


.png)
.png)

.png)
.png)


A cool housing market, still-high interest rates, and other economic headwinds have weighed on the home improvement industry this year. But how did category leaders The Home Depot and Lowe’s fare in Q3 2024 – and what lies ahead for them this holiday season?
We dove into the data to find out.
Looking first at the relative positioning of Home Depot and Lowe’s within the wider home improvement sector shows that the two leaders have maintained their dominance, despite the growing popularity of smaller chains like Harbor Freight Tools and Tractor Supply Co.
In Q3 2024, Home Depot accounted for 29.4% of visits to home improvement and furnishing chains nationwide – while Lowe’s accounted for 20.7%. And diving into the data on a statewide level shows that each of the giants holds sway in a different area of the country. Home Depot drew the most visits in much of the Western United States as well as in most of New England. Lowe’s, on the other hand, led parts of the South and Midwest. And in some states, smaller chains like Menards and Ace Hardware dominated the landscape.

Given the challenges faced by the home improvement industry this year, it may come as no surprise that both Home Depot and Lowe’s sustained year-over-year (YoY) visit gaps in Q3 2024 – 3.1% and 4.1%, respectively. But digging deeper into the data suggests that the two chains may still be poised to enjoy a robust holiday season.
Unlike many other categories, visits to home improvement chains tend to peak in spring rather than during the holiday season. Still, Home Depot and Lowe’s do see visit spikes on Q4 retail milestones like Black Friday and Super Saturday. Last year, for example, Home Depot and Lowe’s drew 77.8% and 78.6% more visits, respectively, on Black Friday (Nov. 24th) than on an average day in 2023. Indeed, the big day was Home Depot’s busiest day of 2023 and Lowe’s second-busiest.
And a look at Home Depot and Lowe’s visit performance during Labor Day – another, more recent retail milestone – shows that the two chains continue to excel at attracting visits on key calendar days. On September 4th, 2023 (Labor Day last year), visits to Lowe’s were 23.8% higher than the January to October 2023 daily visit average. And this year, Lowe’s relative Labor Day spike was even more significant – 24.8%. Home Depot, too, saw a slightly more pronounced Labor Day boost this year than last. So even if overall foot traffic to the home improvement leaders remained somewhat below last year’s levels, they may be in for a busy Q4.

The home improvement industry has yet to regain its pandemic-era glory. But analyzing visit trends to category leaders shows that holiday visit spikes may help fuel a successful holiday season this year. How will Lowe’s and Home Depot perform on Black Friday?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven retail analyses to find out.

It’s been an eventful week for the QSR Burger category, with much of the focus on this week’s quarterly updates focusing on events that took place after Q3 2024 ended. Let’s start with McDonald’s, where an E.Coli outbreak overshadowed what was largely a positive quarter of visitation gains, where the chain had reversed the visitation declines that it saw during the driven year-over-year visitation increases through its $5 Meal Deal and Collector’s Edition promotion (below).

According to the company, the $5 Meal Deal “continued drawing customers back into our restaurants throughout the quarter, maintaining an average check north of $10 and being profitable for our franchisees.” Importantly, McDonald’s management also called out that the $5 Meal Deal is gaining traction among low-income consumers and that it “successfully [grew] traffic share with this group for the first time in over a year.” Our data indicates this as well. Over the past several months, we’ve looked at McDonald’s cross visitation trends with Aldi as a barometer of its traction with lower-income consumers. The percentage of McDonald’s visitors that also visited an Aldi had been steadily increasing through Q2 2024, but we did see a reversal of this trend in Q3 2024, suggesting that more consumers are finding value at the chain. The company remains committed to having the $5 Meal Deal on its menus until December as it works towards “sustainable guest count-led growth.”

McDonald’s E. Coli outbreak did have a negative impact on visitation trends, but these trends may be short-lived. Our data indicated a 6.5% decline in year-over-year visits nationwide on Wednesday, Oct. 25 (the day after the E. Coli outbreak investigation was announced), 10%-11% declines from Oct. 26-Oct. 28, and 7%-8% declines from Oct 29-30. It’s natural to compare this situation to Chipotle’s E. Coli outbreak in 2015, where visitation trends were severely impacted for many months. However, there are meaningful differences between McDonald’s and Chipotle’s cases. First, McDonald’s was quickly able to identify and communicate the source of the outbreak–slivered onions from a Colorado Springs facility at supplier Taylor Farms, which were immediately removed from the company’s supply chain–while also ruling out its beef patties as a source, which has helped to keep the outbreak relatively contained. Second, in addition to an E. Coli outbreak, Chipotle also faced a norovirus outbreak, calling into question the safety of the chain’s entire supply chain. These differences help to explain why we may already be seeing visitation declines inflect at McDonald’s.

