.svg)
Consumers continue to prioritize health and wellness, putting the fitness space in a strong position even as economic headwinds and value-seeking shape discretionary spending. With 2026 now underway – and the industry’s peak sign-up season in motion – we took a closer look at Planet Fitness, one of the category’s largest players, alongside broader fitness trends to put our finger on the pulse of fitness in 2026.
Through most of 2025, Planet Fitness – and the fitness category as a whole – maintained YoY monthly visit growth. February 2025 marked the lone dip in visits for both Planet Fitness and the broader category, likely driven by inclement weather that temporarily kept some consumers out of gyms.
And Planet Fitness’ growth outpaced the wider category nearly every month, with the chain's momentum likely reflecting continued expansion – part of its multi-year growth strategy. Planet Fitness’ average visits per location were also up YoY – aligned with overall category levels – suggesting new gyms are meeting incremental demand rather than redistributing existing traffic.
In January 2026, Planet Fitness continued to experience visit growth, perhaps as New Year’s resolution-driven sign-ups helped lift traffic. Combined with the chain’s ongoing unit expansion, this dynamic could support continued gains as the brand moves further into 2026.
Planet Fitness’ recent gains may also reflect a broader shift within the fitness landscape toward low-priced membership models.
The chart below shows that since at least the start of 2024, visits to budget-friendly gym chains (monthly fees under $30) such as Planet Fitness have consistently outpaced those to mid-tier ($30-$60) and premium competitors ($60+).
But the divergence became more pronounced beginning in early 2025, when traffic growth of premium fitness chains fell off sharply while low-priced gyms continued to see visits accelerate. In a retail environment defined by heightened price sensitivity and value-seeking, lower-cost memberships appear to be resonating with consumers looking to manage discretionary spending while higher-cost concepts face mounting pressure.
Moreover, once a gym membership is paid for, price-conscious consumers could be leaning more heavily into fitness visits as a way to spend time outside the home without opening their wallets – especially as other “going out” activities have become more expensive.
As the fitness industry moves through the early months of 2026, one of the most telling indicators to watch is visitor frequency. During the peak sign-up season, this metric offers an early read on member engagement – and on whether new joiners are building habits that support longer-term retention.
In January 2026, visitor frequency to Planet Fitness held steady, even as several other analyzed gym chains saw slight declines. The dip elsewhere may be partly attributable to Storm Fern, which likely disrupted routines and temporarily curtailed gym visits across affected regions. Against that backdrop, Planet Fitness’ stable frequency stands out as a relative bright spot.
Still, with resolution-driven sign-ups typically extending through much of Q1, it may be too early to draw firm conclusions about full-year performance. As weather-related effects fade and new members settle into routines, frequency trends over the coming months should offer clearer insight into how the category – and Planet Fitness in particular – is positioned for the rest of 2026.
Planet Fitness’ ability to grow visits, sustain per-location demand, and hold visitor frequency steady early in 2026 suggests the brand is benefiting from both internal strategy and favorable category-level tailwinds. While it remains early in the year, the underlying trends indicate that low-cost fitness models, and Planet Fitness in particular, are well-positioned as consumers prioritize cost-effective ways to stay active.
Which gyms will grow in 2026? Visit Placer.ai/anchor to find out.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Super Bowl LX kicked off on Sunday, February 8th at Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, but celebrations across the Bay Area – from fan festivals and concerts to immersive cultural activations – began well before game day.
An AI-powered analysis of two marquee Super Bowl week events – the Ferry Building Projection Show and Chris Stapleton’s concert at the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium – highlights the role pre-game attractions played in extending the championship into a multi-day driver of regional foot traffic.
Between February 5th and 7th – the three nights leading up to the Super Bowl – San Francisco’s iconic Ferry Building became the canvas for a large-scale projection show celebrating 60 years of Super Bowl history. Comparing evening visits during the installation to the nightly average since January 1st, 2025 highlights the magnitude of the crowds drawn downtown for the spectacle.
The Ferry Building is no stranger to major surges in visitation tied to visual events. On July 4th, 2025, visits to the area were 217.5% above the daily average as fireworks lit up the Bay, while New Year’s Eve drove an even larger spike of 336.9%. Other recent activations – including a drone light show on October 8th and the multi-day “Let’s Glow SF” installation from December 5th to 14th – also generated noticeable visit increases.
