.svg)
The off-price apparel space remains well-positioned as consumers continue to favor budget-friendly retailers. We dive into the latest location intelligence for the space – and category leaders Burlington, Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less, and T.J. Maxx – to explore how the segment closed out 2024 and started off in 2025.
The leaders of the off-price apparel space – Burlington, Marshalls, Ross Dress for Less, and T.J. Maxx – drove the success of the category last year. In 2024, Burlington’s visits increased (7.9%), as did visits to Marshalls (5.3%), Ross (0.7%) and T.J. Maxx (4.9%).
Zooming into H2 2024 reveals that Burlington, Marshalls, and T.J. Maxx saw consistent YoY visit growth. And although Ross Dress for Less saw mild visit gaps for some of the period, all four off-price apparel chains analyzed started the new year on a high note with January 2025 visits up across the board compared to the previous year.
Marmaxx, Ross, and Burlington expanded their real estate footprints in 2024 – likely contributing to the chains’ YoY visit increases. And all four retailers’ have plans to continue their expansion strategies in the coming years – putting them on a foot traffic growth trajectory for 2025.
The foot traffic growth of Burlington, Marmaxx, and Ross plays a significant role in the success of the off-price category, which has steadily increased its share of total apparel visits.
In Q4 2024, the off-price apparel category claimed a majority of the combined off-price and our traditional apparel category visits (51.9%) for the first time since at least 2019. This demonstrates the segment’s strong holiday performance and continued resilience in the face of economic headwinds for both consumers and retailers.
Diving deeper into the foot traffic for Burlington, Ross, Marshalls, and T.J. Maxx highlights robust nationwide visits as well as several regional preferences among consumers.
Nationwide, Ross claimed the lion’s share of visits between the four chains in Q4 2024 (31.0%), followed by T.J. Maxx (28.0%), Marshalls (23.1%), and Burlington (17.9%).
Analysis of the chains’ share of visits by CBSA reveals that Ross claimed the greatest share of visits in a majority of the West and Southwest, as well as in many large metropolises. Meanwhile, T.J. Maxx appeared to be the most-visited brand in many CBSAs throughout the Eastern United States, while Marshalls appeared to be the preferred brand in the Mid-Atlantic.
And despite claiming 17.9% of combined visits to the four off-price apparel chains, Burlington received the largest share of visits in only two CBSAs – Midland, TX and Anchorage, AK, which could be due to the brand’s long-term smaller-format strategy. While a smaller-format store may have less physical real estate (and therefore visitor potential) than the typical Marmaxx and Ross location, it affords Burlington the flexibility to source locations with strong economics that can drive productivity for the brand in markets nationwide.
All four brands have a robust presence nationwide, yet regional preferences and variations in real estate footprints highlight the different paths to success in the off-price space.
The off-price apparel segment is thriving in 2025, with Burlington, Marshalls, Ross, and T.J. Maxx leading the charge. Consumers continue to prioritize value, fueling steady foot traffic growth and cementing off-price retailers as key players in the apparel space. Each brand is carving out its own regional strongholds while expanding its footprint, setting the stage for even greater success in the year ahead.
Want more data-driven insights? Visit Placer.ai.
How did Walmart, Target, and wholesale clubs perform in 2024? What do early 2025 foot traffic trends tell us about superstores’ growth potential in the coming year? And what do visitation patterns at Target and Walmart reveal about the role each chain plays in the wider retail landscape? We dove into the data to find out.
Wholesale clubs outperformed more traditional superstores in 2024, as Costco, BJ’s, and Sam’s Club saw 4.8% to 7.2% YoY increases in visits while Target and Walmart’s traffic remained relatively flat. And though wholesale clubs continued outperforming Target and Walmart in the new year as well, the two superstore leaders did see clear visit increases of 3.6% and 3.0%, respectively, in January 2025 – a promising sign for the retail giants’ growth in the year ahead.
Target and Walmart both operate national chains of one-stop shops that carry a variety of consumables and non-consumables, including groceries, apparel, toys, and electronics. But diving into the demographics of the two brand’s captured market reveals that each chain serves a slightly different audience.
Target tends to attract visitors from areas with higher HHI and larger households: The company’s captured market includes a larger share of both households with children and non-family (e.g. roommates) households than Walmart’s, perhaps due to Target’s relative appeal to both suburban and strongly urbanized segments. Meanwhile, Walmart seems to attract more repeat monthly visitors (who visit the chain at least twice a month), perhaps thanks to the chain’s extensive grocery offerings and to its popularity among rural and semirural segments who may not have a variety of retail options to frequent.
The two chains’ visitor base also exhibit differences in in-store behavior. Walmart visitors do seem to linger a little longer in store, with 20.7% of the chain’s visits lasting longer than 45 minutes compared to Target’s 17.1% – maybe thanks to the mission-driven shopping behavior of some of its rural and semirural customer base. But despite the longer visits, Walmart still receives a larger share of weekday visits than Target – perhaps thanks to its larger share of single shoppers with fewer weekday commitments.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai.
How did home improvement leaders The Home Depot and Lowe’s perform in 2024? And what lies ahead for the chains in 2025? We dove into the data to find out.
A challenging retail environment continued weighing on the home improvement space in 2024 as high prices and tighter consumer budgets led many consumers to push off discretionary renovations and remodels. As a result, visits to The Home Depot and Lowe’s remained below 2023 levels throughout 2024. Still, the visit gaps were relatively minor – The Home Depot received 1.6% to 3.5% fewer quarterly visits and Lowe’s saw a 2.2% to 4.7% visit gap relative to 2023 – a testament to the enduring strength of these home improvement giants.
