.svg)
Bowlero Corporation operates more than 350 bowling alleys nationwide, under a portfolio of brands that includes Bowlero and AMF – the company’s two largest chains. How have the bowling alleys performed this year?
We dove into the data to find out.
A look at year-over-year (YoY) visitation trends shows that after a January weather-induced slump and a lackluster three months between February and April 2024, YoY visits to both Bowlero and AMF Bowling Centers picked up major steam. Beginning in May, the two chains saw consistent monthly YoY visit growth ranging from 8.4% to 21.9%.
Fleet expansions undoubtedly contributed to the chains’ summer traffic jumps – but the visit increases were likely also driven by the reintroduction of Bowlero’s popular summer season pass – redeemable across the company’s portfolio of brands – which entitles customers to two free games daily at a center of their choosing. (A premium version can be used at any of the company’s locations.) The pass, which was valid from May 24th to September 2nd, proved to be such a runaway success this year that the company decided to launch a similar promotion for fall. This year’s record-breaking heat may have also contributed to the bowling alleys’ visit boosts – as consumers sought to cool down with indoor activities.
Bowlero and AMF are owned by the same company, but customers seem to interact with each brand slightly differently. Between January and August 2024, AMF attracted a higher share of frequent visitors than Bowlero – perhaps indicating the brand’s positioning as a destination for more serious bowlers and league participants.
On average, 21.4% of AMF’s visitors frequented the chain at least twice a month during the analyzed period – and 8.4% visited at least four times a month. Meanwhile, Bowlero, which touts itself as a “bowling/dining/nightlife experience,” drew smaller shares of frequent visitors – though 16.5% of Bowlero visitors turned out 2+ times a month on average during the analyzed period, and 5.7% visited at least four times a month.
Bowlero, which attracts more casual bowlers than AMF, is also a destination for families. Between January and August 2024, Bowlero’s captured market featured a higher-than-average share of households with children – 28.5%, compared to 26.5% for AMF and a nationwide baseline of 26.9%.
AMF, for its part, was more popular among singles: During the analyzed period, 28.6% of its captured market was made up of one-person households – more than both the nationwide baseline and that of Bowlero (26.7%).
Still, though Bowlero and AMF attract somewhat different audiences, drilling down further into the psychographic segmentation of their captured markets shows that bowling really is an all-American favorite pastime.
During the analyzed period, Bowlero’s was more likely to attract “Young Professionals” and “Near-Urban Diverse Families” – middle-class families living in and around cities – while AMF was more likely to attract upper-middle class, suburban families (“Upper-Suburban Diverse Families”) and households from “Blue Collar Suburbs”. But despite these differences, both chains attracted consumers from a variety of communities, highlighting their broad appeal.
Will consumers continue frequenting bowling alleys as the weather cools down – and will Bowlero’s autumn season pass be as successful as its summer one?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven analyses to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
Recreational retailers – from hobby shops to arts and crafts retailers and bookstores – can play a role in fostering creativity and community.
We took a closer look at several players in the space – including Barnes & Noble, Half Price Books, Hobby Lobby, and Michaes – to see how they are faring as 2024 draws to a close.
One of the biggest challenges traditional brick-and-mortar retailers have faced in recent decades is the rise of online shopping, especially from Amazon – ironically, a company that started as a book retailer. Yet, in 2024, brick-and-mortar bookstores are defying expectations and thriving. Nearly every month this year, chains like Barnes & Noble and Half Price Books have seen more foot traffic at their stores than in 2023.
Despite closing several locations over the past year, Half Price Books experienced significant YoY visit increases between May and August 2024 – with only July seeing a YoY lag likely reflective of the chain’s substantial July 2023 seasonal uptick. Meanwhile, Barnes & Noble – which has been expanding its fleet – saw YoY foot traffic increases ranging from 8.0% to 17.2% throughout the analyzed period. Both chains finished off the summer with impressive 14.3% (Barnes & Noble) and 10.3% (Half Price Books) YoY boosts.
Analyzing monthly fluctuations in visits to the two chains relative to a January 1, 2021 baseline shows just how important both the summer and holiday seasons are for the two bookstores. As brands that cater to both families and college students (see below), Barnes & Noble and Half Price Books see significant annual summer visit upticks in July and August – likely boosted by back-to-school shopping. But particularly for Barnes & Noble, the real magic happens during the holiday season, when people flock to the chain in search of gifts for loved ones.
Bookstores’ strong performance shows that consumers are voting with their feet – embracing the special – and irreplaceable –reading and browsing experience provided by brick-and-mortar stores. And with a strong summer under their belts, Barnes & Noble and Half Price books have every reason to expect a highly successful Q4 2024.
