.svg)
Barnes & Noble has undergone a transformation in recent years – with new leadership and a strategic shift towards smaller, more localized book stores.
But how have these changes impacted the chain’s performance? We dove into the data to find out.
Since November 2023, Barnes & Noble has experienced consistent YoY visit growth. Only in January did foot traffic dip into the red – likely a result of the unusual cold snap that weighed on retailers nationwide.
Like many booksellers, Barnes & Noble does a significant share of its yearly business during the holiday shopping season, when people flock to bookstores to buy gifts for loved ones. So the chain’s impressive YoY performance in November and December 2023 offers an especially promising sign of its positioning going forward.
Barnes & Noble boasts more than 600 stores across the country, and after several years during which it shuttered locations, the chain has begun to expand once again. The company recently acquired Tattered Cover – a Denver-based independent bookseller, which Barnes & Noble will continue to operate under its existing name. And the Chicago area is getting five new Barnes & Noble locations this year.
Examining the visitation patterns and characteristics of Barnes & Noble’s existing visitor base in these CBSAs highlights the bookseller’s growth potential in these regions. In both CBSAs, the chain experienced positive YoY foot traffic growth in early 2024. Barnes & Noble locations in both CBSAs also drew customers from areas with higher median household incomes (HHIs) and greater shares of families with children than the chain’s nationwide baseline – two groups that may be particularly likely to frequent bookstores.
One key factor that has powered Barnes & Noble’s growth trajectory is its emphasis on curating local, independent bookstore feel in its stores. This approach allows individual store managers autonomy in decision-making, and emphasizes stocking local authors and hosting community events.
And diving into the psychographic characteristics of Barnes & Noble’s visitor base in these two expansion markets reveals that, while visitors share some similarities across different geographical regions, they also have unique characteristics.
For example, the Experian: Mosaic dataset identified higher shares of “Singles and Starters” and “Promising Families” in the trade areas that feed visitors to Denver-Aurora-Lakewood Barnes & Noble locations. Meanwhile, stores in the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin tended to attract visitors coming from trade areas with higher shares of “Power Elite” residents.
Local stores can harness these insights to effectively curate a retail experience that resonates with their customer bases: Denver-area Barnes & Noble locations can actively court young families with children or singles who are starting out in their careers. On the flip side, Chicago-area stores can curate offerings to resonate with their more affluent customer base.
Barnes & Noble is demonstrating how to maintain relevance in a world dominated by Amazon. By creating an experience that satisfies book lovers' craving for an independent bookstore atmosphere, the company is thriving.
Will Barnes & Noble sustain strong visitor numbers while maintaining its local charm?
Visit Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven retail insights.
Small-format stores which offer consumers more convenient and localized shopping experiences are on the rise. The trend has been gaining traction since COVID – spearheaded by major retailers like Macy's and Nordstrom, and followed by players such as IKEA, Target, Best Buy, and others.
But what impact do small-format stores have on shopper behavior? We dove into the data to explore consumer interaction with three retailers that are leaning into the small-format space: Sprouts Farmers Market, Bloomingdale’s, and BJ’s Wholesale Club.
Sprouts Farmers Market provides a great example of how a small-format expansion strategy can drive visit growth. Since January 2022, the chain has doubled down on a small-format strategy aimed at significantly reducing the chain’s square footage and environmental impact. And partially thanks to this expansion effort, Sprout saw visits to its smaller format stores increase by nearly 50.0% over the same period – helping the brand outpace the overall grocery sector in early 2024.
By focusing on customer acquisition through smaller accessible stores, Sprouts is successfully meeting the demand for convenience and sustainability. And as a pioneer in the small-format grocery space, Sprouts is setting a high bar for other grocery chains like Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s, who are rolling out their own smaller convenience-style locations. Could this mark the start of an overall shift in the grocery sector? Only time will tell.
In February 2024, Macy’s announced a turnaround plan calling for the closing of about 30% of its traditional department stores, the opening of smaller versions of the company’s eponymous chain, and the addition of more Bloomingdale’s locations. Macy’s also plans the addition of at least one more small-format Bloomie’s store this year – the highly curated, small-format neighborhood concept launched by Macy’s in 2021. With three locations nationwide – and a fourth set to open this fall in New Jersey – Bloomie’s features a mix of established brands and trendy pop-ups tailored to local tastes.
