.svg)
Family Dollar’s parent company Dollar Tree recently announced plans to dramatically rightsize the discount chain’s store fleet, with 600 stores slated for closure in 2024 and more to follow in upcoming years for a total of almost 1000 closures. We dove into the location intelligence for Family Dollar and three other leading value-forward retailers to understand which chain stands to benefit most from Family Dollar’s contraction.
Dollar Tree’s plans to close almost 1000 Family Dollar stores did not surprise retail analysts. Discount & Dollar Stores have been on the rise in recent years, driven in part by significant expansions – visits to the industry up 25.4% in Q1 2023 and up 55.8% in Q4 2023 relative to pre-pandemic Q1 2019. But this growth seems to have bypassed Family Dollar. Q1 2023 visits to the brand were up just 0.8% and traffic during the critical holiday-driven Q4 2023 was up just 9.8% since Q1 2019.
Meanwhile, the eponymous banner of Family Dollar’s parent company Dollar Tree outperformed the wider industry during the same period, with a 28.4% increase in Q1 2023 visits and a 72.1% increase in Q4 2023 visits relative to a Q1 2019 baseline.
.avif)
The Discount & Dollar Store space includes major players like Dollar General and the Dollar Tree banner that can fill the voids left by shuttering Family Dollar Venues. Walmart also may step into some of the newly created gaps. Analyzing the demographic and psychographic composition of the trade areas of these four chains – Family Dollar, Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Walmart – may reveal the chain(s) best positioned to cater to Family Dollar’s current visitor base.
Most people have set daily shopping habits, and chains will likely have more success vying for Family Dollar’s visitor base if they can accommodate the current visitation patterns of Family Dollar shoppers.
Family Dollar and Dollar General respectively receive 37.0% and 37.9% of their daily visits between the hours of 5:00 PM and 8:59 PM. Meanwhile, only 31.2% of Dollar Tree’s visitors and 34.3% of Walmart visitors visited those chains in the late afternoon and evening. The similarities between Dollar General and Family Dollar’s visitation patterns may mean that Dollar General’s staffing and opening schedule is suited to handle the influx of former Family Dollar visitors without making these visitors modify their current shopping behavior.
.png)
Analyzing the four chains by trade area median household income (HHI) also shows that Family Dollar is closer to Dollar General than to Walmart or Dollar Tree – but the data also reveals that Family Dollar serves a distinct demographic base. The chain has a potential market median HHI of $62.1K and a captured market median HHI of $48.3K – in both cases, the lowest trade area median HHI of the four chains analyzed.
Potential market analysis weighs the Census Block Groups (CBG) making up a trade area according to the number of residents in each CBG. The low median HHI in Family Dollar’s potential market means that the chain’s venues tend to be located in lower-income areas compared to the other chains’ store fleets.
Captured market median HHI reflects the median HHI in the CBGs making up a trade area weighted according to the number of visits to the chain from each CBG. And comparing the four chains indicates that the gap between Family Dollar and the other three chains is even larger when looking at the captured market median HHI, with Family Dollar serving the lowest income households within its potential market.
Still, Dollar General’s trade area median HHI is closest to that of Family Dollar – although Family Dollar’s trade area median HHI is still significantly lower than that of Dollar General – which could mean that Dollar General will be most attractive to Family Dollar’s former visitors.
.png)
But looking at other metrics suggests differences in household composition between Family Dollar and Dollar General. Although the potential market share of households with children is similar for the two chains, Family Dollar’s captured market share is higher while Dollar General’s captured market share of households with children is lower.
Family Dollar’s popularity among lower-income households with children may explain why the chain has been struggling in recent years, as this demographic has been particularly hard-hit by the recent economic headwinds. And this distinct demographic base may also mean that Dollar General might want to make some merchandising, pricing, or marketing adjustments to best serve Family Dollar’s former visitors.
.png)
Although the demographic composition of Family Dollar’s trade areas sets the chain’s visitor base apart, diving into the psychographic segmentation of the chain’s captured and potential market highlights similarities with other value-forward retailers.
All four chains analyzed seem particularly popular with rural audiences – specifically with the Rural Average Income and Rural Low Income segments as defined by the Spatial.ai: PersonaLive dataset. (Dollar General and Walmart also see a disproportionate number of visits from the Rural High Income segment within their potential markets.) So some of Family Dollar’s rural shoppers may already be visiting Walmart or Discount & Dollar Stores – and these other retailers may choose to open in areas where Family Dollar is closing and where no other discounter currently operates.
.avif)
The massive rightsizing of Family Dollar’s store fleet creates major opportunities for other value-driven retailers to expand their reach. Who will end up benefiting most from these shifts?
Check in with placer.ai to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
Last year’s retail vibe was nothing if not experiential. Inflation led consumers to trade down and cut back on discretionary spending – but people still sought out fun, affordable venues to meet up with friends and let off some steam.
