.svg)
Q1 2026 is in the books and there were some key elements that popped when we looked at the data.
While we’re all about location data, few things get us as excited as the glorious combination of behavioral location analytics with sentiment data. So, we ran a poll of retail industry professionals with our friends at ShopTalk, and the results were fascinating. But two answers really stood out.
First, only 30% of respondents felt that ‘inspiration’ was a key element of the store experience. This was shockingly low considering how powerful the ‘discover mode’ aspect of the shopper journey can be. It also speaks to the massive potential in better maximizing this component to drive product engagement, sales and retail media opportunities.
Second, while 44% of respondents expected Agentic AI to boost digital commerce and 22% expected to simply fragment digital’s current share, 34% felt it would be a tide that lifted all boats. This is hugely positive in that it indicates a growing recognition that the benefit of digitally native innovations is not limited to the digital environment.
In January, all mall formats in the Placer.ai Mall Index saw a boost. A nice start for malls, but maybe just a fluke?
The February data came in and showed that all mall formats once again saw a boost. This gives more evidence to the going hypothesis that top tier malls are in the midst of a significant and ongoing renaissance. While this clearly has huge ramifications for site selection and placemaking at these centers, it also speaks to an ongoing potential for a significant swath of lower tier malls to drive their own revolutions with a greater focus on driving complementary offerings and local audiences.
I’m hardly unbiased when it comes to Target, but since the week beginning January 26th through the week beginning March 23rd – the retailer has seen nothing but visit growth, with visits averaging a 7.8% year over year lift during that period.
Does this mean that every problem is solved? No. But it does show that while there were clearly challenges faced in recent years, there is a unique potential for Target because of their market positioning and brand. We called them out as one of the clear candidates for a major recovery in 2026 and they are showing early signs that validate that call.
In September of 2024 Costco raised the cost of membership. Did this deter potential members and limit visits? Nope.
Instead, Costco has seen continued growth and an expansion of its audience with new groups becoming a bigger part of its overall mix. The result is the latest sign that Costco’s growth could actually have many more levels to hit with just the expansion of its audience.
In a guest post for The Anchor dunnhumby’s Erich Kahner broke down the grocery segment and powerful positioning that two groups had. Savings-First grocers like Aldi or Lidl were well positioned to grab visits with a clear value offering that emphasized price, an especially powerful tool in a period of seemingly endless economic volatility. On the other hand, Quality-First grocers like Sprouts were leading with an emphasis, not on price, but on exceptional product quality. And while these two concepts may seem like obvious draws for consumers, the ability to so effectively center an offering around a core promise gives these brands a unique market position and the ability to effectively deliver on and prioritize this position.
But there is a third group – the unicorns. In this case, Kahner focused on brands like Trader Joe’s and H-E-B and their ability to leverage authenticity, ideal product mix and a powerful understanding of their audience to deliver an exceptional and targeted experience. And this is critical because it represents the latest example that the antidote to bifurcation – the push to exceptional quality and exceptional value across categories – is authenticity. The ability to create an experience and product offering that stands out and truly resonates for a core audience.
Yes, there are continued improvements in office visitation led largely by more dramatic year over year lifts in areas that took longer to recover like San Francisco. However, there is an overall sense that the current state of affairs in office is generally stable. And this is great for office real estate.
Hybrid work has absolutely changed behavior, but it didn’t stop professionals from coming to the office – or many businesses from demanding this return. But there are clear indications of what drives more office visits. Proximity, industry, and family status all present clear signals of how often an audience will visit the office during a specific period. The positive here is that it shows a clear rationale for why people don’t visit, and it is not because they don’t value the office.
The takeaway? Expect an office-centric version of hybrid work to continue setting the overall pace.
For more data-driven retail & CRE insights, visit placer.ai/anchor
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
Club Pilates’ journey since its acquisition by Xponential Fitness represents a rare and large-scale success in the boutique fitness space. Since 2019, the chain has increased its monthly visits by over 200%, largely by expanding aggressively and saturating existing markets.
But same-store data suggests that the brand, having built a dense and expansive studio footprint, may be hitting its first ceiling, and expansion alone may not be enough to sustain the momentum of the past couple of years. Instead, the chain will likely need to combine new location openings with unlocking the latent value within its existing network of 1,400+ studios – growing membership, driving more engagement, improving utilization, and deepening customer relationships.
To that end, Xponential is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy aimed at boosting unit-level economics, including improving member acquisition and investing in digital upgrades to enhance conversion and retention. The company is also testing pricing and packaging strategies alongside studio refreshes and new class formats to increase engagement and utilization with the goal of improving profitability across the existing studio base.