And zooming in on visitation data for the Bloomie’s in Skokie, Illinois shows how the format helps Bloomingdale’s attract new audience segments. Compared to Bloomingdale’s full-size locations, visitors to the Skokie Bloomie’s in May 2024 came from areas with higher shares of urbanites – including STI: Landscape’s “Urban Cliff Dwellers”, “Seasoned Urban Dwellers”, and “Urban Cliff Climbers” segments. This indicates that Bloomie’s appeals to city dwellers – aligning with Bloomingdale’s goal of providing a contemporary, accessible, and convenient shopping experience in urban settings.
In April 2022, BJ’s Wholesale Club unveiled BJ’s Market - a smaller-format store in Warwick, Rhode Island that’s roughly half the size of a full-sized club location. Examining the location’s visit performance over the last two years highlights the significant impact small-format stores can have on customer engagement and loyalty.
During the first five months of 2024, BJ’s small-format Warwick location experienced consistent YoY visit growth – outperforming the chain’s already-impressive state- and nationwide averages over nearly the entire analyzed period.
But visitors also interacted with the small-format venue differently in other important ways as well. Unsurprisingly, the average visit stay at the small format BJ’s in May 2024 was significantly shorter than the average stay at BJ’s in Rhode Island and at the chain nationwide (21 minutes, versus 27.6 and 30.7 minutes, respectively). And people tended to drop by the Warwick BJ’s more frequently – with 55.0% of visitors visiting the location at least twice during the month, compared to just 37.5% in Rhode Island and 38.7% nationwide.
BJ’s testing of the Warwick small-format location proves that wholesale can be extended beyond endless roaming through enormous big box stores in search for the best value bargain. There is a clear demand for a quicker, more frequent and more efficient shopping experience in the wholesale space, and BJ’s is seizing the opportunity.
Retailers across categories are increasingly incorporating small format stores into their evolving store footprints – with promising results. How will this trend continue to play out? And will consumer preferences continue to shift towards quick, efficient, experiential, and curated shopping experiences?
Follow Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven retail trends.
June 16th, 2024 was Father’s Day – and sons and daughters nationwide took the opportunity to show their dad some appreciation. But how did Father’s Day retail and dining foot traffic compare to that of Mother’s Day?
We dove into the data to find out.
Last month, we observed that though Mother’s Day wasn’t actually created by the greeting card industry, the holiday is one of Hallmark’s busiest days of the year.
And foot traffic analytics show that Father’s Day isn’t far behind. On June 15th, 2024 (the Saturday before Father’s Day), Hallmark stores drew 54.9% more visits than on an average year-to-date (YTD) Saturday – making it the company’s third-busiest day of the year so far. Only May 10th and May 11th, the days before Mother’s Day, drew bigger crowds to the greeting card chain.
And a look at visits to major industries that are top picks for dads shows that a variety of segments enjoyed visit boosts in the run-up to Father’s Day – though for most categories, the magnitude of the bump was considerably smaller than that seen before Mother’s Day.
But for one category in particular – recreational and sporting goods – it was the day before Father’s Day that was the bigger deal. On June 15th, 2024, visits to these retailers jumped 30.9% compared to an average YTD Sunday – making them the biggest beneficiaries of dad’s special occasion. Hobbies, crafts, & gift stores, on the other hand – which saw a substantial visit boost in the lead-up to Mother’s Day – experienced a drop in foot traffic.
Like on Mother’s Day, grateful offspring ponied up on Father’s Day to treat their dads to a nice, sit-down meal. On June 16th, 2024, visits to full-service dining venues jumped 30.3% compared to a YTD Sunday average. Meanwhile, visits to quick-service restaurants increased just slightly, and those to fast-casual establishments declined.
Still, throughout most of the country, full-service restaurants (FSRs) were much busier this year on Mother’s Day than on Father’s Day. The discrepancy was most pronounced in Northeastern states like Connecticut, Pennsylvania, New York, New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Maine, and New Jersey – where Mother’s Day FSR visits were more than 20.0% higher than Father’s Day ones. But two states in the Pacific Northwest, Washington and Oregon, drew more FSR foot traffic on Father’s Day than on Mother’s Day – perhaps due in part to the region’s special connection to the occasion honoring dads. (The tradition of celebrating Father’s Day originated in Spokane, WA in the early 1900’s, decades before it was declared a federal holiday in 1972).