Diving into trade area demographics shows that both Barnes & Noble and Half Price Books appeal to diverse audiences – outperforming nationwide baselines for everything from “Wealthy Suburban Families” to “Young Professionals” (a segment group that includes college students) and “Blue Collar Suburbs”. Still, there are differences between the two chains – offering opportunities for the retailers to tailor their marketing strategies to align with their respective visitors.
Barnes & Noble’s captured market trade area, for example, features a higher share of the middle-class “Near Urban Diverse Families” segment group – while that of Half Price Books features higher shares of the other analyzed segments. The chains’ different audiences can help them strategically curate their book assortments and offer a more tailored experience for their customers – a strategy that Barnes & Noble has placed at the center of its blueprint for growth.
While bookstores have thrived in 2024, craft stores have faced a more mixed performance. Hobby Lobby and Michaels both experienced varying YoY foot traffic trends, with monthly visits tracking closely with 2023’s. Still, August 2024 visits were elevated by 7.9% and 6.0% at Hobby Lobby and Michaels, proving the significance of the back-to-school season.
Weekly visit data further highlights the significant impact of the back-to-school season on craft retailers – which offer both classroom decor and school supplies. As the shopping season kicked in, Hobby Lobby and Michaels both experienced notable increases in foot traffic compared to their year-to-date (YTD) averages.
The week of September 2, 2024 in particular was a strong one across both chains, with visits surging to their highest levels relative to the YTD average. Hobby Lobby experienced an 18.3% surge in visits and Michaels grew by 15.9%. This data emphasizes the critical role seasonality plays in driving traffic to craft retailers, particularly during key periods like back-to-school, when customers are stocking up on supplies. And since the category usually sees its biggest monthly spike during the holiday season (December 2023 visits to Hobby Lobby were 57.7% higher than the 2023 monthly visit average and 52.1% higher at Michaels), the chains seem poised to see more visitors in the coming months. October visits will also likely rise for the two chains, as customers go on the hunt for fall decor.
Hobby and recreational stores have shown resilience and adaptability in 2024, with strong seasonal peaks and diverse customer bases fueling their visits. With the holiday season fast approaching, these companies seem set to continue experiencing foot traffic boosts for the rest of the year.
Visit Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven retail news.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
In September 2024, Placer.ai released two white papers: The Healthcare Opportunity in Grocery and Pricing Strategies Driving Restaurant Visits in 2024. Below is a taste of our findings from The Healthcare Opportunity in Grocery – which dove into the data to explore the impact that wellness offerings can have on grocery store visitation patterns.
Today, many grocery stores offer a range of services – from primary and urgent care to dental and mental health care. In addition to providing an important community service, in-store clinics can boost foot traffic at chains, help health providers reach more patients, and allow shoppers to manage their health and home needs in one convenient trip.
Analyzing foot traffic to grocery stores with and without in-store clinics shows that across chains, locations with on-site healthcare offerings drew more visits in H1 2024 than their chain-wide averages.
The Kroger Co., for example, has been a leader in in-store healthcare services since the early aughts. The company introduced its in-store medical center, The Little Clinic in 2003 – and today operates over 225 Little Clinic locations across its Kroger banner, as well as regional chains Dillons, Jay C Food Stores, Fry’s, and King Soopers.
And in H1 2024, the eight Dillons locations with clinics saw, on average, 93.0% more visits per location than the chain’s banner-wide average. Jay C, which offers two in-store clinics, also saw visits to these venues outpace the H1 2024 banner-wide average by 92.9%. For both chains, relatively small overall footprints may contribute to their outsize visit differences: Indiana-focused Jay C operates just 22 locations, all in the Hoosier State, while Kansas-based Dillons has some 64 locations.
But similar patterns, if somewhat less pronounced, could be observed at Kroger (43.0%), Fry’s (19.2%), and King Soopers (16.5%) – as well as at H-E-B (14.5%), which boasts its own expanding network of in-store clinics.
An analysis of household compositions across the potential and captured markets of Kroger-owned stores with and without Little Clinic offerings suggests that families with children are extremely receptive to these services.
In H1 2024, Kroger, King Soopers, Fry’s, Jay C, and Dillons all featured captured markets with higher shares of STI: PopStats’ “Households With Children” segment than their potential ones – highlighting the chains’ appeal for families. But the share of parental households in those stores with Little Clinics jumped significantly higher for all five banners.
The share of families with children in King Soopers’ overall captured market stood at 28.3% in H1 2024, higher than the 27.2% in its potential one. But the households with children in the captured markets of King Soopers locations with Little Clinics was significantly higher – 30.6% – and similar patterns emerged at Jay C, Dillons, Kroger, and Fry’s.
This special draw is likely linked to the clinics' focus on family health services like physicals, nutrition plans, and vaccines. The convenience of being able to take care of healthcare, grocery shopping, and pharmacy needs all in one go makes these stores particularly attractive to parents. And this jump in foot traffic shows the strategic advantage of incorporating healthcare services into the retail environment.
