.svg)
.avif)
Recent McDonald's menu additions such as the annual Shamrock Shake release and the Big Arch Burger pilot appear to have generated only a modest lift in McDonald’s foot traffic. Although visits increased 5.5% year-over-year during the week of February 16th 2026 – the week of the Shamrock Shake's launch – traffic the following week dipped -0.5%, suggesting the seasonal item generated only a short-lived bump rather than a sustained lift in visits. And the heavily publicized Big Arch generated just a 2.2% YoY traffic boost during its launch week of March 2nd to March 8th 2026 – although performance may strengthen as the item gains traction with consumers.
So while these LTOs did generate modest traffic lifts for the chain, the impact was relatively muted compared to some of last year’s stronger performers, such as McDonald’s Grinch Meals. These results may suggest that consumers are becoming increasingly selective in their spending – potentially making it more difficult for QSR chains to rely on LTOs alone to drive meaningful traffic momentum without additional value-oriented offerings.
While recent LTOs delivered only modest gains on their own, pairing LTOs with a clearer value proposition – such as the upcoming McValue 2.0 – may prove more effective, with limited-time items drawing attention and value-focused offerings encouraging repeat visits. In a price-sensitive environment, this dual strategy could drive a more sustainable traffic lift than product innovation or value promotions alone.
For more data-driven restaurant insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
Confidence in physical retail remains solid this year. More than 55% of survey respondents said they feel confident or very confident about brick-and-mortar performance in 2026, while only around 20% expressed concern.
This sentiment aligns with the broader performance of the sector. The chart below shows two consecutive years of modest but positive retail visit growth, with year-over-year (YoY) gains hovering around 1%. While that pace reflects a relatively stable – rather than booming – environment, it reinforces the idea that physical retail continues to demonstrate resilience despite macroeconomic uncertainty.
Still, the results also highlight an element of caution. Nearly half of respondents reported feeling neutral or concerned about the coming year, suggesting that while the foundation for brick-and-mortar retail remains strong, industry leaders are watching economic conditions closely.
At the same time, most respondents believe online retail will continue to grow faster than physical stores. Nearly 70% said they expect e-commerce to outpace brick-and-mortar growth over the next twelve months.
This outlook is hardly surprising given e-commerce’s smaller starting point and the ongoing digital expansion across the retail landscape. But crucially, the expectation of stronger online growth does not translate into pessimism about stores. Nearly a third of respondents said they were actually more bullish on physical retail than on e-commerce.
These findings suggest the industry has moved beyond the once-dominant narrative that e-commerce would inevitably replace physical retail. Instead, the data reflects a growing consensus that the two channels are increasingly complementary – a story also supported by visit data, which shows e-commerce activity growing faster than brick-and-mortar retail even as both continue to expand. The rise of online retail doesn’t reduce the necessity of physical stores – it pushes retailers, brands, and landlords alike to develop clearer strategies for how online and offline channels work together to create a seamless consumer journey that leverages the unique advantages of each.
When we asked professionals about the role agentic AI could play in retail in the coming years, our expectation was a resounding vote for the lift it would provide e-commerce. And indeed, 44% of respondents said they expect agentic AI to increase the share of online retail.
However, reflecting the growing recognition that retail’s future lies in more harmonized commerce, 34% of respondents said they believe agentic AI will lift all boats – increasing incremental growth across commerce more broadly.
This is a significant signal. It reinforces the idea that innovation, whether centered on physical or digital shopping, is most powerful when it creates value across the entire ecosystem. Rather than viewing technology as a zero-sum competition between channels, many retail leaders increasingly see tools like AI as ways to strengthen the overall shopping experience. And that perspective makes it more likely that retailers and brands will evaluate new technologies through a broader lens that prioritizes integrated commerce.
Understanding why consumers visit stores remains central to shaping the next phase of brick-and-mortar retail. When survey participants were asked to identify the key drivers of in-store visits, tactile experiences topped the list, with nearly 80% of respondents pointing to the ability to see, touch, and try products as among the biggest advantages of physical retail. Another 70% highlighted the enjoyment of the in-store shopping experience itself – emphasizing another element that is difficult to replicate online.