McDonald’s Collector’s Edition was not the only nostalgia-driven promotion driving visits in recent weeks, as Wendy’s Krabby Patty Burger and Pineapple Under the Sea Frosty celebrating SpongeBob's 25th anniversary drove a meaningful lift in visits (below). In fact, this might be the most successful limited-time-offer promotion that we’ve seen across the QSR sector since McDonald’s Adult Happy Meal in October 2022. Importantly, this promotion innovated on existing core menu items without adding complexity. Given the strong visitation lift, we expect more nostalgia-themed promotions in the year ahead.


Affecting everything from merchandise sales to local bars to entire neighborhoods, the economic effect of the Los Angeles Dodgers’ road to the World Series cannot be disputed.
After a comeback from 5-0 to win 7-6 against the New York Yankees, the Dodgers kept everyone on the edge of their seats. With history made by Freddie Freeman’s walk-off grand slam to win Game 1, fans will have moments seared in their memories for decades to come. Dodgers fans are willing to shell out big to celebrate their champions. Fanatics reported that after winning Wednesday night, “the Dodgers set a Fanatics sales record for first-hour sales of a team's merchandise, across any sport, after claiming a championship.” The top five players for merchandise sales were Ohtani, Freeman, Betts, Yamamoto, and Kershaw.
Local bars in various parts of L.A. that featured Dodgers games saw an uptick in year-over-year traffic most weeks, particularly in recent weeks leading up to the National League Championship and the World Series. Spontaneous parades erupted in locations such as Whittier Blvd in East L.A., in Downtown L.A., and near Dodger Stadium in Elysian Park.

We’ve previously written about the Shohei Effect on hotels like the Miyako that features the mural “LA Rising” by Robert Vargas, but now after a World Series championship, the Boys in Blue are set to go even higher into the stratosphere of fandom. We looked at the foot traffic to Dodger Stadium and to Little Tokyo, and no surprise there’s definitely an uptick to the latter on game days, especially on Saturdays. Vargas is currently working on a mural of the late Fernando Valenzuela in Boyle Heights, and Angelenos will likely be flocking in droves to come see “Fernandomania Forever” when it is unveiled.
One interesting finding is that visitation was actually higher during some of the regular season games than for the World Series Games 1 and 2 that took place in LA. One reason may be the sky high prices. Per reseller Ticket IQ, “the average price for a World Series ticket on the secondary market was $3,887, the second most expensive average since it started tracking data in 2010.” For some fans, it was a dream of a lifetime, one that some were willing to “sell a kidney” to attend.


As we enter November, the holiday season is already in full swing across the country. We’re likely to see the consumer’s embrace of seasonal decorations soon, just as we saw in the fall season. The retail industry has already lived through one major promotional event in October, and it’s time to take the temperature on physical retail foot traffic as we head into the busiest part of the season.
One thing that jumped out upon initial review was the foot traffic from department stores, excluding off-price retail. Looking at the four full weeks of October 2024, traffic to full line department stores was flat to last year, compared to the same period last year when traffic was down 8% to 2022 in October (store counts are about even to last year). Visits to luxury department stores show a similar story; traffic in 2023 was down 9% in October and trended down 2% this year. Coming from a sector of retail that has been challenged for years, this slight improvement is worthy of celebration.

Just how important is October’s contribution to holiday shopping visits? For full line department stores, October accounted for 22% of total holiday season visits in both 2022 and 2023; October traffic for luxury department stores was 24% of total holiday traffic in 2022 and 23% in 2023. That means that there’s still almost ¾ of total visitation still left for retailers to capture over the next two months. However, with traffic trending better in 2024 than in 2023 for department stores overall, this year might actually be a proof point for pull forward holiday demand.

Looking at visitation by retailers within the two sectors, Dillard’s, unsurprisingly led the charge for full line department stores in visitation growth. JCPenney also saw a lot of trend improvement compared to last year, as did Macy’s in the back half of the month. The only major retailer that has underperformed 2023 in October was Kohl’s. Through the lens of luxury department stores, Bloomingdale’s and Nordstrom grew traffic in the low to mid-single digits in October, with Neiman Marcus only down slightly to 2023 levels.

