.svg)
Athleisure and sportswear are a go-to for consumers looking to move seamlessly between activities – from a workout to work-from-home. That functionality has kept the category running hot in recent years even while more consumers are getting back to the office and socializing. And since athleisure and sportswear are now bonafide wardrobe staples, more consumers are investing in high-end items. We dove into the data for two of the category’s biggest upscale players – Nike and lululemon – in order to take a closer look at the consumer behavior driving visit growth.
During all four quarters of 2023, Nike and lululemon saw year-over-year (YoY) foot traffic growth that surpassed the visit increases in the wider Athleisure & Sportswear space. Part of Nike’s sizable 2023 YoY visit gains were likely due to the addition of a large number of stores relative to its somewhat modest footprint. Nike is continuing to invest in own-brand stores to boost DTC business including the first U.S. Michael Jordan "World of Flight" store coming to Philadelphia, PA. Lululemon also expanded its store count – albeit more modestly – which likely also helped the company stay ahead of the competition.
.png)
Fueled by significant store growth, Nike managed to keep YoY foot traffic positive in the first two months of 2024 despite the arctic blast that plagued overall retail visits in January.
Lululemon and the wider Athleisure & Sportswear space were less insulated from the effects of the storm, and the comparison to a strong 2023 made for mild YoY visit gaps in January 2024. But by the end of February 2024, both lululemon and the Athleisure & Sportswear space had narrowed their visit gaps and appeared to be on an upward trajectory.
.png)
Diving deeper into the demographic data for Nike’s trade area indicated that the aggressive expansion is not the only factor driving the brand’s recent foot traffic gains. Analysis using the AGS: Demographic Dimensions dataset revealed that since the 2021 retail reopening – and specifically Q3 2021 – the median household income (HHI) of Nike’s captured market has been higher than that of its potential market*. And the gap between the median HHI in the brand’s captured and potential markets seems to have widened even further in 2022-2023.
Driving traffic from affluent consumers appears to be an intentional strategy by the brand. Nike CEO John Donahoe recently noted that the brand is expanding in products across price points and now offers more expensive womenswear than ever before – and location intelligence indicates that this strategy is working. By Q4 2023, the median HHI of Nike’s captured market had climbed to $95.6K – the highest in nearly five years. This suggests that despite the adverse impact of inflation on some aspirational shoppers, Nike is succeeding in driving high-value foot traffic.
*A chain’s potential market refers to the population residing in a given trade area, where the Census Block Groups (CBGs) making up the trade area are weighted to reflect the number of households in each CBG. A chain’s captured market weighs each CBG according to the actual number of visits originating to the chain from that CBG.
.png)
Will the success of upscale athleisure and sportswear continue in 2024? Visit Placer.ai to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
The big news coming out of Dollar Tree’s Q4 2023 update was that the company plans to close 1,000 stores following a comprehensive portfolio review (which we first discussed in December). Management plans to close approximately 600 Family Dollar stores in the first half of fiscal 2024, with another 370 Family Dollar and 30 Dollar Tree stores expected to close over the next several years as store lease terms expire. The 970 anticipated Family Dollar store closures represent 11.6% of the banner’s 8,359 stores opened as of the end of February. Dollar stores were one of the strongest performing categories from a visitation (new stores and perspective during 2023 (below), so it may seem surprising that Dollar Tree plans to close so many Family Dollar stores during 2024.
Dollar Tree’s decision to close Family Dollar stores echoes a lot of what we’ve heard from other retailers closing stores in recent years, including Macy’s, CVS/Walgreens, and others. For the most part, retailers’ decisions to close stores comes down to a combination of factors: (1) population migration has changed the supply/demand balance in a given market; (2) consumer behavior has changed post-COVID; (3) the retailer is facing new sources of competition and eroding consumer loyalty; and (4) retailers are replacing underperforming stores with a modernized store layout.