The dining difference between Father’s Day and Mother’s Day is about more than just quantity: Where moms have a clear soft spot for Olive Garden, dads are all about the steak. Texas Roadhouse was the single busiest FSR chain on Father’s Day this year, with visits outpacing an average YTD Sunday by 49.4%.
Father’s Day doesn’t have quite the same retail and dining impact as Mother’s Day – but it’s an important milestone nonetheless.
What other special calendar days are poised to draw outsize customer foot traffic in 2024?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven retail and dining analyses to find out.
We’ve previously written about the influence of East Asian, Southeast Asian, and Hispanic cultures and their influence on groceries, malls, and food halls with the likes of H Mart, 99 Ranch, Asia Garden Mall, and Mercado Gonazlez. Now, let’s turn our attention to the huge Indian subcontinent, which includes India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives.
One of this summer’s breakout sports stories is that of Sarubh Netravalkar, Oracle software engineer by day, Cricket star on the side! He helped Team USA beat Pakistan during the Men’s T20 Cricket World Cup in a huge upset, and has now been nicknamed the “Desi Diaspora Darling.” The United States is co-hosting and participating in this Cricket tournament for the first time, and fans came out in droves to Eisenhower Stadium in Nassau, NY, which essentially became a pop-up stadium in order for the competition to take place. Tikka fries, an ultimate combo of South Asian flavor and American snack favorite, were on offer at the concession stands.
The embrace of South Asian flavors can also be seen in the growth and success at grocery. Patel Brothers and India Bazaar are two Indian grocery chains that have been growing rapidly. The former saw increased year-over-year growth in 8 of the 12 months preceding. Meanwhile, the latter saw year-over-year growth in 11 out of the last 12 months.
The grocery stores can be found in various states in the US, with a particular concentration for Patel Bros in the Chicago, New York, Boston, and DC areas and for India Bazaar in the Dallas area.
South Asian food has many highly flavorful vegetarian and vegan options, which makes it attractive to those seeking a taste boost to dishes. Chai is a staple at many tea and coffee specialty stores, and some are saying that naan sandwiches could be the next burrito. Having the right recipe can really open doors. Bombay Frankie, now located within Westfield Culver City, has its origins at a gas station, but the demand became so high that they opened up a brick-and-mortar restaurant. Their affectionately called “Indian Burrito” comes both rolled up or deconstructed. With deconstructed, one can decide the perfect bite ratio of fluffy naan, seasoned chicken, cool raita, crunchy cucumbers, and tomatoes bursting with flavor.
A quick Google search shows a burst of restaurants that incorporate naan into their name, such as Naan-tastic, Naansense, and Naan & Kabob. Naan n Curry is an example of a naan chain that has seen positive year-over-year growth.
Sourcing food at home has become a lot more attractive for consumers against the backdrop of economic concerns in 2024. In Kroger’s earnings call, CEO Rodney McMullen called out that out of home food costs are outpacing in home food costs, leading shoppers to focus more on in-home meal solutions. Cooking can be seen as a cost saving lever for visitors, but the pandemic period also fostered a love of cooking and spending time in the kitchen, even for higher income households not necessarily looking to save money. And it appears through Placer’s location insights that retailers that focus on outfitting the kitchen have been benefiting from this change in consumer behavior.
Despite the home industry having its challenges in foot traffic after the pandemic, housewares retailers have had some positive momentum over the past few months. Beyond that, houseware retailers that specialize in kitchen wares, such as Crate & Barrel and Sur La Table, have seen traffic growth throughout 2024. Williams-Sonoma, despite challenging year-over-year declines in traffic, reported comparable sales growth in the first quarter of 2024, which signals a higher level of conversion in-store.
Sur La Table, a retailer that’s been challenged in the past, has found new life in changing consumer needs. One of Sur La Table’s core competencies is in-store cooking classes, and experiential retail continues to be one way the industry can provide inherent value to visitors. Dwell times are almost 10 minutes longer than Williams-Sonoma, its closest competitor (below). It also has the highest median household income of visitors and has the highest share of visits from households over $150k. Certainly at-home cooking has increased across income brackets, but high-end consumers also appear to be interested in adjacent home categories to take their skills to the next level. Blending product knowledge, experiences and assortment has greatly benefitted Sur La Table, and even against a challenging specialty retail landscape, the retailer has once again found its niche.
