.svg)
While a state’s share of brick-and-mortar retail visits generally tracks with its share of the U.S. population, the chart below shows that the relationship is not perfectly proportional. Some states, such as Texas and Florida, generate a larger share of retail traffic than their population size alone would suggest, while others, such as California and New York, account for a smaller portion of visits relative to their population base.
Mapping each state’s share of retail visits to its share of the population reveals a clear geographic pattern: Across much of the Sun Belt, retail visits tend to over-index relative to population, while under-indexing is more common along the West Coast and in parts of the Northeast.
Several structural dynamics may help explain this regional divide. Migration into Sun Belt markets has been driven in part by lower costs of living, and once there, households may have more discretionary income relative to high-cost coastal markets – supporting more frequent in-person shopping trips. At the same time, consumer behavior differs across regions: in higher-cost coastal and Northeastern markets, shoppers may be more likely to consolidate trips or shift spending online, contributing to fewer retail visits per capita.
For retailers and CRE professionals, these patterns suggest that a data-driven expansion strategy should account not just for population growth, but for how and where consumers choose to shop across regions.
Sun Belt markets may offer outsized opportunities for physical retail expansion, as higher-than-expected foot traffic signals strong in-person engagement and potential demand for additional brick-and-mortar supply. Conversely, in coastal and Northeastern markets, where visits under-index and e-commerce adoption is higher, success may depend more on experiential retail, premium formats, or omnichannel integration rather than footprint growth alone.
For more data-driven retail and CRE insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
After failing to attract a buyer for its retail operations following its February 2026 bankruptcy filing, Eddie Bauer LLC announced it would close all of its stores – though the Eddie Bauer brand will continue to be sold online and through wholesale partners. The company has pointed to headwinds such as inflation and tariff uncertainty as major factors contributing to the chapter 11 filing.
But Eddie Bauer isn’t the only brand facing these pressures – and even in today’s challenging macroeconomic environment, some apparel brands are thriving. So what other factors likely contributed to Eddie Bauer’s decline? We dove into the data to find out.
Unsurprisingly, visits to Eddie Bauer’s store fleet had been declining for some time. In 2024, year-over-year (YoY) traffic to Eddie Bauer fell 9.7% compared to just 4.1% for sportswear and athleisure brands and 3.7% for traditional apparel. And although the brand’s YoY visit gap narrowed in 2025, it remained significantly larger than that of the broader categories.
Alongside the company’s explanations, commentators have pointed to other challenges – including rising competition from athleisure brands, limited traction in Asian markets, and a disconnect between the company’s typical older shopper base and the younger demographic it sought to attract. Observers have also noted that the brand’s shift toward outlet malls, as it closed underperforming full-price locations, blurred its premium identity and conditioned consumers to expect deep discounts.
But location analytics also suggest another way in which Eddie Bauer’s drift towards outlet malls may have undermined the company’s brick-and-mortar performance – a mismatch between Eddie Bauer’s core audience and that of the typical outlet mall shopper.
As retail destinations that typically require a drive and center on discretionary purchases, outlet malls tend to attract visitors from areas with higher median household incomes than the nationwide average. But Eddie Bauer’s audience appears to be even more affluent – suggesting that the brand’s core customers may not have been typical bargain-hunting outlet shoppers.
At the same time, Eddie Bauer’s audience skews older and less family-oriented than that of outlet malls overall. In 2025, households belonging to ESRI ArcGIS Tapestry’s “Mature and Retired Living” segment group accounted for more than half of the brand’s captured market – significantly higher than both the nationwide average and the share seen in outlet mall trade areas.
Meanwhile, other key outlet audiences – such as families – were substantially underrepresented in Eddie Bauer’s trade areas. And despite attempts to woo Gen Z consumers, the brand attracted relatively fewer “Contemporary Households,” a younger-skewing group that includes singles, couples without children, and other non-family households.
Retail turnarounds are far from impossible – especially for legacy brands with strong recognition. But in a retail environment with little room for error, success hinges on getting every detail right. As Eddie Bauer’s experience shows, that means keeping locations, target audiences, and positioning tightly aligned, to deliver a clear, compelling value proposition.
For more data-driven retail analyses, follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Over the past several months since our last self-storage update, the industry has remained surprisingly resilient even as its primary fuel source – housing turnover – dried up. With Public Storage's recent acquisition of National Storage Affiliates, we dove into the data to understand what's driving the category's ongoing growth.
Coming out of the pandemic, demand for self-storage facilities surged due to increased migration trends and living space downsizing trends. According to Extra Space’s December 2025 Company Presentation, 12.6% of U.S. Households utilized self-storage facilities in 2023, up from below 10% before the pandemic. Our location intelligence reinforces this data, as monthly visitation trends to self-storage chains continued to grow in 2025, albeit at a slower pace than previous years (below).
