.svg)
If you’ve ever wished you could root for your alma mater from afar, attend a World Series, or blast into space, Cosm may have the solution. This immersive technology company combines state-of-the art stadium experiences with dining and bar service. Think a smaller version of the Sphere, a larger version of an IMAX theater, with the simulation of being at an actual stadium all while enjoying the comforts of a booth with food brought to you.
For fans of large screen immersive experiences, this venue allows you to be enveloped by the aquatic performers of Cirque du Soleil's “O”, feel like you’re on the 50-yard line for the Ohio State versus Penn State football game, or be a pioneering astronaut seeing the earth from space in “Orbital.”
Since it opened at the end of June this year, popular showings have included “Seek,” which takes you on a journey through the cosmos, as well as sports favorites like the New York Jets versus Pittsburgh Steelers game. Game 2 of the World Series had a sell-out crowd as those who chose not to buy tickets for thousands of dollars still had the joy of celebrating in an arena venue with hundreds of other fans, with the feeling of being behind the dugout.
The Los Angeles Times describes Cosm as “part planetarium, part mini-Sphere,” so instead of needing to travel to Griffith Observatory or Las Vegas, one can just jet down the 405 to Inglewood to have a similar experience. So, who’s visiting Cosm? Roughly 3 in 10 (29%) have a hold income (HHI) of $50K-$99.9K. Nearly 1 in 5 (19%) have a HHI of $25K-$49.9K. These two household income segments over index compared to the CA household incomes (shown in gray).
In terms of demographics, per Spatial.ai PersonaLive, Near-Urban Diverse Families, Educated Urbanites, and Melting Pot Families make up the top 3 segments.
Starbucks, the largest coffee chain in the world, and Dutch Bros, one of the fastest growing in the country, are major players in the hot and cold beverage space. With Q3 2024 in the rearview mirror, we took a closer look at the visitation patterns to both chains to see how they are faring – and what might lie ahead for both brands.
Starbucks is one of the most dominant names in coffee across the world, with thousands of stores in the United States alone. Between July 2023 and July 2024, the chain added more than 500 stores to its domestic fleet, bringing its U.S. store count to 16,730. And though Starbucks has faced its share of challenges, these store additions helped keep overall traffic to the coffee leader on par with 2023 levels throughout the summer – though visits dipped somewhat in September as consumers went back to their routines.
But digging deeper into the visit data shows that even as Starbucks saw overall foot traffic growth stall in Q3, the number of short visits to the chain – i.e. those lasting less than 10 minutes – increased. In August and September 2024, the chain drew 8.5% and 4.7% more short visits, respectively, than in the same periods of 2023 – revealing how important these quick stops are for the chain.
In-app ordering, which together with drive-thru orders made up about 70% of sales at the chain as of January 2024, may be contributing to the short visit trend. Still, new CEO Brian Niccol is looking for ways to return the chain to its roots as the third place, and the chain may yet implement shifts to encourage longer visits in the coming months.
Dutch Bros has been one of the most impressive coffee chains to watch over the past few years. The Oregon-based chain has been on an expansion tear – opening more than 150 stores between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024 – and has seen the elevated monthly visits to match. Between June and September 2024, visits to Dutch Bros increased between 13.7% and 16.9%, highlighting the chain’s success at growing its audience.
But like at Starbucks, short visits outperformed longer ones at Dutch Bros – and by a lot. In September 2024, for example, overall visits to the chain grew by 13.7% – but visits lasting less than 10 minutes shot up by 26.6%.
The strength of these short visits, for both Starbucks and Dutch Bros, suggests a shift towards convenience, with both chains utilizing drive-thru services and in-app ordering to accommodate busy consumers.
Digging down deeper into the data shows that for both Starbucks and Dutch Bros, these all-important short visits follow a distinct weekly pattern.
While longer visits (≥10 minutes) to both chains peaked in Q3 2024 on Saturdays, shorter visits were more evenly distributed throughout the week, peaking on Fridays. Overall, 34.1% of long visits to Starbucks, and 37.8% of long visits to Dutch Bros, took place on the weekends in Q3 2024 – compared to 28.1% and and 28.7%, respectively, for shorter visits.
Unsurprisingly, customers may be more likely to grab a quick coffee to go during the work week. And with the return to office still underway, quick visits may be enjoying a boost fueled by commuters in need of a quick cubicle pick-me-up.
As Starbucks works to adapt to shifting consumer preferences, understanding when customers spend more time in-store can help the brand reconnect with its roots as a community hub. And Dutch Bros can continue to enhance the quick-service experience that has fueled its growth. How will the two chains continue to perform in what remains a competitive coffee environment?
Follow Placer.ai for the latest data-driven dining insights.
In recent years, Americans have gotten serious about fitness. Even as consumers tightened their purse strings, they found room in their budgets for the ultimate affordable indulgence: A (relatively) low-cost gym membership that, once paid, offers customers unlimited access to club facilities.