But even as Xponential Fitness works to improve performance at existing locations, expansion – which has been Club Pilates’ primary growth engine to date – will remain an important part of the strategy, with the company aiming to open locations in both "new and existing geographies."
AI-powered location analytics reveal that most Club Pilates visits come from local clients, a trend which has remained remarkably consistent throughout the chain's aggressive expansion. In 2025, around 70% of visits came from patrons travelling less than five miles to reach the studio and more than 85% originated within a 10-mile radius – underscoring the highly local nature of the business.
Because most customers come from nearby, opening additional studios allows the brand to reach new local audiences rather than relying on a single location to cover an entire market. When spaced appropriately, this can grow total demand with limited overlap, while marketing across the market helps reduce the cost of acquiring each new member. As a result, even if same-store visits begin to level off, the brand can continue to grow by expanding its footprint – capturing new pockets of local demand that existing studios do not fully serve.
As Club Pilates enters its next phase, growth will depend both on opening new studios and on optimizing its existing network – improving utilization, deepening engagement, and refining pricing. With strong local density and a loyal, routine-driven customer base, the brand is well positioned to increase member lifetime value through digital enhancements and more personalized experiences. If executed well, this shift from pure expansion to expansion and optimization could elevate Club Pilates from a fast-growing chain to a true fitness super-brand.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai/anchor
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Traffic to malls increased in Q1 2026 across all three formats analyzed – indoor malls, open-air shopping centers, and outlet malls – largely thanks to strong performances in the first two months of the year.
But March 2026 visits were more subdued, with indoor malls seeing a slight year-over-year (YoY) decline of 1.1% and outlet malls experiencing a steeper drop of 4.1% compared to March 2025. Open-air shopping centers were the only format to maintain growth, though their 3.2% YoY visit increase – though solid – was still more modest than the stronger gains seen by the format in January and February.
So what happened in March? Why did open-air shopping centers fare better than their peers? And how can malls return to growth across formats going into Q2?
Some of the dip may be due to calendar differences – March 2026 had one less Saturday than March 2025 – and since Saturdays are typically malls' busiest day, the shift likely impacted overall visits for the month.
But a closer look at daypart trends can shed additional light on both the strength earlier in the quarter and the slowdown in March. In Q1 overall, growth was concentrated at the edges of the day: traffic before 11 AM and after 8 PM saw the strongest gains, with additional support from the early evening (5 PM–8 PM). In contrast, midday traffic – the largest share of visits – was relatively flat for open-air centers and slightly negative for indoor and outlet malls. Still, robust edge growth was sufficient to offset this softness and drive overall quarterly gains.
But in March, growth in morning and evening hours slowed – particularly for indoor and outlet malls – while midday declines became more pronounced. This meant that the off-peak gains were no longer sufficient to offset weakness in the core of the day – leading to the YoY traffic declines for indoor and outlet malls.
But even as traffic to indoor and outlet malls declined, open-air shopping centers maintained growth momentum due to two key advantages. First, the format maintained most of its morning and evening gains, and its midday traffic trends ease from growth to stability rather than from stability to decline like for indoor and outlet malls – so the growth at the edges was still enough to offset the flat visits midday. Second, open-air centers are less dependent on midday visits, with around 77% of visits to open-air shopping centers occurring between 11 AM and 8 PM, compared to 83% to 84% for indoor and outlet malls. This means that open-air shopping centers are more resilient to dips in midday visits than the other two formats.
The softness seen in March at indoor and outlet malls does not negate the strong start to 2026, which drove overall YoY visit growth in Q1. However, it does highlight what will be required to sustain that momentum going forward.
The data points to two paths to more durable growth: reigniting demand during peak midday hours through programming, tenant mix, and convenience-driven visits or reducing reliance on that window by expanding traffic in the morning and evening. Open-air shopping centers provide a model for the latter, with a more balanced daypart mix – likely driven by their dining, entertainment, and extended-hour experiences – that has helped cushion midday softness. For indoor and outlet malls, long-term stability will likely depend on a combination of both – strengthening midday performance while also building consistent off-peak demand.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Lands’ End is entering a new chapter. The recently announced joint venture with WHP Global signals a strategic shift for the heritage apparel brand – one that could expand its reach through licensing, brand partnerships, and new distribution channels.
Under the agreement, WHP assumes control of Lands’ End’s licensing business, while the brand retains its retail operations. And while Lands’ End has long been associated with its catalog and e-commerce dominance, AI-powered location analytics suggest that its physical store fleet maintains an important role.