So with 2023 firmly in the rearview mirror, we dove into the data to check in with Dave & Buster’s Entertainment Inc., owner of eatertainment chain Dave & Buster's, and – since 2022 – Main Event Entertainment. How did the company’s two brands fare in the final months of 2023 and at the start of 2024? And what lies in store for them in the months ahead?
Dave & Buster’s, the sports bar arcade that invites harried grown-ups to cast aside their worries and “unlearn adulthood”, is thriving. With some 160 venues across 42 states, Dave and Buster’s offers the most tightly-wound consumers an inexpensive escape from real life – someplace they can unwind with friends over a beer, some mouthwatering shareables, and a bit of friendly skee-ball.
Over the past several years, Dave & Buster’s has grown its store count, and in 2022 broadened its portfolio with Main Event Entertainment – the family-oriented eatertainment concept that pairs arcade games with larger format activities such as laser tag and bowling. And since November 2023, both brands have sustained mainly positive year-over-year (YoY) visit growth, disrupted only by January 2024’s inclement weather.
.png)
Main Event Entertainment’s purchase by Dave & Buster’s appears to have been a natural move on the company’s part. Overlaying foot traffic data with demographics from STI’s PopStats reveals that the two chains’ comparable offerings attract customers with similar income profiles: In 2023, Dave & Buster’s’ and Main Event’s captured markets featured median household incomes (HHIs) of $67.3K and $67.6K, respectively – just under the nationwide baseline of $69.5K.
But the acquisition of Main Event has also allowed Dave & Buster’s Entertainment, Inc. to broaden its visitor base. Both of the company’s brands attract plenty of singles and families with children. But while Dave & Buster’s young-adult-oriented vibe holds special appeal for people living on their own, Main Event’s child-friendly activities make it a particularly attractive destination for parental households. Together, the two chains offer something for everyone – cementing the company’s role as an eatertainment leader.
.png)
Dave & Buster’s and Main Event also enjoy similar weekly visitation patterns. Unsurprisingly, the two chains are busiest on Saturdays, followed by Sundays and Fridays, and quieter during the rest of the week. But both brands have also found creative ways to boost weekday visits. On Wednesdays, Dave & Buster’s offers a 50%-off deal, letting customers play their favorite games at half the price – and fueling a significant midweek foot traffic spike. Main Event Entertainment, for its part, draws weekday crowds on Mondays with an afternoon all–you-can-play special.
.png)
Everybody needs to let their hair down sometimes – and with Spring Break right around the corner, both Dave & Buster’s and Main Event are building momentum with seasonal specials aimed at making their offerings even more affordable.
For both chains, March is an important milestone – in 2023, Dave & Buster’s and Main Event drew 41.0% and 82.9% more traffic during the week of March 13th, respectively, than they did, on average, throughout the rest of year. And if recent visit trends are any indication, the two brands appear poised to enjoy a healthy Spring Break and a strong rest of 2024.
For more data-driven retail and dining insights, follow Placer.ai.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
Despite the individual restaurant success stories in 2023, last year was also a period of economic headwinds in the dining industry. But Darden Restaurants – and its largest chains Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, and Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen – continued to drive foot traffic. We dove into the location analytics for these three Darden brands and took a closer look at the shifts in consumer behavior impacting the dining space.
Foot traffic in 2023 was largely positive for Olive Garden, LongHorn Steakhouse, and Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen, with the strong visit trends likely helping drive Darden’s recent sales growth.
All three brands posted impressive YoY visit growth in Q1 2023, perhaps aided by the comparison to an Omicron-impacted, muted Q1 2022. LongHorn Steakhouse then pulled ahead of the pack in Q2 and Q3 with YoY foot traffic up 3.7% and 4.8%, respectively, before finishing the year off strong with a 3.8% YoY visit increase in Q4. But the real Darden star in Q4 was Olive Garden. The Italian-focused chain’s success was likely bolstered by the return of the Never Ending Pasta Bowl – offered from late September 2023 through mid-November – which appears to have attracted even more hungry diners than it did the previous year.
Meanwhile, YoY visits to Cheddar’s Scratch Kitchen increased during the first three quarters of 2023 and held relatively steady in Q4 – YoY visits during the last quarter of the year were down just 0.7% – highlighting the overall strength of Darden’s portfolio.
.avif)
Though 2023 was a particularly successful year for Darden foot traffic, Olive Garden, LongHorn, and Cheddar’s were not immune to this year’s arctic blast. The extreme weather in January 2024 impacted dining visits and put a damper on traffic to these chains. But once the weather warmed up in February 2024, YoY visits to Olive Garden, LongHorn, and Cheddar’s began to heat up as well – outpacing even the strong early 2023 traffic – indicating that Darden brands are likely in for another year of robust visits.
