.svg)
Consumers aren’t shying away from testing out new hobbies, despite economic headwinds and changes in sentiment. Perhaps, it is actually a response to those factors that have consumers rushing to embrace new activities or socializing with others. Hobbies can act as a small indulgence for shoppers looking for ways to treat themselves at retail without a larger financial investment.
Typically small indulgences are often associated with categories like beauty or coffee chains, but hobby related retail traffic is also on the rise in areas like craft, books and paper. Consumers looking for activities and third places outside of their homes and offices to socialize have boosted games like Mahjong over the past year, which have prompted retailers to follow the trends and increase assortments that speak to these new interests.
Hobby related retailers have been steadily growing visits over the past year, particularly in the book and craft spaces.
Crafting activities like junk journaling, scrapbooking, needlepoint, and diamond art are all trending, leading to increased interest for chains like Michaels and Hobby Lobby to capture. Crafting retail has consolidated over the past few years with the loss of JOANN, but the demand has shifted to the remaining retailers.
The book category was a leader in 2025, and that momentum hasn’t slowed in 2026. The rise in book clubs as a socialization method has boosted the book industry as a hobby adjacent category. Barnes & Noble also has embraced retail as a third place through community events like storytimes and author events, as well as its cafe. Hobbies can be a catalyst for consumers to check out these retailers, but each of these chains has created reasons for shoppers to return frequently.
The paper category is one that hasn’t seen the same meteoric rise as crafts or books, but it is on the rebound. Paper Source has taken a few pages from its sister-brand Barnes & Noble on diversifying its assortment through areas like gifting and crafting. As consumers grapple with an increasingly digital existence, there does seem to still be a growing affinity for analogue activities and communication including invitations and thank-you notes. Retailers like Paper Source represent how small indulgences can show up for consumers in 2026; even with a smaller price tag, finding joy at retail is unmatched.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Just a few months after Allbirds announced it was pivoting to AI, another DTC darling has taken an unexpected turn. Everlane – the upscale, "radical transparency" sustainability brand – has just been bought by ultra-low-price fast-fashion giant Shein for a reported $100 million.
Much of the coverage has framed the deal as Shein buying a sustainability halo to shore up its credibility in the American market. But location analytics point to a more tangible, often overlooked, asset – direct access, through Everlane's brick-and-mortar footprint, to the high-income, urban consumers Shein has long coveted.
Everlane’s stores are concentrated in affluent neighborhoods. Over the past twelve months, the brand’s potential market posted a median household income (HHI) of $127.7K – 46.3% above the nationwide baseline and a full $39.5K higher than the broader traditional apparel segment.
But even within these wealthy trade areas, Everlane disproportionately attracts the highest-income consumers. During the analyzed period, its captured market registered a median HHI of $142.3K – 11.5% above the brand’s already-affluent trade area. Other traditional apparel chains, by contrast, tend to attract audiences that more closely mirror the demographics of their surrounding markets.
For Shein, the striking gap between Everlane’s captured and potential markets is a signal of the brand’s durable equity: Despite its recent struggles, Everlane still demonstrates a powerful ability to attract highly desirable consumers beyond what would be expected from its physical footprint alone.
Everlane's audience also lines up neatly with the hip, urban demographic Shein has been trying to reach. "Educated Urbanites" – young, well-educated singles in dense urban areas working relatively high-paying jobs – account for a remarkable 40.8% of Everlane's captured market, against just 3.6% nationwide. The brand also over-indexes on "Ultra Wealthy Families," at 18.4% of its captured audience versus a traditional apparel benchmark of 8.7%.
That profile mirrors the consumer Shein has pursued through temporary pop-ups – including in luxury malls – across major U.S. cities.
The sustainability narrative may dominate the headlines, but the strategic logic behind Shein’s Everlane acquisition also runs through the customer base itself.
For Shein, Everlane represents a shortcut into a consumer segment it has sought to penetrate more effectively: affluent, urban, brand-conscious shoppers who still value trend relevance. And for Everlane, that same demographic strength helped transform a distressed sale into a strategic acquisition target – while giving Shein a strong incentive to preserve the brand’s positioning going forward.