Read the full report here to learn more about the impact of healthcare services on grocery visits and customer loyalty. Are shoppers more or less likely to make repeat visits to grocery stores with healthcare services? And how does the addition of a clinic affect the demographic profile of a grocery store’s captured market?
For more data-driven consumer research, visit our resource library.
2024 has been a good year for fast-casual restaurants. Limited-time offers notwithstanding, rising QSR prices have narrowed the price gap between fast food and the more premium offerings of chains like Chipotle and sweetgreen. And with many fast-casual restaurants upping their convenience games with drive-thrus and other innovations, the distinction between the two segments has become increasingly muddied.
So with summer winding down, we dove into the data to explore segment-level consumer behavior at quick-service and fast-casual restaurants. How are they performing this year? And do consumers still interact differently with the two categories?
We dove into the data to find out.
During the first half of 2024, fast-casual restaurants experienced 3.2% year-over-year (YoY) visit growth, while QSR held steady with a minor 0.4% uptick. As QSR favorites have gotten pricier, some budget-conscious diners have responded by trading up – embracing elevated fast-casual experiences that hit the sweet spot between quality and affordability.
Drilling down deeper into the data, however, paints a more nuanced picture. On weekends, both QSRs and fast-casual chains experienced positive YoY visit growth (2.1% and 4.0%, respectively) – a significant difference, but not a tremendous one. On their days off, it seems, Americans are opting for a variety of value-oriented indulgences, and both segments are benefiting.
But on weekdays, fast-casual foot traffic grew by 2.8%, while QSR visits declined slightly by 0.2%. As the return-to-office (RTO) continues apace, more affluent office workers may be driving a weekday fast-casual renaissance.
A look at driving distances to QSR and fast-casual restaurants provides further evidence that commuters may be contributing to fast-casual’s weekday YoY visit growth.
In H1 2024, a higher share of QSR visits came from customers hailing from CBGs less than two miles away from the restaurants – suggesting that QSR visitors were more likely to frequent local, neighborhood venues. Meanwhile, a significantly higher percentage of fast-casual visits (63.6%) originated from CBGs between two and 30 miles away, compared to just 56.8% for QSR. These less-local visitors may be stopping by a fast-casual establishment during their lunch break or after work, on days when they commute to the office.
Interestingly, QSRs and fast-casual restaurants drew similar shares of visitors from CBGs more than 30 miles away – perhaps suggesting that when traveling, consumers enjoy frequenting both segments.
Given fast-casual’s higher-quality offerings, it may come as no surprise that these chains tend to attract a more affluent clientele than their QSR counterparts. During the first half of 2024, the Census Block Groups (CBGs) feeding visitors to QSRs (i.e. their captured market) had a weighted median household income (HHI) of $65.7K – compared to $78.0K for fast-casual chains.
But medians only tell a part of the story – and a closer look at the segments’ visitor bases reveals a striking similarity between them: In H1 2024, the two categories’ captured markets featured nearly equal shares of a key demographic – households earning between $75K and $100K per year. This group includes both average-income families and those with a bit more money to spend. (According to STI:PopStats, the nationwide median HHI stands at $76.1K). And the ability of both quick-service restaurants and fast-casual chains to attract these consumers shows that despite their differences, the two segments do overlap – and both have plenty to offer today’s consumers.
Despite still-high prices, consumers are finding room in their budgets for affordable splurges – and fast-casual restaurants and QSRs (at least on weekends) are benefiting. How will the two segments continue to fare in the upcoming holiday season? And will their demographic middle ground expand as the line between the two categories continues to blur?
Follow Placer.ai’s data-driven restaurant analyses to find out.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
Walmart-owned Sam’s Club has been investing in its own independent retail media network (RMN) – Sam’s Club Members Access Platform (MAP) – for quite some time. This past summer, the RMN launched opt-in display ads in the “Scan & Go” self-checkout feature on the Sam’s Club mobile app, turning any mobile device into an in-club media channel for the chain.
We dove into the latest location analytics for Sam’s Club to understand how in-store foot traffic could drive the success of Scan & Go ads in the chain’s largest markets.
Scan & Go aims to enhance the shopping experience by suggesting product pairings for already-scanned items. The feature’s high adoption rate and frequent usage among Sam’s Club members contributes to its potential as a highly successful advertising channel. And location data indicates that the feature has the ability to attract a growing number of eyeballs.
Nationwide, Sam’s Club drew 5.1% more unique visitors during the first eight months of 2024, and 6.2% more overall visits, than in the equivalent period of 2023. In Texas, the state with the most Sam’s Club locations, the chain saw even more impressive year-over-year (YoY) unique visitor (6.9%) and visit (7.9%) growth – which could add to the appeal of advertising through Scan & Go in the Lone Star State. Meanwhile, Florida – Sam’s Club’s second-biggest market – saw YoY visit and unique visitor growth slightly below the nationwide baseline. But in the Sunshine State, too, the chain saw significant YoY jumps in visits and unique visitors – and experienced longer average dwell time than the chain’s nationwide average.