.avif)
Diving deeper into the analytics for Darden’s brands indicated that shifts in consumer behavior may be a factor in the restaurants’ recent foot traffic gains. Analysis of hourly visits to Olive Garden, LongHorn, and Cheddar’s since 2019 revealed that a greater share of visitors are now engaging with their favorite restaurants during non-traditional dayparts in the mid and late afternoon.
The share of daily Olive Garden, LongHorn, and Cheddar’s visitors visiting between 2 PM and 5:59 PM was higher in 2023 than in 2019 for all three brands. Olive Garden had the largest share of mid and late afternoon visits in 2022 at 32.6% and maintained its share of 2:00 PM to 5:59 PM visitation in 2023. Meanwhile, LongHorn and Cheddar’s share of visits during the 2:00 PM to 5:59 PM daypart continued increasing in 2023 relative to the previous year, which suggests that this trend of late afternoon and early dinner visits is becoming the new normal.
As eating out early is becoming more prevalent in the casual dining space – as well as in fine dining and steakhouse restaurants – Darden might capitalize on this trend by adding more happy hours and other late-afternoon specials to its restaurants’ menus.
.png)
Darden’s biggest chains succeeded in driving foot traffic growth in 2023 and early 2024. Location analytics indicated that while demand for the brands is consistent, consumer behavior is always changing. How will these restaurants navigate the rest of 2024? Visit Placer.ai to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
Athleisure and sportswear are a go-to for consumers looking to move seamlessly between activities – from a workout to work-from-home. That functionality has kept the category running hot in recent years even while more consumers are getting back to the office and socializing. And since athleisure and sportswear are now bonafide wardrobe staples, more consumers are investing in high-end items. We dove into the data for two of the category’s biggest upscale players – Nike and lululemon – in order to take a closer look at the consumer behavior driving visit growth.
During all four quarters of 2023, Nike and lululemon saw year-over-year (YoY) foot traffic growth that surpassed the visit increases in the wider Athleisure & Sportswear space. Part of Nike’s sizable 2023 YoY visit gains were likely due to the addition of a large number of stores relative to its somewhat modest footprint. Nike is continuing to invest in own-brand stores to boost DTC business including the first U.S. Michael Jordan "World of Flight" store coming to Philadelphia, PA. Lululemon also expanded its store count – albeit more modestly – which likely also helped the company stay ahead of the competition.
.png)
Fueled by significant store growth, Nike managed to keep YoY foot traffic positive in the first two months of 2024 despite the arctic blast that plagued overall retail visits in January.
Lululemon and the wider Athleisure & Sportswear space were less insulated from the effects of the storm, and the comparison to a strong 2023 made for mild YoY visit gaps in January 2024. But by the end of February 2024, both lululemon and the Athleisure & Sportswear space had narrowed their visit gaps and appeared to be on an upward trajectory.
.png)
Diving deeper into the demographic data for Nike’s trade area indicated that the aggressive expansion is not the only factor driving the brand’s recent foot traffic gains. Analysis using the AGS: Demographic Dimensions dataset revealed that since the 2021 retail reopening – and specifically Q3 2021 – the median household income (HHI) of Nike’s captured market has been higher than that of its potential market*. And the gap between the median HHI in the brand’s captured and potential markets seems to have widened even further in 2022-2023.
Driving traffic from affluent consumers appears to be an intentional strategy by the brand. Nike CEO John Donahoe recently noted that the brand is expanding in products across price points and now offers more expensive womenswear than ever before – and location intelligence indicates that this strategy is working. By Q4 2023, the median HHI of Nike’s captured market had climbed to $95.6K – the highest in nearly five years. This suggests that despite the adverse impact of inflation on some aspirational shoppers, Nike is succeeding in driving high-value foot traffic.
*A chain’s potential market refers to the population residing in a given trade area, where the Census Block Groups (CBGs) making up the trade area are weighted to reflect the number of households in each CBG. A chain’s captured market weighs each CBG according to the actual number of visits originating to the chain from that CBG.
.png)
Will the success of upscale athleisure and sportswear continue in 2024? Visit Placer.ai to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.0, which implements improvements to our extrapolation capabilities, adds short visit monitoring, and enhances visit detection.
The big news coming out of Dollar Tree’s Q4 2023 update was that the company plans to close 1,000 stores following a comprehensive portfolio review (which we first discussed in December). Management plans to close approximately 600 Family Dollar stores in the first half of fiscal 2024, with another 370 Family Dollar and 30 Dollar Tree stores expected to close over the next several years as store lease terms expire. The 970 anticipated Family Dollar store closures represent 11.6% of the banner’s 8,359 stores opened as of the end of February. Dollar stores were one of the strongest performing categories from a visitation (new stores and perspective during 2023 (below), so it may seem surprising that Dollar Tree plans to close so many Family Dollar stores during 2024.
