.svg)
Last summer’s touring sensations Taylor Swift and Beyonce held concerts that will remain in the hearts of many. With thousands in attendance, both live tours were absolute juggernauts. It was like an adrenaline shot for the performing arts category after COVID-induced closures. Remember the days of drive-in concerts as a panacea? While these two reigning Queens of Music took top billing, there are hundreds of local venues around the country that cater to smaller audiences at a time but are no less impactful on their communities. These are the heart and soul for local plays, musicals, symphonies, operas, touring bands, and art exhibitions. Fundraisers are often held at community performance venues, and they can be incubators for performers to move on to a larger stage.
Placer recently attended the California Presenters Conference, which includes representatives from California, Oregon, Washington, Nevada, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. Programming directors, events managers, and community liaisons all met to share best practices, challenges, and successes. One box office manager, Jonathan Lizardo of the Lisa Smith Wengler Center for the Arts at Pepperdine University, noted that “Nostalgia” was an important theme at his performing arts center, with a recent live show of the Animaniacs in Concert proving to be a hit with adults and kids alike. In this case, his patrons were seeking some escapism and levity in their lives. On the other end of the spectrum, the arts can also be a powerful way to engage the audience in more serious issues, as one panel on Responding to Global Conflict at arts venues drew a crowd. Another topic of interest was the importance of engaging youth with the arts, through school-sponsored visits or after school enrichment. Many University performing arts centers reps were also in attendance, such as USC Vision and Voices, Stanford Live, Caltech Presents, and Seattle University.
Placer’s presentation touched on macrotrends around discretionary spend, examples of venue attendance around the US, an analysis of the visitation trends, audience profile, and economic impact of Taylor Swift’s US tour, and in depth look at a select group of performing arts centers in Arizona to see the role that they play in their community.
Mesa Arts Center has had the highest overall visitation in the past 12 months. Located in Mesa, AZ, it encompasses over 210,000 sq ft and was completed in 2005 at the cost of $95 million. In addition to four performance venues, it is also home to Mesa Contemporary Arts Museum. Programming is suited to a multitude of interests, including National Geographic Live, Broadway, classical music, popular music, ethnic artists, western artists, and dance. It also offers Art Studio for visual arts classes; Opportunities for Ages 55+ such as flamenco classes; and Festivals and Events, such as Dia de Los Muertos. Within the theaters complex, there are four theaters--the 1,570-seat Tom and Janet Ikeda Theater, 550-seat Virginia G. Piper Repertory Theater, 200-seatNesbitt/Elliott Playhouse, and the 99-seat Anita Cox Farnsworth Studio.
The Chandler Center for the Arts recently celebrated its 35th season. Upcoming performances include ballet like Coppelia or live music, such as Billy Joel’s The Stranger. Entertaining acts such as Stomp, Piano Battle, and Cirque du Soleil will also make their way over during the 2024-2025 season. Located in downtown Chandler, the venue includes three dynamic performance spaces (the 1,500-seat Main Stage, the 350-seat Hal Bogle Theatre, and the 250-seat Recital Hall) as well as two extensive art galleries (The Gallery at CCA and Vision Gallery).
While Scottsdale Center for the Performing Arts had the fewest absolute visits in the past 12 months, its year-over-year variance increase has been the highest.
What might account for the difference, one might wonder. Fortunately, Placer data enables one to compare a venue against itself in order to highlight differences from one year to the next. According to the 2023-2024 calendar, it appears that Hubbard Street Dance Chicago playing 2 nights in a row, was a hit with the audience during the week of Jan 29-Feb 4.
It appears the increase in visits cannot be attributed to a single segment. In fact, visits across multiple segments increased year-over-year when comparing May 2023 - April 2024 (blue) vs. May 2022-April 2023 (red) per Spatial.ai PersonaLive.
The most recent 12 months also attracted visits from a much larger trade area.
Migration may also be a factor in the increase of visits to the Scottsdale Performing Arts Center. Placer’s Migration Dashboard is noting an increase in both residents and seasonal visitors over the years.
