incremental visits tend to concentrate in categories most directly tied to how consumers participate in the occasion.
The tournament's strongest retail and dining effects were concentrated in the areas immediately surrounding match venues. Within one mile of stadiums, dining visits rose by 53.7% and retail by 22.0% – but those gains fell sharply as distance increased, although dining continued to benefit farther out. So major events can dramatically reshape demand within a small trade area, without producing anything close to the same effect across the broader market.
Where the stadium sits may influence how widely mega-event traffic benefits a city. Some of the markets with strongest retail and dining corridor gains – including Atlanta, Houston, Seattle, and Philadelphia – hosted matches within the principal city rather than at more distant suburban venues, allowing match-day activity to overlap more naturally with existing commercial districts.
But Dallas and Los Angeles show that a central stadium isn’t essential. Both saw double-digit corridor gains despite hosting matches outside the city center, while creating major fan destinations and World Cup programming elsewhere in the market. The broader lesson is that cities may be able to extend the economic footprint of a mega-event by giving fans multiple places to gather, move through, and spend beyond the stadium itself.
From official FIFA Fan Festivals to multi-site fan zone programs, every host market paired its stadium with free, public places where fans could gather to watch the matches together.
Even when the main event is exclusive or capacity-constrained, public activations can broaden participation and create new hubs of activity. Across the markets analyzed, activation visitors came from lower-income trade areas than did stadium visitors.
The public activations were also much more likely to attract locals – suggesting that free or more accessible programming can engage a broader cross-section of the host community and make otherwise exclusive mega-events more locally inclusive.
World Cup fan sites drew enormous traffic increases, but nearby retail and dining saw much smaller – and highly variable – lifts, showing once again that crowds do not automatically translate into commercial spillover.
The contrast across markets points to the role of site context and event design. Houston's Fan Fest, for example, sat in EaDo, a neighborhood with an existing mix of businesses, and allowed attendees to leave and re-enter freely – which may have contributed to the 22.4% and 24.0% increase in nearby retail and dining traffic, respectively. Los Angeles, meanwhile, took a more self-contained approach – its Coliseum activation prohibited re-entry and offered extensive food and beverage on-site – and the retail and dining traffic within a one-mile radius only increased 7.2% and 8.0%, respectively. These examples suggest that site context and event design can influence whether visitor spending remains inside an activation or spreads into the surrounding district.
The World Cup demonstrated that mega-events can create meaningful commercial opportunities, but careful analysis is needed to identify where, when, and for whom those opportunities are most likely to materialize.
For investors and occupiers, that means focusing on neighborhood-level opportunities rather than assuming a citywide boom. The biggest winners were properties and businesses that aligned with the fan journey in terms of location, tenant mix, experiential offerings, and event activation strategy. Simply being in a host city was not enough; creating a compelling reason for consumers to engage was the defining factor behind performance.
1. Specific location matters more than market selection.
The report’s strongest finding is that World Cup-related demand was highly localized. Retail and dining gains were concentrated around stadiums, fan zones, and other key gathering places rather than spread across entire metropolitan areas. Investors should focus on assets near venues, entertainment districts, pedestrian corridors, and activation sites, as these properties were best positioned to capture event-driven spending.
2. Experience-oriented properties are likely to outperform.
Bars, pubs, entertainment venues, and social gathering concepts captured the largest visitation gains during the tournament, while most traditional retail and restaurant categories saw limited benefits. Mixed-use properties with experiential tenant mixes may therefore be more resilient and better positioned to capitalize on future major events.
3. Tenant mix is a critical value driver.
The World Cup did not create a broad retail tailwind. Sporting goods was the only retail category that consistently benefited across all host markets. This suggests that investors should assess whether a property’s tenants align with event-related consumer behavior rather than assume nearby crowds will translate into sales.
4. Placemaking and activation create value.
Markets with established fan districts, public activations, and connected entertainment corridors often extend spending beyond the stadium. Investors should view major events as opportunities to activate public spaces, develop programming, and strengthen district identity rather than rely solely on venue proximity.
1. Relevance to the event matters more than proximity.
Businesses benefited when they became part of the fan experience. Bars and pubs dramatically outperformed other dining categories because they offered communal viewing opportunities. Occupiers should focus on creating a clear event-related reason for consumers to visit.
2. Plan for peaks, not the entire event.
Traffic gains were often concentrated around specific matches rather than sustained over the full tournament. Staffing, inventory, marketing, and promotions should be aligned with key event dates and anticipated high-interest games.
3. Create experiential offerings.
Restaurants and retailers without a natural event connection can still participate through themed merchandise, watch parties, digital displays, special menus, sponsorships, and fan-focused experiences. The report suggests that occasion-driven demand can be created rather than simply inherited.
4. Fan zones are opportunities, not guarantees.
Some activation sites generated strong retail and dining spillover, while others did not. Occupiers near fan events should not assume that crowds will automatically translate into sales. Connectivity, visibility, event design, and ease of movement between the activation and surrounding businesses are major determinants of success.