But, the pre-Super Bowl Projection Show stood apart. Evening visits to the Ferry Building spiked by 141.6% on the first night of the installation and by 265.7% on the second. On the eve of the Super Bowl, February 7th, visits surged 479.1% above the nightly average, surpassing every other evening visit peak observed over the previous twelve months. This shows that the event was not only visually compelling, but also exceptionally effective at drawing crowds into the city core during Super Bowl week.
While the Ferry Building Projection Show was a major draw in its own right, many attendees treated it as just one stop on a broader evening itinerary.
Location intelligence shows that 18.2% of visitors to the projection show also made an evening visit to Moscone Center, home of the Super Bowl LX Experience between February 3rd and 7th. Other popular destinations included Pier 39, Ghirardelli Square, and the Fillmore Shopping District – all well-established tourist and retail corridors.
Regional indoor shopping centers also benefited from an influx of visitors. Serramonte Center and Stonestown Galleria ranked among the more common evening stops for projection show attendees, a pattern that could suggest travelers sought warm, indoor environments for dining and shopping after spending time along the waterfront.
Taken together, the data indicates that Super Bowl-themed activations drove visit spikes while generating spillover benefits for a diverse mix of retail, dining, and entertainment destinations across the Bay Area.
Among Super Bowl week’s most anticipated and in-demand ticketed events was Chris Stapleton’s concert at the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium on February 7th.
With limited ticket availability and a premium price-tag, the concert drew a notably affluent audience. On the day of the show, households classified as “Ultra Wealthy Families” accounted for 45.5% of the venue’s captured market, compared to 23.5% across the prior twelve months. Similarly, households earning more than $175K represented 46.5% of the venue’s captured market on concert day, well above the 34.9% average observed over the previous year. These shifts demonstrate the robust demand for exclusive Super Bowl week experiences among higher-income music fans.
But affluence alone only tells part of the story. Using location intelligence to examine visitor journeys offers clearer insight into the concert’s audience – whether it skewed local or was bolstered by visiting Super Bowl guests.
Trade area analysis reveals that 36.6% of visitors to the Bill Graham Civic Auditorium on the day of the show traveled between 10 and 30 miles – a higher share than usual for the venue, indicating stronger representation from the extended Bay Area.
At the same time, the event also drew a meaningful influx of long-distance travelers. Visitors coming from more than 250 miles away accounted for 12.9% of concertgoers on February 7th, up from 8.0% over the previous twelve months. This increase suggests that many Super Bowl tourists incorporated the high-profile live show into their itineraries, reinforcing the role of major concerts as drivers of valuable traffic during destination sporting events.
For civic leaders, major activations like these highlight how strategic programming can amplify the regional impact of tentpole sporting events – generating surges in visitation and meaningful spillover to retail corridors, entertainment districts, and shopping centers.
For more data-driven civic insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Wingstop closed out Q4 2025 with soft same-store traffic but a clearly defined strategic trajectory. While same-store visits remained under pressure, performance in Dallas – the brand’s most mature market – suggests that improvements in operational efficiency could play a central role in unlocking Wingstop’s next phase of growth.
Wingstop continued to expand its physical footprint in Q4 2025, driving total chain-wide traffic up 1.0% year over year (YoY) for the quarter and 4.5% for 2025 as a whole. At the same time, same-store traffic remained soft, extending a pattern that persisted throughout the second half of the year.
Some of that pressure reflects a challenging baseline comparison. Wingstop is lapping an unusually strong 2024, when domestic same-store sales surged nearly 20% YoY – setting a high bar for subsequent growth. The decline in same-store visits also aligns with the brand’s deliberate shift toward off-premise occasions: By Q3 2025, 72.8% of Wingstop’s sales were digital, underscoring the brand’s evolution into a tech-led, delivery-forward concept.
Still, looking more closely at Wingstop’s Dallas, TX market – home to the majority of its company-owned restaurants – offers a compelling signal for how the brand can reverse recent traffic trends. In 2025 earnings calls, management repeatedly pointed to Dallas as a top performer, attributing its resilience to the early integration of the chain’s AI-powered Smart Kitchen platform.
Piloted in Dallas before its nationwide rollout in late 2025, the AI-powered system is designed to optimize throughput and accuracy to deliver a more consistent pickup experience. And location analytics appear to support management’s view: In Q4 2025, 44.5% of Wingstop visits in the Dallas DMA lasted under ten minutes, compared to 40.8% nationwide.