Another interesting insight Placer’s data uncovered; department stores are more of a destination for consumers this year. Looking at Macy’s cross-visitation specifically in October, the percent of visitors to Macy’s that traveled home after visiting was almost 50 basis points higher than in 2023. Our data also showed a lower percentage of cross visitation between Macy’s and other department stores this year compared to last October. Department stores may be doing a better job of capturing consumers' attention and better aligning themselves with the needs of their shoppers. This is in contrast of what we're seeing in essential retail categories such as grocery stores and superstores, where consumers are willing to cross shop multiple retailers; this underscores just how different consumer behavior is by category.

What does this signal about the remainder of the “true” holiday season? It’s hard to tell as we stand today, but the trend improvement across department stores this year gives us some optimism about consumers flocking to physical stores this year. But, it’s important to give consumers a reason to visit as many times as possible, especially as retail fatigue sets in from shopping earlier in the season. Value is still going to be the top driver of visitation this year, but unique products, services and experiences are still important to capturing the joy of the season.

If you’ve ever wished you could root for your alma mater from afar, attend a World Series, or blast into space, Cosm may have the solution. This immersive technology company combines state-of-the art stadium experiences with dining and bar service. Think a smaller version of the Sphere, a larger version of an IMAX theater, with the simulation of being at an actual stadium all while enjoying the comforts of a booth with food brought to you.
For fans of large screen immersive experiences, this venue allows you to be enveloped by the aquatic performers of Cirque du Soleil's “O”, feel like you’re on the 50-yard line for the Ohio State versus Penn State football game, or be a pioneering astronaut seeing the earth from space in “Orbital.”
Since it opened at the end of June this year, popular showings have included “Seek,” which takes you on a journey through the cosmos, as well as sports favorites like the New York Jets versus Pittsburgh Steelers game. Game 2 of the World Series had a sell-out crowd as those who chose not to buy tickets for thousands of dollars still had the joy of celebrating in an arena venue with hundreds of other fans, with the feeling of being behind the dugout.

The Los Angeles Times describes Cosm as “part planetarium, part mini-Sphere,” so instead of needing to travel to Griffith Observatory or Las Vegas, one can just jet down the 405 to Inglewood to have a similar experience. So, who’s visiting Cosm? Roughly 3 in 10 (29%) have a hold income (HHI) of $50K-$99.9K. Nearly 1 in 5 (19%) have a HHI of $25K-$49.9K. These two household income segments over index compared to the CA household incomes (shown in gray).

In terms of demographics, per Spatial.ai PersonaLive, Near-Urban Diverse Families, Educated Urbanites, and Melting Pot Families make up the top 3 segments.


Starbucks, the largest coffee chain in the world, and Dutch Bros, one of the fastest growing in the country, are major players in the hot and cold beverage space. With Q3 2024 in the rearview mirror, we took a closer look at the visitation patterns to both chains to see how they are faring – and what might lie ahead for both brands.
Starbucks is one of the most dominant names in coffee across the world, with thousands of stores in the United States alone. Between July 2023 and July 2024, the chain added more than 500 stores to its domestic fleet, bringing its U.S. store count to 16,730. And though Starbucks has faced its share of challenges, these store additions helped keep overall traffic to the coffee leader on par with 2023 levels throughout the summer – though visits dipped somewhat in September as consumers went back to their routines.
But digging deeper into the visit data shows that even as Starbucks saw overall foot traffic growth stall in Q3, the number of short visits to the chain – i.e. those lasting less than 10 minutes – increased. In August and September 2024, the chain drew 8.5% and 4.7% more short visits, respectively, than in the same periods of 2023 – revealing how important these quick stops are for the chain.
In-app ordering, which together with drive-thru orders made up about 70% of sales at the chain as of January 2024, may be contributing to the short visit trend. Still, new CEO Brian Niccol is looking for ways to return the chain to its roots as the third place, and the chain may yet implement shifts to encourage longer visits in the coming months.