Diving into the audience segmentation of Sam’s Club’s trade areas in Texas and Florida reveals how each state offers a unique advertising opportunity to the brand’s retail media partners.
Between September 2023 and August 2024, the Sam’s Club’s Texas captured market had a higher share of families with children (31.1%) than its Florida one (24.7%), highlighting the chain’s greater reach among this demographic in the Lone Star State. But parental households are generally more common in Texas than Florida – and while Sam’s Club’s Texas markets were under-indexed for this demographic compared to the statewide baseline, the chain’s Florida markets were over-indexed for it compared to the Sunshine State’s lower baseline. So for advertisers seeking to reach Florida households with children, Sam’s Club offers a particularly enticing opportunity to do so.
Meanwhile, Sam’s Club’s Texas captured market featured a higher share of “Near-Urban Diverse Families” (8.6%) than the statewide baseline of 6.2%, while the brand’s Florida market had a slightly smaller share of the segment (6.2%) than the statewide baseline (7.3%). Texas Sam’s Club locations, it seems, offer more focused access to this demographic – both in absolute terms, and in relation to statewide baselines.
Looking closely at weekly visitation patterns to Sam’s Club in Texas and Florida provides further insight into the ideal timing for engagement with the brand’s RMN.
Between September 2023 and August 2024, the busiest days at Sam’s Club in both Florida and Texas were Saturdays and Sundays. However, Texas locations had a greater share of its weekend visits between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM, while Florida saw a greater share of its weekend traffic between 10:00 AM and 1:00 PM.
An understanding of these patterns could help advertisers and Sam’s Club predict the potential for Scan & Go usership at specific times – offering insight into strategies and pricing methods that account for peak visitation times.
At present, Scan & Go display ads are available at all Sam’s Club’s stores, but only to select members – which means the potential engagement and revenue streams driven by the new feature have yet to be fully realized. And as Scan & Go display ads achieve success, the chain may explore additional enhancements to its multi-channel RMN.
For updates and more retail foot traffic insights, visit Placer.ai.
This blog includes data from Placer.ai Data Version 2.1, which introduces a new dynamic model that stabilizes daily fluctuations in the panel, improving accuracy and alignment with external ground truth sources.
The COVID-19 pandemic – and the subsequent shift to remote work – has fundamentally redefined where and how people live and work, creating new opportunities for smaller cities to thrive.
But where are relocators going in 2024 – and what are they looking for? This post dives into the data for several CBSAs with populations ranging from 500K to 2.5 million that have seen positive net domestic migration over the past several years – where population inflow outpaces outflow. Who is moving to these hubs, and what is drawing them?
The past few years have seen a shift in where people are moving. While major metropolitan areas like New York still attract newcomers, smaller cities, which offer a balance of affordability, livability, and career opportunities, are becoming attractive alternatives for those looking to relocate.
Between July 2020 and July 2024, for example, the Austin-Round Rock-Georgetown, TX CBSA, saw net domestic migration of 3.6% – not surprising, given the city of Austin’s ranking among U.S. News and World Report’s top places to live in 2024-5. Raleigh-Cary, NC, which also made the list, experienced net population inflow of 2.6%. And other metro areas, including Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR (3.3%), Des Moines-West Des Moines, IA (1.4%), Oklahoma City, OK (1.1%), and Madison, WI (0.6%) have seen more domestic relocators moving in than out over the past four years.
All of these CBSAs have also continued to see positive net migration over the past 12 months – highlighting their continued appeal into 2024.
What is driving domestic migration to these hubs? While these metropolitan areas span various regions of the country, they share a common characteristic: They all attract residents coming, on average, from CBSAs with younger and less affluent populations.
Between July 2020 and July 2024, for example, relocators to high-income Raleigh, NC – where the median household income (HHI) stands at $84K – tended to hail from CBSAs with a significantly lower weighted median HHI ($66.9K). Similarly, those moving to Austin, TX – where the median HHI is $85.4K – tended to come from regions with a median HHI of $69.9K. This pattern suggests that these cities offer newcomers an aspirational leap in both career and financial prospects.
Moreover, most of these CBSAs are drawing residents with a younger weighted median age than that of their existing residents, reinforcing their appeal as destinations for those still establishing and growing their careers. Des Moines and Oklahoma City, in particular, saw the largest gaps between the median age of newcomers and that of the existing population.