Dollar Tree’s decision to close Family Dollar stores echoes a lot of what we’ve heard from other retailers closing stores in recent years, including Macy’s, CVS/Walgreens, and others. For the most part, retailers’ decisions to close stores comes down to a combination of factors: (1) population migration has changed the supply/demand balance in a given market; (2) consumer behavior has changed post-COVID; (3) the retailer is facing new sources of competition and eroding consumer loyalty; and (4) retailers are replacing underperforming stores with a modernized store layout.
Management cited changing demographics and market saturation as key considerations driving its consolidation efforts for Family Dollar. While the company has not announced which locations it plans to close, we’ve plotted Family Dollar’s 1,000 lowest performing locations over the trailing twelve months on a visit per square foot basis below.
If we compare this to a map of changes in Origin/Destination Household Income Ratio over the past four years (using Placer’s Migration Trends report), the changing demographics that Dollar Tree cited becomes evident. Many underperforming Family Dollar locations are in the Mid-Atlantic and Southeast markets, several of which have seen an increase in higher household income population due to migration (represented by the green dots below). As populations in these markets have shifted, it’s not surprising that the company is reevaluating its store portfolio in these markets.
The other factor at play behind these store closures is increasing competition. We’ve discussed disruption from Temu and other online marketplaces in the past, but dollar stores are also fighting for visitor share with value grocery chains, superstores, and convenience stores. And it’s not just lower-income consumers that these chains are fighting over–we’re seeing increasing evidence that dollar stores are seeing visits from middle income consumers. In fact, Dollar Tree CEO Rick Dreiling noted that Dollar Tree added 3.4 million new customers in 2023, mostly from households earning over $125,000 a year. We’ve previously noted how Walmart has been successful attracting more middle-income consumers but if we look at captured trade area demographics for the Dollar Tree banner (and not including Family Dollar) from Q3 2023 to Q4 2023, we do see an increase in the trade areas between $50-$150K in household income (below).
Admittedly, some of the increase in higher-income consumers can be explained by the aforementioned migration trends, but management also attributes the pick up in middle-income consumers to its multi-price point strategy called “More Choices” (which we’ve discussed in the past). In particular, we believe the company has seen success driving visits to Dollar Tree stores with its $3, $4, and $5 frozen and refrigerated assortment, which have been rolled out to more than 6,500 locations today (almost 80% of the banner’s store base as of February). The company has also discussed adding cooler capacity at Family Dollar stores; 17,000 cooler doors were added at Family Dollar last year, which brought the average to 26 coolers per store (versus a long-term goal of 30 coolers per store). We suspect that many of the closed Family Dollar stores will be replaced with new stores featuring expanded cooler offerings to better compete for customers across all demographic groups.
There are also more practical reasons for the store closures, including improved execution. Dreiling pointed out that underperforming stores can “take the bulk of a district manager's time”. By closing them, the company can better focus on service and execution at existing stores. Also, management believes that the closings will be accretive from a cash perspective (i.e., it’s cheaper to run these underperforming stores dark than it is to operate them at a loss).
When closing stores, there is always the risk that customers will churn to competing retail brands and categories. In fact, we’ve seen a meaningful number of visitors to CVS and Walgreens locations that closed the past two years migrate to nearby grocery and superstore chains. However, by replicating many of Dollar Tree’s successful strategies–including expanded cooler assortments–at future Family Dollar store openings, it gives the chain an opportunity to offset potential visitors lost to this round of closures.
While many retailers have embraced smaller format stores, one chain bucking this trend is Dick’s Sporting Goods through its large-format House of Sport concept. This format offers shoppers an “elevated assortment and service model, premium experiences and enhanced visual expressions”. We discussed the early success of the House of Sport last summer, and with a few months of additional data to look at, we can now better assess the longer-term potential of this concept sporting goods retail category.
Below, we’ve presented visit per location data for the 12 Dick’s House of Sport locations currently open versus Dick’s chainwide average since the beginning of 2023. The strong visits per location trends that we identified last July continued into the back half of 2023 and early 2024, with House of Sport locations now seeing 5-6 times the number of visits per location compared to the rest of the chain. For reference, the average Dick’s Sporting Goods store is roughly 50K square feet square feet compared to 100K-120K square feet for House of Sport, indicating that House of Sport is also outperforming on a visit per square foot basis.
Given the strong visitation trends, it’s not surprising that Dick’s plans to invest more in the House of Sport concept in the years ahead. In 2024, the company plans to open eight new locations, with seven being planned relocations/conversions of existing Dick’s stores and one new store at Prudential Center in Boston. The company also plans to begin construction this year on approximately 15 House of Sport locations that will open throughout 2025, bringing the total number of House of Sport locations to 35 by the end of 2025. Longer-term, management sees an opportunity for 75-100 House of Sport locations by 2027.