At the same time, respondents expressed skepticism about some of the strategies often cited as drivers of store traffic. Only 12% identified services such as buy-online-pickup-in-store (BOPIS) or in-store returns as major traffic drivers. This suggests that while these services are important components of omnichannel retail – reflected, for example, in a growing share of short in-store visits across industries – they may not yet be fully integrated into shopping journeys in ways that maximize their potential.
Perhaps most surprisingly, only 30% of respondents said stores excel at inspiring shoppers to discover new products. Yet this capability may represent one of brick-and-mortar retail’s greatest untapped opportunities. Physical environments are uniquely positioned to spark discovery through merchandising, layout, and experiential elements – factors that can expand baskets and deepen customer engagement.
Industry sentiment also varies significantly across retail segments, with sector-level expectations closely tracking last year’s visit performance. When asked whether they expected various categories to grow, remain stable, or decline over the next twelve months, respondents were more likely to express confidence in continued growth or stability for segments that experienced stronger YoY traffic trends in 2025.
Wholesale clubs, which saw visits rise 5.0% YoY in 2025, topped the list – with 97% of respondents expecting growth or stability in the months ahead, followed by grocery stores at 96%. The strength of both sectors reflects broader consumer trends, including suburban living, increased home cooking, and a heightened focus on value and wellness.
Still, respondents are significantly more bullish on wholesale clubs than on traditional grocery stores: Breaking down the growth / stability outlook down further, 61% of respondents expect clubs to see continued growth, compared with about 35% for grocery stores.
One reason may be the club model’s ability to capture large shopping baskets. While consumers today are increasingly willing to visit multiple stores to find the best value or selection, club retailers excel at capturing a significant share of the shopping list once they secure the visit. Grocery stores, on the other hand, attract frequent trips – but these may include fewer items as shoppers spread spending across multiple retailers. This dynamic may push grocers to focus more heavily on specialization, differentiated offerings, and higher value per visit.
Mass merchandisers such as Walmart and Target also received strong confidence scores, reflecting Walmart’s recent performance and expectations surrounding Target’s ongoing turnaround strategy. Meanwhile, discount and dollar stores – another category that has performed well recently – were widely expected to remain stable, with fewer respondents predicting continued rapid growth for the sector in the months ahead.
There are few sectors we love talking about more than malls. Several years ago, the prevailing expectation was of a perpetual decline for the sector as a whole. But the “death of the mall” narrative has quickly diminished – or at least evolved. In our survey, 54% of respondents expected continued success for Tier 1 malls, while 30% anticipated decline across all mall types. Only 16% expected Tier 2 malls to perform well, and less than half of those believed that success would extend further down the tier ladder.
This largely aligns with visit data, with top-tier indoor malls driving significant success in recent years – a trend that will likely be further reinforced by the continued shift of key audiences toward the suburbs.
However, the potential of Tier 2 malls remains an area worth watching. A major part of the success of top malls has been a shift away from heavy concentrations of apparel and beauty toward more diverse tenant mixes, along with a stronger emphasis on elevated dining and experiences. This has been a critical element for the highest-performing malls. But in an environment where space is increasingly at a premium – and where less space is being dedicated to apparel and beauty in these top locations – a significant opportunity may emerge for Tier 2 malls to provide a stage for retailers that can no longer find a home in the most sought-after centers.
The result is an opportunity for these properties to become the “big fish” in smaller ponds, particularly if they focus on building tenant mixes that complement major regional players rather than compete with them directly. Executed well, this strategy could reduce direct competition while creating more destinations where consumers want to spend time.
Industry sentiment, especially when combined with visit data, offers a valuable snapshot of how retail is likely to evolve in the year ahead. Together, they point to a sector defined by steady physical retail performance, growing integration between online and in-store channels, optimism around technologies like AI, and shifting opportunities across segments from wholesale clubs and grocery to evolving mall formats.
For more data-driven retail insights visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Swig, the Utah-born drive-thru concept that helped popularize customizable dirty sodas, has evolved from a regional novelty into one of the fastest-growing beverage chains in the country. Known for mixing classic soft drinks with flavored syrups, creams, and fruit add-ins – alongside cookies and pretzel bites – the brand has expanded well beyond its Mountain West roots.
This expansion is fueled by significant online hype, with new locations often generating lines that wrap around the block and leave some customers waiting over an hour to try their first drink. And as the brand pushes deeper into the Sunbelt and beyond, location analytics offer a window into how this growth is impacting traffic trends and reshaping the brand's audience.