Looking ahead to 2026, can this momentum continue? Home sales have improved modestly as interest rates inched downward, but the industry has had to pivot to generate growth the past few years. With that backdrop, we’ve identified four trends that will define the category in 2026.
With fewer people moving, operators had to cut prices to attract new tenants, with "street rates" declining in recent years. According to [many operators], "street rates" for a 10x10 unit dropped 10%–15% year-over-year in 2025. To compensate, major REITs (like Public Storage and Extra Space) raised rates on current tenants. Because these tenants were also locked into their housing situations, they proved incredibly "sticky" – accepting the price hikes rather than going through the hassle of moving their goods. Our data also shows an increase in the share of frequent visitors (2+ times a month) to self-storage units, reinforcing the idea that storage has become a more embedded, utility-like part of their daily lives – and further reducing their likelihood to churn even as rents rise.
If you can't move, you improve. As migration trends and housing turnover trends have slowed, there appears to be a shift in the rationale behind why customers were renting self-storage units. Instead of "moving storage," demand has shifted toward "lifestyle storage." As homeowners renovated to accommodate hybrid work setups or cleared out spare rooms for new family members, they needed temporary space. We see this with the percentage of remote workers visiting the largest self-storage chains, which has steadily increased the past several years. In turn, this helped put a floor under occupancy rates, which have stabilized in the low-90% range for REIT-managed storage properties and in the low-80% range across all operators.
The self-storage industry is seeing regional divergence. Sunbelt markets (Phoenix, Tampa, Atlanta), which saw massive migration and development booms during the pandemic, faced a supply hangover in 2025. With too many new facilities opening just as migration slowed, these markets saw the steepest drops in pricing compared to high-barrier markets in the Northeast.
However, this “saturation" could offer opportunities within this category. Recently, CubeSmart and CBRE Investment Management announced a $250 million joint venture to acquire assets in these very high-growth markets. Their first acquisition? A property in Phoenix – the poster child for recent oversupply. This move signals a critical shift for 2026: while development is slowing, institutional capital is waking up. Major players are using this period of soft pricing to acquire high-quality assets in the Sunbelt, betting that the long-term population growth will eventually absorb the current supply glut.
While standard drive-up units remain the bread and butter of the consumer self-storage industry, 2025 saw a continued shift toward climate-controlled solutions as a key revenue driver. New development throughout 2025 and into 2026 has skewed heavily toward 100% climate-controlled facilities. As consumers store higher-value items – such as electronics, wine, and collectibles – rather than just "garage overflow," they have proven willing to pay a higher premium for strict humidity and temperature regulation.
Simultaneously, investors tracking the self-storage sector have historically looked to industrial cold storage (refrigerated warehousing for food and pharma) as a parallel play, given both asset classes benefit from similar "last-mile" logistics tailwinds. However, the 2026 outlook for the industrial side has shifted significantly.
While the rise of online grocery and pharmaceutical delivery initially made refrigerated warehousing a defensive darling, the sector is now digesting a massive pandemic-era development boom. The U.S. industrial cold storage market is currently facing a notable supply glut. As industry leader Americold recently highlighted, "[O]ver the last few years, it's in excess of 15% of incremental capacity that's been added mainly by a lot of new market entrants whose business model is to get a little bit of scale and then try to transact."
This creates a split narrative for 2026: while consumer climate-controlled self-storage continues to capture premium yields, the industrial cold storage sector is entering a period of recalibration, forcing operators to focus on absorbing excess capacity and improving efficiency rather than breaking ground on new builds. We see this in visitation trends to cold-storage leaders Americold and Lineage, where visits continue to trend downward versus 2022 as these chains see an increase in new competitors.
As we head deeper into 2026, the industry is watching for the "thaw." If interest rates moderate and housing turnover picks up, street rates could rally quickly. But until then, the name of the game is consolidation and efficiency. Expect more REITs to follow CubeSmart’s lead, partnering with institutional capital to scoop up modern, climate-controlled assets while smaller operators struggle to compete in a low-volume environment.
For more data-driven CRE insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
.avif)
Recent McDonald's menu additions such as the annual Shamrock Shake release and the Big Arch Burger pilot appear to have generated only a modest lift in McDonald’s foot traffic. Although visits increased 5.5% year-over-year during the week of February 16th 2026 – the week of the Shamrock Shake's launch – traffic the following week dipped -0.5%, suggesting the seasonal item generated only a short-lived bump rather than a sustained lift in visits. And the heavily publicized Big Arch generated just a 2.2% YoY traffic boost during its launch week of March 2nd to March 8th 2026 – although performance may strengthen as the item gains traction with consumers.