How did Planet Fitness, the nation’s largest value gym perform in Q3 2024? We dove into the data to find out.
Planet Fitness has been on a roll. In Q2 2024, the chain reported a 4.2% system-wide increase in same store sales and the addition of 18 new gyms to its fleet. (Though Planet Fitness operates clubs outside the U.S., the vast majority of its some 2600 locations are domestic).
Foot traffic data shows that the chain continued to thrive through Q3, with year-over-year (YoY) monthly visit upticks ranging from 4.1% to 11.6% – outperforming the wider industry. And while the value gym giant finally raised the price of its basic membership this summer for the first time in more than thirty years, the move does not seem to have dented Planet Fitness’ growth trajectory – though it’s still early days.
Planet Fitness takes pains to emphasize its commitment to being a “Judgement Free Zone” – and casual gym-goers make up a significant portion of its visitor base. In Q3 2024, 44.3% of visitors hit the club, on average, less than twice a month.
But Planet Fitness also has a significant – and growing – share of die-hard gym buffs who visit the club at least eight or ten times a month - i.e. at least twice a week. In Q3 2024, a full 16.8% of visitors to Planet Fitness came to the gym at least eight times a month on average – up from just 12.9% in 2019 and 15.3% in 2022. And 11.9% visited the chain ten or more times a month – up from 8.6% in 2019 and 10.6% in 2022.
Though casual visitors are also important for any fitness club’s bottom line, a strong and thriving community of highly committed members is an important foundation for future growth.
Gym visit frequency, however, varies throughout the United States. Analyzing the share of highly committed visitors to Planet Fitness reveals significant differences between states.
New Mexico led the pack in Q3 with 13.9% of visitors frequenting the gym, on average, at least ten times a month – followed by Rhode Island (13.1%) and California (12.7%). On the other end of the spectrum lay Montana, where just 6.0% of club goers were highly committed visitors in Q3, followed by Iowa (7.7%) and Vermont (8.0%).
This data highlights how gym engagement can be influenced by regional factors such as lifestyle, climate, and access to alternative fitness options – suggesting that Planet Fitness and similar chains may benefit from tailoring their marketing and membership strategies to local trends and preferences.
The holiday season isn’t a particularly busy one for gyms – which usually see traffic begin to slow down in September before picking up again in the new year. But if Planet Fitness’ solid September 2024 performance is any indication, the chain may be in for a busier fourth quarter this year than last. Will Planet Fitness continue to deliver as the year draws to a close?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven analyses to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
In a market ruled by value and convenience, traditional full-service restaurants (FSRs) have faced an uphill slog. But even in 2024, some FSRs are flourishing. We dove into the data to explore factors driving success at three very different full-service chains: First Watch, Chili’s Grill & Bar, and Outback Steakhouse.
First Watch first burst onto the scene in 1983 with a single restaurant in California – and now boasts some 544 locations across 29 states. With offerings ranging from Superfood Kale Salads to more traditional pancakes and bacon and eggs, First Watch has emerged as a prime destination for diners seeking to enjoy a leisurely breakfast with family and friends.
And foot traffic data shows that First Watch, still firmly in expansion mode, is continuing to grow its audience. Between June and September 2024, First Watch saw consistent year-over-year (YoY) visit growth, outperforming both the full-service restaurant category and other diners & breakfast spots.
One factor that may be helping to propel First Watch’s success is the relative affluence of its customer base. Analyzing the income breakdown of First Watch’s trade area shows that in Q3 2024, nearly ten percent (9.7%) of households in the chain’s captured market earned $200K+ per year, compared with 6.5% for diners & breakfast chains and 6.9% for the wider FSR space. On the flip side, only 43.9% of households in First Watch’s captured market had annual incomes below $75K, compared to just over 50.0% for both analyzed segments.
Amidst concerns surrounding food inflation, rising labor costs, and discretionary spending cutbacks, First Watch’s wealthier customer base may be helping to shield it from some of the value pressures that have weighed on other restaurants – contributing to its resilience.
Another FSR that has been experiencing outsized visit growth this year – at least since April – is Chili’s Grill & Bar. Following a tepid start to the year, Chili’s launched its much-vaunted Big Smasher Burger on April 29th, 2024, and hasn’t looked back since.
The new offering, added to Chili’s 3 For Me value menu, presented a full-service value challenge to QSR favorites like the Big Mac. And in Q2 2023, the item helped drive a 14.8% increase in same-store sales.
Since the big launch, weekly YoY visits to Chili’s have been consistently elevated – kept aloft with the help of viral hype around Chili’s long standing Triple Dipper offering, as well as the new secret Nashville Hot Mozz offering that became so popular it spawned a halloween costume.
Unlike First Watch, Chili’s has found success by embracing its role as a value chain. The median household income (HHI) of Chili’s captured market in Q3 2024 was $73.1K – below the nationwide median of $76.1K, and on par with that of the wider FSR space ($73.7K – By way of comparison, the median HHI of First Watch’s captured market was $85.6K in Q3).