Career opportunities and affordable housing are major drivers of migration, and data from Niche’s Neighborhood Grades suggests that these CBSAs attract newcomers due to their strong performance in both areas. All of the analyzed CBSAs had better "Jobs" and "Housing" grades compared to the regions from which people migrated. For example, Austin, Texas received the highest "Jobs" rating with an A-, while most new arrivals came from areas where the "Jobs" grade was a B.
While the other analyzed CBSAs showed smaller improvements in job ratings, the combination of improvements in both “Jobs” and “Housing” make them appealing destinations for those seeking better economic opportunities and affordability.
Young professionals may be more open than ever to living in smaller metro areas, offering opportunities for cities like Austin and Raleigh to thrive. And the demographic analysis of newcomers to these CBSAs underscores their appeal to individuals seeking job opportunities and upward mobility.
Will these CBSAs continue to attract newcomers and cement their status as vibrant, opportunity-rich hubs for young professionals? And how will this new mix of population impact these growing markets?
Visit Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven civic news.
Commercial real estate in 2026 is characterized by differentiated performance across markets and asset types. Office recovery trajectories vary meaningfully by metro, retail performance reflects format-specific resilience, and domestic migration patterns continue to influence long-term demand fundamentals.
Many higher-income metros continue to trail 2019 benchmarks but drive the strongest Year-over-year gains, signaling a potential inflection in office utilization trends.
• Sunbelt markets along with New York, NY are closest to pre-pandemic office visit levels, while many coastal gateway and tech-heavy markets trail 2019 benchmarks.
• Many of the metros still furthest below pre-pandemic levels are now posting the strongest year-over-year gains.
• Leasing velocity may accelerate in coastal markets – particularly in high-quality assets – even if full recovery remains distant. The expansion of AI-driven firms and innovation-focused employers could support incremental demand in these ecosystems, reinforcing a bifurcation between top-tier buildings and the broader office inventory.
• Higher-income metros such as San Francisco show deeper structural gaps vs 2019, perhaps due to their higher concentration of hybrid-eligible workers – yet those same metros are driving the strongest YoY recovery in 2025.
• Accelerating growth in 2025 suggests that shifting employer policies, workplace enhancements, or broader labor dynamics may be beginning to drive increased in-office activity.
• Office performance in higher-income markets will increasingly depend on workplace quality and policy alignment. Assets that support premium amenities, modern design, and tenants implementing clear in-office expectations are likely to influence sustained office visits and leasing velocity in these metros.
Retail traffic is broadly improving across states, though performance varies by region and format.
• Retail traffic growth is broad-based, with the majority of states showing year-over-year gains in shopping center traffic in 2025.
• Still, even as many states are posting gains, pockets of softer performance remain – specifically in parts of the Southeast and Midwest.
• Broad-based traffic gains indicate consumer demand is more durable than anticipated. In growth states, operators can shift from defensive stabilization to capturing upside – pushing rents, upgrading tenant quality, and accelerating leasing while momentum holds. In softer markets, the focus should remain on protecting traffic through strong anchors and necessity-driven tenancy.
• Convenience-oriented formats are leading traffic growth, with strip/convenience centers materially outperforming all other shopping center types, and neighborhood and community centers also posting gains. This reinforces the strength of proximity-driven, daily-needs retail.
• Destination retail formats, including regional malls and factory outlets, continue to lag, while super-regional malls were essentially flat. Larger-format, discretionary-driven centers are not capturing the same momentum as convenience-based formats.
• The data suggests that consumer behavior continues to favor convenience, frequency, and necessity over destination-based shopping. Operators should lean into service-oriented and daily-needs tenancy in strip and neighborhood formats, while mall operators may need to further reposition assets toward experiential, mixed-use, or non-retail uses to stabilize traffic.
Domestic migration continues to reshape state-level demand, with gains clustering in select growth corridors.
• Domestic migration drove population gains in parts of the Southeast and Northern Plains, while several Western and Northeastern states show flat or negative migration.
• Some previously strong in-migration states in the South and West, including Texas and Utah, are showing softer movement, while other established migration leaders such as Florida and the Carolinas continue to attract net inbound residents.
• Migration flows are shifting relative to prior years. Operators should temper growth assumptions in states where inflows are slowing and prioritize markets where inbound demand remains strong.
• Florida dominates metro-level migration growth, with eight of the top ten U.S. metros for net domestic migration are in Florida.
• The markets with the strongest domestic migration-driven population gains are not major gateway cities but smaller, often retirement- or lifestyle-oriented metros, suggesting that migration-driven demand is increasingly flowing to secondary markets.
• CRE operators should prioritize expansion, leasing, and site selection in high-growth secondary metros where population inflows can directly translate into retail spending, housing absorption, and service demand.
1. Expanded grocery supply is increasing overall category engagement. New locations and deeper food assortments across formats are bringing shoppers into the category more often, rather than fragmenting demand.