Eatertainment chains – entertainment concepts that combine dining and play – are thriving in the current experience economy. We dove into the data for game and restaurant chains Dave & Buster’s and Main Event Entertainment (acquired by Dave & Buster’s in 2022) to better understand how eatertainment is driving success in 2024.
The past few years have been challenging ones for restaurants. But eatertainment has a special draw – and since November 2023, both Dave & Buster’s and Main Event Entertainment have seen mainly positive YoY visit growth.
In January 2024, visits slowed in the wake of extreme weather that rocked much of the country and led many would-be diners to stay home. But in February and March 2024 things picked up again, with the two chains seeing YoY visit growth ranging from 4.6% to 10.6%.
Again in April 2024, both Dave & Buster’s and Main Event Entertainment experienced minor visit gaps. But a closer look at weekly visits reveals that this was largely due to a calendar shift: April 2024 had one fewer Saturday than April 2023 – the chains' busiest day of the week by far. (In Q1 2024, Saturdays accounted for 33.8% of total visits to Main Event Entertainment and 33.3% of visits to Dave & Buster’s). And during nearly every individual week of April 2024, the brands maintained strongly positive momentum.
Dave & Buster’s and Main Event Entertainment recent visit growth has been partly fueled by the two chains’ growing store counts. And a deeper dive into how the chains’ visitation patterns have evolved since COVID shows why they are well-positioned for continued expansion – and success.
One factor likely contributing to the eatertainment brands’ strength is the increasing loyalty of their visitors. Dave & Buster’s leveled up its rewards program in 2021 – and has been upping its loyalty game ever since. Members can access special deals, like the chain’s recent 50% off food promotion, and earn points by playing games or ordering off the menu. Main Event, too, keeps customers coming back with a variety of promotions, from Monday Night Madness to Kids Eat Free Tuesdays – a particularly attractive offer for the chain’s family-oriented audience.
And since 2019, both chains have seen a steady increase in the share of visits made by customers frequenting the chain at least twice a month.
In addition, both Dave & Buster’s and Main Event appear to be finding success by leaning into the evening daypart.
Back in 2019, Main Event introduced a late-night menu and announced that all of its stores would be open until at least 12:00 AM – and even later on Fridays and Saturdays. (Even before that, some of its stores were open during the wee hours). Dave & Buster’s has also taken steps to increase its night-time business with special late-night deals and happy hours.
And location analytics indicates that this strategy is bearing fruit. Over the past several years, both brands have experienced an increase in their share of late-night visits (i.e. those taking place between 9:00 PM and 2:00 AM). And in Q1 2024, Dave & Buster’s and Main Event saw 23.9% and 27.3% of their total visits during the late-night daypart, respectively.
While it might be assumed that at-home entertainment and the "Netflix effect" pose a threat to eatertainment chains (particularly during the evening hours, as there is more content than ever to get home to), the data suggests that many consumers are staying out late for social dining and entertainment.
Demand for dining and social experiences continues to grow. As consumer behavior and demographics evolve, how will these eatertainment chains perform and which new concepts may rise to prominence as 2024 progresses?
Visit Placer.ai to find out.
In this blog, we dive into the latest location analytics and demographic data for luxury retailers and high-end department stores and take a closer look at consumer behavior in the upscale shopping space.
Over the past year, the Placer.ai Luxury Retail Index – including brands like Louis Vuitton, Tiffany & Co., and Chanel – saw year-over-year (YoY) foot traffic growth during crucial shopping seasons. May and June 2023 had significant increases in YoY visits, perhaps due to an influx of recreational shoppers on summer vacation, and July saw an uptick as well. YoY visits peaked again in November and December, likely reflecting the popularity of upscale retail corridors during the all-important holiday shopping season.
Some of this strength may be a result of affluent consumers refocusing their shopping on the U.S.: In 2022, many high-income shoppers chose to purchase big-ticket items abroad due to various economic benefits. But by 2023, demand for domestic luxury retail appeared to rebound, as some upscale retail clients “repatriated” their discretionary dollars.