As an apparel brand with a history of catalogue retail, Lands’ End continues to generate the majority of its sales online. Yet its physical stores remain a critical component of the business – and an increasingly bright spot.
Lands’ End outpaced the broader apparel category in year-over-year visit growth in three of the past four quarters, with the only decline in Q1 2026 likely tied to store closures as part of ongoing optimization. At the same time, visits per location have remained consistently positive and above category benchmarks, highlighting the strength of the remaining fleet. This suggests that brick-and-mortar continues to be an effective driver of growth as the brand moves into its next phase.
Further evidence of the fleet’s strength – and its long-term potential – can be seen in the audience it attracts.
AI-powered audience segmentation indicates that in 2025, the brand captured an outsized share of visits from Ultra Wealthy Families, as well as from singles – the combined one-person and non-family households – segments, relative to the traditional apparel category.
The significant share of affluent families points to a customer base with both spending power and relative insulation from macroeconomic pressure. Meanwhile, strength among singles – a cohort that skews younger and includes a meaningful share of Gen Z consumers – highlights traction with a target demographic critical to long-term relevance.
The prevalence of both these audiences in Land's End's trade area suggests a dual advantage. Strong engagement from affluent households may help support near-term stability, while resonance with younger shoppers could indicate a developing pipeline for sustained growth in the years ahead.
The performance of Lands’ End’s store fleet, coupled with the composition of its audience, suggests a brand with momentum in physical retail – a notable advantage as it retains control of that side of the business. A productive fleet and a resilient, evolving customer base provide stability today, and could offer a strong foundation for broader brand expansion in the years ahead.
How will Lands’ End leverage this momentum as it enters its next phase? Visit Placer.ai/anchor to find out.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Lane Bryant faced significant challenges during the pandemic and has continued to gradually shrink its store fleet in the years since. And now, with nearly one in eight U.S. consumers using GLP-1 medications, plus-size apparel demand is beginning to shift in meaningful ways – introducing a new layer of complexity for the legacy retailer.
How is Lane Bryant navigating these challenges, and what does its customer base reveal about its ability to adapt?
In July 2020, Lane Bryant’s parent company filed for bankruptcy and closed more than 150 stores. But following its acquisition later that year by Sycamore Partners, the brand began to regain its footing – and recent location analytics suggest those stabilization efforts are taking hold.
While the reduced footprint has, unsurprisingly, led to lower overall traffic, average annual visits per location remain above 2019 levels, suggesting that demand has been successfully consolidated into existing locations. Average visits per location also held steady between 2024 and 2025, even as the company continued to quietly trim its unit count. The result is a smaller but more productive fleet, with steady activity supported by fewer, better-aligned stores.
Still, as Lane Bryant continues to stabilize, the question becomes how it can further increase store-level productivity. And analyzing the demographic profile of its trade areas offers insight into both its core strengths and where the next phase of optimization may emerge.
One of the brand’s clearest advantages is Lane Bryant’s strong reach among family-oriented segments, which are overrepresented in its captured market – the areas within its trade area generating the highest share of visits – compared both to its overall trade area (its potential market) and to the national baseline. These segments, including parents of young children and households with teenagers at home, tend to skew younger than peak GLP-1 users, potentially offering the chain some near-term insulation from rapid GLP-1-driven disruption. Still, these cohorts are also seeing growing adoption – and as usage expands within this demographic, Lane Bryant will need to increasingly support customers through evolving size needs rather than rely on demand tied to a stable size identity.
At the same time, the data points to opportunities to expand reach across other segments. Among older households, Lane Bryant’s captured audience aligns with its trade area but falls below the nationwide average, highlighting potential whitespace that could be unlocked through footprint adjustments or more targeted engagement in markets where this segment is more concentrated.
Among younger “Contemporary Households,” by contrast – a segment that includes singles, non-family households, and married couples without children – the brand under-indexes relative to its trade area while slightly outperforming the national benchmark. This suggests Lane Bryant has geographic access to a larger pool of these consumers but has yet to fully capture their demand, pointing to an opportunity for growth through more targeted marketing and merchandising.