Management cited changing demographics and market saturation as key considerations driving its consolidation efforts for Family Dollar. While the company has not announced which locations it plans to close, we’ve plotted Family Dollar’s 1,000 lowest performing locations over the trailing twelve months on a visit per square foot basis below.
If we compare this to a map of changes in Origin/Destination Household Income Ratio over the past four years (using Placer’s Migration Trends report), the changing demographics that Dollar Tree cited becomes evident. Many underperforming Family Dollar locations are in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast markets, several of which have seen an increase in higher household income population due to migration (represented by the green dots below). As populations in these markets have shifted, it’s not surprising that the company is reevaluating its store portfolio in these markets.
The other factor at play behind these store closures is increasing competition. We’ve discussed disruption from Temu and other online marketplaces in the past, but dollar stores are also fighting for visitor share with value grocery chains, superstores, and convenience stores. And it’s not just lower-income consumers that these chains are fighting over–we’re seeing increasing evidence that dollar stores are seeing visits from middle income consumers. In fact, Dollar Tree CEO Rick Dreiling noted that Dollar Tree added 3.4 million new customers in 2023, mostly from households earning over $125,000 a year. We’ve previously noted how Walmart has been successful attracting more middle-income consumers but if we look at captured trade area demographics for the Dollar Tree banner (and not including Family Dollar) from Q3 2023 to Q4 2023, we do see an increase in the trade areas between $50-$150K in household income (below).
Admittedly, some of the increase in higher-income consumers can be explained by the aforementioned migration trends, but management also attributes the pick up in middle-income consumers to its multi-price point strategy called “More Choices” (which we’ve discussed in the past). In particular, we believe the company has seen success driving visits to Dollar Tree stores with its $3, $4, and $5 frozen and refrigerated assortment, which have been rolled out to more than 6,500 locations today (almost 80% of the banner’s store base as of February). The company has also discussed adding cooler capacity at Family Dollar stores; 17,000 cooler doors were added at Family Dollar last year, which brought the average to 26 coolers per store (versus a long-term goal of 30 coolers per store). We suspect that many of the closed Family Dollar stores will be replaced with new stores featuring expanded cooler offerings to better compete for customers across all demographic groups.
There are also more practical reasons for the store closures, including improved execution. Dreiling pointed out that underperforming stores can “take the bulk of a district manager's time”. By closing them, the company can better focus on service and execution at existing stores. Also, management believes that the closings will be accretive from a cash perspective (i.e., it’s cheaper to run these underperforming stores dark than it is to operate them at a loss).
When closing stores, there is always the risk that customers will churn to competing retail brands and categories. In fact, we’ve seen a meaningful number of visitors to CVS and Walgreens locations that closed the past two years migrate to nearby grocery and superstore chains. However, by replicating many of Dollar Tree’s successful strategies–including expanded cooler assortments–at future Family Dollar store openings, it gives the chain an opportunity to offset potential visitors lost to this round of closures.
While many retailers have embraced smaller format stores, one chain bucking this trend is Dick’s Sporting Goods through its large-format House of Sport concept. This format offers shoppers an “elevated assortment and service model, premium experiences and enhanced visual expressions”. We discussed the early success of the House of Sport last summer, and with a few months of additional data to look at, we can now better assess the longer-term potential of this concept sporting goods retail category.
Below, we’ve presented visit per location data for the 12 Dick’s House of Sport locations currently open versus Dick’s chainwide average since the beginning of 2023. The strong visits per location trends that we identified last July continued into the back half of 2023 and early 2024, with House of Sport locations now seeing 5-6 times the number of visits per location compared to the rest of the chain. For reference, the average Dick’s Sporting Goods store is roughly 50K square feet square feet compared to 100K-120K square feet for House of Sport, indicating that House of Sport is also outperforming on a visit per square foot basis.