For more data-driven retail insights, follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Dollar stores often benefit from consumer pullbacks – and with soaring gas prices and plummeting consumer sentiment, spring 2026 had all the ingredients for a category-wide boost.
But location analytics reveal a more nuanced picture, with Dollar General and Dollar Tree on notably different trajectories. We dove into the data to explore some of the factors behind the gap and what they reveal about today’s value-driven shopper.
Same-store visit data shows Dollar General outpacing Dollar Tree throughout the first four months of 2026, with the gap between the two chains widening as the year progressed. By March, Dollar Tree visits had slipped into negative territory (-0.6% YoY), with declines reaching -3.5% in April. Dollar General, meanwhile, maintained low-single-digit growth of 1.9% and 2.3% in March and April, respectively.
The divergence mirrors each chain’s recent sales drivers. Last quarter, Dollar General saw comparable sales growth driven primarily by increased traffic, while Dollar Tree posted ticket-driven gains – supported by the discretionary categories it has expanded through its Multi-Price 3.0 strategy. As consumer hesitancy deepened through the spring, that shift likely left Dollar Tree's traffic more vulnerable to pullback. Still, given the chain’s continued expansion and a difficult year-over-year comparison, a same-store visit dip of just a few percentage points suggests that underlying demand remains resilient.
Dollar General's hyper-local footprint has also long been a structural strength – one that likely became even more valuable in the spring 2026 environment. Gas prices climbed sharply in March, pushing the national average above $4 per gallon by early April for the first time in four years. With 12.4% of Dollar General visits originating from within half a mile of a store, compared to 7.3% for Dollar Tree, the chain was particularly well positioned to capture quick, low-drive-distance trips at a time when consumers were watching their fuel budgets.
Still, temporary headwinds aside, Dollar Tree’s stronger draw among families with children and the coveted Gen Z cohort could become a meaningful advantage as consumer conditions improve.
Dollar Tree and Dollar General have similar exposure to younger consumers and households with children across their potential trade areas, but Dollar Tree appears to do a better job converting that potential audience into actual visits. Its captured market – reflecting the parts of its trade area actually generating the most visits – is on par with or slightly over-indexes for both groups compared to its potential market, while Dollar General under-indexes.
That gap carries strategic implications for both chains. Dollar Tree’s expanded offerings in seasonal décor, party supplies, toys, and home goods may be resonating with these audiences. And though this discretionary tilt may leave traffic more exposed when budgets tighten, it also positions Dollar Tree well to capture occasion-driven and family-oriented spending as spending rebounds.
For Dollar General, meanwhile, under-indexing with those same groups highlights a longer-term opportunity to broaden its appeal among younger consumers – and drive incremental growth in the process.
The spring slowdown underscores that value retail is not immune to broader consumer pressure – and that not all dollar chains are exposed to that pressure in the same way. Dollar General's dense, hyper-local footprint gives it an edge when shoppers are watching basket size and driving costs. Dollar Tree's discretionary leaning, meanwhile, makes it more vulnerable in the near term – but its stronger pull among younger consumers and families suggests it is building relevance with audiences that could matter more in the next spending cycle.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Five Below has thrived in recent years, riding strong demand for affordable splurges. But how did the chain hold up in early 2026, with rising gas prices and sinking consumer sentiment squeezing discretionary spending?
Five Below has continued expanding its footprint over the past year, entering the Pacific Northwest for the first time and ending January 2026 with 1,921 stores across 46 states – a net increase of 150 stores compared to early 2025.
This growth helped drive a 25.9% YoY jump in chainwide visits in Q1 2026. But same-store visits also sustained double-digit growth throughout the quarter and into April – showing that Five Below is meaningfully growing its audience at existing locations even as it opens new ones at a rapid clip. That’s a rare combination at a moment when much of retail is grappling with consumer pullback.
Five Below's same-store momentum appears closely tied to its revamped merchandising strategy. Since taking the helm in December 2024, CEO Winnie Park has integrated the company’s “Five Beyond” items – priced at $7, $10, $15, and above – throughout the main store floor. Park has also pushed sharper, more trend-focused merchandising and a marketing approach built around social discovery and creator-led engagement.
And these steps appear to be attracting higher-earning shoppers. Captured market data shows that the median household income of Five Below’s visitor base rose from $78.5K in 2025 to $80.3K in 2026 – a meaningful uptick after several years of marginal declines.