Dutch Bros has been one of the most impressive coffee chains to watch over the past few years. The Oregon-based chain has been on an expansion tear – opening more than 150 stores between Q2 2023 and Q2 2024 – and has seen the elevated monthly visits to match. Between June and September 2024, visits to Dutch Bros increased between 13.7% and 16.9%, highlighting the chain’s success at growing its audience.
But like at Starbucks, short visits outperformed longer ones at Dutch Bros – and by a lot. In September 2024, for example, overall visits to the chain grew by 13.7% – but visits lasting less than 10 minutes shot up by 26.6%.
The strength of these short visits, for both Starbucks and Dutch Bros, suggests a shift towards convenience, with both chains utilizing drive-thru services and in-app ordering to accommodate busy consumers.

Digging down deeper into the data shows that for both Starbucks and Dutch Bros, these all-important short visits follow a distinct weekly pattern.
While longer visits (≥10 minutes) to both chains peaked in Q3 2024 on Saturdays, shorter visits were more evenly distributed throughout the week, peaking on Fridays. Overall, 34.1% of long visits to Starbucks, and 37.8% of long visits to Dutch Bros, took place on the weekends in Q3 2024 – compared to 28.1% and and 28.7%, respectively, for shorter visits.
Unsurprisingly, customers may be more likely to grab a quick coffee to go during the work week. And with the return to office still underway, quick visits may be enjoying a boost fueled by commuters in need of a quick cubicle pick-me-up.

As Starbucks works to adapt to shifting consumer preferences, understanding when customers spend more time in-store can help the brand reconnect with its roots as a community hub. And Dutch Bros can continue to enhance the quick-service experience that has fueled its growth. How will the two chains continue to perform in what remains a competitive coffee environment?
Follow Placer.ai for the latest data-driven dining insights.

Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.