Given the strong visitation trends, it’s not surprising that Dick’s plans to invest more in the House of Sport concept in the years ahead. In 2024, the company plans to open eight new locations, with seven being planned relocations/conversions of existing Dick’s stores and one new store at Prudential Center in Boston. The company also plans to begin construction this year on approximately 15 House of Sport locations that will open throughout 2025, bringing the total number of House of Sport locations to 35 by the end of 2025. Longer-term, management sees an opportunity for 75-100 House of Sport locations by 2027.
Interestingly, Dick’s plans to incorporate experiential elements similar to House of Sport across the rest of its store portfolio. During its Q4 2023 update this past week, management also announced plans to open 16 next-generation 50K square foot Dick’s Sporting Goods stores in 2024, including the relocation/remodeling of 12 existing stores (on top of the 11 next-generation stores already opened). These next generation stores were inspired by the House of Sport format and incorporate expanded product assortments for certain categories, emphasis on services, and improved visuals. The company also plans to open 10 Golf Galaxy Performance Center locations in 2024 (aligning well with golf’s post-COVID comeback).
In total, Dick’s Sporting Goods plans to increase square footage by approximately 2% in 2024, marking the retailer's largest annual square footage increase since 2017. Importantly, the economics behind Dick’s nascent store formats are compelling. The House of Sport formats generate approximately $35 million in omnichannel sales per store, approximately 20% EBITDA margins, and cash-on-cash returns of 35% on an initial investment of $18.5M ($11.5M capex, $3.5M inventory, and $3.5M pre-opening costs). The next-generation Dick’s stores are expected to generate $14M in omnichannel sales per store, 20% EBITDA margins, and cash-on-cash returns of 65% on an initial investment of $4.5M ($2.5M capex, $1.5M inventory, and $0.5M in pre-opening costs).
Meow Wolf’s Omega Mart in Las Vegas is an immersive entertainment experience that is sui generis and requires an in-person visit to truly understand this one-of-a-kind adventure. It’s a bit like an escape room, a bit of a psychedelic art show, with tongue-in-cheek humor and a satiric take on our consumerist tendencies. Make sure to keep an open mind when you visit and don’t be afraid to touch and feel the objects. In addition to Las Vegas, there are also locations in Denver “Convergence Station”, Grapevine “The Real Unreal”, and Santa Fe “House of Eternal Return”, with Houston opening in 2024.
When we look at participants from Las Vegas, Denver, and Grapevine, per Spatial.ai Followgraph, they have a higher propensity for being enthusiasts about Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, Electric Vehicles, Celebrity Entrepreneurs, Mental Health Advocates, and Athleisure. They are more likely than average to Chase Credit Card Rewards, Invest in Real Estate, eat Mexican Food, and Love BBQ.
The segments they come from are varied, per Spatial.ai PersonaLive. Las Vegas tends to attract the most Near-Urban Diverse Families, followed by Young Professionals. Nearly 1 in 5 at the Denver location are Young Professionals, as are 14.1% in Grapevine.
Those visiting the Denver location stay the longest, with a median dwell time of 120 minutes. Santa Fe is next at 109 minutes.
As the experience economy evolves, the options for fun continue to grow. Here at the Anchor, we’ve delved into eatertainment, bowling, rock climbing, pickleball, mini-golf, driving ranges, and more. Enter Axe Throwing. It’s the type of activity you’ll often see on some of those reality dating shows, but upon closer inspection, it’s also come into a league of its own, and with technology allowing one to project targets onto the cork board, the ante is upped with a variety of games available. The International Axe Throwing Federation has over 20,000 members in 9 countries, pointing to the popularity of this sport worldwide. Here in the US, two large chains include Bad Axe Throwing and Bury the Hatchet.
Of all the predictions about what would be the prevailing retail trends in 2024, an uncharacteristic cold snap wasn’t on anyone’s radar. But so far this year, extreme weather has had a major impact on consumer behavior in a host of retail categories. How big an influence have drastic conditions had on foot traffic and what visit patterns are emerging as temperatures thaw? We dove into the latest location analytics to find out.
A powerful Arctic blast gripped a large portion of the continental U.S. in January 2024. And along with other disastrous consequences, the chill caused many consumers to stay indoors – resulting in a decline in overall retail visits.