2. Grocery visit growth is being driven by low- and middle-income households. Elevated food costs are leading to more frequent, budget-conscious trips, reinforcing grocery’s role as a non-discretionary category.
3. Short, frequent trips are a major driver of brick-and-mortar traffic growth. Fill-in shopping, deal-seeking, and omnichannel behaviors are pushing visit frequency higher, even as trip duration declines.
4. Scale is accelerating consolidation among large grocery chains. Larger retailers are using their size to invest in value, assortment, private label, and execution, allowing them to capture longer and more engaged shopping trips.
5. Both large and small grocers have viable paths to growth. Large chains are winning by competing for the full grocery list, while smaller banners can grow by specializing, owning specific missions, or offering compelling value that earns them a place in shoppers’ routines.
While much of the retail conversation going into 2026 focused on discretionary spending pressure, digital substitution, and higher-income consumers as the primary drivers of growth, grocery foot traffic tells a different story.
Rather than being diluted by new formats or eroded by e-commerce, brick-and-mortar grocery engagement is expanding. Visits are rising even as grocery supply spreads across wholesale clubs, discount and dollar stores, and mass merchants. At the same time, growth is being powered not by affluent trade areas, but by low- and middle-income households navigating higher food costs through more frequent, targeted trips. Shoppers are showing up more often and increasingly splitting their trips across retailers based on value, availability, and mission – pushing grocers to compete for portions of the grocery list instead of the full weekly basket.
The data also suggests that the largest grocery chains are capturing a disproportionate share of rising grocery demand – but the multi-trip nature of grocery shopping in 2026 means that smaller banners can still drive traffic growth. By strengthening their value proposition, specializing in specific products, or owning specific shopping missions, these smaller chains can complement, rather than compete with, larger one-stop destinations.
Ultimately, AI-based location analytics point to a clear set of grocery growth drivers in 2026: expanded supply that increases overall engagement, more frequent and mission-driven trips, and continued traffic concentration among large chains alongside new opportunities for smaller banners.
One driver of grocery growth in recent years is simply the expansion of grocery supply across multiple retail formats. Wholesale clubs are constantly opening new locations and discount and dollar stores are investing more heavily in their food selection, giving consumers a wider choice of where to shop for groceries. And rather than fragmenting demand, this broader availability appears to have increased overall grocery engagement – benefiting both dedicated grocery stores and grocery-adjacent channels.
Grocery stores continue to capture nearly half of all visits across grocery stores, wholesale clubs, discount and dollar stores, and mass merchants. That share has remained remarkably stable thanks to consistent year-over-year traffic growth – so even as grocery supply increases across categories, dedicated grocery stores remain the primary destination for food shopping.
Meanwhile, mass merchants have seen a decline in relative visit share as expanding grocery assortments at discount and dollar stores and the growing store fleets of wholesale clubs give consumers more alternatives for one-stop shopping.
While much of the broader retail conversation heading into 2026 centers on higher-income consumers carrying growth, the trend looks different in the grocery space. Recent visit trends show that grocery growth has increasingly shifted toward lower- and middle-income trade areas, underscoring the distinct dynamics of non-discretionary retail.
For lower- and middle-income shoppers, elevated food costs appear to be translating into more frequent grocery trips as consumers manage budgets through smaller baskets, deal-seeking, and shopping across retailers. In contrast, higher-income households – often cited as a key growth engine for discretionary retail – are contributing less to grocery visit growth, likely reflecting more stable shopping patterns or a greater ability to consolidate trips or shift spend online.
This means that, in 2026, grocery growth is not being propped up by high-income consumers. Instead, it is being fueled by necessity-driven shopping behavior in lower- and middle-income communities – reinforcing grocery’s role as an essential category and suggesting that similar dynamics may be at play across other non-discretionary retail segments.
Another factor driving grocery growth is the rise in short grocery visits in recent years. Between 2022 and 2025, the biggest year-over-year visit gains in the grocery space went to visits under 30 minutes, with sub-15 minute visits seeing particularly big boosts. As of 2025, visits under 15 minutes made up over 40% of grocery visits nationwide – up from 37.9% of visits in 2022.
This shift toward shorter visits – especially those under 15 minutes – is driven in part by the continued expansion of omnichannel grocery shopping, as many consumers complete larger stock-up orders online and rely on in-store trips for order collection or quick, fill-in needs. At the same time, the rise in short visits paired with consistent YoY growth in grocery traffic points to additional, behavior-driven forces at play – consumers' growing willingness to shop around at different grocery stores in search of the best deal or just-right product.
Value-conscious shoppers – particularly consumers from low- and middle-income households, which have driven much of recent grocery growth – seem to be increasingly shopping across multiple retailers to secure the best prices. This behavior often involves making targeted trips to different stores in search of the strongest deals, a pattern that is contributing to the rise in shorter, more frequent grocery visits. At the same time, other grocery shoppers are making quick trips to pick up a single ingredient or specialty item – perhaps reflecting the increasingly sophisticated home cooks and social media-driven ingredient crazes. In both these cases, speed is secondary to getting the best value or the right product.