To be sure, visit gaps re-emerged in some months of early 2024 – though these are partly attributable to factors like January’s unusually stormy weather and an April calendar shift. (April 2024 had one fewer Saturday than April 2023, providing less opportunity for visits in the highly discretionary category). But March 2024 also saw YoY visit growth. And given how well luxury retailers performed during their busiest months of year, the category may very well rally once again heading into the summer.
Recent location intelligence also offers encouraging signs from the high-end department store space.
Like luxury retailers, high-end department stores saw narrowing visit gaps during the peak holiday shopping season – with Saks Fifth Avenue seeing a YoY uptick in November 2024, and Neiman Marcus seeing one in December.
In March 2024, YoY traffic turned positive for Nordstrom (3.3%), Bloomingdale’s (3.1%), and Neiman Marcus (3.1%), while Saks Fifth Avenue had just a -0.6% visit gap. And although April 2024 was a challenging month for the retailers, perhaps due in part to the calendar shift mentioned above, all four upscale department stores outperformed the traditional apparel category – another indication that high-end department stores may be poised for a comeback.
Analyzing demographic changes in the captured markets of both luxury brands and high-end department stores indicates that increasingly affluent consumers are the main drivers of visits to the segment. (A chain’s captured market is obtained by weighting each Census Block Group (CBG) in its trade area according to the CBG’s share of visits to the chain – and so reflects the population that actually visits the chain in practice).
Over the last four quarters, visitors to luxury retailers and high-end department stores came from areas with higher median household incomes (HHIs) than in previous years. For example, during the period between Q2 2023 and Q1 2024, the median HHI of Bloomingdale’s captured market was $122.1K, an increase from $119.7K between April 2022 and March 2023, and $117.3K from April 2021 to March 2022.
In the face of recent inflationary pressures, aspirational luxury shoppers (who tend to be slightly less affluent) are likely quicker to adjust their behavior and trade down to more affordable brands. Meanwhile, prestige luxury shoppers – those with the highest incomes – tend to be relatively resilient, and so are able to continue shopping at their favorite luxury brands, driving up the HHI in these retailers’ trade areas.
Luxury retailers and high-end department stores have had recent foot traffic successes, while their clientele has become increasingly affluent. Will these brands continue their upward visit trajectories – and how will they leverage affluent foot traffic going forward?
Visit Placer.ai to find out.
Discretionary retail has faced its fair share of headwinds over the past few years, from pandemic-related restrictions to inflation. And while prices have stabilized, subdued consumer confidence continues to weigh on non-essential segments. But even in this challenging environment, some companies, like Ulta Beauty, are continuing to see visit growth, while others, like Gap Inc. and its portfolio of apparel brands, are making a comeback.
With Q2 2024 well underway, we take a look at the foot traffic patterns for these companies to see how they are faring.
In 2020, Placer.ai predicted that Ulta Beauty would be an unstoppable force in beauty retail – and the chain has impressed ever since. Over the past several years, Ulta has been on a consistent upward visit trajectory, propelled by strong demand for affordable luxuries (the so-called “Lipstick Effect”), and consumer interest in self-care.
And though the pace of Ulta’s tremendous YoY visit growth has moderated somewhat in recent months, the beauty giant continues to thrive – drawing even more visitors in early 2024 than during the equivalent period of last year. Between January and April 2024, YoY visits to the beauty retailer remained consistently elevated, outperforming the wider Beauty & Wellness space.
The fashion segment has experienced rising prices and persistent inflation over the past few years, leading to a new era of discount and thrift shopping. And iconic apparel retailers like Gap Inc – operator of Gap, Old Navy, Athleta, and Banana Republic – have not been immune to the challenges facing the category.
But through a combination of high-profile hirings and revitalized branding efforts, Gap Inc. has been readying itself for a comeback. In Q4 2023, the retailer announced stronger-than-expected results, driven primarily by Gap and Old Navy. And recent foot traffic to the company’s largest brands provides further evidence that its turnaround efforts may be starting to bear fruit.