To be sure, a similar push into higher-price discretionary categories appears to have weighed on some other discount retailers, such as Dollar Tree, this spring. But Five Below has always been a discretionary-first destination – and unlike Dollar Tree, whose shoppers can shift more of their trips to Dollar General as they prioritize basics, Five Below's affordable-splurge appeal isn't easily replicated elsewhere in the value aisle.
Five Below's audience is also more distinctly local than other discretionary retail chains – an advantage as rising gas prices push consumers to rethink longer drives. Though not as hyper-local as traditional dollar stores, Five Below still pulls disproportionately from nearby neighborhoods: in early 2026, 53.8% of visits came from within five miles, compared with 47.9% for discretionary chains more broadly. That local footprint, paired with attainable price points, makes Five Below a natural choice for consumers eager to splurge on something fun even as they grow more selective about discretionary trips.
Five Below's Q1 2026 performance reflects a chain firing on multiple cylinders – expanding its footprint, lifting traffic at existing stores, broadening its demographic reach, and benefiting from a convenient presence as gas prices weigh on longer trips. In an environment marked by growing consumer caution, that breadth of momentum positions Five Below to keep outperforming through the rest of 2026.
For more data-driven retail insights follow Placer.ai/anchor.
During periods of economic uncertainty and tighter consumer spending, demand for smaller indulgences often remains resilient. In beauty, this phenomenon is commonly referred to as the “lipstick effect” – the idea that consumers continue seeking affordable products that provide a sense of comfort, self-care, or reward even as discretionary budgets tighten.
Still, even this resilience doesn’t allow beauty chains to rest on their laurels. In 2025, both Ulta Beauty and Bath & Body Works introduced new corporate strategies aimed at driving their next phase of growth – but from very different starting points. Ulta is evolving from a position of relative strength, leaning into loyalty, discovery, and brand partnerships to sustain momentum. Bath & Body Works, meanwhile, is navigating a more uneven traffic recovery as it works to reduce its reliance on promotional peaks and expand engagement across digital and alternative channels.
How are those efforts resonating with consumers? And how are expanding e-commerce options impacting brick-and-mortar beauty visits? We dove into the data to find out.
Ulta Beauty’s has been faring well in recent months, with positive same-store and overall traffic increasing year-over-year (YoY) in nine of the last twelve months.
That consistency may reflect the impact of Ulta Beauty Unleashed – the company’s strategy aimed at deepening customer engagement and refining in-store execution, launched just over a year ago. The initiative has helped fuel continued growth in Ulta’s loyalty ecosystem, which now boasts more than 46 million members, while also creating a flywheel effect in which greater customer participation supports Ulta’s personalization capabilities that, in turn, help drive further engagement.
Ulta’s strong loyalty infrastructure also plays a role in the retailer’s ability to offer an innovative product assortment through brand-building – another pillar of the Ulta Beauty Unleashed strategy. This approach helps Ulta sustain a sense of discovery and newness within the store environment, driving consistent traffic while also creating opportunities for outsized visit spikes. This dynamic was evident in February 2026, when the launch of the Rare Beauty partnership drove record-breaking demand and contributed to a 10.3% increase in YoY visits to the chain – marking Ulta’s largest monthly traffic gain of the past twelve months.
Bath & Body Works, on the other hand, has been more reliant on promotion-driven peaks – something its leadership has been candid about since announcing its new Consumer First Formula.
Double-digit year-over-year (YoY) visit growth in July and October 2025 as well as in January 2026 aligned with periods of heightened promotional activity – including the retailer’s Semi-Annual Sales. But traffic moderated between those peaks, highlighting what management believes to be an overreliance on promotional cadences.
As Bath & Body Works CEO Daniel Heaf put it “transformations of this scale take time.” The foot traffic data suggests that the brand may still be facing near-term headwinds, with monthly YoY traffic trending down since February 2026 – although the dips may also indicate that a portion of in-store demand is shifting to e-commerce and alternate sales channels.