Although retail foot traffic the week of January 8th, 2024 was almost in line with 2023 levels – likely due to a flux of consumers stocking up on essentials – the week of January 15th saw the overall retail visits gap widen to 2.9% year-over-year (YoY) as the storm expanded its grip on the country.
The worst of the cold abated in late January 2024, and consumers appeared to be out and about again – catching up on errands and making up for time spent cooped up at home. Overall retail visits picked up steam the week of January 22nd, 2024 and sustained positive YoY growth through February.
.png)
Zooming in on retail foot traffic by state revealed the scope of the storm’s impact on visits nationwide. Generally, states that bore the brunt of the cold blast saw the widest YoY retail visits gaps. And although perennial cold weather regions were not spared from the unusual cold spell, consumers in the often frigid Upper Midwest and Northeast may have been more acclimated to the cold and therefore able to maintain somewhat normal shopping routines.
In January 2024, Montana, Wyoming, the Dakotas, and Minnesota – along with Maine, Vermont, and New Hampshire – all experienced YoY retail visit growth, despite the extreme weather. Meanwhile, foot traffic in much of the Midwest and South buckled under the abnormal conditions.
The resilience of the Upper Midwest and the Northeast was evident again as temperatures thawed. While winter weather was still prevalent in these parts, North Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Maine, and Vermont all cozied up to over 8.0% YoY retail visit growth in February 2024.
As was the case for retail foot traffic patterns as a whole, the cold snap took a toll on visits to the dining space early on in 2024. The data suggests that many consumers stayed home and cut back on dining out during the extreme storm. But as temperatures more or less normalized, restaurant-goers were eager to get back to their favorite dining hot spots.
Analysis of weekly foot traffic to the various dining categories in January and February 2024 once again showcased the industry’s resilience and the strength of discretionary spending as a whole.
.png)
Diving into dining foot traffic on the state level provided further evidence that freezing conditions likely influenced the eating-out behavior of consumers.
Location analytics revealed that as storms raged in January 2024, southern and midwestern states – where consumers may have been caught off guard by the extreme weather – experienced the widest YoY dining visit gaps. Meanwhile, upper midwestern and northeastern states – where consumers are generally accustomed to harsher winters – produced dining traffic growth.
In February 2024 – as temperatures warmed – several states in the Upper Midwest and Northeast mustered exceptional increases in YoY dining visits. But notably, all of the continental U.S. saw YoY dining traffic growth during that month – further indication of the dining space’s ability to bounce back from adversity and the sustained demand for going out.
Which retail trends will prevail as 2024 progresses? Visit Placer.ai to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
During the pandemic and its aftermath, Americans were on the move. Millions left expensive coastal markets for lower-cost destinations across the Sun Belt, while boomtowns such as Bozeman, Boise, and Austin struggled to keep pace with the influx of new residents.
That wave of relocation has since cooled, as return-to-office mandates, higher mortgage rates, and a shrinking affordability gap between coastal cities and many COVID-era hotspots have dampened the incentive to move. But even in a slower market, domestic migration remains one of the most powerful forces shaping local economies, housing markets, and consumer demand.
This report leverages AI-powered location analytics to examine the relocation patterns reshaping the United States in 2026 – where Americans are moving, the demographic and economic forces driving those decisions, and how retailers, investors, developers, and policymakers can respond to the opportunities and challenges created by these shifts.
Which major metros are attracting the most new residents? Which pandemic-era standouts have seen growth stall or reverse? And what factors best predict a large metro area's domestic migration growth potential in 2026?
The latest statewide migration data shows that the slower relocation pace observed in 2024 persisted into 2025. No state recorded net inflows or outflows exceeding 0.7% of its starting population. And while several smaller states continued to attract new residents at meaningful rates, none of the nation's six most populous states saw net in-migration exceed 0.2%.