Unsurprisingly, the data shows that as Swig has expanded its footprint, it has successfully grown its overall traffic. In February 2026, visits to the chain were 137.9% higher than in February 2023 – and up 30.7% year-over-year compared to February 2025.
The data also shows the emergence of a clear seasonal pattern, with visits to Swig peaking each year in the summer as people seek out cool soda treats to beat the heat. Notably, the magnitude of the summer peak in 2025 was larger than ever before, suggesting that as the chain becomes more mainstream, its seasonal appeal may be increasing. But the dramatic increase in off-season visits as well shows that Swig is successfully building a loyal customer base that craves its offerings year-round.
This rapid growth is also leading to a meaningful broadening of Swig’s customer base. While the chain’s trade areas still remain affluent relative to the average U.S. household, the median household income (HHI) of its captured market is dropping as it reaches a more varied demographic.
And while "Wealthy Suburban Families" and "Upper Suburban Diverse Families" remain Swig’s largest audience segments, their total share of the market has edged down as engagement deepens across additional cohorts. This includes, notably, households in Blue Collar Suburbs who are now overindexed at 8.1% of Swig’s captured market, compared to a 6.9% nationwide baseline.
As Swig continues its transition from a niche favorite to a broad staple, it will inevitably face the challenges of sustained growth, such as maintaining unit-level productivity and operational consistency. However, for now, the data and the visible excitement surrounding new openings suggest that the dirty soda pioneer still has plenty of fizz left.
For more data-driven dining analyses follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Foot traffic to retail corridors nationwide plummeted during the shelter-in-place restrictions of 2020, and recent data shows that visits have yet to fully recover to 2019 levels. While traffic has steadily improved each year since the pandemic lows, 2025 visits remain 11.7% below their pre-pandemic baseline.
What is holding the retail corridor recovery back? We dove into the data to find out.
Retail corridors are typically concentrated in downtown areas, featuring a mix of stores, restaurants, bars, and offices – and are often surrounded by even more office space. And comparing average visits per day of week in 2025 and 2019 suggests that the persistence of hybrid and remote work is likely driving much of the lag.
Monday through Thursday foot traffic to retail corridors was down between 16.3% and 17.3% in 2025 compared to 2019. The gap narrowed to 11.7% on Friday as activity began to shift toward the weekend, and nearly disappeared on Saturday (-2.8%) and Sunday (-4.2%).
The much larger weekday deficit suggests that reduced office attendance continues to weigh on downtown retail activity. With fewer workers commuting daily, there are fewer pre-work coffee stops, lunchtime errands, and spontaneous after-work visits that once fueled these corridors. So while leisure-driven weekend traffic has largely rebounded, the office-driven weekday ecosystem that historically sustained retail corridors has yet to fully return.
Hourly data reinforces the role that office attendance (or lack thereof) is playing in the retail corridor visit lag. The steepest declines are concentrated squarely within traditional workday hours: visits between 7 AM and 11 AM are down 23.7% compared to 2019, followed by a 19.2% decline from 11 AM to 3 PM. But the gap is much more moderate both earlier and later in the day (from 12 AM to 7 AM and 3 PM to 12 PM) in the day later in the day, with visits down 13.7% from 3 PM to 7 PM and just 9.6% after 7 PM. This suggests that the missing traffic is closely tied to reduced daily commuting – fewer morning coffee runs, lunch breaks, and midday errands – while evening and leisure-oriented visits have proven far more resilient. With more schedule flexibility, downtown businesses and civic stakeholders may need to focus on creating reasons for consumers to intentionally visit downtowns during slower weekday hours, rather than relying on routine commuter traffic to fill stores organically.
The retail corridor traffic data suggests that downtowns are facing a structural shift in when and why people visit. With fewer daily commuters, stakeholders may need to focus less on restoring a five-day office week and more on activating the days and hours that already show strength. Civic leaders can prioritize safety, cleanliness, transit reliability, and targeted weekday programming or events that encourage intentional trips downtown. Retailers and dining concepts can adapt hours, promotions, and experiences to better align with flexible work schedules. In a hybrid era, success may depend less on recreating old commuting patterns and more on making downtown a destination people choose – not just a place they pass through.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Downtown Austin is navigating a period of unusual complexity. A convention center renovation and major highway construction have created significant disruption, while extreme summer heat and pullbacks in consumer spending are adding further pressure.
