.svg)
Walmart’s recent acquisition of the Pittsburgh, PA-area Monroeville Mall signals a new chapter for the retail giant, creating opportunities for both Walmart and the mall itself. Why did Walmart choose this particular property, what makes it such an appealing prospect – and what might the company do with the space?
We dove into the data to find out.
Unsurprisingly, shoppers also interact differently with malls – including the Monroeville Mall purchased by Walmart – than they do with Walmart. In 2024, for example, 39.4% of indoor mall visits nationwide took place on weekends, compared to just 33.6% for Walmart. Mall shoppers were also more likely to travel further for their visits and stay longer, partly due to the entertainment and dining options malls typically offer. (Monroeville Mall, for instance, is home to a Cinemark movie theater). By moving into the mall space, Walmart stands to reach a new kind of shopper, both demographically and behaviorally.
Why did Walmart choose to begin its foray into malls with the Monroeville Mall? Foot traffic data points to a unique balance here: The Monroeville Mall audience is different enough to expand Walmart’s reach, yet still similar in ways that could make it easier to convert new shoppers.
Analyzing Walmart’s trade areas with demographic data from STI: PopStats, for example, reveals that, on average, indoor mall shoppers tend to be more affluent than Walmart shoppers. In 2024, the median household income (HHI) of Walmart’s captured market was $64.5K – noticeably below the indoor mall median of $88.5K. But Monroeville Mall’s captured market had a median HHI of $62.8K – slightly below that of local Walmarts in the Pittsburgh, PA CBSA. Monroeville shoppers were also more likely to visit Walmart than shoppers at other malls, suggesting a natural overlap between the two visitor bases.
At the same time, Monroeville Mall offers Walmart access to new audience segments. In 2024, Monroeville Mall’s captured market showed significantly higher proportions of “Singles and Starters” and “Suburban Style” visitors (the latter encompassing middle-aged, suburban families with upscale incomes). Meanwhile, its share of the older “Autumn Years” segment – though still high – was smaller than that of Walmart’s base, highlighting the opportunity to engage a wider range of demographics.
Walmart has yet to announce specific plans for its new acquisition – though some have speculated that its partnership with Cypress Equities to “reimagine” the space signals a mix of retail, entertainment, and other amenities. Location analytics hint at several potential directions Walmart might pursue.
As consumers have changed their shopping habits, many malls have doubled down on experiential offerings – including on-site gyms, which deliver regular, repeat visits. And location analytics show that adding a fitness club to the Monroeville property may be especially beneficial for Walmart. Over the past year, Monroeville visitors were more likely to visit leading gym chains like Planet Fitness, Anytime Fitness, and LA Fitness compared to the average mall-goer nationwide.
And examining some of Monroeville Mall’s successful tenants highlights additional potential strategies for Walmart. Malls have faced considerable headwinds in recent years, and the downturn appears to have impacted the Monroeville Mall as well, with overall foot traffic dipping somewhat year over year (YoY) in 2024. But some tenants – including Barnes & Noble and Harbor Freight Tools – saw YoY visit upticks.
Visits to entertainment-focused offerings also increased, with the complex’s Full Throttle Adrenaline Park logging a 6.1% YoY foot traffic boost. And taking a broader look at the consumer habits of Monroeville visitors reveals an affinity for eatertainment: In 2024, 14.3% of Monroeville Mall-goers frequented a Dave & Busters, compared to just 7.4% for indoor mall visitors nationwide.
While Walmart’s ultimate intentions for Monroeville Mall remain under wraps, location analytics reveal a world of possibilities. And as retail continues to shift, Monroeville Mall may stand as a powerful case study of how a traditional big-box brand can successfully bridge into the mall space, capturing new audiences and invigorating a retail property ready for reinvention.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai.
In February 2024, Gap Inc. hired Zac Posen as Creative Director, tasking the designer with revitalizing the companies’ portfolio of brands. A year later, we analyzed the data to understand where the company stands today and uncover untapped opportunities for growth.
In 2024, visits to most Gap brands declined slightly compared to 2023, with the company’s four banners collectively experiencing a year-over-year (YoY) traffic dip of 3.5%.
Athleta outperformed the other three brands as well as the overall apparel (excluding off-price and department stores) average, with yearly visits up 0.2% and positive quarterly traffic growth for two of the four quarters. Old Navy came in second, starting the year strong with a 4.2% YoY increase in Q1 visits and ending 2024 with Q4 visits down just 2.4% – outperforming the industry’s YoY dip of 3.3%. And though Gap did lag slightly behind the overall apparel average, the brand managed to stay relatively close to its 2023 visit levels, indicating that its performance is stabilizing.
Meanwhile, Banana Republic experienced the sharpest visit declines with 2024 traffic down 9.6% YoY – indicating that the brand continues to face significant challenges.