So while these LTOs did generate modest traffic lifts for the chain, the impact was relatively muted compared to some of last year’s stronger performers, such as McDonald’s Grinch Meals. These results may suggest that consumers are becoming increasingly selective in their spending – potentially making it more difficult for QSR chains to rely on LTOs alone to drive meaningful traffic momentum without additional value-oriented offerings.
While recent LTOs delivered only modest gains on their own, pairing LTOs with a clearer value proposition – such as the upcoming McValue 2.0 – may prove more effective, with limited-time items drawing attention and value-focused offerings encouraging repeat visits. In a price-sensitive environment, this dual strategy could drive a more sustainable traffic lift than product innovation or value promotions alone.
For more data-driven restaurant insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
Confidence in physical retail remains solid this year. More than 55% of survey respondents said they feel confident or very confident about brick-and-mortar performance in 2026, while only around 20% expressed concern.
This sentiment aligns with the broader performance of the sector. The chart below shows two consecutive years of modest but positive retail visit growth, with year-over-year (YoY) gains hovering around 1%. While that pace reflects a relatively stable – rather than booming – environment, it reinforces the idea that physical retail continues to demonstrate resilience despite macroeconomic uncertainty.
Still, the results also highlight an element of caution. Nearly half of respondents reported feeling neutral or concerned about the coming year, suggesting that while the foundation for brick-and-mortar retail remains strong, industry leaders are watching economic conditions closely.
At the same time, most respondents believe online retail will continue to grow faster than physical stores. Nearly 70% said they expect e-commerce to outpace brick-and-mortar growth over the next twelve months.
This outlook is hardly surprising given e-commerce’s smaller starting point and the ongoing digital expansion across the retail landscape. But crucially, the expectation of stronger online growth does not translate into pessimism about stores. Nearly a third of respondents said they were actually more bullish on physical retail than on e-commerce.
These findings suggest the industry has moved beyond the once-dominant narrative that e-commerce would inevitably replace physical retail. Instead, the data reflects a growing consensus that the two channels are increasingly complementary – a story also supported by visit data, which shows e-commerce activity growing faster than brick-and-mortar retail even as both continue to expand. The rise of online retail doesn’t reduce the necessity of physical stores – it pushes retailers, brands, and landlords alike to develop clearer strategies for how online and offline channels work together to create a seamless consumer journey that leverages the unique advantages of each.
When we asked professionals about the role agentic AI could play in retail in the coming years, our expectation was a resounding vote for the lift it would provide e-commerce. And indeed, 44% of respondents said they expect agentic AI to increase the share of online retail.
However, reflecting the growing recognition that retail’s future lies in more harmonized commerce, 34% of respondents said they believe agentic AI will lift all boats – increasing incremental growth across commerce more broadly.
This is a significant signal. It reinforces the idea that innovation, whether centered on physical or digital shopping, is most powerful when it creates value across the entire ecosystem. Rather than viewing technology as a zero-sum competition between channels, many retail leaders increasingly see tools like AI as ways to strengthen the overall shopping experience. And that perspective makes it more likely that retailers and brands will evaluate new technologies through a broader lens that prioritizes integrated commerce.
Understanding why consumers visit stores remains central to shaping the next phase of brick-and-mortar retail. When survey participants were asked to identify the key drivers of in-store visits, tactile experiences topped the list, with nearly 80% of respondents pointing to the ability to see, touch, and try products as among the biggest advantages of physical retail. Another 70% highlighted the enjoyment of the in-store shopping experience itself – emphasizing another element that is difficult to replicate online.
At the same time, respondents expressed skepticism about some of the strategies often cited as drivers of store traffic. Only 12% identified services such as buy-online-pickup-in-store (BOPIS) or in-store returns as major traffic drivers. This suggests that while these services are important components of omnichannel retail – reflected, for example, in a growing share of short in-store visits across industries – they may not yet be fully integrated into shopping journeys in ways that maximize their potential.
Perhaps most surprisingly, only 30% of respondents said stores excel at inspiring shoppers to discover new products. Yet this capability may represent one of brick-and-mortar retail’s greatest untapped opportunities. Physical environments are uniquely positioned to spark discovery through merchandising, layout, and experiential elements – factors that can expand baskets and deepen customer engagement.
Industry sentiment also varies significantly across retail segments, with sector-level expectations closely tracking last year’s visit performance. When asked whether they expected various categories to grow, remain stable, or decline over the next twelve months, respondents were more likely to express confidence in continued growth or stability for segments that experienced stronger YoY traffic trends in 2025.
Wholesale clubs, which saw visits rise 5.0% YoY in 2025, topped the list – with 97% of respondents expecting growth or stability in the months ahead, followed by grocery stores at 96%. The strength of both sectors reflects broader consumer trends, including suburban living, increased home cooking, and a heightened focus on value and wellness.