Yet despite these headwinds, visitation is nearing pre-pandemic levels. And a key factor driving Austin’s recovery has been its deliberate use of data to guide strategy, align stakeholders, and deploy resources where they can have the greatest impact.
Since 2022, Downtown Austin has been on a steady recovery trajectory. By 2025, non-resident and non-employee visits to the area reached 94.4% of 2019 levels – a milestone that becomes even more meaningful against the backdrop of this year’s intensely hot summer and the temporary closure of Austin’s convention center, which has remained offline since April 2025.
This data reveals resilience that might otherwise have gone unnoticed – critical framing when coordinating across agencies and reassuring stakeholders that downtown remains a reliable economic engine even during infrastructure transitions.
The composition of that visitation tells an equally important story. A growing share of visitors to downtown Austin are coming from within Texas – especially on weekends.
In an environment where consumers are more value-conscious and long-haul travel remains uneven, this regional draw has become a strategic asset. In-state travelers are more likely to make shorter, repeat trips, creating consistent demand for restaurants, entertainment venues, and retail corridors.
The Downtown Austin Alliance uses this insight to refine both marketing and access strategies. Partnerships such as discounted ride programs within a 30-mile radius reduce friction for local visitors during the holiday season, while targeted programming ensures downtown remains competitive as a weekend destination.
At the policy level, this data strengthens the case that downtown’s success benefits the broader state economy. When a rising share of visitors originates within Texas, the dollars spent downtown circulate locally – supporting jobs, generating tax revenue, and reinforcing Austin’s role as an economic anchor.
Data also helps the Alliance optimize services around major events that drive tourism to Austin – such as the annual ACL Music Festival and Formula 1 Grand Prix – supporting operational precision. High-traffic areas receive intensified cleaning and hospitality services, while lower-traffic zones become candidates for murals, activations, and smaller-scale programming designed to distribute energy more evenly. Event-driven data also informs conversations with transportation partners as construction continues to reshape mobility routes.
The strategic use of data is also evident in the revitalization of East Sixth Street. Long known as a historic entertainment corridor with a late-night reputation, the district is now the focus of a coordinated effort to evolve its positioning and offerings.
And data has played an important role in getting people on board. Location analytics, for example, show that out-of-market visitors to the district are coming from more affluent areas, showing that spending power exists and is growing – and that the district’s offerings may have room to evolve alongside its audience.
For property owners and local businesses, this data provides a clearer picture of market potential. And for public-sector partners, it strengthens the case for infrastructure upgrades and placemaking investments.
Austin’s experience offers a broader lesson for cities navigating disruption. Infrastructure transitions, climate pressures, and evolving travel patterns present real challenges – but by grounding placemaking strategies in clear, measurable data, Austin is strengthening downtown’s economic foundation and aligning stakeholders around a shared vision.
.avif)
Amid a tightening job market, the list of employers requiring workers to show up in person – many now mandating five days a week – continues to grow. But how did the office recovery fare in February 2026, a month marked by heavy snowstorms across major Northeast markets?
We dove into the data to find out.
In February 2026, visits to the Placer.ai Nationwide Office Index were 31.9% below 2019 levels – marking the smallest February post-pandemic visit gap to date. Overall attendance even slightly outpaced February 2024, a leap year that benefited from 20 business days instead of the usual 19.
While this is hardly the most impressive RTO showing we’ve seen in recent months, February’s gains came in spite of meaningful headwinds.
A late-February blizzard disrupted major Northeast markets, driving a year-over-year (YoY) decline in New York City office visits and widening Manhattan’s post-pandemic gap to 21.3% below 2019 levels. Boston, also hit hard by snow, saw visits remain flat YoY, slipping behind San Francisco and Denver in overall recovery progress.
By contrast, cities in other regions posted clear gains, with San Francisco – still benefiting from AI-driven hiring and renewed tech activity – once again seeing some of the strongest growth at +11.9% YoY.
February’s performance underscores a familiar pattern of month-to-month fluctuation, even as the broader RTO trajectory continues its upward climb. Regional dynamics – from weather disruptions to sector-specific hiring cycles – are shaping local outcomes, but the national baseline for office utilization is steadily rising.