Bath & Body Works recently opened a new Amazon storefront, refreshed its mobile app, and lowered its free-shipping threshold, moves aimed at capturing digital demand and promoting discovery – particularly among younger consumers. And the company’s launch into campus bookstores reflects a similar effort to leverage alternative distribution channels to extend the brand’s reach and build relevance with younger consumers. These digital and alternative retail investments are designed to build longer-term engagement that could eventually translate into sustained growth for the chain.
But even as Ulta and Bath & Body Works lean into digital and alternative channels, the brands are continuing to invest in their owned stores – and analyzing shifts in visit length for the two chains offers further insight into the role stores continue to play within each brand’s broader transformation strategy.
A Q1 comparison reveals that since 2023, more than 37% of visits to Ulta lasted over 30 minutes. The retailer has been rolling out an updated store format since 2022 – designed to promote exploration with a more intuitive category-based layout. And investments in the store experience have continued with ongoing Beauty Bar activations and events, K-Beauty World shop-in-shops, and the recent Wellness by Ulta Beauty pilot, all likely contributors to a more discovery-driven customer experience and longer dwell times.
Bath & Body Works, while seeing a smaller share of visits exceeding the 30-minute mark than Ulta, posted a significant increase in visits of that length between Q1 2025 (32.5%) and Q1 2026 (34.1%). This indicates that the Gingham+ redesign introduced in 2025 – featuring scent bars, dedicated product testing zones, and a more immersive merchandising approach – may be influencing the amount of time shoppers spend in-store.
While digital and nontraditional retail channels have become critical components of modern beauty retail strategy, the in-store experience remains a key driver of customer engagement – whether a retailer is navigating a period of transformation or working to sustain long-term growth.
The data suggests that beauty retail’s next phase of growth will depend on more than category resilience alone. Both Bath & Body Works and Ulta Beauty are investing in new ways to engage consumers – from loyalty ecosystems and digital expansion to immersive store experiences designed to encourage discovery. And while their strategies differ, both underscore a broader industry reality: even in an increasingly omnichannel environment, physical stores remain central to how beauty brands build engagement and long-term consumer loyalty.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
January and February saw a modest year-over-year (YoY) uptick in visits to the DICK’s Sporting Goods banner, while March traffic softened. However, March 2026’s visit decline appears at least partially calendar-driven – the month had one fewer Saturday than the previous year – and traffic rebounded to near-flat levels in April.
Gap entered 2026 with momentum, but foot traffic softened in both March and April – perhaps reflecting the calendar shift as well as broader consumer caution and its impact on discretionary spending. Still, the traffic slowdown may be a temporary setback. Gap continues to expand into apparel-adjacent retail categories such as beauty and accessories – with new product launches in the months ahead that could help reinvigorate visits.
Meanwhile, lululemon’s North American business continues to face headwinds, as domestic performance lags behind stronger international results. Yet, the company – still searching for a new CEO – is guiding for a turnaround in the second half of 2026. Planned initiatives include new product introductions, reduced reliance on markdowns, and ongoing store expansion. Whether visit trends begin to reflect that anticipated recovery will be closely watched as the year unfolds.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
1. Appetite for offline retail & dining is stronger than ever. Both retail and dining visits were higher in H1 2025 than they were pre-pandemic.
2. Consumers are willing to go the extra mile for the perfect product or brand. The era of one-stop-shops may be waning, as many consumers now prefer to visit multiple chains or stores to score the perfect product match for every item on their shopping list.
3. Value – and value perception – gives chains a clear advantage. Value-oriented retail and dining segments have seen their visits skyrocket since the pandemic.
4. Consumer behavior has bifurcated toward budget and premium options. This trend is driving strength at the ends of the spectrum while putting pressure on many middle-market players.
5. The out-of-home entertainment landscape has been fundamentally altered. Eatertainment and museums have stabilized at a different set point than pre-COVID, while movie theater traffic trends are now characterized by box-office-driven volatility.
6. Hybrid work permanently reshaped office utilization. Visits to office buildings nationwide are still 33.3% below 2019 levels, despite RTO efforts.
The first half of 2025 marked five years since the onset of the pandemic – an event that continues to impact retail, dining, entertainment, and office visitation trends today.
This report analyzes visitation patterns in the first half of 2025 compared to H1 2019 and H1 2024 to identify some of the lasting shifts in consumer behavior over the past five years. What is driving consumers to stores and dining venues? Which categories are stabilizing at a higher visit point? Where have the traffic declines stalled? And which segments are still in flux? Read the report to find out.