Still, respondents are significantly more bullish on wholesale clubs than on traditional grocery stores: Breaking down the growth / stability outlook down further, 61% of respondents expect clubs to see continued growth, compared with about 35% for grocery stores.
One reason may be the club model’s ability to capture large shopping baskets. While consumers today are increasingly willing to visit multiple stores to find the best value or selection, club retailers excel at capturing a significant share of the shopping list once they secure the visit. Grocery stores, on the other hand, attract frequent trips – but these may include fewer items as shoppers spread spending across multiple retailers. This dynamic may push grocers to focus more heavily on specialization, differentiated offerings, and higher value per visit.
Mass merchandisers such as Walmart and Target also received strong confidence scores, reflecting Walmart’s recent performance and expectations surrounding Target’s ongoing turnaround strategy. Meanwhile, discount and dollar stores – another category that has performed well recently – were widely expected to remain stable, with fewer respondents predicting continued rapid growth for the sector in the months ahead.
There are few sectors we love talking about more than malls. Several years ago, the prevailing expectation was of a perpetual decline for the sector as a whole. But the “death of the mall” narrative has quickly diminished – or at least evolved. In our survey, 54% of respondents expected continued success for Tier 1 malls, while 30% anticipated decline across all mall types. Only 16% expected Tier 2 malls to perform well, and less than half of those believed that success would extend further down the tier ladder.
This largely aligns with visit data, with top-tier indoor malls driving significant success in recent years – a trend that will likely be further reinforced by the continued shift of key audiences toward the suburbs.
However, the potential of Tier 2 malls remains an area worth watching. A major part of the success of top malls has been a shift away from heavy concentrations of apparel and beauty toward more diverse tenant mixes, along with a stronger emphasis on elevated dining and experiences. This has been a critical element for the highest-performing malls. But in an environment where space is increasingly at a premium – and where less space is being dedicated to apparel and beauty in these top locations – a significant opportunity may emerge for Tier 2 malls to provide a stage for retailers that can no longer find a home in the most sought-after centers.
The result is an opportunity for these properties to become the “big fish” in smaller ponds, particularly if they focus on building tenant mixes that complement major regional players rather than compete with them directly. Executed well, this strategy could reduce direct competition while creating more destinations where consumers want to spend time.
Industry sentiment, especially when combined with visit data, offers a valuable snapshot of how retail is likely to evolve in the year ahead. Together, they point to a sector defined by steady physical retail performance, growing integration between online and in-store channels, optimism around technologies like AI, and shifting opportunities across segments from wholesale clubs and grocery to evolving mall formats.
For more data-driven retail insights visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Swig, the Utah-born drive-thru concept that helped popularize customizable dirty sodas, has evolved from a regional novelty into one of the fastest-growing beverage chains in the country. Known for mixing classic soft drinks with flavored syrups, creams, and fruit add-ins – alongside cookies and pretzel bites – the brand has expanded well beyond its Mountain West roots.
This expansion is fueled by significant online hype, with new locations often generating lines that wrap around the block and leave some customers waiting over an hour to try their first drink. And as the brand pushes deeper into the Sunbelt and beyond, location analytics offer a window into how this growth is impacting traffic trends and reshaping the brand's audience.
Unsurprisingly, the data shows that as Swig has expanded its footprint, it has successfully grown its overall traffic. In February 2026, visits to the chain were 137.9% higher than in February 2023 – and up 30.7% year-over-year compared to February 2025.
The data also shows the emergence of a clear seasonal pattern, with visits to Swig peaking each year in the summer as people seek out cool soda treats to beat the heat. Notably, the magnitude of the summer peak in 2025 was larger than ever before, suggesting that as the chain becomes more mainstream, its seasonal appeal may be increasing. But the dramatic increase in off-season visits as well shows that Swig is successfully building a loyal customer base that craves its offerings year-round.
This rapid growth is also leading to a meaningful broadening of Swig’s customer base. While the chain’s trade areas still remain affluent relative to the average U.S. household, the median household income (HHI) of its captured market is dropping as it reaches a more varied demographic.
And while "Wealthy Suburban Families" and "Upper Suburban Diverse Families" remain Swig’s largest audience segments, their total share of the market has edged down as engagement deepens across additional cohorts. This includes, notably, households in Blue Collar Suburbs who are now overindexed at 8.1% of Swig’s captured market, compared to a 6.9% nationwide baseline.
As Swig continues its transition from a niche favorite to a broad staple, it will inevitably face the challenges of sustained growth, such as maintaining unit-level productivity and operational consistency. However, for now, the data and the visible excitement surrounding new openings suggest that the dirty soda pioneer still has plenty of fizz left.
For more data-driven dining analyses follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Everybody loves coffee. And with some 75% of American adults indulging in a cup of joe at least once a week, it’s no wonder the industry is constantly on an upswing.