These retailers are often at the top of wedding registry lists, which could benefit traffic as we head into the summer months and the height of wedding season. Crate & Barrel, while not solely a kitchen focused retailer, has long been known as a registry destination that helps registrants outfit a kitchen with all of the cookware and gadgets one could need. Year to date through June, Crate & Barrel traffic is up 3% year-over-year, which is even more impressive considering that its assortment features an array of home furnishings categories, including furniture. Looking at demographic segments using Spatial.ai, Crate & Barrel over indexes in visits from Educated Urbanites and Young Professionals and Sunset Boomers compared the the average of other housewares chains, a signal that the wedding registry business, typically fueled by kitchen goods, could be attracting these particular subsets. Crate & Barrel also has a high level of loyalty in visits compared to other competitors in the space.
As we reported about Wayfair a few weeks ago, home retailers that have created exciting experiences and reasons to visit are still resonating with consumers, despite the tempered interest in the home category. An increased interest in cooking by consumers certainly plays a part in these retailers' success, but they have also had to provide even more incentive to drive traffic growth as consumers shift their attention away from purchasing for their homes. Having an experiential component or registry business have kept kitchen focused retailers more aligned with their consumer’s needs, which drive inherent value in today’s retail landscape, something not easy to come by.
Thrifting is on the rise. Whether fueled by a desire to shop more sustainably, find unique pieces, or save money, consumers have been increasingly turning to secondhand clothing stores for their new threads. And interest in thrift shopping is only expected to grow over the next few years – with some estimates putting the U.S. secondhand market at $73 billion by 2028.
With 2024 nearly at the midway point, we dove into the data to take a closer look at the segment.
The past few years have seen a growing interest among consumers in all things value, and thrift shops have been reaping the benefits. Between January and May 2024, the segment experienced strong monthly year-over-year (YoY) foot traffic growth. And compared to pre-COVID, too, thrift stores drew 29.6% more foot traffic in Q1 2024 than in Q1 2019.
Diving into the visit performance of individual thrift store chains reveals strength across a variety of brands. YoY visits to Goodwill, Crossroads Trading Co., and Savers were consistently elevated between January and May 2024.
Who are the shoppers driving thrift shop visit growth? Analyzing the demographics of thrift store visitors’ trade areas reveals that in 2024, thrift stores serve an economically diverse customer base. Data from the STI: PopStats dataset combined with Placer.ai captured market data shows that Goodwill draws customers from areas with a median household income (HHI) below the nationwide median $76.1K. Savers, for its part, draws shoppers from average-income areas, while Crossroad Trading Co. attracts a high-HHI customer base – likely due to the chain’s strong presence in affluent California and focus on high-end items.
Still, a look at the wider apparel shopping habits of thrift store visitors shows that these shoppers tend to be bargain hunters: Between January and May 2024, visitors to Crossroads Trading Co. and Savers were more likely to visit Goodwill than any other clothing chain. But they – together with Goodwill visitors – also did plenty of shopping at off-price chains like Ross Dress For Less, Marshall’s, and T.J. Maxx. (Crossroad Trading Co., which places a strong emphasis on selling on-trend, high-end items, also saw many of its customers shopping at Macy’s, while Savers visitors were more likely to frequent Kohl’s).
This consistent interest in budget-friendly venues underscores the strong preference for value among the growing ranks of thrift store shoppers
Thrifting is proving its staying power, with visits to major thrift stores outpacing those of other apparel categories. Will the secondhand market continue on its upward trajectory?
Follow Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven retail trends.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
1. Appetite for offline retail & dining is stronger than ever. Both retail and dining visits were higher in H1 2025 than they were pre-pandemic.
2. Consumers are willing to go the extra mile for the perfect product or brand. The era of one-stop-shops may be waning, as many consumers now prefer to visit multiple chains or stores to score the perfect product match for every item on their shopping list.
3. Value – and value perception – gives chains a clear advantage. Value-oriented retail and dining segments have seen their visits skyrocket since the pandemic.
4. Consumer behavior has bifurcated toward budget and premium options. This trend is driving strength at the ends of the spectrum while putting pressure on many middle-market players.
5. The out-of-home entertainment landscape has been fundamentally altered. Eatertainment and museums have stabilized at a different set point than pre-COVID, while movie theater traffic trends are now characterized by box-office-driven volatility.
6. Hybrid work permanently reshaped office utilization. Visits to office buildings nationwide are still 33.3% below 2019 levels, despite RTO efforts.