And a closer look at the demographic make-up of Chili’s captured market shows just how broad the appeal of the chain is. In Q3 2024, Chili’s visitor base was over-represented for a wide range of segments across age and income groups – from “Wealthy Suburban Families” to “Young Urban Singles”, “Suburban Boomers’, and residents of “Blue Collar Suburbs”. By delivering high-quality meals at affordable prices, Chili’s has solidified its place as an everyman’s chain, offering value comparable to that of quick-service restaurants.
Aussie-themed Outback Steakhouse – Bloomin’ Brands’ biggest chain – is another full-service restaurant that is successfully weathering the storm. Like other FSRs, Outback has faced its fair share of challenges over the past few years, with rising costs and spending cutbacks taking a toll on the chain’s performance. But in Q3 2024, the average number of visits to each Outback Steakhouse location increased 0.5% YoY, even as overall traffic to the chain fell 1.7% in the wake of strategic rightsizing moves that included the shuttering of a number of underperforming locations. By contrast, the average number of visits per location in the wider FSR space dropped 1.2%, while overall foot traffic to the segment fell 2.1%. Outback Steakhouse’s ability to sustain a YoY visit-per-location uptick in Q3, even if a minor one, shows that its rightsizing efforts are paying off.
And drilling down deeper into regional data for the chain shows that in some areas of the country, Outback Steakhouse is positively thriving. In California, Outback’s third-largest market in terms of store count, the chain saw a YoY visit increase of 5.3% – significantly higher than the statewide FSR average of 1.1%. In Washington and Oregon, Outback Steakhouse experienced even more substantial visit increases – 9.0% and 9.6%, respectively – even as full-service restaurants generally languished. And in all three states, the number of Outback Steakhouse locations has remained basically unchanged over the past year, meaning that these increases reflect the growing draw of the chain’s existing venues.
First Watch, Chili’s Grill & Bar, and Outback Steakhouse are very different full-service chains – but each of them is thriving in its own way. How will the three brands fare as the holiday season picks up steam?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven dining analyses to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
Quick-service restaurants (QSRs) have faced headwinds in 2024, from higher costs to increased competition. But some brands are weathering the storm particularly well. We dove into the data to check in with two of the nation’s most prominent restaurant companies – Restaurant Brands International (RBI) and Yum! Brands – to see how their biggest chains, Burger King (RBI) and Taco Bell (Yum!), performed in Q3 2024.
Burger King, RBI’s largest restaurant chain, has been the focus of a major modernization effort, dubbed the “Royal Reset”, that includes a series of restaurant remodels and equipment and technology upgrades. Burger King has also been rightsizing – closing underperforming restaurants to shore up the chain’s overall strategic positioning.
And foot traffic data shows that these initiatives are paying off. In Q3 2024, overall visits to Burger King dipped 1.7% YoY – but the average number of visits to each Burger King location increased slightly (0.4%). This per-location uptick may have been fueled, in part, by the chain’s summer “$5 Your Way” value meal special, which kept YoY visits elevated through July. And some major markets – including Texas, Illinois, Washington, and Connecticut – performed even better, with average visit-per-location growth ranging from 1.5% - 5.1% YoY.
Taco Bell is Yum! Brands’ largest chain – accounting for over 70.0% of visits to the company’s U.S. restaurants in Q3 2024. And the Tex-Mex leader is another QSR that is standing strong in 2024. Throughout the summer, Taco Bell experienced YoY visit growth ranging from 1.2% to 2.2% – and though the chain saw a minor 1.9% YoY dip in September, this may be due to the month having one fewer Friday than the equivalent period of 2023. (Friday is Taco Bell’s busiest day of the week). Even accounting for this dip, visits to Taco Bell were up 0.6% YoY overall in Q3 2024.
One factor that has likely helped Taco Bell weather recent QSR storms has been its strength in executing special promotions. In July, the Tex-Mex leader attracted big crowds with a limited-time offer commemorating the 20th anniversary of the chain’s popular Baja Blast beverage. And in October 2024, the restaurant marked National Taco Day (Tuesday, October 1st) with ten hours of $1 tacos – fueling a substantial traffic spike: On the big day, visits rose 14.7% above the chain’s daily year-to-date (YTD) average, and 18.4% above the chain’s Tuesday YTD average.
Burger King and Taco Bell found success in Q3 2024 through limited-time promotions – and in the case of the former, a strategic focus on rightsizing while updating existing stores. How will RBI and Yum!’s biggest brands perform in Q4?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven restaurant analyses to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
Starbucks’ preliminary fiscal Q4 2024 (July-September 2024) results--including a 10% decline in comparable transactions in its North America segment--reinforce that the company has "drifted from its core", as new Starbucks CEO Brian Niccol discussed following the release. The results also come at a time when other coffee and beverage chains are seeing year-over-year visit increases, reinforcing that new product innovations aren't connecting with consumers–management explained that “accelerated investments in an expanded range of product offerings coupled with more frequent in-app promotions and integrated marketing to entice frequency across the customer base did not improve customer behaviors.” (The difference between our visit per location figure and Starbucks’ reported number is likely due to lower coverage of urban stores in our platform).