Banana Republic’s 2024 performance continues a multi-year trend of declining traffic, despite the brand’s relatively affluent consumer base – an audience that, in theory, should have positioned the brand to weather the current inflationary environment more effectively.
But the brand may be positioning itself for a comeback. Last year, Banana Republic underwent a leadership change, with Gap Inc. CEO Richard Dixon stating that “2024 will be about getting back to the basics.” The brand has been redesigning select stores and leaning into influencer marketing with the goal of “reestablishing the brand to thrive in the premium lifestyle space.”
And as return to office mandates continue to roll in – reinvigorating the long dormant demand for business casual and office wear – the chain is well positioned for a comeback.
Location intelligence analysis also reveals an additional growth opportunity. Banana Republic is the only Gap banner without a dedicated sportswear line. Athleta specializes in athletic wear, Gap offers GapFit, and Old Navy’s activewear line has been a core component of the banner’s success in recent years.
But the data indicates that Banana Republic shoppers are just as active as visitors of the other Gap banners – in fact, cross-visit data suggests that those who shop at Banana Republic frequent fitness chains at similar rates as Athleta customers.
Analyzing cross-visitation to leading sporting goods retailers also indicates high demand for sportswear among Banana Republic shoppers: Consumers who visit Banana Republic visit Dick’s Sporting Goods and Academy Sports + Outdoors at higher rates than Gap Shoppers, and visit lululemon and REI at higher rates than both Gap and Old Navy visitors. This data strongly suggests that Banana Republic customers would likely embrace an expanded product mix that includes premium athleisure and sportswear.
While Gap Inc. already offers premium women’s activewear through its Athleta brand, none of Gap Inc.’s existing brands cater to the growing demand for premium men’s athletic wear. Expanding Banana Republic’s offerings to include a high-end athleisure line – with a specific focus on menswear – could help the brand carve out a niche in this fast-growing segment while leveraging its existing customer base’s interest in performance apparel.
Beyond product expansion, this move could align with Banana Republic’s broader repositioning efforts, reinforcing its identity as a premium lifestyle brand that caters to both professional and active lifestyles. Given the increasing overlap between workwear and athleisure, a thoughtfully designed sportswear line could also strengthen Banana Republic’s appeal to younger, fashion-conscious consumers who seek versatility in their wardrobes.
As Gap Inc. navigates its next phase under Zac Posen’s creative leadership, identifying and leveraging untapped opportunities—such as Banana Republic’s athleisure potential—will be critical for reinvigorating the company’s portfolio. By strategically diversifying its offerings, Gap Inc. can not only address shifting consumer preferences but also carve out a more competitive position in an evolving retail landscape.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/blog.
Department stores continue to adapt to evolving consumer preferences and an ever-changing retail landscape. We looked at the latest location analytics for traditional and luxury department stores to uncover how they are finding success in today’s dynamic apparel space.
Consumers’ prioritization of value has significantly impacted the apparel space in recent years.
Fueled by tepid consumer confidence and rampant inflation, demand for off-price has soared, putting pressure on department stores and traditional apparel retailers. As a result, off-price’s share of total visits to the apparel space steadily increased between 2021 (36.4%) and 2024 (41.5%), while the visit shares of our traditional department stores and other apparel segments declined.
But luxury department stores, which serve a higher-income clientele, appear to have remained relatively insulated from the rise in budget-conscious shopping, as the relative share of visits to this segment held steady over the past four years.
Diving into cross-visitation trends also reveals the impact of a growing off-price segment on the department store space.
Between 2021 and 2024, the share of both Nordstrom’s and Dillard’s visitors that also visited one of the leading off-price chains increased – suggesting that shoppers at both traditional and premium department stores feel the draw of off-price apparel. (Still, the shares of Dillard’s visitors that also visited one of the off-price chains was generally larger than that of Nordstrom’s, suggesting that visitors to the more upscale department store were less inclined to also visit an off-price store.)
And it seems that leading department stores are already trying to meet the growing demand for discounts within their consumer base. Dillard’s emphasis on private-label merchandise helps keep products affordable without compromising quality. Meanwhile, Nordstrom continues to expand its off-price format – Nordstrom Rack – to capitalize on demand for value in the apparel space.
Still, value-seeking behavior on the part of the consumer doesn’t always mean prioritization of discounts, and one way that several department stores are adding value – and finding success – is by investing in the shopping experience.
Bloomingdale’s emphasized experiential events and exclusive product launches to engage consumers last year, including several pop-culture-inspired collections. The department store’s visits increased 1.5% YoY in 2024, perhaps reflecting the demand for Bloomingdale’s immersive and culturally relevant environment.