Among those smaller states, South Carolina and Delaware led the nation with net in-migration equal to 0.7% of their populations, followed by Idaho (0.6%), Maine (0.5%), Tennessee (0.4%), and North Carolina (0.3%). For most of these states, migration accelerated relative to 2024, though Delaware's inflow rate moderated slightly and North Carolina held steady.
Despite their differences, these states tend to offer a similar mix of lifestyle amenities, relatively low congestion, and opportunities for growth. Many also benefit from business-friendly climates, favorable tax policies, or housing costs that remain attractive relative to the higher-cost markets from which they draw new residents.
At the other end of the spectrum was Vermont, which saw the nation’s largest net outflow as share of population in 2025, losing 0.4% of its population to domestic relocation. The decline deepens a reversal that first emerged in 2024, when the state swung to a net loss of 0.2%, after attracting inflows of 0.8% and 0.5% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Vermont's reversal likely reflects a combination of factors, including return-to-office mandates and the waning appeal of remote work. Housing undersupply in the state may have also contributed, illustrating how important infrastructure investments are to sustaining migration gains over time.
Among the nation's six most populous states, Florida was the only one to see accelerating net in-migration in 2025, attracting new residents equal to 0.2% of its starting population, up from 0.1% the year before. Texas, by contrast, slowed from 0.1% net in-migration in 2024 to essentially flat in 2025, highlighting the cooling of what was once one of the country's strongest pandemic-era migration magnets.
Meanwhile, the legacy "exodus" states continue to lose residents, but at a slower pace than in previous years. Illinois and California have seen their migration deficits steadily narrow, with further improvement in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, Illinois moved from -0.8% → -0.2% → -0.2% → -0.1%, while California moved from -0.9% → -0.4% → -0.3% → -0.2%. And though New York has held steady at -0.2% over the past two years, this marks a significant moderation from 2022, when the state experienced net outmigration equal to 1.1% of its population.
Statewide trends reveal important shifts, but a closer look at the nation's ten largest metropolitan areas suggests that broader interstate averages increasingly mask diverging local realities. Several metros are attracting residents through interstate domestic migration even when their states as a whole are experiencing little or no net migration growth.
Phoenix (+0.3%), for example, stood out as the nation's top-performing large metro in 2025, despite Arizona's absence from the list of leading migration destinations – with the majority of its inflow coming from out of state.
Dallas (+0.2%) ranked second, continuing its rebound from -0.1% in 2023 even as Texas' statewide migration gains cooled. Like Phoenix, Dallas drew a majority of its new residents from outside the state, underscoring its growing appeal as a national migration destination. Houston, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, falling from 0.1% net in-migration in 2023 to -0.1% in 2025. While it is too early to call this a sustained reversal, the divergence between the two metros may reflect Dallas's growing pull as a corporate magnet alongside rising housing costs and weather-related challenges in Houston.
Metro-level data also suggests that the pandemic-era "big-city exodus" narrative is continuing to fade. Los Angeles improved from -0.8% in 2023 to -0.3% in 2025, while New York held steady at -0.3% after improving in 2024. Even Miami (-0.6%), which ranked last among major metros despite Florida's continued statewide gains, saw its outflows moderate from 2023 levels. And while Illinois continued to post net outmigration, Chicago (0.0%) reached migration neutrality in 2025 after recording losses in both 2023 and 2024.
Despite Miami's struggles – and Florida’s relatively modest 0.2% inflow – a look beyond the top 10 large metros reveals that the Sunshine State is home to six of the nation's eight fastest-growing large metros nationwide.
Those top-performing metros, defined as CBSAs with 500K+ residents that added at least 0.8% of their population through net domestic migration over the past year, share a similar profile: lower housing costs, retiree appeal, suburban density, and an easy drive to a larger economic hub.
Much of the growth of these Florida metro areas, however, is being fueled from within Florida itself. While major out-of-state metros such as New York (6.1%) and Chicago (2.0%) remained important sources of new residents, nearly half of the net migration into Florida's top destination metros came from elsewhere in the state. In 2025, Miami (22.5%), Orlando (13.0%), Tampa (5.8%), and Naples (4.2%) together accounted for 45.5% of the net positive migration feeding these fast-growing markets.