As we wrote when Niccol assumed the CEO role in August, Starbucks’ transformation won’t happen overnight, but the data behind Niccol’s early strategies at Chipotle still hints at a successful turnaround. Niccol's plan to improve the Starbucks customer experience, remove bottlenecks and operational complexities (including a more streamlined menu), and refine Mobile Order and Pay is a sound strategy, but it will take time to implement. Positively, we believe that Starbucks has a strong foundation to work from. Below, we show the monthly visitor per location trend line since the beginning of 2022. While declines in visit frequency is something the company will work to address with its current initiatives, the number of visitors coming into each location generally remains strong (down only 2%-3% per month on average thus far in 2024). Assuming the company can execute Niccol’s plan to reduce bottlenecks and operation complexities, Starbucks’ wide visitor reach should drive improved engagement and visit frequency.
As we also pointed out a few months ago, we believe that Starbucks’ success in smaller underpenetrated markets have been somewhat overlooked. We analyzed Starbucks’ unit expansion opportunities in detail in September 2022, and we’ve seen progress on this initiative since then. Starbucks’ recent store development effects have been focused on “Tier 2 and Tier 3 cities where we see population growth and forecast both underserved demand and high incrementality.” We’ve revisited our visit per location data for Starbucks’ Top 25 designated market areas (DMAs) versus non-Top 25 DMAs over the last 12 full months below, and similar to our last update, Starbucks is seeing higher visits per location in its non-Top 25 markets. Many of these non-Top 25 DMA stores have been opened in the past 12-18 months, which suggests improved metrics as operational complexities are reduced and these locations enter the same-store sales base.
1. Shoppers are taking more, shorter trips to grocery stores. Over the past 12 months, grocery stores have experienced nearly uniform YoY visit growth. And since COVID, the segment has steadily increased both overall visits and average visits per location – even as average dwell times have consistently declined.
2. Grocery stores are holding ground against fierce competition. Despite growing inroads by discount and dollar stores, wholesale clubs, and general mass retailers like Walmart and Target, grocery stores have maintained their share of the overall food-at-home visit pie over the past several years.
3. Grocery visit share is most pronounced on the coasts. In Q1 2025, grocery stores claimed the majority of food-at-home visits on the West Coast, in parts of the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Mountain Regions, and in Florida and Michigan.
4. Fresh-format, value, and ethnic grocery visit shares are growing at the expense of traditional chains. And in Q1 2025, fresh-format and value grocers outperformed the other sub-segments with positive YoY visit and average visit-per-location growth.
5. Hispanic markets are on the rise. Though the broader ethnic grocery sub-segment was essentially flat YoY in Q1 2025, Hispanic-focused stores recorded increases in both visits and visits per location – and have been steadily growing visits since 2021.
6. Smaller formats for the win. In Q1 2025, smaller-format grocery store locations outpaced mid-sized and larger-format ones, underscoring the power of compact spaces to deliver significant foot traffic gains.
Brick-and-mortar grocery stores face an uncertain market in 2025. Rising food-at-home prices (eggs, anyone?), declining consumer confidence, and increased competition from discounters, superstores, and online shopping channels all present the segment with significant headwinds. Yet even in the face of these challenges, the sector has demonstrated remarkable resilience – growing its foot traffic and holding onto visit share.
What strategies have helped the segment navigate today’s tough market? And how can industry stakeholders make the most of the opportunities in the current market? This report draws on the latest location intelligence to uncover the trends shaping grocery retail in early 2025 – highlighting insights to help key players make informed, data-driven decisions on store formats, product offerings, and more.
The grocery segment has experienced nearly uniform positive year-over-year (YoY) growth over the last 12 months. This sustained performance in the face of inflation and other headwinds highlights the underlying strength of the category.
What is driving this growth? Since 2022, the grocery segment has seen consistent overall visit growth that has outpaced increases in visits per location – a sign that chain expansion has played a key role in the category’s success. But the average number of visits to each grocery store has also been on the rise, indicating that the segment continues to expand without cannibalizing existing store traffic.
At the same time, visitor dwell times have been steadily dropping since 2021. This shift appears to reflect a trend towards multiple, shorter trips by inflation-wary consumers eager to avoid large, costly carts or cherry pick deals across various retailers. Many shoppers may also be placing more bulk orders online and supplementing those deliveries with brief in-store stops for additional items as needed.
The bottom line: Shoppers are taking more grocery trips overall each year, but spending less time in-store during each visit. Operators can respond to this trend by optimizing layouts and promoting “grab-and-go” areas for an even more efficient quick-trip experience.