Comparing YoY performance for shorter and longer visits to Wingstop – both in Dallas and nationwide – further highlights the growing importance of speed of service. In Q4 2025, visits lasting under ten minutes increased YoY on a per-location basis nationwide, with even stronger gains in Dallas, while longer visits continued to lag.
Crucially, although Dallas was not immune to the broader pressures weighing on longer visits, its YoY decline was notably less severe than the national trend. This divergence suggests that, beyond reducing wait times, the faster and more accurate service enabled by the Smart Kitchen platform may be contributing to a stronger overall visitor experience.
Location analytics suggest that operational improvements and faster service are beginning to translate into stronger traffic for Wingstop. And with the chain’s new loyalty platform set to launch nationwide later this year the brand may be poised for renewed same-store momentum.
For more data-driven dining insights, follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
The return to office was put to the test last month as a slew of new RTO mandates took effect – coinciding with the late-January arrival of Winter Storm Fern. With policies pulling in one direction and weather disruptions pulling in the other, how were offices impacted on the ground?
January 2026 delivered a reminder that return-to-office progress is anything but linear – but it is still gaining ground. Despite Winter Storm Fern disrupting travel and commutes across large parts of the country toward the end of the month, office attendance continued its gradual recovery. Visits to the Nationwide Office Index were 38.3% below January 2019 levels, a modest improvement from January 2025, when a Polar Vortex similarly inhibited commutes.
And while total monthly visits came in slightly below January 2024 levels, adjusting for the number of working days reveals a more encouraging picture. On a per-working-day basis, January 2026 was the busiest in-office January since COVID – no small feat in a month when ice and snow covered large swaths of the contiguous U.S. for several days. The fact that offices were generally fuller than in prior Januaries, even amid widespread disruptions, points to a robust underlying RTO trajectory.
Fern’s influence becomes clearer, however, when zooming in on individual metros. Cities that avoided the worst of the storm generally posted stronger year-over-year (YoY) gains, while heavily impacted markets saw flatter or negative results. Miami, for example, continued to record YoY increases, while New York City – hit hard by Fern – saw visits edge down 0.3% YoY.
Last year’s winter conditions also played a meaningful role in YoY comparisons. Both Dallas and Houston were affected by Fern this January, though Dallas bore the brunt of the storm, with snow, ice, travel disruptions, and flight cancellations contributing to a 6.7% YoY drop in office visits. Houston, by contrast, experienced more limited disruption in January 2026 and posted a YoY increase – in part because it was lapping the January 2025 Gulf Coast Blizzard, which saw rare snow accumulations effectively shut the city down. In other words, Houston’s biggest weather-related disruption occurred last winter, while Dallas faced a more acute shock this year.
Washington, D.C.’s 3.2% YoY uptick and Atlanta’s 9.1% gain similarly reflect comparisons to January 2025, when both markets were hampered by extreme winter weather. But these rebounds also point to underlying recovery momentum – especially for Atlanta, which, despite being impacted by Fern, ranked third among the analyzed cities for post-pandemic office recovery.
Meanwhile, West Coast markets that were largely spared severe winter conditions posted the strongest year-over-year gains. Los Angeles and San Francisco led the pack, with YoY increases of 15.6% and 10.9%, respectively.
In today’s hybrid workplace, weather disruptions have become an increasingly accepted reason to skip the commute and work from home. And as a result, January – one of the most weather-prone months of the year – has emerged as a softer period for office attendance, regardless of broader RTO momentum.
Still, when adjusting for the number of working days, office visits this January marked a meaningful improvement over last year – further evidence that return-to-office progress continues to move steadily forward.
For more data-driven office recovery analyses, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
The fast casual space has become an increasingly competitive battleground for share-of-stomach as price-sensitive consumers trade down to lower-cost food channels. Against this backdrop, CAVA and sweetgreen offer a timely case study in resilience. Both brands continue to expand their footprints and diversify their audiences while leaning on loyalty programs and menu innovation to sustain growth during a volatile period for the dining sector. Using AI-powered location analytics, we uncover how macroeconomic pressures have shaped foot traffic trends to both chains and explore the strategies helping to keep them on a positive growth trajectory.
CAVA and sweetgreen continue to pursue aggressive expansion strategies, contributing to the overall visit growth of both brands. But while CAVA showed relative stability in both overall visits and same-store performance in H2 2025, sweetgreen experienced softer year-over-year (YoY) visit growth and moderate same-store visit declines in most months – raising the possibility of emerging “bowl fatigue.”