The migration flows feeding the nation’s fastest-growing large metros suggest that affordability remains a powerful driver of domestic relocation.
In 2025, seven of the eight top destination metros analyzed above had lower typical home values than their largest feeder markets. Lakeland–Winter Haven, FL, for example, had a typical home value of $313.4K in December 2024, compared with $404.9K in Orlando and $380.2K in Tampa – its two largest sources of net migration. Even North Port–Bradenton–Sarasota, FL – the most expensive Florida metro in this group – drew its largest share of net migration from the New York metro area, where home values are substantially higher.
The lone exception was Charleston–North Charleston, SC, whose largest source of net migration was Baltimore – a market with lower typical home values than the destination. Even in Charleston, however, affordability appears to have played a role. New York, a significantly more expensive market, ranked a close second in 2025, accounting for 6.5% of net positive migration into Charleston, just behind Baltimore’s 6.8%.
While housing costs are only one factor influencing migration decisions, the data suggests that households continue to gravitate toward markets where homeownership is comparatively more attainable than in the places they leave behind.
Typical Home Values* in Top Feeder Markets to Destination Hubs, 2025
*Typical home value based on Zillow Research’s Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) for Dec. 2024, immediately preceding the analyzed migration period (Jan.–Dec. 2025).
But as important as affordability is in explaining today’s domestic migration patterns, age appears to be an even stronger determinant of where people choose to relocate.
Among mid-sized and large metros (250K+ residents) experiencing significant population shifts – defined as gaining or losing at least 1.0% of their starting population through domestic migration over the past two years – households are increasingly moving toward older, more established communities.
The data reveals a clear negative relationship between migration performance and age differential – a metric calculated by subtracting the median age of the destination market from the weighted median age of its feeder markets. Negative values indicate movement toward older communities, while positive values indicate movement toward younger ones. In other words, the metros attracting the strongest migration inflows tend to be older than the markets sending them residents.
The data also shows a clear positive relationship between migration performance and retiree concentration. Metros with larger shares of residents aged 65 and older generally saw stronger migration gains over the past two years, while younger metros tended to attract fewer newcomers. This suggests that retiree-driven relocation has become an increasingly important driver of migration. At the same time, the influx of younger residents points to the broader appeal of these communities, which offer a mix of affordability, amenities, and lifestyle advantages.
Net Migration as Share of Starting Population, 2024–2025*
*Analysis includes metro areas with 250K+ residents and domestic migration gains or losses of at least 1.0% during the study period. Weighted Age Differential compares the destination market’s median age with the weighted median age of origin markets, with positive values indicating migration toward younger markets and negative values indicating migration toward older markets. Age data: Census ACS 2020–2024.
The pandemic-era urban exodus is giving way to a more nuanced migration landscape. Large urban markets are stabilizing, while growth is increasingly concentrated in smaller states, secondary metros, and intra-state corridors. Affordability remains a powerful pull, but retirees, lifestyle considerations, and local market dynamics are also playing an increasingly important role in where Americans choose to live.
To capitalize on these shifts in 2026, civic leaders, commercial real estate (CRE) investors, retailers, and developers should:
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
Physical retail is increasingly defined by a small group of dominant players – Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General – that span grocery, essentials, and discretionary categories at a scale no other retailers can match. These chains serve as bellwethers of consumer behavior, revealing where Americans are spending, how often they shop, and what drives their decisions. And understanding their visitation patterns sheds light on the key dynamics shaping both their performance and the broader blueprint for retail success in 2026.
Retail giants Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General continue to capture a growing share of brick-and-mortar visits nationwide.
• The share of physical retail traffic captured by these giants rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 17.5% in Q1 2026, signaling continued sector consolidation.