Physical retail is increasingly defined by a small group of dominant players – Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General – that span grocery, essentials, and discretionary categories at a scale no other retailers can match. These chains serve as bellwethers of consumer behavior, revealing where Americans are spending, how often they shop, and what drives their decisions. And understanding their visitation patterns sheds light on the key dynamics shaping both their performance and the broader blueprint for retail success in 2026.
Retail giants Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General continue to capture a growing share of brick-and-mortar visits nationwide.
• The share of physical retail traffic captured by these giants rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 17.5% in Q1 2026, signaling continued sector consolidation.
• The scale advantage enjoyed by retail giants is increasingly self-reinforcing: Larger players benefit from superior data, stronger vendor leverage, and operational efficiencies that in turn further widen the gap.
• As these advantages compound, direct competition becomes less viable. Instead, smaller retailers should focus on owning specific trip missions – such as convenience, fill-in, or discovery – where format, assortment curation, and in-store experience can more directly shape consumer choice.
• For CRE operators, the growing dominance of these retail giants increases reliance on top-tier anchors, potentially driving performance gaps between centers with strong national tenants and those without.
• For CPG companies, the consolidation in the offline retail space heightens channel concentration, making success with a handful of large retailers critical while increasing those retailers’ negotiating leverage.
Traffic trends across the four giants reveal meaningful divergence in performance.
• Costco and Dollar General are driving the strongest visit growth, supported by both substantial fleet expansions and rising visits per location. In 2025, visits per store exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 18.1% for Costco and 10.2% for Dollar General, with both brands also seeing steady increases in their share of total brick-and-mortar retail chain visits.
• Walmart remains the largest player by far, accounting for 9.7% of traffic to major brick-and-mortar chains in 2025. And though the behemoth’s share of visits declined slightly in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it has held steady over the past three years.
• Target’s visit share has remained relatively flat over the past three years, reflecting stalled momentum. Still, early 2026 trends point to emerging signs of recovery – with Q1 visits up 8.3% compared to Q1 2019.
• Value retail is winning, but in more specialized forms: Dollar General (extreme value + convenience) and Costco (bulk value + loyalty) are driving the strongest traffic growth and rising visits per store, while Walmart’s broad “everyday value” remains steady with slower growth. Target, for its part, is lagging – likely a reflection of the broader bifurcation in retail which has left middle-market players caught between consumers trading down to value and those trading up to quality.
• For retailers and CPG companies, the broader lesson is that value perception is becoming more nuanced. It’s no longer just about offering low prices at scale, but about how value is delivered – whether through small packs vs. bulk, or quick trips vs. stock-up missions. Success increasingly depends on prioritizing these distinct value formats and investing in channels where store-level productivity is improving.
• For CRE operators, the outperformance of retailers with clearly defined value propositions underscores the importance of mission-driven tenant mix. As shoppers visit with increasingly specific missions in mind, retailers that cater to those missions are outperforming. Tenant strategies should reflect this shift, ensuring complementary offerings that reinforce a cohesive shopping mission.
Walmart remains the dominant brick-and-mortar retailer nationwide and across all fifty states. Still, the data suggests there is room for multiple runners-up to succeed across geographies and customer segments.
• Dollar General, Target, and Costco each attract distinct audience segments. Dollar General attracts a disproportionately high share of the “Mature and Retired Living” segment, while Costco leads among family households, with Target also over-indexing with this group. Among younger “Contemporary Households,” meanwhile – a segment encompassing singles, married couples without children, and non-family households – Target commands the highest share, slightly over-indexing compared to the nationwide baseline.
• Regional strengths vary significantly, with Dollar General concentrated in the South, Costco dominant in the Northwest, and Target showing more dispersed areas of strength.
• Despite similar overall visit share, Dollar General leads in more states (26 vs. 17 for Target), reflecting broader geographic dominance.
• For retailers, the data suggests that growth opportunities are increasingly shaped by localized demographic and geographic dynamics – meaning that targeted, market-specific strategies may be more effective than uniform national approaches.
• Younger “Contemporary Households” remain less locked-in than older demographics, representing a key battleground for future growth.
• For CPG companies, this data highlights that channel strategy is really about building the right mix of retailers, since even large national players reach different types of consumers.
• CRE operators should ask "which anchor is right for this trade area" rather than "which anchor is strongest," as mismatched tenants can underperform even if they’re nationally dominant.
After remaining essentially flat in 2025, average visits per location to Walmart grew 3.5% YoY in Q1 2026. And the retailer’s solid Q1 performance across the U.S. underscores its unique ability to resonate across income levels, geographies, and shopping missions.
• Walmart posted year-over-year visit growth across nearly all U.S. markets in Q1 2026, reinforcing its role as a universally relevant retailer.
• The giant’s comparative softness in small parts of the Northeast suggests an opportunity to double down on region-specific assortments, urban-friendly formats, or partnerships to better match local shopping behaviors.
• Walmart’s broad-based growth shows that even as consumers are increasingly willing to visit multiple retailers to get what they want, its Superstore model has solidified its role as a primary stop on the American shopping journey – making it a uniquely reliable anchor for CRE operators.
• For smaller retailers, this underscores the opportunity to win the “second stop” – capturing trips through curated assortments and more tailored in-store experiences that Walmart’s scale is less optimized to deliver.