During the all-important November and December shopping season last year, Gap and Old Navy saw YoY visits hold steady or increase, outpacing the wider Apparel space. In January 2024, visits to the two chains declined in the wake of an Arctic blast that kept many shoppers at home. But in February, Gap enjoyed a 0.7% YoY visit bump, while Old Navy saw just a mild drop – less than that of the overall Apparel category. In March 2024, both Gap and Old Navy enjoyed strong YoY visit growth, far outperforming overall Apparel – likely driven by sales events held by each brand. And though April saw YoY visits decline once again, with the two chains falling behind Apparel, drilling down into weekly data offers a different perspective.
Both Gap and Old Navy started off April with lackluster YoY performance, perhaps due in part to the comparison to an early April 2023 that included Easter weekend. But towards the end of April and beginning of May, Gap and Old Navy’s’ visit gaps narrowed – with some weeks seeing positive YoY visit growth, and with the two chains once again either nearly on par with, or outperforming, overall Apparel.
Gap Inc. itself is bullish about what the next year holds in store, with big names like Zak Posen joining the Gap family in hopes of propelling the company forward. Though it may be premature to declare an end to the troubles that have plagued the clothier in recent years, early 2024 foot traffic provides further evidence that the company is heading in the right direction.
Ulta continues to experience visit growth, highlighting Beauty’s enduring appeal. Meanwhile, Gap and Old Navy are witnessing narrowed visit gaps and some weekly visit growth.
Is the Apparel segment making a comeback? Can the Beauty segment sustain its positive momentum indefinitely?
Visit Placer.ai to keep up to date with the latest retail developments.
We dove into the data to check in with specialty discount chains Ollie’s Bargain Outlet and Five Below. How did they fare in early 2024? And what can the two brands’ recent performance tell us about what lies in store for them in the months ahead?
A quest for bargains and the promise of unexpected finds have kept Discount & Dollar Store shoppers coming so far in 2024. Despite lapping a strong 2023, foot traffic to Ollie’s Bargain Outlet and Five Below remained consistently above last year’s levels between January and April 2024, partly due to the chains’ continued expansions.
Though both chains draw Easter shoppers with special seasonal offerings, Five Below’s primary focus on low-ticket recreational merchandise makes it a natural destination for shoppers eager to fill their baskets with candy and other inexpensive holiday items. And Q1 2024 foot traffic to the chain appeared to be shaped by Easter shopping patterns. The brand’s YoY visits increased significantly in February with the roll-out of holiday wares, and the Saturday before Easter (March 30th, 2024) saw a sizable foot traffic boost that was 38.7% above the chainwide average for Saturdays in Q1 2024 – contributing to the month’s elevated visits overall. This pull-forward in demand, together with the comparison to an April 2023 that included Easter Sunday, at least partially explains Five Below’s more modest visit growth in April.
For both Ollie’s and Five Below, strong traffic since the beginning of the year indicates continued YoY gains may be expected in the months ahead.
In addition to YoY visit growth in the early months of 2024, Ollie’s and Five Below are seeing elevated weekend visits and an increase in longer visits, indicative of a robust treasure-hunting culture that is driving demand.
In Q1 2024, 37.8% of visits to Ollie’s and 37.4% of Five Below’s visits occurred on weekends, while weekend visits accounted for only 32.8% of visits to the wider Discount & Dollar Store category. This is likely due to Ollie’s and Five Below’s growing notoriety as destinations for treasure hunting – a pastime perhaps preferred at the end of the work week when schedules are more flexible.
Meanwhile, the share of visits lasting over 30 minutes in Q1 2024 increased for both brands YoY, even as it slightly declined for the category as a whole. This indicates that shoppers drawn to Ollie’s and Five Below’s recreational vibes spent even more time browsing the aisles in Q1 2024 than they did last year. Ollie’s closeout buying model and shifting array of steeply discounted brand name merchandise is especially conducive to the thrill of the hunt – and the chain saw a remarkable 41.3% of visits lasting more than half an hour in Q1.
Ollie’s Bargain Outlet and Five Below continue to demonstrate their consumer appeal in 2024. As the brands expand, holidays prove to be retail highlights while a culture of treasure hunting has shown its capacity to drive consistent traffic.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai.