In early 2024, year-over-year (YoY) visits to coffee chains increased nationwide – with every state in the continental U.S. experiencing year-over-year (YoY) coffee visit growth.
The most substantial foot traffic boosts were seen in smaller markets like Oklahoma (19.4%), Wyoming (19.3%), and Arkansas (16.9%), where expansions may have a more substantial impact on statewide industry growth. But the nation’s largest coffee markets, including Texas (10.9%), California (4.2%), Florida (4.2%), and New York (3.5%), also experienced significant YoY upticks.
The nation’s coffee visit growth is being fueled, in large part, by chain expansions: Major coffee players are leaning into growing demand by steadily increasing their footprints. And a look at per-location foot traffic trends shows that by and large, they are doing so without significantly diluting visitation to existing stores.
On an industry-wide level, visits to coffee chains increased 5.1% YoY during the first five months of 2024. And over the same period, the average number of visits to each individual coffee location declined just slightly by 0.6% – meaning that individual stores drew just about the same amount of foot traffic as they did in 2023.
Drilling down into chain-level data shows some variation between brands. Dutch Bros., BIGGBY COFFEE and Dunkin’ all saw significant chain-wide visit boosts, accompanied by minor increases in their average number of visits per location.
Starbucks, for its part, which reported a YoY decline in U.S. sales for Q2 2024, maintained a small lag in visits per location. But given the coffee leader’s massive footprint – some 16,600 stores nationwide – its ability to expand while avoiding more significant dilution of individual store performance shows that Starbucks’ growth is meeting robust demand.
What is driving the coffee industry’s remarkable category-wide growth? And who are the customers behind it? This white paper dives into the data to explore key factors driving foot traffic to leading coffee chains in early 2024. The report explores the demographic and psychographic characteristics of visitors to major players in the coffee space and examines strategies brands can use to make the most of the opportunity presented by a thriving industry.
One factor shaping the surge in coffee visit growth is the slow-but-sure return-to-office (RTO). Hybrid work may be the post-COVID new normal – but RTO mandates and WFH fatigue have led to steady increases in office foot traffic over the past year. And in some major hubs – including New York and Miami – office visits are back to more than 80.0% of what they were pre-pandemic.
A look at shifting Starbucks visitation patterns shows that customer journeys and behavior increasingly reflect those of office-goers. In April and May 2022, for example, 18.6% of Starbucks visitors proceeded to their workplace immediately following their coffee stop – but by 2024, this share shot up to 21.0%.
Over the same period, the percentage of early morning (7:00 to 10:00 AM) Starbucks visits lasting less than 10 minutes also increased significantly – from 64.3% in 2022 to 68.7% in 2024. More customers are picking up their coffee on the go – many of them on the way to work – rather than settling down to enjoy it on-site.
Dunkin’ is another chain that is benefiting from consumers on the go. Examining the coffee giant’s performance across major regional markets – those where the chain maintains a significant presence – reveals a strong correlation between the share of Dunkin’ visits in each state lasting less than five minutes and the chain’s local YoY trajectory.
In Wisconsin, for example, 50.9% of visits to Dunkin’ between January and May 2024 lasted less than five minutes. And Wisconsin also saw the most impressive YoY visit growth (5.9%). Illinois, Ohio, Maine, and Connecticut followed similar patterns, with high shares of very short visits and strong YoY showings.
On the other end of the spectrum lay Tennessee, Alabama, and Florida, where very short visits accounted for a low share of the chain’s statewide total – under 40.% – and where visits declined YoY.
Dunkin’s success with very short visits may be driven in part by its popular app, which makes it easy for harried customers to place their order online and save time in-store. And this is good news indeed for the coffee leader – since customers using the app also tend to generate bigger tickets.
Dutch Bros.’ meteoric rise has been fueled, in part, by its appeal to younger audiences. Recently ranked as Gen Z’s favorite quick-service restaurant, the rapidly-expanding coffee chain sets itself apart with a strong brand identity built on cultivating a positive, friendly customer experience.
And Dutch Bros.’ people-centered approach is resonating especially well with singles – including young adults living alone – who may particularly appreciate the chain’s community atmosphere.
Analyzing the relative performance of Dutch Bros.’ locations across metro areas – focusing on regions where the chain has a strong local presence – shows that it performs best in areas with plenty of singles. Indeed, the share of one-person households in Dutch Bros.’ local captured markets is very strongly correlated with the coffee brand’s CBSA-level YoY per-location visit performance. Areas with higher concentrations of one-person households saw significantly more YoY visit growth in the first part of 2024. (A chain’s captured market is obtained by weighting each Census Block Group (CBG) in its trade area according to the CBG’s share of visits to the chain – and so reflects the population that actually visits the chain in practice).