In Q4 2025, CAVA posted 16.6% YoY visit growth, with loyalty program enhancements and a holiday campaign likely helping to sustain visits.
Sweetgreen’s 4.4% visit growth in Q4 2025 was moderate by comparison, although December stood out for delivering positive YoY visits and same-store visits. This boost may have been driven by the value-focused $10 Harvest Bowl promotion alongside continued adoption of the brand’s refreshed loyalty program.
For both chains, revamped loyalty programs and continued expansion may set the stage for growth in the year ahead.
Even as refreshed loyalty programs and expansion act as growth levers, both chains have recently called out a shared headwind – softer engagement among Gen Z and Millennial diners amid sustained financial pressure on younger consumers.
However, AI-powered captured market analysis combined with the Spatial.ai: PersonaLive dataset suggests early signs of renewed momentum. In Q4 2025, both chains saw an increased share of visitors from the “Young Urban Singles” segment – a cohort that skews heavily Gen Z and Millennial – compared to Q4 2024. And sweetgreen saw growth in its “Educated Urbanites” segment – another cohort that skews heavily Gen Z and Millennial, and which makes up a large share of the chain’s captured market. These shifts could indicate that both brands reclaimed some younger traffic toward the end of the year.
At the same time, both brands saw broader audience diversification within their captured markets. Sweetgreen increased its share of “Wealthy Suburban Families”, while CAVA saw gains among “Upper Suburban Diverse Families” and “Near-Urban Diverse Families”. This suggests that growth among older and more financially stable segments is likely helping to offset some of the pullback from younger diners.
And while some of CAVA and sweetgreen’s suburban and near-urban audience gains likely reflect both chains’ continued unit expansion beyond urban cores, the rise in young urban traffic indicates that strategic initiatives are resonating with traditional audiences. Menu innovation and tools that give diners greater control over nutritional inputs – particularly offerings aligned with protein-forward trends – may be helping to re-engage young urban diners.
As consumer budgets remain under pressure, CAVA and sweetgreen illustrate that sustaining momentum in today’s dining landscape requires a deliberate, multi-pronged strategy. Thoughtful real estate decisions can expand a brand’s consumer base while innovation and loyalty programs keep existing audiences engaged.
The broader industry takeaway is clear: brands that deepen relevance across multiple consumer segments may be best positioned to compete for share-of-stomach in the months ahead.
Which restaurant brands will succeed in 2026? Visit Placer.ai/anchor to find out.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Malls started the year on a strong note, with year-over-year traffic increases across all three mall formats. Open-air shopping centers received the largest gains, with visits up 6.2% compared to January 2025. Indoor malls, which outperformed the other formats for much of 2025, also posted solid growth of 4.5% YoY – a notable result given their already strong performance last January. Even outlet malls, which struggled to maintain growth momentum for most of 2025, saw a 3.6% increase in visits – perhaps suggesting that consumers are entering 2026 more willing to return to discretionary shopping destinations after a cautious 2025.
A closer look at the data suggests that a meaningful share of last month’s mall traffic may have been driven by post-holiday retail returns. There is some evidence that return activity was higher this January than in January 2025, and the timing of visits supports this interpretation.
Mall traffic was heavily front-loaded to the first two weeks of the year – consistent with the post-holiday returns window – with visit growth already beginning to moderate during the third week of January. (The more pronounced decline in traffic observed in the final week of the month was likely driven by the impact of Winter Storm Fern, which weighed on visits across all mall formats).
Visit duration patterns further support the idea that increased returns activity drove much of January’s mall traffic surge – the largest gains were concentrated in short visits, with trips lasting 10 minutes or less increasing by double digits across all mall formats.
At the same time, the data also shows year-over-year growth in longer visits, indicating that higher-quality, more engaged mall trips increased in January 2026 as well. So while post-holiday returns clearly played a role in driving January foot traffic, the simultaneous growth in longer trips suggests that shoppers were also spending time browsing or making additional purchases.
As 2026 unfolds, this blend of efficiency and engagement will be a key dynamic to watch: consumers appear increasingly willing to re-enter physical retail spaces, but they remain intentional about how they shop. Mall formats that can seamlessly support quick, frictionless visits while also encouraging extended dwell time may be best positioned to capture both sides of evolving consumer behavior in the year ahead.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