• For CPG companies, Walmart stands out as a highly attractive partner for broad, efficient reach, given its consistent traffic across markets.
Target’s recent performance suggests early momentum in reversing prior softness.
• Q1 2026 visits to Target rose 5.1% year over year, marking the chain’s first positive visit growth in more than a year, and suggesting that the chain’s new turnaround strategy may be bearing fruit.
• Gains were driven primarily by visits lasting 30 to 45 minutes, which accounted for 19.6% of overall visits to Target in Q1 2026 – pointing to stronger in-store engagement rather than quick, mission-driven stops.
• Target’s return to traffic growth – driven by increases in mid-length trips – signals a sustainable recovery on the horizon, strengthening its reliability as a traffic-driving tenant for CRE operators.
• Target's turnaround shows retailers how increasing shopper engagement can generate growth by converting quick trips into higher-value, multi-category experiences.
• For CPG companies, the rise in mid-length visits indicates a more receptive in-store environment for discovery and trade-up, making Target an increasingly attractive channel for innovation, merchandising, and premium offerings.
Dollar General is becoming embedded in consumers’ daily routines.
• Visitor frequency to Dollar General is on the rise. In Q1 2026, nearly a quarter of visitors frequented the chain at least four times in an average month, up from 21.2% in Q1 2022.
• Dollar General is becoming increasingly local in nature: As its footprint expands, more visits originate nearby, with 28.0% coming from within one mile – reinforcing its role as a neighborhood store of choice.
• Dollar General’s visitation patterns point to a growing ownership of the convenience mission. Its expanding store density is creating a self-reinforcing network effect, where proximity fuels frequency, and frequency strengthens long-term defensibility.
• For retailers, Dollar General’s rising share of nearby and high-frequency visits shows that proximity can drive habit, making convenience a powerful lever for building repeat behavior.
• For CRE operators, the data highlights the strength of hyper-local, necessity-driven traffic, positioning Dollar General as a stable tenant that anchors consistent, repeat visitation.
• For CPG professionals, the increase in frequent trips signals a high-velocity purchase environment, favoring smaller pack sizes and products that align with regular replenishment cycles.
Costco continues to grow and diversify its audience despite higher membership fees and stricter food court access policies, highlighting the strength of its value proposition and loyalty model.
• In September 2024, Costco raised its membership fees for the first time in seven years – and more recently tightened enforcement of member-only access to its food courts. Despite these changes, visitation has remained strong, highlighting the company’s pricing power and deep customer loyalty.
• At the same time, Costco’s shopper base is broadening, with median household income trending slightly downward while remaining relatively affluent.
• Offering strong value to a relatively affluent consumer base can be a winning formula in 2026. Retailers that combine quality, trust, and perceived savings – rather than competing solely on low prices – are well positioned to drive both loyalty and sustained traffic growth.
• For CRE operators, Costco’s sustained traffic growth and broadening shopper base reinforce its value as a standalone, high-demand traffic magnet that can anchor entire trade areas and drive surrounding retail development.
• For CPG companies, the combination of high traffic and declining median HHI signals that Costco is evolving into a scaled channel reaching beyond affluent shoppers, requiring more diversified assortment and pricing strategies.
.avif)
It’s been decades since the U.S. last hosted the World Cup, and anticipation continues to build. While the matches themselves will deliver thrilling moments for fans inside the stadium, a far broader audience is expected to engage from beyond the gates – gathering at bars, watch parties, and living rooms across the country.
Drawing on insights from recent sporting and cultural events, this analysis examines how the World Cup may impact consumer behavior and audiences across stadiums, host cities, and nationwide.
In 2025, MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ hosted a wide range of concerts and sporting events. And an examination of three – Kendrick Lamar & SZA’s tour stop, the FIFA Club World Cup Final, and a Week 17 New York Jets matchup against division rivals and the Super Bowl-bound New England Patriots – reveals clear differences in audience composition across event types.
Trade area analysis showed that the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup Final drew the largest share of single visitors and the highest median household income (HHI) of the three events – a pattern that could reflect the premium tickets and travel typically associated with a quadrennial championship match.
With the 2026 World Cup elevating the level of global competition, stadiums set to host matches this summer – including MetLife – may see even more dramatic shifts in their audience relative to other events.
While spectators attending World Cup matches are likely to differ from those drawn to other events throughout the year, audience shifts are likely to occur also within the tournament itself. As the competition progresses and the stakes rise, the visitor profile at host stadiums may trend progressively higher-income, as suggested by an analysis of Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, CA during the recent NFL season and Super Bowl.
During the Super Bowl, the stadium’s captured market median HHI surpassed that of every 49ers home game during the 2025-26 season – a pattern consistent with the event’s premium ticket pricing, national draw, and high levels of out-of-market travel.
And since the World Cup only takes place every four years, and necessitates international travel for die-hard fans, attendees are likely to be even more affluent than Super Bowl go-ers. Moreover, as the tournament reaches its later stages, each match becomes more significant and carries the potential to drive an even more affluent in-person audience.
Diving deeper into last year’s FIFA Club World Cup Final and Semifinal matches at MetLife Stadium provides further insight into the significance of the in-person audience that doesn’t make it into the stands. While FIFA generally places restrictions on tailgating, the behavior was still observed at MetLife and several other tournament venues in 2025. To put the phenomenon into perspective, location intelligence indicates that on the day of the Club World Cup final, combined visits to MetLife and its parking lots were 24.8% higher than visits to the stadium alone.