GLP-1 adoption is disrupting traditional plus-size apparel demand, while also creating new opportunities as consumers undergoing weight loss journeys increase spend while moving through sizes. Retailers that can support customers across these transitions with more flexible assortments will be better positioned to capture this shift. And Lane Bryant’s steady operational footing and well-defined core audience provide it with a solid foundation to compete in this next phase of growth.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Oh baby! The competition for ownership of the baby retail space has once again intensified. Target recently announced the debut of its new “Baby Boutique” concept, which launched online on March 15th and is expected to roll out to 200 locations this year. The updated format greatly expands Target’s assortment of brands and baby items, including the debut of beloved and upscale baby brands like Uppababy, Doona, Bugaboo and Stokke, which previously hadn’t been sold at the retailer. Target’s strategy appears to be aimed at courting and retaining new and expectant parents who are looking for a one-stop shopping experience for baby products, whether in hardlines or softlines.
The baby category, in particular, has presented a white space opportunity for retailers across the country since the closure of buybuy Baby in 2023. Since then, Kohl’s launched a shop-in-shop concept with Babies”R”Us and buybuy Baby had a small but unsuccessful relaunch after being sold. That has left consumers with fractured options, including e-commerce only, department stores, mass merchants and local boutiques. Target’s push could propel it into the national leader role for the category, and also help the brand to revitalize itself after a challenging 2025 performance.
Looking at some of the insights behind this new pivot, it’s clear that Target is hoping to capture the attention of shoppers who would have normally shopped at the former buybuy Baby. According to Placer.ai’s foot traffic combined with Personalive consumer segmentation, Target’s shopper profile looks very similar to that of buybuy Baby during its operation. Specifically, the share of visits by Wealthy Suburban Families, Near Urban Diverse Families and Ultra Wealthy Families are all very closely aligned between the two chains, indicating that Target’s strategy could easily entrench itself with today’s consumer.
Despite the battle for national attention, there have also been innovations on a smaller scale in baby products. Babylist, a popular digitally native registry service, opened its first brick and mortar location in Beverly Hills in 2023, bringing the showroom experience to life for shoppers who want to test and learn before committing to baby gear. Baby items, particularly in hardlines like car seats and strollers, tend to be large ticket items, and many parents still want that tactile experience while shopping.
According to Placer’s foot traffic insights, the location has been successful in attracting the right customer base. The store allows shoppers to gain product knowledge and compare brands and models by category, making it easier to plan an online baby registry more effectively. Traffic has grown over the last year to the showroom, and the store's audience over-indexes for Ultra Wealthy Families, which both could drive conversion to the online marketplace.
Another group that has a high share of visits are Sunset Boomers, which would account for potential new grandparents. Grandparents are a vital shopper base for baby retailers, as they have higher levels of disposable income and are often purchasing gifts for others. Target could benefit from the buy-in of this group as it continues its journey into the world of baby-focused retail.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.png)
1) Broad-based growth: All four grocery formats grew year-over-year in Q2 2025, with traditional grocers posting their first rebound since early 2024.
2) Value grocers slow: After leading during the 2022–24 trade-down wave, value grocer growth has decelerated as that shift matures.
3) Fresh formats surge: Now the fastest-growing segment, fueled by affluent shoppers seeking health, wellness, and convenience.
4) Bifurcation widens: Growth concentrated at both the low-income (value) and high-income (fresh) ends, highlighting polarized spending.
5) Shopping missions diverge: Short trips are rising, supporting fresh formats, while traditional grocers retain loyal stock-up customers and value chains capture fill-in trips through private labels.
6) Traditional grocers adapt: H-E-B and Harris Teeter outperformed by tailoring strategies to their core geographies and demographics.Bifurcation of Consumer Spending Help Fresh Format Lead Grocery Growth
Grocery traffic across all four major categories – value grocers, fresh format, traditional grocery, ethnic grocers – was up year over year in Q2 2025 as shoppers continue to engage with a wide range of grocery formats. Traditional grocery posted its first YoY traffic increase since Q1 2024, while ethnic grocers maintained their steady pattern of modest but consistent gains.
Value grocers, which dominated growth through most of 2024 as shoppers prioritized affordability, continued to expand but have now ceded leadership to fresh-format grocers. Rising food costs between 2022 and 2024 drove many consumers to chains like Aldi and Lidl, but much of this “trade-down” movement has already occurred. Although price sensitivity still shapes consumer choices – keeping the value segment on an upward trajectory – its growth momentum has slowed, making it less of a driver for the overall sector.
Fresh-format grocers have now taken the lead, posting the strongest YoY traffic gains of any category in 2025. This segment, anchored by players like Sprouts, appeals to the highest-income households of the four categories, signaling a growing influence of affluent shoppers on the competitive grocery landscape. Despite accounting for just 7.0% of total grocery visits in H1 2025, the segment’s rapid gains point to a broader shift: premium brands emphasizing health and wellness are emerging as the primary engine of growth in the grocery sector.