Interestingly, Dick’s plans to incorporate experiential elements similar to House of Sport across the rest of its store portfolio. During its Q4 2023 update this past week, management also announced plans to open 16 next-generation 50K square foot Dick’s Sporting Goods stores in 2024, including the relocation/remodeling of 12 existing stores (on top of the 11 next-generation stores already opened). These next generation stores were inspired by the House of Sport format and incorporate expanded product assortments for certain categories, emphasis on services, and improved visuals. The company also plans to open 10 Golf Galaxy Performance Center locations in 2024 (aligning well with golf’s post-COVID comeback).
In total, Dick’s Sporting Goods plans to increase square footage by approximately 2% in 2024, marking the retailer's largest annual square footage increase since 2017. Importantly, the economics behind Dick’s nascent store formats are compelling. The House of Sport formats generate approximately $35 million in omnichannel sales per store, approximately 20% EBITDA margins, and cash-on-cash returns of 35% on an initial investment of $18.5M ($11.5M capex, $3.5M inventory, and $3.5M pre-opening costs). The next-generation Dick’s stores are expected to generate $14M in omnichannel sales per store, 20% EBITDA margins, and cash-on-cash returns of 65% on an initial investment of $4.5M ($2.5M capex, $1.5M inventory, and $0.5M in pre-opening costs).
.avif)
Indoor malls and open-air centers have posted consistent YoY visit growth, outlet declines have been modest, and early 2026 data shows renewed momentum across all three formats.
Growth in short visits and extended stays – alongside declines in mid-length trips – shows that consumers are gravitating toward trips with a clear purpose, favoring either efficiency or immersion.
Rising dwell times and strong engagement from younger, contemporary households position indoor malls as leading destinations for longer, experience-driven trips.
A higher share of short, weekday visits – along with strong appeal among affluent families – underscores their role as convenient, essential retail hubs.
As off-price and online alternatives erode their treasure-hunt advantage and long-distance visitation softens, outlets face a strategic choice between deepening local relevance and reinvesting in destination appeal.
The malls that thrive will be those that intentionally optimize for convenience, experience, or a disciplined integration of both.
Despite economic headwinds, intensifying e-commerce competition, and fragile consumer confidence, shopping centers continue to defy the “dead mall” narrative – reinventing themselves and, in many cases, thriving.
What can location analytics tell us about the state of the mall in 2026? Which trends and audiences are driving their performance – and how can operators and retailers best capitalize on the opportunities within the category?
Over the past two years, both indoor malls and open-air shopping centers have posted consistent year-over-year (YoY) traffic growth. And while outlet malls experienced slight declines, the pullback was modest – signaling a period of stability rather than erosion.
Early 2026 data also points to continued momentum, with all three mall formats recording mid-single-digit YoY traffic gains in the first two months of the year. Although it’s still early days – and YoY comparisons in 2026 were boosted by an additional Saturday – the positive start suggests that the industry is entering the year on a solid footing.
With e-commerce always within reach, hybrid work anchoring more consumers at home, and ongoing economic uncertainty influencing spending decisions, trips to physical stores are becoming more intentional. Shopping center visit data reflects this shift as well, with growth in both quick convenience visits and extended experiential outings – alongside a decline in mid-length trips.
In 2025, quick trips (under 30 minutes) increased across all formats, underscoring malls’ growing role as convenient, high-utility destinations for picking up an online order, grabbing a quick bite, or making a targeted purchase. At the same time, extended visits of more than 75 minutes increased at indoor malls and open-air centers, reflecting sustained appetite for immersive, experiential outings.
Meanwhile, mid-length visits (between 30 and 75 minutes) lagged across formats – falling indoor malls and outlet malls and remaining flat at open-air centers – suggesting shoppers are losing patience with undifferentiated trips that lack a clear purpose.
Still, although short visits increased year over year across all mall types, and long visits increased for both indoor malls and open-air centers, the distribution of dwell time varies by format. Short visits make up a larger share of traffic at open-air shopping centers, for example, while longer visits account for a greater share at indoor malls. This divergence underscores the need for format-specific strategies, with operators clearly defining the core shoppers and missions they are best suited to serve and aligning tenant mix, amenities, and marketing accordingly.
Indoor malls, for instance, have increasingly positioned themselves as experiential hubs – particularly for younger consumers. Recent survey data shows that 57% of shoppers aged 18 to 34 report visiting a mall frequently or often, and they are more likely than older cohorts to arrive without a specific purchase in mind.
Foot traffic patterns reinforce this experiential appeal. In 2025, 37.6% of indoor mall visits lasted more than 75 minutes, compared to 33.4% for open-air centers and 34.6% for outlets. Indoor malls also captured the largest share of visits from the young-skewing “contemporary households” segment – singles, non-family households, and young couples without children – indicating strong resonance with younger audiences.
As indoor malls expand their experiential offerings, visit durations are rising even further – even as they hold steady or even slightly decline at other formats. For operators, this shift highlights a significant opportunity for indoor malls to deepen their role as climate-controlled third places. And for brands, it means high-impact access to Gen Z consumers in discovery mode – top-of-funnel engagement that is increasingly difficult and expensive to replicate through digital channels alone.