Meanwhile, Nordstrom’s digital strategy demonstrated how a seamless omnichannel platform can elevate the shopping experience. The brand’s new app uses generative AI to make personalized style recommendations and allows users to check merchandise availability or make a stylist appointment at their local store. The app’s pre-holiday release may have contributed to Nordstrom’s resounding success in 2024, including a 2.2% visit increase compared to 2023.
And the investments in in-store experiences yielding visit dividends are not limited to premium chains. Dillard's, often considered a mid-range brand, has expert stylists ready to assist, and carefully manages inventory so stores are well-stocked but clutter-free, cultivating a classy retail environment. Dillard’s saw 2.3% YoY visit growth in 2024, indicating that its in-store experience is highly valued by shoppers.
Department stores are uniquely positioned to thrive in the current apparel retail landscape. Faced with demand for lower price points, department stores can harness the opportunity with affordable private-label merchandise or off-price formats. And while value-seeking is on the rise, retailers that provide an elevated shopping experience add a different kind of value to their brand.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai.
Dine Brands, which owns and operates IHOP, Applebee’s, and Fuzzy’s Taco Shop, is a major name in the full-service casual-dining restaurant segment. We took a look at how its two largest brands – IHOP and Applebee’s – performed in 2024.
The full-service dining segment has experienced its fair share of challenges over the past years, with pandemic-era closures and inflation weighing on restaurant visits. And Dine Brands’ largest chains, IHOP and Applebee’s, were not immune to these challenges, with YoY visits down by 3.6% and 3.0%, respectively, in 2024.
Applebee’s closed a number of locations throughout 2024, a move that likely contributed to the relative stability of its visits per location metrics: Q4 2024’s visits per location were just 1.6% lower than in Q4 2023 compared to a YoY decline of 3.9% in overall traffic. The brand’s emphasis on value may also have helped Applebee’s narrow its YoY visit gap between Q3 and Q4, as its $9.99 Really Big Meal Deal – launched in November 2024 and extended into 2025 – likely drove traffic from budget-conscious patrons.
IHOP and Applebee’s dominate in their own distinct dayparts – IHOP in the mornings and Applebee’s in the evenings. This diversity allows Dine Brands to effectively "own the clock" and cater to a range of dining preferences throughout various times of day.
Perhaps unsurprisingly – the word “pancake” is in its name – IHOP primarily attracts guests during morning hours, with 46.6% of its visits occurring between 6:00 AM and 12:00 PM. In contrast, Applebee’s serves as a popular post-work and dinner destination, with 56.0% of its visits taking place after 6:00 PM.
And recognizing the value of owning the clock in this way, Dine Brands unveiled its newest concept – a dual-branded IHOP-Applebee’s, with the first opening in February in Seguin, Texas and another twelve slated to open throughout 2025. This approach, which Dine Brands already piloted in international markets, allows diners the option to mix and match from IHOP and Applebee’s most popular menu items.
Beyond visit timing, IHOP and Applebee’s also serve distinct customer demographics, further reinforcing their complementary strengths. In 2024, 28.5% of households in IHOPs’ captured market were households with children, compared to 26.7% for Applebee’s. IHOP also saw larger shares of “Singles & Starters” in its captured market – defined by the Experian: Mosaic dataset as young singles and starter families living a city lifestyle.
Meanwhile, Applebee’s attracted visitors coming from captured markets with older audiences, with 9.4% of its visitors falling into the "Autumn Years" category – nearly double IHOP’s 5.0% share.
These distinctions mean that Dine Brands isn’t just spreading its traffic across different times of day – it also is capturing consumers across different life stages. By offering something for a variety of diners, the restaurant group can continue driving visits across multiple dining needs and occasions.
Despite weathering their fair share of challenges in 2024, IHOP and Applebee’s are innovating as 2025 gets underway.
For the latest data-driven dining insights, visit Placer.ai.
Best Buy has long been a go-to destination for consumers looking for the latest tech – but like many retailers, it has faced challenges in recent years. We dove into the data to explore the latest visitation trends for Best Buy and the demographics of visitors that are driving traffic to the chain.
Best Buy’s visits lagged in 2024 (7.0% below 2023 levels), but the company continues to invest in a real estate strategy aimed at improving consumer engagement. To leverage its store fleet most efficiently, Best Buy is closing traditional large-format stores while opening smaller-format ones to provide a tailored experience to consumers – often in small and midsized markets previously untapped by the retailer.
And Best Buy may already be reaping the benefits of this strategy; in January 2025, the retailer received a 0.4% YoY boost in foot traffic. As the chain continues to optimize its real estate footprint, it could be on track to drive more visit growth in the near future – particularly as more shoppers replace consumer electronics purchased during the pandemic.
Drilling down to daily visitation over the holiday season further highlights Best Buy’s momentum going into 2025. Best Buy consistently drives traffic during critical retail moments, and 2024 was no exception.