• The scale advantage enjoyed by retail giants is increasingly self-reinforcing: Larger players benefit from superior data, stronger vendor leverage, and operational efficiencies that in turn further widen the gap.
• As these advantages compound, direct competition becomes less viable. Instead, smaller retailers should focus on owning specific trip missions – such as convenience, fill-in, or discovery – where format, assortment curation, and in-store experience can more directly shape consumer choice.
• For CRE operators, the growing dominance of these retail giants increases reliance on top-tier anchors, potentially driving performance gaps between centers with strong national tenants and those without.
• For CPG companies, the consolidation in the offline retail space heightens channel concentration, making success with a handful of large retailers critical while increasing those retailers’ negotiating leverage.
Traffic trends across the four giants reveal meaningful divergence in performance.
• Costco and Dollar General are driving the strongest visit growth, supported by both substantial fleet expansions and rising visits per location. In 2025, visits per store exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 18.1% for Costco and 10.2% for Dollar General, with both brands also seeing steady increases in their share of total brick-and-mortar retail chain visits.
• Walmart remains the largest player by far, accounting for 9.7% of traffic to major brick-and-mortar chains in 2025. And though the behemoth’s share of visits declined slightly in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it has held steady over the past three years.
• Target’s visit share has remained relatively flat over the past three years, reflecting stalled momentum. Still, early 2026 trends point to emerging signs of recovery – with Q1 visits up 8.3% compared to Q1 2019.
• Value retail is winning, but in more specialized forms: Dollar General (extreme value + convenience) and Costco (bulk value + loyalty) are driving the strongest traffic growth and rising visits per store, while Walmart’s broad “everyday value” remains steady with slower growth. Target, for its part, is lagging – likely a reflection of the broader bifurcation in retail which has left middle-market players caught between consumers trading down to value and those trading up to quality.
• For retailers and CPG companies, the broader lesson is that value perception is becoming more nuanced. It’s no longer just about offering low prices at scale, but about how value is delivered – whether through small packs vs. bulk, or quick trips vs. stock-up missions. Success increasingly depends on prioritizing these distinct value formats and investing in channels where store-level productivity is improving.
• For CRE operators, the outperformance of retailers with clearly defined value propositions underscores the importance of mission-driven tenant mix. As shoppers visit with increasingly specific missions in mind, retailers that cater to those missions are outperforming. Tenant strategies should reflect this shift, ensuring complementary offerings that reinforce a cohesive shopping mission.
Walmart remains the dominant brick-and-mortar retailer nationwide and across all fifty states. Still, the data suggests there is room for multiple runners-up to succeed across geographies and customer segments.
• Dollar General, Target, and Costco each attract distinct audience segments. Dollar General attracts a disproportionately high share of the “Mature and Retired Living” segment, while Costco leads among family households, with Target also over-indexing with this group. Among younger “Contemporary Households,” meanwhile – a segment encompassing singles, married couples without children, and non-family households – Target commands the highest share, slightly over-indexing compared to the nationwide baseline.
• Regional strengths vary significantly, with Dollar General concentrated in the South, Costco dominant in the Northwest, and Target showing more dispersed areas of strength.
• Despite similar overall visit share, Dollar General leads in more states (26 vs. 17 for Target), reflecting broader geographic dominance.
• For retailers, the data suggests that growth opportunities are increasingly shaped by localized demographic and geographic dynamics – meaning that targeted, market-specific strategies may be more effective than uniform national approaches.
• Younger “Contemporary Households” remain less locked-in than older demographics, representing a key battleground for future growth.
• For CPG companies, this data highlights that channel strategy is really about building the right mix of retailers, since even large national players reach different types of consumers.
• CRE operators should ask "which anchor is right for this trade area" rather than "which anchor is strongest," as mismatched tenants can underperform even if they’re nationally dominant.
After remaining essentially flat in 2025, average visits per location to Walmart grew 3.5% YoY in Q1 2026. And the retailer’s solid Q1 performance across the U.S. underscores its unique ability to resonate across income levels, geographies, and shopping missions.