The share of one-person households in Dutch Bros.’ Tucson, AZ captured market, for example, stands at 33.4% – well above the nationwide baseline of 27.5%. And between January and May 2024, Tucson-area Dutch Bros. saw a 6.0% increase in the average number of visits per location. Tulsa, OK, Medford, OR, and Oklahoma City, OK – which also feature high shares of one-person households (over 30.0%) – similarly saw per-location visit increases ranging from 3.6% - 7.0%. On the flip side, Fresno, CA, Las Vegas-Henderson-Paradise, NV, and San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX, which feature lower-than-average shares of single-person households, saw YoY per-location visit declines ranging from 1.5%-9.5%.
As Dutch Bros. forges ahead with its planned expansions, it may benefit from doubling down on this trends and focusing its development efforts on markets with higher-than-average shares of one-person households – such as university towns or urban areas with lots of young professionals.
Michigan-based BIGGBY COFFEE is another java winner in expansion mode. With a growth strategy focused on emerging markets with less brand saturation, BIGGBY has been setting its sights on small towns and rural areas throughout the Midwest and South. Though the chain does have locations in bigger cities like Detroit and Cincinnati, some of its most significant markets are in smaller population centers.
And a look at the captured markets of BIGGBY’s 20 top-performing locations in early 2024 shows that they are significantly over-indexed for suburban consumers – both compared to BIGGBY as a whole and compared to nationwide baselines. (Top-performing locations are defined as those that experienced the greatest YoY visit growth between January and May 2024).
“Suburban Boomers”, for example – a Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment encompassing middle-class empty-nesters living in suburbs – comprised 10.6% of BIGGBY’s top captured markets in early 2024, compared to just 6.6% for BIGGBY’s overall. (The nationwide baseline for Suburban Boomers is even lower – 4.4%.) And Upper Diverse Suburban Families – a segment made up of upper-middle-class suburbanites – accounted for 9.6% of the captured markets of BIGGBY’s 20 top locations, compared to just 7.2% for BIGGBY’s as a whole, and 8.3% nationwide.
Coffee has long been one of America’s favorite beverages. And java chains that offer consumers an enjoyable, affordable way to splurge are expanding both their footprints and their audiences. By leaning into shifting work routines and catering to customers’ varying habits and preferences, major coffee players like Starbucks, Dunkin’, Dutch Bros., and BIGGBY COFFEE are continuing to thrive.
Note: This report is based on an analysis of visitation patterns for regional and nationwide grocery chains and does not include single-location stores.
Grocery stores, superstores, and dollar stores all carry food products – and American consumers buy groceries at all three. But even in today’s crowded food retail environment, traditional grocery chains have a special role to play. With their primary focus on stocking a wide variety of fresh foods, these chains serve a critical function in offering consumers access to healthy options.
But visualizing the footprints of major grocery chains across the continental U.S. – alongside those of discount & dollar stores – shows that the geographical distribution of grocery chains remains uneven.
In some areas, including parts of the Northeast, Midwest, South Atlantic, and Pacific regions, grocery chains are plentiful. But in others – some with population centers large enough to feature a robust dollar store presence – they remain in short supply.
And though many superstore locations also provide a full array of grocery offerings, they, too, are often sparsely represented in areas with low concentrations of grocery chains.
For grocery chain operators seeking to expand, these underserved grocery markets can present a significant opportunity. And for civic stakeholders looking to broaden access to healthy food across communities, these areas highlight a policy challenge. For both groups, identifying underserved markets with significant untapped demand can be a critical first step in deciding where to focus grocery development initiatives.
This white paper dives into the location analytics to examine grocery store availability across the United States – and harnesses these insights to explore potential demand in some underserved markets. The report focuses on locations belonging to regional or nationwide grocery chains, rather than single-location stores.
Last year, grocery chains accounted for 43.4% of nationwide visits to food retailers – including grocery chains, superstores, and discount & dollar stores. But drilling down into the data for different areas of the country reveals striking regional variation – offering a glimpse into the variability of grocery store access throughout the U.S. In some states, grocery stores attract the majority of visit share to food retailers, while in others, dollar stores or superstores dominate the scene.
The ten states where residents were most likely to visit grocery chains in early 2024 – Oregon, Vermont, Washington, Massachusetts, California, Maryland, New Hampshire, Connecticut, New Jersey, and Rhode Island – were all on the East or West Coasts. In these states, as well as in Nevada and New York, grocery chain visits accounted for 50.0% or more of food retail visits between January and April 2024.
Meanwhile, residents of many West North Central and South Central states were much less likely to do their food shopping at grocery chains. In North Dakota, for example, grocery chain visits accounted for just 11.7% of visits to food retailers over the analyzed period. And in Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Arkansas, too, grocery stores drew less than 20.0% of the overall food retail foot traffic.