On Black Friday 2024, the retailer saw a 473.1% visit boost compared to the daily average for 2024. And the foot traffic surge continued the following day (Black Saturday, 162.4%) as consumers likely continued to take advantage of the weekend’s discounts.
And as was the case in previous years, Best Buy’s traffic picked up as Christmas 2024 neared, with significant visit spikes on Super Saturday (199.0%), Panic Sunday (151.3%), and Christmas Eve Eve (171.7%). Best Buy also saw elevated traffic post-Christmas traffic on Boxing Day (128.0%), when consumers likely looked to exchange gifts or set up their new tech with the help of the renowned Geek Squad.
Of course, Best Buy is more than just a holiday shopping destination. And analysis of audience segmentation for the retailer reveals that families are overrepresented in the chain’s captured* market relative to its potential* market – indicating that this segment in particular drives significant traffic year-round.
According to the AGS: Demographic Dimensions dataset, in 2024, the average household size in Best Buy’s potential market was 2.49 people compared to 2.64 people in the chain’s captured market. Married couples with children were also more heavily represented in the chain’s captured market (33.4%) compared to its potential market (32.0%), suggesting a relatively larger share of visitors from family households among Best Buy’s visitors.
Further analysis of audience segments within the chain’s captured and potential markets indicates that visitors from a variety of family types are drawn to Best Buy. According to the Spatial.ai: PersonaLive dataset, residents belonging to the “Wealthy Suburban Families”, “Upper Suburban Diverse Families”, “Near-Urban Diverse Families”, and “Blue Collar Suburbs” segments were all over-represented in Best Buy’s captured market compared to its potential market. This suggests that visitors from different types of family households – working-class, wealthy, urban, and suburban – are driving traffic to Best Buy.
Perhaps families are drawn to Best Buy’s expanding experiential format, where visitors of all ages can get hands-on with LEGO and explore home theater set ups worthy of a family movie night.
*A chain or venue’s potential market is derived by the census block groups (CBGs) from which the retailer draws its visitors weighted by the population size of each, whereas a captured market is derived from the same CBGs weighted by the share of visits from each, and thus reflects the population that actually visits the chain or venue.
Best Buy’s ability to drive traffic through strategic store formats, holiday shopping surges, and family households highlights the company’s ongoing relevance in the evolving consumer electronics landscape. With early signs of a foot traffic resurgence, Best Buy appears to have positioned itself for continued success in 2025.
Want more data-driven retail insights? Visit Placer.ai.
Our hearts go out to all those affected by the recent Los Angeles wildfires. Many Angelenos, in search of a sense of normalcy and diversion, have turned to a familiar and comforting place—the mall.
On the west side of Los Angeles, Third Street Promenade in Santa Monica experienced a significant surge in weekly visitation compared to a baseline of January 6th-12th 2025. This increase is not surprising, as many Palisadians fled south to Santa Monica hotels and rentals, allowing them to stay close to their neighborhoods, children’s schools, and social circles.
Westfield Century City and The Grove also saw increased foot traffic, as both malls serve as key gathering spots in their communities and feature state-of-the-art movie theaters, providing a few hours of escape. Additionally, their upgraded HVAC systems—enhanced post-pandemic—may offer an added layer of comfort for visitors. Similarly, Westfield Topanga, a familiar shopping destination for residents of the San Fernando Valley, saw an uptick in visits during the second half of January. And traffic at these shopping destinations was still elevated as of mid-February, suggesting that at least some displaced residents are likely staying in the area in the more medium-term.
Some Palisadians have opted to relocate much farther south, though this migration appears to have had a more dispersed effect on shopping patterns. As a result, we do not see a significant impact on visitation to South Bay shopping centers like Manhattan Village and Del Amo Fashion Center.
While reports have mentioned some Palisadians moving to Newport Beach—a community that shares similar demographics with the Palisades—the influx does not appear to be large enough to meaningfully shift mall visitation patterns in January. Additionally, given the circumstances, it is unlikely that many displaced residents would be making frequent trips to Fashion Island or South Coast Plaza. Instead, those who have temporarily relocated to the area are likely settling in as newly arrived locals.
If we examine the year-over-year (YoY) change in visits from specific ZIP codes, Placer data reveals a significant surge in visitation to Third Street Promenade from the Pacific Palisades during January 2025, with visits increasing by 20.4% compared to the same period last year.
Demographic analysis of the Third Street Promenade’s trade area also indicates that the shopping corridor drew a higher proportion of family households and more affluent audience segments – perhaps thanks to the influx of visitors from the Palisades.
Amid the disruption caused by the wildfires, shopping centers have stepped in as steady community spaces rather than just retail venues. The uptick in foot traffic at locations like Third Street Promenade and Westfield Century City shows that these malls are serving as reliable hubs for daily routines and social connection, offering residents practical support as they navigate uncertain times.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