Visit share data also shows that despite fierce competition from discount and dollar stores, wholesalers, and general mass retailers, the grocery segment has steadfastly preserved its share of the overall food-at-home visit pie.
Between Q1 2019 and Q1 2025, wholesale clubs and discount and dollar stores increased their share of total food-at-home visits, gains that have come primarily at the expense of Walmart and Target. Meanwhile, grocery outlets have held firm – despite some fluctuations over the years, their Q1 2019 visit share remained essentially unchanged in Q1 2025.
So even as consumers flock to alternative food purveyors in search of lower prices, grocery stores aren’t losing ground – and on a nationwide level, they remain the biggest player by far in the food-at-home shopping space.
Still, grocery store visit share varies significantly by region. On the West Coast, in parts of the Northeast, Mid-Atlantic, and Mountain regions, and in Florida and Michigan, grocery stores accounted for the majority of food-at-home visits in Q1 2025. Oregon (61.6%) and Washington (59.6%) led the pack, followed by Massachusetts (59.2%), Vermont (58.5%), and California (57.9%). Meanwhile, in West Virginia, Arkansas, South Dakota, Oklahoma, North Dakota, and Mississippi, less than 30% of food-at-home traffic went to grocery stores, with more shoppers in these regions turning to general mass retailers or discounters.
Grocery store operators in lower-grocery-share regions may choose to focus on price competitiveness and convenient store locations to capture more foot traffic from competitors in the space.
Which types of grocery stores are thriving the most? The grocery segment is diverse, encompassing traditional grocery chains like Kroger, Safeway, and H-E-B; budget-oriented value chains such as Aldi, WinCo Foods, Grocery Outlet Bargain Market, and Market Basket; fresh-format specialty brands like Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and Sprouts Farmers Market; and numerous ethnic grocers.
Examining shifts in visit share among these various grocery store segments shows that traditional grocery still dominates, commanding over 70.0% of total grocery store foot traffic.
Still, over the past several years, traditional grocers have gradually ceded ground to other segments – especially value chains. Budget grocers saw a temporary surge in visits during the panic-buying days of early 2020 – and have been more gradually gaining visit share since Q1 2023. . Fresh-format banners, which lost ground in 2021 after a Q1 2020 bump, in the wake of COVID, have also been on the upswing and appear poised to capture additional visit share in the coming months and years. And though ethnic grocers still account for a relatively small portion of the overall market, they have slightly increased their visit share, reflecting heightened consumer interest in these specialized offerings.
Recent performance metrics point to a bifurcation in the grocery market similar to that observed in other retail categories. In Q1 2025, fresh-format and value retailers – which appeal, respectively, to the most and least affluent visitor bases – saw the greatest growth in both overall visits and average visits per location.
This trend highlights the power of both value and health-focused quality to motivate consumers in 2025. And grocery players that can meet these needs will be well-positioned for success in the months ahead.
One factor fueling fresh-format’s success may be its role as a convenient, relatively affordable midday lunch destination for the remote work crowd.
In Q1 2025, consumers working from home accounted for 20.2% of fresh-format grocery stores’ captured market – a significantly higher share than any other analyzed grocery segment. These stores also tended to be busier midday than the other segments. Remote workers may be stopping by to grab a quick bite – and some may be choosing to do their grocery shopping during their lunch break when stores are less crowded.
This finding suggests an opportunity for grocery operators across all segments to develop or enhance in-store salad bars and quick-serve sections to tap into the lunch rush. Likewise, CPG companies may benefit from developing more ready-made, nutritious meal options that align with these midday dining habits.
Though the broader ethnic grocery category remained essentially flat in Q1 2025, Hispanic-focused grocers emerged as a sub-segment to watch. Both overall visits and average visits per location to these stores have been on the rise since 2021.
This robust demand presents an opportunity for CPG brands and grocers across segments to expand Hispanic-focused offerings, capturing a slice of this growing market.
Finally, store size matters more than ever in 2025. During the first quarter of the year, smaller format grocery store locations (locations under 30K square feet, across different chains) outpaced larger stores with a 3.2% YoY jump in visits, showing that bigger isn’t always better in the grocery store space.
This pattern aligns with the decrease in dwell times noted above – shoppers may be making shorter trips to smaller, more convenient grocery store locations. These quick errands are ideal for picking up a few items to supplement online orders, shopping multiple deals, or sourcing specialty products unavailable at larger grocery destinations. And to lean into this trend, grocery operators might consider testing neighborhood “micro-store” concepts, focusing on curated selections, and offering convenient parking or pickup to match consumer preferences for targeted purchases and quicker trips.
Location intelligence reveals a growing, dynamic grocery landscape which is holding its ground in the face of increased competition. Shorter trips, busier lifestyles, and changing work routines are reshaping in-store experiences. And grocery players that refine their store formats, target both lunch and on-the-go shoppers, and adapt to shifting demographics can position themselves to thrive in this competitive sector. As the market continues to evolve, continuous attention to these changing patterns will be key to maintaining and expanding market share.