But low grocery store visit share does not necessarily indicate a lack of consumer interest or ability to support such stores. And in some of these underserved regions, existing grocery chains are seeing outsize visit growth – indicating growing demand for their offerings.
North Dakota, the state with the smallest share of visits going to grocery chains in early 2024, experienced a 9.1% year-over-year (YoY) increase in grocery visits during the same period – nearly double the nationwide baseline of 5.7%. Other states with low grocery visit share, including Nebraska, Arkansas, Alabama, Mississippi, and New Mexico, also experienced higher-than-average YoY grocery chain visit growth. This suggests significant untapped potential for grocery stores and a market that is hungry for more.
Alabama is one state where grocery chains accounted for a relatively small share of overall food retail foot traffic in early 2024 (just 28.9%) – but where YoY visit growth outperformed the nationwide average. And digging down even further into local grocery store visitation trends provides further evidence that at least in some places, low grocery visit share may be due to inadequate supply, rather than insufficient demand.
In Central Alabama, for example, many residents drive at least 10 miles to reach a local grocery chain. And several parts of the state, both rural and urban, feature clusters of grocery stores that draw customers from relatively far away.
But zooming in on YoY visitation data for local grocery chain locations shows that at least some of these areas likely harbor untapped demand. Take for example the Camden, Butler, Thomasville, and Gilbertown areas (circled in the map above). The Piggly Wiggly location in Butler, AL, drew 40.1% of visits from 10 or more miles away. The same store experienced a 23.3% YoY increase in visits in early 2024 – far above the statewide baseline of 6.6%. Meanwhile, the Super Foods location in Thomasville, AL, which drew 52.8% of visits from at least 10 miles away – experienced YoY visit growth of 12.3%. The Piggly Wiggly locations in Camden, AL and Gilbertown, AL saw similar trends.
At the same time, trade area analysis of the four locations reveals that the grocery stores had little to no trade area overlap during the analyzed period. Each store served specific areas, with minimal cannibalization among customer bases.
These metrics appear to highlight robust demand for grocery stores in the region – grocery visits are growing at a stronger rate than those in the overall state, people are willing to make the drive to these stores, and each one has little to no competition from the others.
While significant opportunity exists across the country, many communities still face considerable challenges in supporting large grocery stores. Though South Carolina has a significant number of grocery chain locations, for example, certain areas within the state have low access to food shopping opportunities. And one local government – Greenville County – is considering offering tax breaks to grocery stores that set up shop in the area, to improve local fresh food accessibility.
Placer.ai migration and visitation data shows that Greenville County is ripe for such initiatives: the county’s population grew by 4.8% over the past four years – with much of that increase a result of positive net migration. And YoY visits to Greenville County Grocery Stores have consistently outperformed state averages: In April 2024, grocery visits in the county grew by 6.1% YoY, while overall visits to grocery stores in South Carolina grew by 4.2%. This growth – both in terms of grocery visits and population – points to rising demand for grocery stores in Greenville County.
Analyzing the Greenville County grocery store trade areas with Spatial.ai’s FollowGraph dataset – which looks at the social media activity of a given audience – offers further insight into local grocery shoppers’ particular demand and preferences.
Consumers in Greenville-area grocery store trade areas, for example, are more likely to be interested in “Mid-Range Grocery Stores” (including brands like Aldi, Kroger, and Lidl) than residents of grocery store trade areas in the state as a whole. This metric provides further evidence of local demand for grocery chains – and offers a glimpse into the kinds of specific grocery offerings likely to succeed in the area.
Grocery stores remain essential services for many consumers, providing a place to pick up fresh produce, meat, and other healthy food options. And many areas in the country are ripe for expansion, with eager customer bases and growing demand. Identifying such areas with location analytics can help both grocery store operators and municipal stakeholders provide their communities and customer bases with an enhanced grocery shopping experience that caters to local preferences.
Following COVID-era highs, domestic migration levels have begun to taper off – with the number of Americans moving within the U.S. hitting an all-time low, according to some sources, in 2023.
To be sure, some popular COVID-era destinations – including Idaho, the Carolinas, and Utah – saw their net domestic migration continue to rise, albeit at a slower pace. But other states which had been relocation hotspots between February 2020 and February 2023, such as Wyoming and Texas, experienced negative net migration between February 2023 and February 2024.
Analyzing CBSA-level migration data reveals differences and similarities between last year’s migration patterns and COVID-era trends.
Between February 2020 and February 2023, seven out of the ten CBSAs posting the largest population increases due to inbound domestic migration were located in Florida. But between February 2023 and February 2024, the top 10 CBSAs with the largest net migrated percent of the population were significantly more diverse. Only four out of the ten CBSAs were located in Florida, and several new metro areas – including Provo-Orem, UT, Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA, and Boulder, CO – joined the list.