If indoor malls excel at capturing extended, social visits, open-air centers are finding success through convenience. In 2025, open-air centers had the highest shares of both weekday visits (64.0%) and short, sub-30 minutes (36.8%) among the three formats. Grocery anchors, superstores, and essential-service tenants like gyms – more common at open-air centers than at other formats – help drive steady, non-discretionary traffic.
Demographically, open-air centers drew the highest share of affluent families, a key demographic for daily errands. This alignment with higher-income households, combined with weekday consistency, positions open-air centers as reliable errand hubs embedded in community life.
Outlet malls, for their part, have historically differentiated themselves by offering something shoppers couldn’t find elsewhere: an experiential treasure hunt featuring brand-name merchandise at compelling prices. But the decline in long visits shown above suggests that this positioning may be coming under pressure – likely from the rise of off-price and discount chains as well as other low-cost, convenient treasure-hunt alternatives like thrift stores. When shoppers can score attractive deals online or browse for bargains at a nearby T.J. Maxx or Ollie’s Bargain Outlet, the incentive to dedicate time and travel to an outlet trip may no longer feel as compelling – especially for outlet malls’ core audience, which includes meaningful contingents of middle and lower-income consumers with families.
And data points to a subtle but steady erosion in the share of visitors willing to go the extra mile to visit outlet malls. Since 2023, the share of outlet visits from consumers traveling more than 30 miles has slipped from 33.1% to 31.8%, even as long-distance visits to other mall formats have remained relatively stable. This softening of destination demand may be contributing to outlets’ recent traffic lags.
Still, despite these lags in foot traffic, major outlet companies continue to see YoY increases in same-center tenant sales per square foot. The format’s strong visit start to 2026 also suggests that outlets still have significant draw – and that with the right strategy, they could reinvigorate their traffic trends.
One option is for outlet malls to lean further into their immediate trade areas: Nearly 20% of visits to outlets already originate within five miles – a share that edged up from 19.4% in 2023 to 19.9% in 2025. These closer shoppers may be largely responsible for the segment’s rise in short visits, pointing to an opportunity to further augment BOPIS offerings and select essential-use tenants.
Another option is to strengthen outlets’ destination appeal with distinctive retail, dining, and experiential offerings that resonate with value-oriented, larger-household shoppers. But whether they focus on convenience or on justifying the journey – or attempt to balance both – success will depend on identifying who their shoppers are and which missions they are best positioned to own.
As in other areas of retail, shopping center success increasingly depends on strategic clarity. The malls that thrive will be those that clearly define their role in their customers’ lives and execute against it with intention – whether by decisively optimizing for efficiency, fully investing in experience, or thoughtfully integrating both.
Commercial real estate in 2026 is characterized by differentiated performance across markets and asset types. Office recovery trajectories vary meaningfully by metro, retail performance reflects format-specific resilience, and domestic migration patterns continue to influence long-term demand fundamentals.
Many higher-income metros continue to trail 2019 benchmarks but drive the strongest Year-over-year gains, signaling a potential inflection in office utilization trends.
• Sunbelt markets along with New York, NY are closest to pre-pandemic office visit levels, while many coastal gateway and tech-heavy markets trail 2019 benchmarks.
• Many of the metros still furthest below pre-pandemic levels are now posting the strongest year-over-year gains.
• Leasing velocity may accelerate in coastal markets – particularly in high-quality assets – even if full recovery remains distant. The expansion of AI-driven firms and innovation-focused employers could support incremental demand in these ecosystems, reinforcing a bifurcation between top-tier buildings and the broader office inventory.
• Higher-income metros such as San Francisco show deeper structural gaps vs 2019, perhaps due to their higher concentration of hybrid-eligible workers – yet those same metros are driving the strongest YoY recovery in 2025.
• Accelerating growth in 2025 suggests that shifting employer policies, workplace enhancements, or broader labor dynamics may be beginning to drive increased in-office activity.
• Office performance in higher-income markets will increasingly depend on workplace quality and policy alignment. Assets that support premium amenities, modern design, and tenants implementing clear in-office expectations are likely to influence sustained office visits and leasing velocity in these metros.
Retail traffic is broadly improving across states, though performance varies by region and format.
• Retail traffic growth is broad-based, with the majority of states showing year-over-year gains in shopping center traffic in 2025.
• Still, even as many states are posting gains, pockets of softer performance remain – specifically in parts of the Southeast and Midwest.
• Broad-based traffic gains indicate consumer demand is more durable than anticipated. In growth states, operators can shift from defensive stabilization to capturing upside – pushing rents, upgrading tenant quality, and accelerating leasing while momentum holds. In softer markets, the focus should remain on protecting traffic through strong anchors and necessity-driven tenancy.