For more data driven CRE insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
During the pandemic and its aftermath, Americans were on the move. Millions left expensive coastal markets for lower-cost destinations across the Sun Belt, while boomtowns such as Bozeman, Boise, and Austin struggled to keep pace with the influx of new residents.
That wave of relocation has since cooled, as return-to-office mandates, higher mortgage rates, and a shrinking affordability gap between coastal cities and many COVID-era hotspots have dampened the incentive to move. But even in a slower market, domestic migration remains one of the most powerful forces shaping local economies, housing markets, and consumer demand.
This report leverages AI-powered location analytics to examine the relocation patterns reshaping the United States in 2026 – where Americans are moving, the demographic and economic forces driving those decisions, and how retailers, investors, developers, and policymakers can respond to the opportunities and challenges created by these shifts.
Which major metros are attracting the most new residents? Which pandemic-era standouts have seen growth stall or reverse? And what factors best predict a large metro area's domestic migration growth potential in 2026?
The latest statewide migration data shows that the slower relocation pace observed in 2024 persisted into 2025. No state recorded net inflows or outflows exceeding 0.7% of its starting population. And while several smaller states continued to attract new residents at meaningful rates, none of the nation's six most populous states saw net in-migration exceed 0.2%.
Among those smaller states, South Carolina and Delaware led the nation with net in-migration equal to 0.7% of their populations, followed by Idaho (0.6%), Maine (0.5%), Tennessee (0.4%), and North Carolina (0.3%). For most of these states, migration accelerated relative to 2024, though Delaware's inflow rate moderated slightly and North Carolina held steady.
Despite their differences, these states tend to offer a similar mix of lifestyle amenities, relatively low congestion, and opportunities for growth. Many also benefit from business-friendly climates, favorable tax policies, or housing costs that remain attractive relative to the higher-cost markets from which they draw new residents.
At the other end of the spectrum was Vermont, which saw the nation’s largest net outflow as share of population in 2025, losing 0.4% of its population to domestic relocation. The decline deepens a reversal that first emerged in 2024, when the state swung to a net loss of 0.2%, after attracting inflows of 0.8% and 0.5% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Vermont's reversal likely reflects a combination of factors, including return-to-office mandates and the waning appeal of remote work. Housing undersupply in the state may have also contributed, illustrating how important infrastructure investments are to sustaining migration gains over time.
Among the nation's six most populous states, Florida was the only one to see accelerating net in-migration in 2025, attracting new residents equal to 0.2% of its starting population, up from 0.1% the year before. Texas, by contrast, slowed from 0.1% net in-migration in 2024 to essentially flat in 2025, highlighting the cooling of what was once one of the country's strongest pandemic-era migration magnets.
Meanwhile, the legacy "exodus" states continue to lose residents, but at a slower pace than in previous years. Illinois and California have seen their migration deficits steadily narrow, with further improvement in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, Illinois moved from -0.8% → -0.2% → -0.2% → -0.1%, while California moved from -0.9% → -0.4% → -0.3% → -0.2%. And though New York has held steady at -0.2% over the past two years, this marks a significant moderation from 2022, when the state experienced net outmigration equal to 1.1% of its population.
Statewide trends reveal important shifts, but a closer look at the nation's ten largest metropolitan areas suggests that broader interstate averages increasingly mask diverging local realities. Several metros are attracting residents through interstate domestic migration even when their states as a whole are experiencing little or no net migration growth.
Phoenix (+0.3%), for example, stood out as the nation's top-performing large metro in 2025, despite Arizona's absence from the list of leading migration destinations – with the majority of its inflow coming from out of state.
Dallas (+0.2%) ranked second, continuing its rebound from -0.1% in 2023 even as Texas' statewide migration gains cooled. Like Phoenix, Dallas drew a majority of its new residents from outside the state, underscoring its growing appeal as a national migration destination. Houston, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, falling from 0.1% net in-migration in 2023 to -0.1% in 2025. While it is too early to call this a sustained reversal, the divergence between the two metros may reflect Dallas's growing pull as a corporate magnet alongside rising housing costs and weather-related challenges in Houston.