In the first half of 2025, visits to both the retail and dining segments were consistently higher than they were in 2019. In both the dining and the retail space, the increases compared to pre-COVID were probably driven by significant expansions from major players, including Costco, Chick-fil-A, Raising Cane's, and Dutch Bros, which offset the numerous retail and dining closures of recent years.
The overall increase in visits indicates that, despite the ubiquity of online marketplaces and delivery services, consumer appetite for offline retail and dining remains strong – whether to browse in store, eat on-premises, collect a BOPIS order, or pick up takeaway.
A closer look at the chart above also reveals that, while both retail and dining visits have exceeded pre-pandemic levels, retail visit growth has slightly outpaced the dining traffic increase.
The larger volume of retail visits could be due to a shift in consumer behavior – from favoring convenience to prioritizing the perfect product match and exhibiting a willingness to visit multiple chains to benefit from each store's signature offering. Indeed, zooming into the superstore and grocery sector shows an increase in cross-shopping since COVID, with a larger share of visitors to major grocery chains regularly visiting superstores and wholesale clubs. It seems, then, that many consumers are no longer looking for a one-stop-shop where they can buy everything at once. Instead, shoppers may be heading to the grocery stores for some things, the dollar store for other items, and the wholesale club for a third set of products.
This trend also explains the success of limited assortment grocers in recent years – shoppers are willing to visit these stores to pick up their favorite snack or a particularly cheap store-branded basic, knowing that this will be just one of several stops on their grocery run.
Diving into the traffic data by retail category reveals that much of the growth in retail visits since COVID can be attributed to the surge in visits to value-oriented categories, such as discount & dollar stores, value grocery stores, and off-price apparel. This period has been defined by an endless array of economic obstacles like inflation, recession concerns, gas price spikes, and tariffs that all trigger an orientation to value. The shift also speaks to an ability of these categories to capitalize on swings – consumers who visited value-oriented retailers to cut costs in the short term likely continued visiting those chains even after their economic situation stabilized.
Some of the visit increases are due to the aggressive expansion strategies of leaders in those categories – including Dollar General and Dollar Tree, Aldi, and all the off-price leaders. But the dramatic increase in traffic – around 30% for all three categories since H1 2019 – also highlights the strong appetite for value-oriented offerings among today's consumers. And zooming into YoY trends shows that the visit growth is still ongoing, indicating that the demand for value has not yet reached a ceiling.
While affordable pricing has clearly driven success for value retailers, offering low prices isn't a guaranteed path to growth. Although traffic to beauty and wellness chains remains significantly higher than in 2019, this growth has now plateaued – even top performers like Ulta saw slight YoY declines following their post-pandemic surge – despite the relatively affordable price points found at these chains.
Some of the beauty visit declines likely stems from consumers cutting discretionary spending – but off-price apparel's ongoing success in the same non-essential category suggests budget constraints aren't the full story. Instead, the plateauing of beauty and drugstore visits while off-price apparel visits boom may be due to the difference in value perception: Off-price retailers are inherently associated with savings, while drugstores and beauty retailers, despite carrying affordable items, lack that same value-driven brand positioning. This may suggest that in today's market, perceived value matters as much as actual affordability.
Another indicator of the importance of value perception is the decline in visits to chains selling bigger-ticket items – both home furnishing chains and electronic stores saw double-digit drops in traffic since H1 2019.
And looking at YoY trends shows that visits here have stabilized – like in the beauty and drugstore categories – suggesting that these sectors have reached a new baseline that reflects permanently shifted consumer priorities around discretionary spending.
A major post-pandemic consumer trend has been the bifurcation of consumer spending – with high-end chains and discount retailers thriving while the middle falls behind. This trend is particularly evident in the apparel space – although off-price visits have taken off since 2019 (as illustrated in the earlier graph) overall apparel traffic declined dramatically – while luxury apparel traffic is 7.6% higher than in 2019.
Dining traffic trends also illustrate this shift: Categories that typically offer lower price points such as QSR, fast casual, and coffee have expanded significantly since 2019, as has the upscale & fine dining segment. But casual dining – which includes classic full-service chains such as Red Lobster, Applebee's, and TGI Fridays – has seen its footprint shrink in recent years as consumers trade down to lower-priced options or visit higher-end venues for special occasions.