• Walmart posted year-over-year visit growth across nearly all U.S. markets in Q1 2026, reinforcing its role as a universally relevant retailer.
• The giant’s comparative softness in small parts of the Northeast suggests an opportunity to double down on region-specific assortments, urban-friendly formats, or partnerships to better match local shopping behaviors.
• Walmart’s broad-based growth shows that even as consumers are increasingly willing to visit multiple retailers to get what they want, its Superstore model has solidified its role as a primary stop on the American shopping journey – making it a uniquely reliable anchor for CRE operators.
• For smaller retailers, this underscores the opportunity to win the “second stop” – capturing trips through curated assortments and more tailored in-store experiences that Walmart’s scale is less optimized to deliver.
• For CPG companies, Walmart stands out as a highly attractive partner for broad, efficient reach, given its consistent traffic across markets.
Target’s recent performance suggests early momentum in reversing prior softness.
• Q1 2026 visits to Target rose 5.1% year over year, marking the chain’s first positive visit growth in more than a year, and suggesting that the chain’s new turnaround strategy may be bearing fruit.
• Gains were driven primarily by visits lasting 30 to 45 minutes, which accounted for 19.6% of overall visits to Target in Q1 2026 – pointing to stronger in-store engagement rather than quick, mission-driven stops.
• Target’s return to traffic growth – driven by increases in mid-length trips – signals a sustainable recovery on the horizon, strengthening its reliability as a traffic-driving tenant for CRE operators.
• Target's turnaround shows retailers how increasing shopper engagement can generate growth by converting quick trips into higher-value, multi-category experiences.
• For CPG companies, the rise in mid-length visits indicates a more receptive in-store environment for discovery and trade-up, making Target an increasingly attractive channel for innovation, merchandising, and premium offerings.
Dollar General is becoming embedded in consumers’ daily routines.
• Visitor frequency to Dollar General is on the rise. In Q1 2026, nearly a quarter of visitors frequented the chain at least four times in an average month, up from 21.2% in Q1 2022.
• Dollar General is becoming increasingly local in nature: As its footprint expands, more visits originate nearby, with 28.0% coming from within one mile – reinforcing its role as a neighborhood store of choice.
• Dollar General’s visitation patterns point to a growing ownership of the convenience mission. Its expanding store density is creating a self-reinforcing network effect, where proximity fuels frequency, and frequency strengthens long-term defensibility.
• For retailers, Dollar General’s rising share of nearby and high-frequency visits shows that proximity can drive habit, making convenience a powerful lever for building repeat behavior.
• For CRE operators, the data highlights the strength of hyper-local, necessity-driven traffic, positioning Dollar General as a stable tenant that anchors consistent, repeat visitation.
• For CPG professionals, the increase in frequent trips signals a high-velocity purchase environment, favoring smaller pack sizes and products that align with regular replenishment cycles.
Costco continues to grow and diversify its audience despite higher membership fees and stricter food court access policies, highlighting the strength of its value proposition and loyalty model.
• In September 2024, Costco raised its membership fees for the first time in seven years – and more recently tightened enforcement of member-only access to its food courts. Despite these changes, visitation has remained strong, highlighting the company’s pricing power and deep customer loyalty.
• At the same time, Costco’s shopper base is broadening, with median household income trending slightly downward while remaining relatively affluent.
• Offering strong value to a relatively affluent consumer base can be a winning formula in 2026. Retailers that combine quality, trust, and perceived savings – rather than competing solely on low prices – are well positioned to drive both loyalty and sustained traffic growth.
• For CRE operators, Costco’s sustained traffic growth and broadening shopper base reinforce its value as a standalone, high-demand traffic magnet that can anchor entire trade areas and drive surrounding retail development.
• For CPG companies, the combination of high traffic and declining median HHI signals that Costco is evolving into a scaled channel reaching beyond affluent shoppers, requiring more diversified assortment and pricing strategies.