In the spirit of retail quarterly earnings season, it has been eye-opening to see the disparity in performances, especially among specialty retailers. This week, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) reported first quarter earnings, with comparable dollar sales up 4.6%, a strong growth number compared to many in the industry. Urban Outfitters, Inc. benefitted from a diversified retail portfolio, with the growth stemming from its Anthropologie, Free People and Nuuly brands, both in-store and online, while its namesake brand continues to be challenged over the past few years. As far as specialty apparel retailers go, the company has done a fantastic job of creating retail experiences that are unique and irreplaceable for their customers, and finding true competitors of its brands proves difficult.
Looking at Q1 2024 traffic performance, Free People and Anthropologie led the way, echoing the earnings release. Free People visits, excluding FP Movement, grew 8% year-over-year and Anthropologie saw an increase in traffic of 5% year-over-year. Urban Outfitters, on the other hand, actually saw traffic levels beat sales performance, with traffic flat compared to Q1 2023.
Anthropologie, despite retail and economic headwinds, has tightened up its value proposition to consumers and has a clear vision of its target shopper. Using Spatial.ai’s PersonaLive segmentation (as shown below), Anthropologie attracted the most visits from Ultra Wealthy Families in Q1 2024, followed by Young Professionals and Sunset Boomers. Compared to the other portfolio brands, Anthropologie attracts a higher median income consumer and over indexes with more mature consumers, two groups that have higher levels of spending power in today’s economy and haven’t decidedly altered their retail habits as much as middle- and lower-income shoppers. Anthropologie has clearly benefited from the strength of its visitors, and its curated multi-category retail experience that has shielded the chain from the struggles of other home furnishing and apparel retailers. It will be interesting to watch if the brand is able to continue to maintain its success through the remainder of the year if economic conditions become further challenged.
Free People appeals to a consumer somewhat in the middle of both Anthropologie and Urban Outfitters, and has been able to capitalize on Anthropologie’s success and hedge against Urban Outfitters’ struggles. Free People’s design sense makes it a crowd-favorite but also a source for many “dupes” on other retail platforms; however, the influx of similar designs haven’t seen to slow their momentum. FP Movement, the brand’s athleisure line that also has stand alone retail locations, has been another lever for growth. Using Placer.ai to look at three FP movement locations compared to the Free People chain, FP movement grew visits faster than the parent brand, and also had a higher dwell time. Urban Outfitters, Inc. disclosed that dollar sales for Free People were up almost 18% in Q1 2024, but the company doesn't break out sales between FP Movement and Free People. There are some risks with the athleisure market, as brands face softening performance and consumers shift away from more discretionary apparel categories. FP movement has created core and in-demand silhouettes that drive traffic, but with fashion trends, that may not be enough to sustain long-term visit growth.
Finally, there’s the lackluster performance from the namesake brand. Younger adults have so many retail options at their fingertips that retailers who cater to these consumers can often be lost in the shuffle, especially with so much competition coming from online and offline retail. Urban Outfitters long curated a distinct look and feel, as well as a mix of national brands and private labels that differentiated it from competitors; with retailers in similar price bands like Abercrombie & Fitch staging a comeback, Urban Outfitters has lost its footing. Looking into the consumer segments using Spatial.ai’s PersonaLive, Educated Urbanites and Young Professionals top Urban Outfitters segmentation; price-sensitivity could be making younger shoppers more discerning in their apparel purchases. Off-price may also be a factor here and provide higher levels of competition for the customer base. Urban Outfitters holds a lot of brand value, and if the brand is able to right size assortments and value in the short term, there could be upside to bring it closer to its sister brands.
Compared to most of the specialty retail narratives out in the market, Urban Outfitters, Inc. has a lot of positive momentum with a few of its brands. Nuuly, its subscription rental service, was also called out as a positive highlight of the quarter, and learnings about consumer preferences through that service could help to inform the go-forward strategies at Anthropologie, Free People and Urban Outfitters. There is a lot to celebrate as it relates to its discretionary retail fleet, despite the challenges at the namesake brand, and proves that specialty retail that still feels “special” has consumers' lasting attention.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