Chili's has been a major exception to the casual dining downturn, largely driven by the chain's success in cementing its value-perception among consumers – suggesting that casual dining chains can still shine in the current climate by positioning themselves as leaders in value.
Consumers' current value orientation seems to be having an impact beyond the retail and dining space: When budgets are tight, spending money in one place means having less money to spend in another – and recent data suggests that the consumer resilience in retail and dining may be coming at the expense of travel – or perhaps experiences more generally.
While airport visits from domestic travelers were up compared to pre-COVID, diving into the data reveals that the growth is mostly driven by frequent travelers visiting airports two or more times in a month. Meanwhile, the number of more casual travelers – those visiting airports no more than once a month – is lower than it was in 2019.
This may suggest that – despite consumers' self-reported preferences for "memorable, shareable moments" – at least some Americans are actually de-prioritizing experiences in the first half of 2025, and choosing instead to spend their budgets in retail and dining venues.
The out of home entertainment landscape has also undergone a significant change since COVID – and the sector seems to have settled into a new equilibrium, though for part of the sector, the equilibrium is marked by consistent volatility.
Eatertainment chains – led by significant expansions from venues like Top Golf – saw a 5.5% visit increase compared to pre-pandemic levels, though YoY growth remained modest at 1.1%. On the other hand, H1 2025 museum traffic fell 10.9% below 2019 levels with flat YoY performance (+0.2%). The minimal year-over-year changes in both categories suggest that these entertainment segments have found their new post-COVID equilibrium.
The rise of eatertainment alongside the drop in museum visits may also reflect the intense focus on value for today's consumers. Museums in 2025 offer essentially the same value proposition that they offered in 2019 – and for some, that value proposition may no longer justify the entrance fee. But eatertainment has gained popularity in recent years as a format that offers consumers more bang for their buck relative to stand-alone dining or entertainment venues – which makes it the perfect candidate for success in today's value-driven consumer landscape.
But movie theaters traffic trends are still evolving – even accounting for venue closures, visits in H1 2025 were well below H1 2019 levels. But compared to 2024, movie traffic was also up – buoyed by the release of several blockbusters that drove audiences back to cinemas in the first half of 2025. So while the segment is still far from its pre-COVID baseline, movie theaters retain the potential for significant traffic spikes when compelling content drives consumer demand.
The blockbuster-driven YoY increase can perhaps also be linked to consumers' spending caution. With budgets tight, movie-goers may want to make sure that they're spending time and money on films they are sure to enjoy – taking fewer risks than they did in 2019, when movie tickets and concession prices were lower and consumers were less budget-conscious.
H1 2025 also brought some moderate good news on the return to office (RTO) front, with YoY visits nationwide up 2.1% and most offices seeing YoY office visit increases – perhaps due to the plethora of RTO mandates from major companies. But comparing office visitation levels to pre pandemic levels highlights the way left to go – nationwide visits were 33.3% below H1 2019 levels in H1 2025, with even RTO leaders New York and Miami still seeing 11.9% and 16.1% visit gaps, respectively.
So while the data suggests that the office recovery story is still being written – with visits inching up slowly – the substantial gap from pre-pandemic levels suggests that remote and hybrid work models have fundamentally reshaped office utilization patterns.
Five years post-pandemic, consumer behavior across the retail, dining, entertainment, and office spaces has crystallized into distinct new patterns.
Traffic to retail and dining venues now surpasses pre-pandemic levels, driven primarily by value-focused segments. But retail and dining segments that cater to higher income consumers –such as luxury apparel and fine dining – have also stabilized at a higher level, highlighting the bifurcation of consumer behavior that has emerged in recent years. Entertainment formats show more variability – while eatertainment traffic has settled above and museums below 2019 levels, and movie theaters still seeking stability. Office spaces remain the laggard, with visits well below pre-pandemic levels despite corporate return-to-office initiatives showing modest impact.
It seems, then, that the new consumer landscape rewards businesses that can clearly articulate their value proposition to attract consumers' increasingly selective spending and time allocation – or offer a premium product or experience catering to higher-income audiences.