The fact that value grocers and fresh-format grocers – segments with the lowest and highest median household incomes among their customer bases – are the two categories driving the most growth underscores how the bifurcation of consumer spending is playing out in the grocery space as well. On one end, price-sensitive shoppers continue to seek out affordable options, while on the other, affluent consumers are fueling demand for premium, health-oriented formats. This dual-track growth pattern highlights how widening economic divides are reshaping competitive dynamics in grocery retail.
1) Broad-based growth: All four grocery categories posted YoY traffic gains in Q2 2025.
2) Traditional grocery rebound: First YoY increase since Q1 2024.
3) Ethnic grocers: Continued steady but modest upward trend.
4) Value grocers: Still growing, but slowing after most trade-down activity already occurred (2022–24).
5) Fresh formats: Now the fastest-growing segment, driven by affluent shoppers and interest in health & wellness.
6) Market shift: Premium, health-oriented brands are becoming the new growth driver in grocery.
7) Bifurcation of spending: Growth at both value and fresh-format grocers highlights a polarization in consumer spending patterns that is reshaping grocery competition.
Over the past two years, short grocery trips (under 10 minutes) have grown far more quickly than longer visits. While they still make up less than one-quarter of all U.S. grocery trips, their steady expansion suggests this behavioral shift is here to stay and that its full impact on the industry has yet to be realized.
One format particularly aligned with this trend is the fresh-format grocer, where average dwell times are shorter than in other categories. Yet despite benefiting from the rise of convenience-driven shopping, fresh formats attract the smallest share of loyal visitors (4+ times per month). This indicates they are rarely used for a primary weekly shop. Instead, they capture supplemental trips from consumers looking for specific needs – unique items, high-quality produce, or a prepared meal – who also value the ability to get in and out quickly.
In contrast, leading traditional grocers like H-E-B and Kroger thrive on a classic supermarket model built around frequent, comprehensive shopping trips. With the highest share of loyal visitors (38.5% and 27.6% respectively), they command a reliable customer base coming for full grocery runs and taking time to fill their carts.
Value grocers follow a different, but equally effective playbook. Positioned as primary “fill-in” stores, they sit between traditional and fresh formats in both dwell time and visit frequency. Many rely on limited assortments and a heavy emphasis on private-label goods, encouraging shoppers to build larger baskets around basics and store brands. Still, the data suggests consumers reserve their main grocery hauls for traditional supermarkets with broader selections, while using value grocers to stretch budgets and stock up on essentials.
1) Short trips surge: Under-10-minute visits have grown fastest, signaling a lasting behavioral shift.
2) Fresh formats thrive on convenience: Small footprints, prepared foods, and specialty items align with quick missions.
3) Traditional grocers retain loyalty: Traditional grocers such as H-E-B and Kroger attract frequent, comprehensive stock-up trips.
4) Value grocers fill the middle ground: Limited assortments and private label drive larger baskets, but main hauls remain with traditional supermarkets.
5) Fresh formats as supplements: Fresh format grocers such as The Fresh Market capture quick, specialized trips rather than weekly shops.
While broad market trends favor value and fresh-format grocers, certain traditional grocers are proving that a tailored strategy is a powerful tool for success. In the first half of 2025, H-E-B and Harris Teeter significantly outperformed their category's modest 0.6% average year-over-year visit growth, posting impressive gains of 5.6% and 2.8%, respectively. Their success demonstrates that even in a polarizing environment, there is ample room for traditional formats to thrive by deeply understanding and catering to a specific target audience.
These two brands achieve their success with distinctly different, yet equally focused, demographic strategies. H-E-B, a Texas powerhouse, leans heavily into major metropolitan areas like Austin and San Antonio. This urban focus is clear, with 32.6% of its visitors coming from urban centers and their peripheries, far above the category average. Conversely, Harris Teeter has cultivated a strong following in suburban and satellite cities in the South Atlantic region, drawing a massive 78.3% of its traffic from these areas. This deliberate targeting shows that knowing your customer's geography and lifestyle remains a winning formula for growth.
1) Traditional grocers can still be competitive: H-E-B (+5.6% YoY) and Harris Teeter (+2.8% YoY) outpaced the category average of +0.6% in H1 2025.
2) H-E-B’s strategy: Strong urban focus, with 32.6% of traffic from major metro areas like Austin and San Antonio.
3) Harris Teeter’s strategy: Suburban and satellite city focus, with 78.3% of traffic from South Atlantic suburbs.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