1. Elevated visitor frequency could mean that gym-goers are getting more value out of their memberships and are therefore more likely to stay signed up. Between January and March 2025, all of the gym chains analyzed had a higher share of frequent visitors (those who visited about once a week) than in the equivalent month of 2024.
2. Fitness chains at all price tiers need to be strategic about the value they offer and the amenities that can engage budget-conscious consumers. Between Q1 2022 and Q1 2025, the captured trade area median HHI increased for all fitness subsegments – value-priced, mid-range, and high-end – suggesting that consumers swapped pricier gym memberships for more affordable options.
3. Close attention should be paid to how long visitors spend at fitness chains in order to reduce crowding and bottlenecks. Between Q1 2022 and Q1 2025, the average visit length increased at value-priced, mid-range, and high-end gyms. Floorplan and equipment improvements could be considered, as well as having trainers available to help gym-goers streamline workouts.
4. Gyms can use hourly visit data to better serve their members or use promotions to stabilize facility usage throughout the day. In Q1 2025, high-end chains received a larger share of morning visits while value-priced and mid-range fitness chains received larger shares of evening visits.
Like many industries in recent years, the fitness sector has experienced significant shifts in consumer behavior. From the rise in home workouts during the pandemic to the strain of hyper-inflation, foot traffic trends to gyms and health clubs have been as dynamic as the consumers they serve.
This report leverages location analytics to explore the consumer trends driving visitation in the fitness space and provides actionable insights for industry stakeholders.
The pandemic drove several shifts in the fitness space. Widespread gym closures led consumers to embrace home-based workouts, while demand for all things fitness increased due to an emphasis on overall health and wellness. This subsequently drove a renewed interest in gym-based workouts as restrictions lifted – even as some consumers remained committed to their home workout routines.
In Q1 2023, visits to fitness chains surpassed Q1 2019 levels for the first time since the onset of the pandemic, a sign that consumers had recommitted to out-of-home fitness. And in Q1 2024 and Q1 2025, fitness chains saw further growth, climbing to 12.8% and 15.5% above the Q1 2019 baseline, respectively.
Several factors have likely driven consumers’ return to gyms and health clubs, including the desire for both social connection and professional-grade facilities difficult to replicate at home. The steep increase in cost of living has likely also played a role, since consumers cutting back on discretionary spending can enjoy multiple outings and a range of recreational activities at the gym for one monthly fee.
Zooming in on weekly visits to the fitness space in Q1 2025 reveals the industry’s exceptional strength and resilience in the early part of the year.
The fitness industry experienced YoY visit growth nearly every week of Q1 2025 (and 2.4% YoY visit growth overall) with only minor visit gaps the weeks of January 20th, 2025 and February 17th, 2025 – likely due to extreme weather that prevented many Americans from hitting the gym.
And the fitness industry’s weekly visit growth appeared to strengthen throughout the quarter, defying the typical waning of New Year's resolutions. This could indicate that gym visits haven't plateaued and that consumers are demonstrating greater commitment to their fitness routines compared to last year.
Diving into visitation patterns for leading fitness chains highlights how increased visitor frequency drove foot traffic growth in Q1 2025.
Fitness chains tend to receive the most visits during the first months of the year as consumers recommit to health and wellness in their post-holidays New Year’s resolutions. And not only do more people hit the gym – analyzing the data reveals that gym-goers also typically work out more frequently during this period. Zooming in on 2025 so far suggests that consumers are especially committed to their fitness routines this year: Leading gyms saw an increase in the proportion of frequent visitors (4+ times a month) in Q1 2025 compared to the already significant percentage of frequent visitors in the first quarter of 2024.
Elevated visitor frequency could mean that gym-goers are getting more value out of their memberships than last year, and are therefore more likely to stay signed up throughout the year.
At the same time, the data also reveals that – contrary to what may be expected – a fitness chain’s share of frequent visitors appears to be independent of the cost of membership associated with the club: Life Time, a high-end club, and EōS Fitness, a value-priced gym, had the highest shares of frequent visitors between January 2024 and March 2025. This suggests that factors other than cost, such as location convenience, class offerings, community, or individual motivation, might be more influential in driving frequent gym attendance.
Segmenting the fitness industry by membership price tiers – value-priced, mid-range, and high-end – can reveal further insights on current consumer behavior around out-of-home fitness.
In Q1 2025, the captured market* median household income (HHI) was higher than the nationwide median HHI ($79.6K/year) across all price tiers – suggesting that even value-priced fitness chains are attracting a relatively affluent audience. This could indicate that gym memberships are somewhat of a luxury and that consumers from lower-income households gave up their gym memberships altogether as they tightened their purse strings.
Analyzing the historical data since Q1 2022 also reveals that the captured market median HHI has risen consistently over the past couple of years with the largest median HHI increase observed in the captured trade areas of high-end fitness chains. This suggests that middle-income households – that are more sensitive to the rising cost of living – likely swapped pricier gym memberships for more affordable options in recent years.