AI-powered trade area analysis further contextualizes the economic significance of this audience. During the semifinal matches, MetLife Stadium’s captured market median HHI remained nearly identical – just over $100K – with and without parking lot visitors. A similar pattern held for the Final, where median HHI for both the stadium-only and combined stadium-plus-parking visitors both rose above $115K, with the stadium-only figure only marginally higher.
This suggests that tailgaters represent a significant cohort with discretionary income to spend on the broader match-day experience, even if they opt out of spending big money on tickets.
With tailgating during the 2026 World Cup likely to remain limited due to FIFA regulations, the spending power of fans just outside the stadiums could create opportunities for alternative forms of engagement. Fan zones and other nearby hospitality events may offer effective ways to capture demand.
Nearby dining and entertainment venues are among the most accessible experiences for fans in the stadium area, and these stand to benefit significantly from elevated game-day foot traffic.
Analysis of recent FIFA Club World Cup matches reveals the impact of match-day activity on local businesses. Visitor journey data from the June 25th, 2025 matchup between Inter Milan and River Plate at Seattle’s Lumen Field, and the June 28th, 2025 meeting between Palmeiras and Botafogo at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia reveals that a significant share of stadium visitors also stopped at nearby dining and recreation venues on the day. Location intelligence also shows that, on the day of the match, each stadium-adjacent venue received a significant visit boost compared to its 2025 daily average.
This pattern underscores the potential impact of the World Cup on the surrounding commercial ecosystem. The stadium may anchor the experience, but fan engagement will likely spill into adjacent areas – creating opportunities for both organizers and local businesses. To take full advantage, restaurants and bars can position themselves as fan-friendly destinations through watch parties, extended hours, and even mobile or outdoor offerings in stadium corridors.
Previous major sporting events – including the Super Bowl – demonstrate that the impact of large-scale sporting moments often extends beyond the immediate stadium vicinity into the broader regional economy.
In the weeks leading up to the latest Super Bowl in Santa Clara, CA on February 8th, 2026, both the San Francisco-Oakland-Berkley and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara CBSAs saw a notable uptick in year-over-year dining traffic – outperforming the nationwide average. The timing suggests that early-arriving travellers combined with locals enjoying pre-event concerts and events helped fuel demand. In contrast, nationwide dining traffic saw a more pronounced lift the following week – likely tied to Valentine’s Day on February 14.
This pattern indicates that regions hosting – or located near – World Cup 2026 matches could experience similar pre-event dining tailwinds. As out-of-town visitors arrive and local engagement builds in the days and weeks leading up to key matches, restaurants and hospitality may benefit from elevated demand – particularly when supported by ancillary events and fan experiences.
Other recent examples suggest that cities hosting major events like the World Cup stand to benefit from an influx of out-of-town visitors – particularly those with higher spending power.
Since the beginning of 2025, New Orleans has hosted a series of popular events that drove significant non-local traffic. AI-powered trade area data indicates that during these periods, out-of-market visitors consistently exhibited a higher median HHI than both local residents and typical commuters into the city.
As expected, the 2025 Super Bowl generated the most pronounced spike in out-of-market visitor median HHI among the events analyzed, but the pattern extends beyond one-time spectacles. Recurring events like Mardi Gras and major music festivals also attracted high-income visitors to the city – likely benefitting the local hospitality, dining, and retail industries.
Looking ahead to the 2026 World Cup, host cities are likely to experience a similar dynamic. The tournament’s global draw will likely bring affluent travelers with discretionary dollars to the host regions – visitors that will spend not only on match tickets, but also on accommodation, dining, and shopping. By sponsoring tournament-related festivals, concerts, and experiences in or near retail corridors, cities can amplify the economic impact of the World Cup beyond the stadium.
The impact of the 2026 World Cup is unlikely to be confined to the select cities hosting matches. Major sporting events drive large-scale at-home viewership, generating ripple effects nationwide.
The Super Bowl offers a useful benchmark. In the days leading up to February 8th, 2026, visits to grocery stores and pizza chains rose above day-of-week averages for 2025, ultimately peaking on the day of the big game day as households appeared to pick up last-minute fixings and takeout for their watch parties.
This pattern indicates that the World Cup – with its extended schedule and multiple high-stakes matchups – could drive repeated waves of elevated grocery and take-out demand as fans gather together throughout the tournament.
Of course, at-home viewing is just one piece of the match-day equation. Many fans opt for a more communal experience – gathering at sports bars across the country to watch the game alongside fellow supporters.
Recent highly-anticipated soccer matches offer a clear signal of this behavior. During the recent Allstate Continental Clásico, MLS Cup Final, and SheBelieves Cup Final, top sports bars in key markets like Los Angeles and Miami recorded visit spikes above day-of-week averages.
Not every World Cup fan will be able to attend in-person or travel to a host city, but previous match-day lifts in sports bar traffic demonstrate that fans nationwide will participate in the tournament experience.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup is set to engage a wide spectrum of fans – from casual viewers at home to dedicated supporters traveling to stadiums – shaping how and where demand emerges.
As a result, the tournament’s impact will be felt across multiple layers of retail, dining, and tourism. Stadium-centered spending, activity in surrounding corridors, host-city consumer demand, and gatherings of spectators nationwide all point to a broad and interconnected World Cup effect that is likely to shape both audience composition and behavior at scale.