• Convenience-oriented formats are leading traffic growth, with strip/convenience centers materially outperforming all other shopping center types, and neighborhood and community centers also posting gains. This reinforces the strength of proximity-driven, daily-needs retail.
• Destination retail formats, including regional malls and factory outlets, continue to lag, while super-regional malls were essentially flat. Larger-format, discretionary-driven centers are not capturing the same momentum as convenience-based formats.
• The data suggests that consumer behavior continues to favor convenience, frequency, and necessity over destination-based shopping. Operators should lean into service-oriented and daily-needs tenancy in strip and neighborhood formats, while mall operators may need to further reposition assets toward experiential, mixed-use, or non-retail uses to stabilize traffic.
Domestic migration continues to reshape state-level demand, with gains clustering in select growth corridors.
• Domestic migration drove population gains in parts of the Southeast and Northern Plains, while several Western and Northeastern states show flat or negative migration.
• Some previously strong in-migration states in the South and West, including Texas and Utah, are showing softer movement, while other established migration leaders such as Florida and the Carolinas continue to attract net inbound residents.
• Migration flows are shifting relative to prior years. Operators should temper growth assumptions in states where inflows are slowing and prioritize markets where inbound demand remains strong.
• Florida dominates metro-level migration growth, with eight of the top ten U.S. metros for net domestic migration are in Florida.
• The markets with the strongest domestic migration-driven population gains are not major gateway cities but smaller, often retirement- or lifestyle-oriented metros, suggesting that migration-driven demand is increasingly flowing to secondary markets.
• CRE operators should prioritize expansion, leasing, and site selection in high-growth secondary metros where population inflows can directly translate into retail spending, housing absorption, and service demand.
1. Expanded grocery supply is increasing overall category engagement. New locations and deeper food assortments across formats are bringing shoppers into the category more often, rather than fragmenting demand.
2. Grocery visit growth is being driven by low- and middle-income households. Elevated food costs are leading to more frequent, budget-conscious trips, reinforcing grocery’s role as a non-discretionary category.
3. Short, frequent trips are a major driver of brick-and-mortar traffic growth. Fill-in shopping, deal-seeking, and omnichannel behaviors are pushing visit frequency higher, even as trip duration declines.
4. Scale is accelerating consolidation among large grocery chains. Larger retailers are using their size to invest in value, assortment, private label, and execution, allowing them to capture longer and more engaged shopping trips.
5. Both large and small grocers have viable paths to growth. Large chains are winning by competing for the full grocery list, while smaller banners can grow by specializing, owning specific missions, or offering compelling value that earns them a place in shoppers’ routines.
While much of the retail conversation going into 2026 focused on discretionary spending pressure, digital substitution, and higher-income consumers as the primary drivers of growth, grocery foot traffic tells a different story.
Rather than being diluted by new formats or eroded by e-commerce, brick-and-mortar grocery engagement is expanding. Visits are rising even as grocery supply spreads across wholesale clubs, discount and dollar stores, and mass merchants. At the same time, growth is being powered not by affluent trade areas, but by low- and middle-income households navigating higher food costs through more frequent, targeted trips. Shoppers are showing up more often and increasingly splitting their trips across retailers based on value, availability, and mission – pushing grocers to compete for portions of the grocery list instead of the full weekly basket.
The data also suggests that the largest grocery chains are capturing a disproportionate share of rising grocery demand – but the multi-trip nature of grocery shopping in 2026 means that smaller banners can still drive traffic growth. By strengthening their value proposition, specializing in specific products, or owning specific shopping missions, these smaller chains can complement, rather than compete with, larger one-stop destinations.
Ultimately, AI-based location analytics point to a clear set of grocery growth drivers in 2026: expanded supply that increases overall engagement, more frequent and mission-driven trips, and continued traffic concentration among large chains alongside new opportunities for smaller banners.
One driver of grocery growth in recent years is simply the expansion of grocery supply across multiple retail formats. Wholesale clubs are constantly opening new locations and discount and dollar stores are investing more heavily in their food selection, giving consumers a wider choice of where to shop for groceries. And rather than fragmenting demand, this broader availability appears to have increased overall grocery engagement – benefiting both dedicated grocery stores and grocery-adjacent channels.
Grocery stores continue to capture nearly half of all visits across grocery stores, wholesale clubs, discount and dollar stores, and mass merchants. That share has remained remarkably stable thanks to consistent year-over-year traffic growth – so even as grocery supply increases across categories, dedicated grocery stores remain the primary destination for food shopping.
Meanwhile, mass merchants have seen a decline in relative visit share as expanding grocery assortments at discount and dollar stores and the growing store fleets of wholesale clubs give consumers more alternatives for one-stop shopping.
While much of the broader retail conversation heading into 2026 centers on higher-income consumers carrying growth, the trend looks different in the grocery space. Recent visit trends show that grocery growth has increasingly shifted toward lower- and middle-income trade areas, underscoring the distinct dynamics of non-discretionary retail.