This white paper leverages a variety of location intelligence tools – including Placer.ai’s Migration Report, Niche Neighborhood Grades, and ACS Census Data location intelligence – to analyze two migration hotspots. Specifically, the report focuses on Daytona Beach, FL, which already appeared on the February 2020 to February 2023 list and has continued to see steady growth, and Boulder, CO, which has emerged as a new top destination. The data highlights the potential of CBSAs with unique value propositions to continue to attract newcomers despite ongoing housing headwinds.
The Boulder, CO CBSA has emerged as a domestic migration hotspot: The net influx of population between February 2023 and February 2024 (i.e. the total number of people that moved to Boulder from elsewhere in the U.S., minus those that left) constituted 3.1% of the CBSA’s February 2024 population.
The strong migration is partially due to the University of Colorado, Boulder’s growing popularity. But the metro area has also emerged as a flourishing tech hub, with Google, Apple, and Amazon all setting up shop in town, along with a wealth of smaller start ups.
Most domestic relocators tend to remain within state lines – so unsurprisingly, many of the recent newcomers to Boulder moved from other CBSAs in Colorado. But perhaps due to Boulder’s robust tech ecosystem, many of the new residents also came from Los Angeles, CA (6.6%) and San Francisco, CA (3.4%) – other CBSAs known for their thriving tech scenes.
At the same time, looking at the other CBSAs feeding migration to the area indicates that tech is likely not the only draw attracting people to Boulder: A significant share of relocators came from the CBSAs of Chicago, IL (6.1%), Dallas , TX (4.9%), and New York, NY (3.9%). The move from these relatively urbanized CBSAs to scenic Boulder indicates that some of the domestic migration to the area is likely driven by people looking for better access to nature or a general lifestyle change.
According to the U.S. News & World Report, Boulder ranked in second place in terms of U.S. cities with the best quality of life. Using Niche Neighborhood Grades to compare quality of life attributes in the Boulder CBSA and in the areas of origin dataset highlights some of the draw factors attracting newcomers to Boulder beyond the thriving tech scene.
The Boulder CBSA ranked higher than the metro areas of origin for “Public Schools,” “Health & Fitness,” “Fit for Families,” and “Access to Outdoor Activities.” These migration draw factors are likely helping Boulder attract more senior executives alongside younger tech workers – and can also explain why relocators from more urban metro areas may be choosing to make Boulder their home.
Boulder’s strong inbound migration numbers over the past year – likely driven by its flourishing tech scene and beautiful natural surroundings – reveal the growth potential of certain CBSAs regardless of wider housing market headwinds.
Florida experienced a population boom during the pandemic, and several CBSAs in the state – including the Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL CBSA – have continued to welcome domestic relocators in high numbers. The CBSA’s anchor city, Daytona Beach – known for its Bike Week and NASCAR’s Daytona 500 – has also seen positive net migration between February 2023 and February 2024.
Americans planning for retirement or retirees operating on a fixed income are likely particularly interested in optimizing their living expenses. And given Daytona’s relative affordability, it’s no surprise that the median age in the areas of origin feeding migration to Daytona Beach tends to be on the older side.
According to the 2021 Census ACS 5-Year Projection data, the median age in Daytona Beach was 39.0. Meanwhile, the weighted median age in the areas of migration origin was 42.6, indicating that those moving to Daytona Beach may be older than the current residents of the city.
Zooming into the migration data on a zip code level also highlights Daytona Beach’s appeal to older Americans: The zip code welcoming the highest rates of domestic migration was 32124, home to both Jimmy Buffet’s Latitude Margaritaville’s 55+ community and the LPGA International Golf Club, host of the LPGA Tour. The median age in this zip code is also older than in Daytona Beach as a whole, and the weighted age in the zip codes of origin was even higher – suggesting that older Americans and retirees may be driving much of the migration to the area.
Looking at the migration draw factors for Daytona Beach also suggests that the city is particularly appealing to retirees, with the city scoring an A grade for its “Fit for Retirees.” But the city of Daytona Beach is also an attractive destination for anyone looking to elevate their leisure time, with the city scoring higher than Daytona Beach’s cities of migration origin for “Weather,” “Access to Restaurants,” or “Access to Nightlife.”
Like Boulder, Daytona’s scenery – including its famous beaches – is likely attracting newcomers looking to spend more time outdoors and improve their work-life balance. And like Boulder and its tech scene, Daytona Beach also has an extra pull factor – its affordability and fit for older Americans – that is likely helping the area continue to attract new residents, even as domestic migration slows down nationwide.
Although the overall pace of domestic migration has slowed, analyzing location intelligence data reveals several migration hotspots amidst the overall cooldown. Boulder and Daytona Beach each have a set of unique draw factors that seem to attract different populations – and the success of these regions highlights the many paths to migration growth in 2024.