The first half of 2025 marked five years since the onset of the pandemic – an event that continues to impact retail, dining, entertainment, and office visitation trends today.
This report analyzes visitation patterns in the first half of 2025 compared to H1 2019 and H1 2024 to identify some of the lasting shifts in consumer behavior over the past five years. What is driving consumers to stores and dining venues? Which categories are stabilizing at a higher visit point? Where have the traffic declines stalled? And which segments are still in flux? Read the report to find out.
In the first half of 2025, visits to both the retail and dining segments were consistently higher than they were in 2019. In both the dining and the retail space, the increases compared to pre-COVID were probably driven by significant expansions from major players, including Costco, Chick-fil-A, Raising Cane's, and Dutch Bros, which offset the numerous retail and dining closures of recent years.
The overall increase in visits indicates that, despite the ubiquity of online marketplaces and delivery services, consumer appetite for offline retail and dining remains strong – whether to browse in store, eat on-premises, collect a BOPIS order, or pick up takeaway.
A closer look at the chart above also reveals that, while both retail and dining visits have exceeded pre-pandemic levels, retail visit growth has slightly outpaced the dining traffic increase.
The larger volume of retail visits could be due to a shift in consumer behavior – from favoring convenience to prioritizing the perfect product match and exhibiting a willingness to visit multiple chains to benefit from each store's signature offering. Indeed, zooming into the superstore and grocery sector shows an increase in cross-shopping since COVID, with a larger share of visitors to major grocery chains regularly visiting superstores and wholesale clubs. It seems, then, that many consumers are no longer looking for a one-stop-shop where they can buy everything at once. Instead, shoppers may be heading to the grocery stores for some things, the dollar store for other items, and the wholesale club for a third set of products.
This trend also explains the success of limited assortment grocers in recent years – shoppers are willing to visit these stores to pick up their favorite snack or a particularly cheap store-branded basic, knowing that this will be just one of several stops on their grocery run.
Diving into the traffic data by retail category reveals that much of the growth in retail visits since COVID can be attributed to the surge in visits to value-oriented categories, such as discount & dollar stores, value grocery stores, and off-price apparel. This period has been defined by an endless array of economic obstacles like inflation, recession concerns, gas price spikes, and tariffs that all trigger an orientation to value. The shift also speaks to an ability of these categories to capitalize on swings – consumers who visited value-oriented retailers to cut costs in the short term likely continued visiting those chains even after their economic situation stabilized.
Some of the visit increases are due to the aggressive expansion strategies of leaders in those categories – including Dollar General and Dollar Tree, Aldi, and all the off-price leaders. But the dramatic increase in traffic – around 30% for all three categories since H1 2019 – also highlights the strong appetite for value-oriented offerings among today's consumers. And zooming into YoY trends shows that the visit growth is still ongoing, indicating that the demand for value has not yet reached a ceiling.
While affordable pricing has clearly driven success for value retailers, offering low prices isn't a guaranteed path to growth. Although traffic to beauty and wellness chains remains significantly higher than in 2019, this growth has now plateaued – even top performers like Ulta saw slight YoY declines following their post-pandemic surge – despite the relatively affordable price points found at these chains.
Some of the beauty visit declines likely stems from consumers cutting discretionary spending – but off-price apparel's ongoing success in the same non-essential category suggests budget constraints aren't the full story. Instead, the plateauing of beauty and drugstore visits while off-price apparel visits boom may be due to the difference in value perception: Off-price retailers are inherently associated with savings, while drugstores and beauty retailers, despite carrying affordable items, lack that same value-driven brand positioning. This may suggest that in today's market, perceived value matters as much as actual affordability.
Another indicator of the importance of value perception is the decline in visits to chains selling bigger-ticket items – both home furnishing chains and electronic stores saw double-digit drops in traffic since H1 2019.
And looking at YoY trends shows that visits here have stabilized – like in the beauty and drugstore categories – suggesting that these sectors have reached a new baseline that reflects permanently shifted consumer priorities around discretionary spending.
A major post-pandemic consumer trend has been the bifurcation of consumer spending – with high-end chains and discount retailers thriving while the middle falls behind. This trend is particularly evident in the apparel space – although off-price visits have taken off since 2019 (as illustrated in the earlier graph) overall apparel traffic declined dramatically – while luxury apparel traffic is 7.6% higher than in 2019.