For lower- and middle-income shoppers, elevated food costs appear to be translating into more frequent grocery trips as consumers manage budgets through smaller baskets, deal-seeking, and shopping across retailers. In contrast, higher-income households – often cited as a key growth engine for discretionary retail – are contributing less to grocery visit growth, likely reflecting more stable shopping patterns or a greater ability to consolidate trips or shift spend online.
This means that, in 2026, grocery growth is not being propped up by high-income consumers. Instead, it is being fueled by necessity-driven shopping behavior in lower- and middle-income communities – reinforcing grocery’s role as an essential category and suggesting that similar dynamics may be at play across other non-discretionary retail segments.
Another factor driving grocery growth is the rise in short grocery visits in recent years. Between 2022 and 2025, the biggest year-over-year visit gains in the grocery space went to visits under 30 minutes, with sub-15 minute visits seeing particularly big boosts. As of 2025, visits under 15 minutes made up over 40% of grocery visits nationwide – up from 37.9% of visits in 2022.
This shift toward shorter visits – especially those under 15 minutes – is driven in part by the continued expansion of omnichannel grocery shopping, as many consumers complete larger stock-up orders online and rely on in-store trips for order collection or quick, fill-in needs. At the same time, the rise in short visits paired with consistent YoY growth in grocery traffic points to additional, behavior-driven forces at play – consumers' growing willingness to shop around at different grocery stores in search of the best deal or just-right product.
Value-conscious shoppers – particularly consumers from low- and middle-income households, which have driven much of recent grocery growth – seem to be increasingly shopping across multiple retailers to secure the best prices. This behavior often involves making targeted trips to different stores in search of the strongest deals, a pattern that is contributing to the rise in shorter, more frequent grocery visits. At the same time, other grocery shoppers are making quick trips to pick up a single ingredient or specialty item – perhaps reflecting the increasingly sophisticated home cooks and social media-driven ingredient crazes. In both these cases, speed is secondary to getting the best value or the right product.
So while some shorter visits reflect a growing emphasis on efficiency – as shoppers use in-store trips to complement primarily online grocery shopping – others appear driven by a preference for value or product selection over speed. Despite their differences, all of these behaviors have one thing in common – they're all contributing to continued growth in brick-and-mortar grocery visits. Grocers who invest in providing efficient in-store experiences are particularly well-positioned to benefit from these trends.
As early as 2022, the top 15 most-visited grocery chains already accounted for roughly half of all grocery visits nationwide. And by outpacing the industry average in terms of visit growth, these chains have continued to capture a growing share of grocery foot traffic.
This widening gap suggests that scale is increasingly enabling grocers to reinvest in the factors that attract and retain shoppers. Larger chains are better positioned to invest in broader and more differentiated product selection, stronger private-label programs that deliver quality at accessible price points, competitive pricing, and operational excellence across stores and omnichannel touchpoints. These capabilities allow top chains to serve a wide range of shopping missions – from quick, convenience-driven trips to more intentional visits in search of the right product or ingredient.
Consolidation at the top of the grocery category is reinforcing a virtuous cycle: scale enables better value, selection, and experience, which in turn draws more shoppers into stores and supports continued grocery traffic growth.
In 2025, the top 15 most-visited grocery chains accounted for a disproportionate share of visits lasting 15 minutes or more, while smaller grocers captured a larger share of the shortest trips. As shown above, larger grocery chains, which tend to attract longer visits, grew faster than the industry overall – but short visits, which skew more heavily toward smaller chains, accounted for a greater share of total traffic growth. Together, these patterns show that both long, destination trips and short, targeted visits are driving grocery traffic growth and creating viable paths forward for retailers of all sizes.
Larger chains are more likely to serve as destinations for fuller shopping missions, competing for the entire grocery list – or a significant share of it. But smaller banners can grow too by competing for more short visits. By specializing in a specific product category, owning a clearly defined shopping mission, or delivering a compelling value proposition, smaller grocers can earn a place in shoppers’ routines and become a deliberate stop within a broader grocery journey.
As grocery moves deeper into 2026, growth is being driven by the cumulative effect of how consumers are navigating food shopping today. Expanded supply has increased overall engagement, higher food costs are driving more frequent and targeted trips, and shoppers are increasingly willing to split their grocery list across retailers based on value, availability, and mission.
Looking ahead, this suggests that grocery growth will remain resilient, but unevenly distributed. Retailers that clearly understand which trips they are best positioned to win – and invest accordingly – will be best placed to capture that growth. Large chains are likely to continue benefiting from scale, consolidation, and their ability to serve full shopping missions, while smaller banners can grow by earning a defined role within shoppers’ broader grocery journeys. In 2026, success in grocery will be less about winning every trip and more about consistently winning the right ones.