So while some shorter visits reflect a growing emphasis on efficiency – as shoppers use in-store trips to complement primarily online grocery shopping – others appear driven by a preference for value or product selection over speed. Despite their differences, all of these behaviors have one thing in common – they're all contributing to continued growth in brick-and-mortar grocery visits. Grocers who invest in providing efficient in-store experiences are particularly well-positioned to benefit from these trends.
As early as 2022, the top 15 most-visited grocery chains already accounted for roughly half of all grocery visits nationwide. And by outpacing the industry average in terms of visit growth, these chains have continued to capture a growing share of grocery foot traffic.
This widening gap suggests that scale is increasingly enabling grocers to reinvest in the factors that attract and retain shoppers. Larger chains are better positioned to invest in broader and more differentiated product selection, stronger private-label programs that deliver quality at accessible price points, competitive pricing, and operational excellence across stores and omnichannel touchpoints. These capabilities allow top chains to serve a wide range of shopping missions – from quick, convenience-driven trips to more intentional visits in search of the right product or ingredient.
Consolidation at the top of the grocery category is reinforcing a virtuous cycle: scale enables better value, selection, and experience, which in turn draws more shoppers into stores and supports continued grocery traffic growth.
In 2025, the top 15 most-visited grocery chains accounted for a disproportionate share of visits lasting 15 minutes or more, while smaller grocers captured a larger share of the shortest trips. As shown above, larger grocery chains, which tend to attract longer visits, grew faster than the industry overall – but short visits, which skew more heavily toward smaller chains, accounted for a greater share of total traffic growth. Together, these patterns show that both long, destination trips and short, targeted visits are driving grocery traffic growth and creating viable paths forward for retailers of all sizes.
Larger chains are more likely to serve as destinations for fuller shopping missions, competing for the entire grocery list – or a significant share of it. But smaller banners can grow too by competing for more short visits. By specializing in a specific product category, owning a clearly defined shopping mission, or delivering a compelling value proposition, smaller grocers can earn a place in shoppers’ routines and become a deliberate stop within a broader grocery journey.
As grocery moves deeper into 2026, growth is being driven by the cumulative effect of how consumers are navigating food shopping today. Expanded supply has increased overall engagement, higher food costs are driving more frequent and targeted trips, and shoppers are increasingly willing to split their grocery list across retailers based on value, availability, and mission.
Looking ahead, this suggests that grocery growth will remain resilient, but unevenly distributed. Retailers that clearly understand which trips they are best positioned to win – and invest accordingly – will be best placed to capture that growth. Large chains are likely to continue benefiting from scale, consolidation, and their ability to serve full shopping missions, while smaller banners can grow by earning a defined role within shoppers’ broader grocery journeys. In 2026, success in grocery will be less about winning every trip and more about consistently winning the right ones.
To optimize office utilization and surrounding activity in 2026, stakeholders should:
1. Plan for continued, but slower, office recovery. Attendance continues to rise and has reached a post-pandemic high, but moderating growth suggests the return-to-office may progress at a more gradual and incremental pace than in prior years.
2. Account for growing seasonality in office staffing, local retail operations, and municipal services. As office visitation becomes increasingly concentrated in late spring and summer, offices, downtown retailers, and cities may need to plan for more predictable peaks and troughs by adjusting hours, staffing levels, and local services accordingly, rather than relying on annual averages.
3. Align leasing strategies with seasonal demand. Stronger attendance in Q2 and Q3 suggests these quarters are best suited for leasing activity, while softer Q1 and Q4 periods may be better used for renovations, repositioning, and targeted activation efforts designed to draw workers in.
4. Design hybrid policies around midweek anchor days. With Tuesdays and Wednesdays consistently driving the highest office attendance, employers can maximize collaboration and space utilization by concentrating meetings, programming, and in-office expectations midweek.
5. Reduce early-week commute friction to support attendance. Monday office attendance appears closely correlated with commute ease, suggesting that reliable and efficient transportation may be an important factor in early-week office recovery.
6. Prioritize proximity in leasing and development decisions. Visits from employees traveling less than five miles to work have increased steadily since 2019, reinforcing the value of centrally located offices and housing near employment hubs.
2025 was the year of the return-to-office (RTO) mandate. Employers across industries – from Amazon to JPMorgan Chase – instituted full-time on-site requirements and sought to rein in remote work. But the year also underscored the limits of policy. As employee pushback and enforcement challenges mounted, many organizations turned to quieter tactics such as “hybrid creep” to gradually expand in-office expectations without triggering outright resistance.