Dining traffic trends also illustrate this shift: Categories that typically offer lower price points such as QSR, fast casual, and coffee have expanded significantly since 2019, as has the upscale & fine dining segment. But casual dining – which includes classic full-service chains such as Red Lobster, Applebee's, and TGI Fridays – has seen its footprint shrink in recent years as consumers trade down to lower-priced options or visit higher-end venues for special occasions.
Chili's has been a major exception to the casual dining downturn, largely driven by the chain's success in cementing its value-perception among consumers – suggesting that casual dining chains can still shine in the current climate by positioning themselves as leaders in value.
Consumers' current value orientation seems to be having an impact beyond the retail and dining space: When budgets are tight, spending money in one place means having less money to spend in another – and recent data suggests that the consumer resilience in retail and dining may be coming at the expense of travel – or perhaps experiences more generally.
While airport visits from domestic travelers were up compared to pre-COVID, diving into the data reveals that the growth is mostly driven by frequent travelers visiting airports two or more times in a month. Meanwhile, the number of more casual travelers – those visiting airports no more than once a month – is lower than it was in 2019.
This may suggest that – despite consumers' self-reported preferences for "memorable, shareable moments" – at least some Americans are actually de-prioritizing experiences in the first half of 2025, and choosing instead to spend their budgets in retail and dining venues.
The out of home entertainment landscape has also undergone a significant change since COVID – and the sector seems to have settled into a new equilibrium, though for part of the sector, the equilibrium is marked by consistent volatility.
Eatertainment chains – led by significant expansions from venues like Top Golf – saw a 5.5% visit increase compared to pre-pandemic levels, though YoY growth remained modest at 1.1%. On the other hand, H1 2025 museum traffic fell 10.9% below 2019 levels with flat YoY performance (+0.2%). The minimal year-over-year changes in both categories suggest that these entertainment segments have found their new post-COVID equilibrium.
The rise of eatertainment alongside the drop in museum visits may also reflect the intense focus on value for today's consumers. Museums in 2025 offer essentially the same value proposition that they offered in 2019 – and for some, that value proposition may no longer justify the entrance fee. But eatertainment has gained popularity in recent years as a format that offers consumers more bang for their buck relative to stand-alone dining or entertainment venues – which makes it the perfect candidate for success in today's value-driven consumer landscape.
But movie theaters traffic trends are still evolving – even accounting for venue closures, visits in H1 2025 were well below H1 2019 levels. But compared to 2024, movie traffic was also up – buoyed by the release of several blockbusters that drove audiences back to cinemas in the first half of 2025. So while the segment is still far from its pre-COVID baseline, movie theaters retain the potential for significant traffic spikes when compelling content drives consumer demand.
The blockbuster-driven YoY increase can perhaps also be linked to consumers' spending caution. With budgets tight, movie-goers may want to make sure that they're spending time and money on films they are sure to enjoy – taking fewer risks than they did in 2019, when movie tickets and concession prices were lower and consumers were less budget-conscious.
H1 2025 also brought some moderate good news on the return to office (RTO) front, with YoY visits nationwide up 2.1% and most offices seeing YoY office visit increases – perhaps due to the plethora of RTO mandates from major companies. But comparing office visitation levels to pre pandemic levels highlights the way left to go – nationwide visits were 33.3% below H1 2019 levels in H1 2025, with even RTO leaders New York and Miami still seeing 11.9% and 16.1% visit gaps, respectively.
So while the data suggests that the office recovery story is still being written – with visits inching up slowly – the substantial gap from pre-pandemic levels suggests that remote and hybrid work models have fundamentally reshaped office utilization patterns.
Five years post-pandemic, consumer behavior across the retail, dining, entertainment, and office spaces has crystallized into distinct new patterns.
Traffic to retail and dining venues now surpasses pre-pandemic levels, driven primarily by value-focused segments. But retail and dining segments that cater to higher income consumers –such as luxury apparel and fine dining – have also stabilized at a higher level, highlighting the bifurcation of consumer behavior that has emerged in recent years. Entertainment formats show more variability – while eatertainment traffic has settled above and museums below 2019 levels, and movie theaters still seeking stability. Office spaces remain the laggard, with visits well below pre-pandemic levels despite corporate return-to-office initiatives showing modest impact.
It seems, then, that the new consumer landscape rewards businesses that can clearly articulate their value proposition to attract consumers' increasingly selective spending and time allocation – or offer a premium product or experience catering to higher-income audiences.