Metro-level data also suggests that the pandemic-era "big-city exodus" narrative is continuing to fade. Los Angeles improved from -0.8% in 2023 to -0.3% in 2025, while New York held steady at -0.3% after improving in 2024. Even Miami (-0.6%), which ranked last among major metros despite Florida's continued statewide gains, saw its outflows moderate from 2023 levels. And while Illinois continued to post net outmigration, Chicago (0.0%) reached migration neutrality in 2025 after recording losses in both 2023 and 2024.
Despite Miami's struggles – and Florida’s relatively modest 0.2% inflow – a look beyond the top 10 large metros reveals that the Sunshine State is home to six of the nation's eight fastest-growing large metros nationwide.
Those top-performing metros, defined as CBSAs with 500K+ residents that added at least 0.8% of their population through net domestic migration over the past year, share a similar profile: lower housing costs, retiree appeal, suburban density, and an easy drive to a larger economic hub.
Much of the growth of these Florida metro areas, however, is being fueled from within Florida itself. While major out-of-state metros such as New York (6.1%) and Chicago (2.0%) remained important sources of new residents, nearly half of the net migration into Florida's top destination metros came from elsewhere in the state. In 2025, Miami (22.5%), Orlando (13.0%), Tampa (5.8%), and Naples (4.2%) together accounted for 45.5% of the net positive migration feeding these fast-growing markets.
The migration flows feeding the nation’s fastest-growing large metros suggest that affordability remains a powerful driver of domestic relocation.
In 2025, seven of the eight top destination metros analyzed above had lower typical home values than their largest feeder markets. Lakeland–Winter Haven, FL, for example, had a typical home value of $313.4K in December 2024, compared with $404.9K in Orlando and $380.2K in Tampa – its two largest sources of net migration. Even North Port–Bradenton–Sarasota, FL – the most expensive Florida metro in this group – drew its largest share of net migration from the New York metro area, where home values are substantially higher.
The lone exception was Charleston–North Charleston, SC, whose largest source of net migration was Baltimore – a market with lower typical home values than the destination. Even in Charleston, however, affordability appears to have played a role. New York, a significantly more expensive market, ranked a close second in 2025, accounting for 6.5% of net positive migration into Charleston, just behind Baltimore’s 6.8%.
While housing costs are only one factor influencing migration decisions, the data suggests that households continue to gravitate toward markets where homeownership is comparatively more attainable than in the places they leave behind.
Typical Home Values* in Top Feeder Markets to Destination Hubs, 2025
*Typical home value based on Zillow Research’s Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) for Dec. 2024, immediately preceding the analyzed migration period (Jan.–Dec. 2025).
But as important as affordability is in explaining today’s domestic migration patterns, age appears to be an even stronger determinant of where people choose to relocate.
Among mid-sized and large metros (250K+ residents) experiencing significant population shifts – defined as gaining or losing at least 1.0% of their starting population through domestic migration over the past two years – households are increasingly moving toward older, more established communities.
The data reveals a clear negative relationship between migration performance and age differential – a metric calculated by subtracting the median age of the destination market from the weighted median age of its feeder markets. Negative values indicate movement toward older communities, while positive values indicate movement toward younger ones. In other words, the metros attracting the strongest migration inflows tend to be older than the markets sending them residents.
The data also shows a clear positive relationship between migration performance and retiree concentration. Metros with larger shares of residents aged 65 and older generally saw stronger migration gains over the past two years, while younger metros tended to attract fewer newcomers. This suggests that retiree-driven relocation has become an increasingly important driver of migration. At the same time, the influx of younger residents points to the broader appeal of these communities, which offer a mix of affordability, amenities, and lifestyle advantages.
Net Migration as Share of Starting Population, 2024–2025*
*Analysis includes metro areas with 250K+ residents and domestic migration gains or losses of at least 1.0% during the study period. Weighted Age Differential compares the destination market’s median age with the weighted median age of origin markets, with positive values indicating migration toward younger markets and negative values indicating migration toward older markets. Age data: Census ACS 2020–2024.
The pandemic-era urban exodus is giving way to a more nuanced migration landscape. Large urban markets are stabilizing, while growth is increasingly concentrated in smaller states, secondary metros, and intra-state corridors. Affordability remains a powerful pull, but retirees, lifestyle considerations, and local market dynamics are also playing an increasingly important role in where Americans choose to live.