For employers seeking to boost attendance, as well as office owners, retailers, and cities looking to maximize today’s visitation patterns, understanding what actually drives employee behavior has become more critical than ever. This reports dives into the data to examine office visitation patterns in 2025 – and explore how structural factors such as weather, commute convenience, and workplace proximity have emerged as key differentiators shaping how and when, and how often workers come into the office.
National office visits rose 5.6% year over year in 2025, bringing attendance to just 31.7% below pre-pandemic levels and marking the highest point since COVID disrupted workplace routines. At the same time, the pace of growth slowed compared to 2024, signaling a possible transition into a steadier phase of recovery.
With new return-to-office mandates expected in 2026, and the balance of power quietly shifting towards employers, additional gains remain likely. But the trajectory suggested by the data points toward gradual progress rather than a return to the more rapid rebounds seen in 2023 or 2024.
Before COVID, “I couldn’t come in, it was raining” would have sounded like a flimsy excuse to most bosses. But today, weather, travel, and individual scheduling are widely accepted reasons to stay home, reflecting a broader assumption that face time should flex around convenience.
This shift is visible in the growing seasonality of office visitation, which has intensified even as overall attendance continues to rise. In 2019, office life followed a relatively steady year-round cadence, with only modest quarterly variation after adjusting for the number of working days. In recent years, however, greater seasonality has emerged. Since 2024, Q1 and Q4 have consistently underperformed while Q2 and Q3 have posted meaningfully stronger attendance – a pattern that became even more pronounced in 2025. Winter weather disruptions, extended holiday travel, and the growing normalization of “workations” appear to be pulling some visits out of the colder, holiday-heavy months and concentrating them into late spring and summer.
For employers, office owners, downtown retailers, and city planners, this emerging seasonality matters. Staffing, operating budgets, and programming decisions increasingly need to account for predictable soft quarters and peak periods, making quarterly planning a more useful lens than annual averages. Leasing activity may also convert best in Q2 and Q3, when districts feel most active. Slower quarters, meanwhile, may be better suited for renovations, construction, or employer- and city-led programming designed to give workers a reason to show up.
The growing premium placed on convenience is also evident in the persistence of the TGIF workweek – and in the factors shaping its regional variability.
Before COVID, Mondays were typically the busiest day of the week, followed by relatively steady attendance through Thursday and a modest drop-off on Fridays. Today, Tuesdays and Wednesdays have firmly established themselves as the primary anchor days, while Mondays and Fridays see consistently lower activity. And notably, this pattern has remained essentially stable over the past three years – despite minor fluctuations – as workers continue to cluster their in-office time around the days that offer the most perceived value while preserving flexibility at the edges of the week.
At the same time, while the hybrid workweek remains firmly entrenched nationwide, its contours vary significantly across regions – and the data suggests that convenience is once again a key differentiator.
Across major markets, a clear pattern emerges: Cities with higher reliance on public transportation tend to see weaker Monday office attendance, while markets where more workers drive alone show stronger early-week presence. While industry mix and local office culture still matter, the data points to commute hassle as another factor potentially shaping Monday attendance.
New York City, excluded from the chart below as a clear outlier, stands as the exception that proves the rule. Despite nearly half of local employees relying on public transportation (48.7% according to the Census 2024 (ACS)), the city’s extensive and deeply embedded transit system appears to reduce perceived friction. In 2025, Mondays accounted for 18.4% of weekly office visits in the city, even with heavy transit usage.
The contrast highlights an important nuance: Where transit is fast, frequent, and integrated into daily routines, it can support office recovery, offering a potential roadmap for other dense urban markets seeking to rebuild early-week momentum.
Another powerful signal of today’s convenience-first mindset shows up in commute distances. Since 2019, the share of office visits generated by employees traveling less than five miles has steadily increased, largely at the expense of mid-distance commuters traveling 10 to 25 miles.
To be sure, this metric reflects total visits rather than unique visitors, so the shift may be driven by increased visit frequency among workers with shorter, simpler commutes rather than a change in where employees live overall. Still, the pattern is telling: Workers with shorter commutes appear more likely to generate repeat in-person visits, while longer and more complex commutes correspond with fewer trips. Over time, this dynamic could shape office leasing decisions, residential demand near employment centers – whether in urban cores or in nearby suburbs – and the geography of the workforce.
Taken together, the data paints a clear picture of the modern return-to-office landscape. Attendance is rising, but behavior is no longer driven by mandates alone. Instead, workers are making rational, convenience-based decisions about when coming in is worth the effort.
For cities, the implication is straightforward: Ease of access matters. Investments in transit reliability, last-mile connectivity, and housing near employment centers can all play a meaningful role in shaping how consistently people show up. For employers, too, the lesson is that the path back to the office runs through convenience, not just compulsion, as attendance gains are increasingly driven by how effectively organizations reduce friction and increase the perceived value of being on-site.