These metrics indicate that fitness chains at all price tiers need to think strategically about the value they offer and the amenities that can engage budget-conscious consumers who are carefully weighing every expenditure.
*Captured trade area is obtained by weighting the census block groups (CBGs) from which the chain draws its visitors according to their share of visits to the chain and thus reflects the population that visits the chain in practice.
Fitness clubs of all types need to manage their capacity to ensure health and safety standards and a positive experience for members. And understanding the average amount of time visitors spend at the gym can help fitness chains at every price point keep their finger on the pulse of their facilities.
Between Q1 2022 and Q1 2025, the average visit length increased at value-priced, mid-range, and high-end gyms. Value-priced gyms experienced the largest increase in average visit length – from 72.4 minutes in Q1 2022 to 74.0 minutes in Q1 2025 – perhaps due to their relatively lower-income visitors spending more time enjoying club amenities after cutting back on other forms of recreation. Meanwhile, mid-range and high-end gyms experienced relatively modest increases in average visit length, which were higher to begin with – likely due to their ample class and spa offerings and overall inviting, upscale spaces.
Elevated average visit length could mean that visitors are well-engaged and less likely to cancel their memberships. But as overall gym visits are on the rise, fitness chains may want to pay close attention to how long visitors spend at the facility. Floorplan and equipment improvements could be considered in order to reduce bottlenecks, and having trainers available to instruct on equipment usage and workout technique could help gym-goers streamline workouts.
Along with average visit length, understanding the daypart in which they receive the most visits is another way that fitness chains can improve efficiency and prevent overcrowding. And analysis of the hourly visits to fitness sub-segments revealed that some fitness segments receive more morning visits while others are more popular in the evenings.
In Q1 2025, high-end chains received a larger share of visits between 6 a.m. and 9 a.m. (19.7%) than value-priced and mid-range fitness chains (11.6% and 11.8%, respectively). Meanwhile, value-priced and mid-range fitness chains received larger shares of visits between 6 p.m. and 9 p.m. (21.9% and 22.2%) than high-end chains (16.5%).
Gyms can leverage this data to better serve members, for instance by scheduling more classes during peak hours. Value-priced and mid-range gyms, which saw a larger disparity between shares of morning and evening visits in Q1 2025, might also consider incentivizing off-peak usage through discounted morning memberships or early-bird snack bar deals.
The fitness space appears to be in good shape in 2025. Visits have made a full recovery from the pandemic era and still continue to grow, indicating strong consumer demand for out-of-home workouts. And using location intelligence to analyze the behavior and demographics of visitors to gyms at different price points can help identify opportunities for driving even greater success.
1. Idaho and South Carolina have emerged as significant domestic migration magnets over the past four years. Between January 2021 and 2025, both states gained over 3.0% of their populations through domestic migration. Other Mountain and Sun Belt states – including Nevada, Montana, and Florida – also drew significant inflow, while California, New York, and Illinois experienced the greatest outmigration.
2. Interstate migration cooled noticeably in 2024. During the 12-month period ending January 2025, California, New York and Illinois saw their outflows slow dramatically, while domestic migration hotspots like Georgia, Texas, and Florida saw inflows flatten to zero. A similar cooling trend emerged on a CBSA level.
3. Still, some states continued to see notable relocation activity over the past year. In 2024, Idaho, South Carolina, and North Dakota drew the most relocators relative to their populations. And among the nation’s ten largest states, North Carolina led with an inflow of 0.4%.
4. Phoenix remained a rare bright spot among the nation’s ten largest metro areas. The CBSA was the only major analyzed hub to maintain positive net domestic migration through 2024.
Over the past several years, the United States has experienced significant domestic migration shifts, driven by factors like remote work, housing affordability, and regional economic opportunities. As some areas reap the benefits of population inflows, others grapple with outflows tied to higher living costs and evolving workplace dynamics.
This report dives into the location analytics to explore where Americans have moved since 2021 – and how these patterns began to change in 2024.
Since 2021, Americans have flocked toward warmer climates, expansive natural scenery, and more affordable housing options – particularly in the Mountain and Sun Belt states.
Between January 2021 and January 2025, South Carolina led the nation in positive net domestic migration – drawing an influx of newcomers equivalent to 3.6% of its January 2025 population. (This metric is referred to as a state’s “net migrated percent of population.”) Next in line was Idaho with a 3.4% net migrated percent of population, followed by Nevada, (2.8%), Montana (2.8%), Florida (2.1%), South Dakota (2.1%), Wyoming (2.0%), North Carolina (2.0%), and Tennessee (1.9%). Texas saw positive net migration of just 0.9% during the same period. However, the Lone Star State’s large overall population means a substantial number of newcomers in absolute terms.