To capitalize on these shifts in 2026, civic leaders, commercial real estate (CRE) investors, retailers, and developers should:
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
Physical retail is increasingly defined by a small group of dominant players – Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General – that span grocery, essentials, and discretionary categories at a scale no other retailers can match. These chains serve as bellwethers of consumer behavior, revealing where Americans are spending, how often they shop, and what drives their decisions. And understanding their visitation patterns sheds light on the key dynamics shaping both their performance and the broader blueprint for retail success in 2026.
Retail giants Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General continue to capture a growing share of brick-and-mortar visits nationwide.
• The share of physical retail traffic captured by these giants rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 17.5% in Q1 2026, signaling continued sector consolidation.
• The scale advantage enjoyed by retail giants is increasingly self-reinforcing: Larger players benefit from superior data, stronger vendor leverage, and operational efficiencies that in turn further widen the gap.
• As these advantages compound, direct competition becomes less viable. Instead, smaller retailers should focus on owning specific trip missions – such as convenience, fill-in, or discovery – where format, assortment curation, and in-store experience can more directly shape consumer choice.
• For CRE operators, the growing dominance of these retail giants increases reliance on top-tier anchors, potentially driving performance gaps between centers with strong national tenants and those without.
• For CPG companies, the consolidation in the offline retail space heightens channel concentration, making success with a handful of large retailers critical while increasing those retailers’ negotiating leverage.
Traffic trends across the four giants reveal meaningful divergence in performance.
• Costco and Dollar General are driving the strongest visit growth, supported by both substantial fleet expansions and rising visits per location. In 2025, visits per store exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 18.1% for Costco and 10.2% for Dollar General, with both brands also seeing steady increases in their share of total brick-and-mortar retail chain visits.
• Walmart remains the largest player by far, accounting for 9.7% of traffic to major brick-and-mortar chains in 2025. And though the behemoth’s share of visits declined slightly in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it has held steady over the past three years.
• Target’s visit share has remained relatively flat over the past three years, reflecting stalled momentum. Still, early 2026 trends point to emerging signs of recovery – with Q1 visits up 8.3% compared to Q1 2019.
• Value retail is winning, but in more specialized forms: Dollar General (extreme value + convenience) and Costco (bulk value + loyalty) are driving the strongest traffic growth and rising visits per store, while Walmart’s broad “everyday value” remains steady with slower growth. Target, for its part, is lagging – likely a reflection of the broader bifurcation in retail which has left middle-market players caught between consumers trading down to value and those trading up to quality.
• For retailers and CPG companies, the broader lesson is that value perception is becoming more nuanced. It’s no longer just about offering low prices at scale, but about how value is delivered – whether through small packs vs. bulk, or quick trips vs. stock-up missions. Success increasingly depends on prioritizing these distinct value formats and investing in channels where store-level productivity is improving.
• For CRE operators, the outperformance of retailers with clearly defined value propositions underscores the importance of mission-driven tenant mix. As shoppers visit with increasingly specific missions in mind, retailers that cater to those missions are outperforming. Tenant strategies should reflect this shift, ensuring complementary offerings that reinforce a cohesive shopping mission.
Walmart remains the dominant brick-and-mortar retailer nationwide and across all fifty states. Still, the data suggests there is room for multiple runners-up to succeed across geographies and customer segments.
• Dollar General, Target, and Costco each attract distinct audience segments. Dollar General attracts a disproportionately high share of the “Mature and Retired Living” segment, while Costco leads among family households, with Target also over-indexing with this group. Among younger “Contemporary Households,” meanwhile – a segment encompassing singles, married couples without children, and non-family households – Target commands the highest share, slightly over-indexing compared to the nationwide baseline.
• Regional strengths vary significantly, with Dollar General concentrated in the South, Costco dominant in the Northwest, and Target showing more dispersed areas of strength.
• Despite similar overall visit share, Dollar General leads in more states (26 vs. 17 for Target), reflecting broader geographic dominance.
• For retailers, the data suggests that growth opportunities are increasingly shaped by localized demographic and geographic dynamics – meaning that targeted, market-specific strategies may be more effective than uniform national approaches.
• Younger “Contemporary Households” remain less locked-in than older demographics, representing a key battleground for future growth.
• For CPG companies, this data highlights that channel strategy is really about building the right mix of retailers, since even large national players reach different types of consumers.