Meanwhile, California (-2.2%), New York (-2.1%), and Illinois (-1.9%) experienced the greatest outflows relative to their populations. This exodus was driven largely by soaring housing costs and the rise of remote work, which lowered barriers to moving out of high-priced areas.
Between January 2024 and January 2025, many of the same broad patterns persisted, but at a more moderate clip – suggesting a stabilization of domestic migration nationwide. This leveling off could reflect factors such as rising mortgage interest rates, which dampened home buying and selling, as well as the increased push for employees to return to the office.
Still, South Carolina (+0.6%) and Idaho (+0.6%) remained among the top inflow states. The two hotspots were joined – and slightly surpassed – by North Dakota (+0.8%), where even modest waves of newcomers make a big impact due to the state’s lower population base. A wealth of affordable housing and a strong job market have positioned North Dakota as a particularly attractive destination for U.S. relocators in recent years. And Microsoft and Amazon’s establishment of major presences around Fargo has strengthened the region’s economy.
Meanwhile, California (-0.3%), New York (-0.2%), and Illinois (-0.1%) continued to post negative net migration, but at a markedly slower rate than in prior years. And notably, several states that had been struggling with outflow, such as Michigan, Minnesota, Virginia, Ohio, and Oregon, began showing minor positive inflow during the same 12-month window. As home affordability erodes in pandemic-era hot spots like the Mountain states and Sun Belt, these areas may emerge as new destinations for Americans seeking lower costs of living.
Zooming in on the ten most populous U.S. states offers an even clearer picture of how domestic migration patterns have stabilized over the past year. The graph below shows a side-by-side comparison of domestic migration patterns during the 36-month period ending January 2024 and the 12-month period ending January 2025.
California, New York, and Illinois saw population outflows slow dramatically during the 12 months ending January 2025 – while domestic migration magnets such as Georgia, Texas, and Florida saw inflow flatten to zero. Meanwhile, Ohio, Michigan, and Pennsylvania flipped from slightly negative to slightly positive net migration – incremental upticks that could signal a possible turnaround.
The only “Big Ten” pandemic-era migration magnet to maintain strong inflow in 2024 was North Carolina – which saw a 0.4% influx in 2024 as a result of interstate moves.
A closer look at the top four states receiving outmigration from California and New York (October 2020 to October 2024) reveals that residents leaving both states tended to settle in nearby areas or in Florida.
Among those leaving New York, 37.4% ended up in neighboring states – 21.1% moved to New Jersey, 9.2% to Pennsylvania, and 7.1% to Connecticut. But an astonishing 28.8% decamped all the way to the Sunshine State, trading the Northeast’s colder climate for Florida sunshine.
Similarly, 20.1% of California leavers chose to stay nearby, moving to Nevada (11.5%) or Arizona (8.6%). Another 19.1% moved to Texas, and 8.0% moved to Florida, making it the fourth-largest destination for Californians.
Zooming in on CBSA-level data – focusing on the nation’s ten largest metropolitan areas, all with over five million people – reveals a similar picture of slowing domestic migration over the last year.
Los Angeles, New York, Chicago, and Washington, D.C. – four cities that experienced notable population outflows between January 2021 and January 2024 – saw those outflows flatten considerably. For these metros, this leveling-off may serve as a promising sign that the waves of departures seen in recent years may have begun to subside. Conversely, Houston and Dallas, which both welcomed positive net migration between January 2021 and January 2024, registered zero-net domestic migration in 2024. Atlanta, for its part, remained flat in both of the analyzed periods.
In Miami, however, outmigration persisted at a substantial rate. Despite Florida’s overall status as a domestic migration magnet, Miami lost 2.6% of its population to domestic net migration between January 2020 and January 2024 – and another 1.0% between January 2024 and January 2025. As one of Florida’s most expensive housing markets, Miami may be losing some residents to other parts of the state or elsewhere in the region. Meanwhile, Philadelphia, which lost 0.3% of its population to net domestic migration between January 2021 and January 2024, continued losing residents at a slightly faster pace in 2024 – another 0.3% just last year.
Of the ten biggest CBSAs nationwide, only Phoenix continued to see a net domestic migration gain through 2024 (+0.2%). This highlights the CBSA’s continued draw as a (relative) relocation hotspot even in 2024’s cooling market.
Who are the domestic relocators heading to Phoenix?
From October 2020 to October 2024, the top five metro areas sending residents to the Phoenix CBSA each registered median household incomes (HHIs) of $73K to $98K – surpassing Phoenix’s own median of $72K. This suggests that many of those moving in are arriving from wealthier, often more expensive metro areas – for whom even Phoenix’s high-priced market may offer more affordable living.
Overall, domestic migration patterns appear to have cooled in 2024, reflecting economic and societal trends that have slowed the rush from pricey coastal hubs to more affordable regions. Yet states like South Carolina, Idaho, and North Dakota – as well as metro areas like Phoenix – continue to attract new arrivals, paving the way for evolving regional demographics in the years to come.