• CRE operators should ask "which anchor is right for this trade area" rather than "which anchor is strongest," as mismatched tenants can underperform even if they’re nationally dominant.
After remaining essentially flat in 2025, average visits per location to Walmart grew 3.5% YoY in Q1 2026. And the retailer’s solid Q1 performance across the U.S. underscores its unique ability to resonate across income levels, geographies, and shopping missions.
• Walmart posted year-over-year visit growth across nearly all U.S. markets in Q1 2026, reinforcing its role as a universally relevant retailer.
• The giant’s comparative softness in small parts of the Northeast suggests an opportunity to double down on region-specific assortments, urban-friendly formats, or partnerships to better match local shopping behaviors.
• Walmart’s broad-based growth shows that even as consumers are increasingly willing to visit multiple retailers to get what they want, its Superstore model has solidified its role as a primary stop on the American shopping journey – making it a uniquely reliable anchor for CRE operators.
• For smaller retailers, this underscores the opportunity to win the “second stop” – capturing trips through curated assortments and more tailored in-store experiences that Walmart’s scale is less optimized to deliver.
• For CPG companies, Walmart stands out as a highly attractive partner for broad, efficient reach, given its consistent traffic across markets.
Target’s recent performance suggests early momentum in reversing prior softness.
• Q1 2026 visits to Target rose 5.1% year over year, marking the chain’s first positive visit growth in more than a year, and suggesting that the chain’s new turnaround strategy may be bearing fruit.
• Gains were driven primarily by visits lasting 30 to 45 minutes, which accounted for 19.6% of overall visits to Target in Q1 2026 – pointing to stronger in-store engagement rather than quick, mission-driven stops.
• Target’s return to traffic growth – driven by increases in mid-length trips – signals a sustainable recovery on the horizon, strengthening its reliability as a traffic-driving tenant for CRE operators.
• Target's turnaround shows retailers how increasing shopper engagement can generate growth by converting quick trips into higher-value, multi-category experiences.
• For CPG companies, the rise in mid-length visits indicates a more receptive in-store environment for discovery and trade-up, making Target an increasingly attractive channel for innovation, merchandising, and premium offerings.
Dollar General is becoming embedded in consumers’ daily routines.
• Visitor frequency to Dollar General is on the rise. In Q1 2026, nearly a quarter of visitors frequented the chain at least four times in an average month, up from 21.2% in Q1 2022.
• Dollar General is becoming increasingly local in nature: As its footprint expands, more visits originate nearby, with 28.0% coming from within one mile – reinforcing its role as a neighborhood store of choice.
• Dollar General’s visitation patterns point to a growing ownership of the convenience mission. Its expanding store density is creating a self-reinforcing network effect, where proximity fuels frequency, and frequency strengthens long-term defensibility.
• For retailers, Dollar General’s rising share of nearby and high-frequency visits shows that proximity can drive habit, making convenience a powerful lever for building repeat behavior.
• For CRE operators, the data highlights the strength of hyper-local, necessity-driven traffic, positioning Dollar General as a stable tenant that anchors consistent, repeat visitation.
• For CPG professionals, the increase in frequent trips signals a high-velocity purchase environment, favoring smaller pack sizes and products that align with regular replenishment cycles.
Costco continues to grow and diversify its audience despite higher membership fees and stricter food court access policies, highlighting the strength of its value proposition and loyalty model.
• In September 2024, Costco raised its membership fees for the first time in seven years – and more recently tightened enforcement of member-only access to its food courts. Despite these changes, visitation has remained strong, highlighting the company’s pricing power and deep customer loyalty.
• At the same time, Costco’s shopper base is broadening, with median household income trending slightly downward while remaining relatively affluent.
• Offering strong value to a relatively affluent consumer base can be a winning formula in 2026. Retailers that combine quality, trust, and perceived savings – rather than competing solely on low prices – are well positioned to drive both loyalty and sustained traffic growth.
• For CRE operators, Costco’s sustained traffic growth and broadening shopper base reinforce its value as a standalone, high-demand traffic magnet that can anchor entire trade areas and drive surrounding retail development.
• For CPG companies, the combination of high traffic and declining median HHI signals that Costco is evolving into a scaled channel reaching beyond affluent shoppers, requiring more diversified assortment and pricing strategies.