Diving deeper into the daily visits data also reveals that, despite the challenges, the two retailers succeeded in driving significant visit boosts through promotions and holiday sales: Mother’s Day, Black Friday, and the Saturday of Memorial Day were the top three visited days for The Home Depot and Lowe’s in 2024. Lowe’s received its highest daily traffic boost on Mother’s Day – likely thanks to its free plant giveaway – while The Home Depot saw its largest visit surge over the traditionally busy Black Friday. Finally, Memorial Day sales drove the third largest visit peak for both chains.
The boost in consumer traffic during special events underscores the potential of seasonal promotions to drive engagement and foot traffic – even in times of wider retail headwinds and economic uncertainty.
Both The Home Depot and Lowe’s received fewer visitors in 2024 compared to 2023, but a closer look reveals that the YoY dips in repeat visitors (who visited at least twice a month) were larger than the declines in casual (once a month) shoppers. For example, in December 2024, the number of casual visitors to The Home Depot dipped 3.0% YoY while the number of repeat monthly visitors declined by 4.0% compared to 2023. YoY visitor trends to Lowe’s generally followed a similar trend.
This trend suggests that, with home sales at their lowest levels since 1995 and many consumers looking to avoid non-essential expenditures, demand for large-scale renovations may be slowing. As a result, contractors and homeowners undertaking major remodeling projects are likely visiting these stores less frequently.
But while these trends may be hampering home improvement visits in the short term, the current downturn could also be setting the stage for a future recovery – as a stabilizing economy could unleash significant pent-up demand.
Visits to the country’s two largest home improvement retailers, while not yet returned to their pandemic-era highs, are beginning to stabilize. Will 2025 see a return to normal for the chains?
Visit Placer.ai to keep up with the latest data-driven retail insights.
With consumer interest in wellness showing no sign of slowing down, we dove into fitness foot traffic data to see how the segment performed in 2024 and understand what the new year holds for the category.
The fitness category has yet to hit its peak. Following consistent year-over-year (YoY) growth in monthly visits throughout 2024, traffic to the category rose again in January 2025 with visits 2.3% higher than in January 2024 – a strong start for what is likely to be another standout year in the fitness space.
And while some may consider New Year’s resolutions to be an outdated, unhelpful institution, the data indicates that January still drives a significant fitness spike as Americans across the country commit to their wellness goals at the start of the year.
Fitness visits in January 2025 were 21.2% higher than in December 2024 – only a slightly lower spike than the month-over-month (MoM) January 2024 jump of 23.4% – indicating that New Year’s resolutions are still quite popular in 2025. At the same time, the slightly lower MoM growth in January may also reflect the relatively stable visitation trends throughout 2024 – a shift from the traditional patterns of fitness chains losing about 30% of their members each year.
Diving into individual fitness chains reveals that the category’s ongoing success is driving visit growth across the fitness segment – including at budget gyms such as Planet Fitness and Crunch Fitness, mid-range chains such as LA Fitness, and premium brands such as Life Time. And critically, both overall visitors and visit frequency were consistently elevated in H2 2024 and going into 2025, indicating that not only are more people going to the gym – they’re also generally going more frequently. It seems, then, that the wellness trend of the past few years is still gaining momentum.
While the increased interest in wellness seems to have brought a boost in industry-wide fitness visits, analyzing visit frequency by brand and quarter does reveal some differences – and some similarities – across different brand tiers.
All four brands analyzed – Planet Fitness, Crunch Fitness, LA Fitness, and Life Time – received the largest share of repeat visitors (at least twice a month) in Q1 2024, as New Year’s resolutions drove a boost in gym-going frequency. The share of repeat visitors then consistently fell throughout the year, and the chains (with the exception of Life Time) received the lowest share of repeat visits in Q4 as vacations and holidays likely interfered with people’s exercise schedule.
One might expect high value low price (HVLP) gyms to attract lower-usage members – since the modest fee may mean that members are not compelled to get the most bang for their buck – but looking at the data reveals that visit frequency did not necessarily correlate with membership pricing. While Planet Fitness and Crunch Fitness are both HVLP chains, their visit frequency patterns differed significantly: Planet Fitness seemed to attract a relatively high share of lower-usage members, while Crunch Fitness’ visit frequency exceeded that of higher-priced LA Fitness and was in fact was closer to that of premium chain Life Time.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai.
Bloomin’ Brands, the parent company of Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse, faced a year of mixed results in 2024 amid continued challenges in the dining sector.
We analyzed the company’s overall performance, along with its individual brands, to see what the visit data reveals about the past year.
The past year was a challenging one for many restaurant chains, and Bloomin’ Brands was not immune. Overall visits to the restaurant group declined by 2.9% YoY, with quarterly visits in 2024 falling between 1.9% and 4.0% compared to 2023.
Still, Bloomin’ appears to be working on a pivot – and visits per location metrics suggest that this is working. The company closed dozens of stores throughout 2024, a rightsizing strategy aimed at focusing on high-performing locations. As a result, visits per location tracked more closely with 2023 levels, with visits per location for 2024 as a whole up by 0.1% compared to 2023.
Diving into individual brands reveals that most of Bloomin’s chains displayed minimal visit gaps. In particular, Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse finished the year strong with a 0.8% YoY increase in Q4 2024 visits – in keeping with the general outperformance of fine dining concepts, especially around the holidays.
Still, one brand, Bonefish Grill, lagged behind the others. The company intends to simplify the menu and enhance the core brand experience, which may help bring visits back to Bonefish in 2025.
While most Bloomin’ Brands chains experienced visit declines in 2024, visits per location tracked closely with 2023 levels, reflecting the impact of the company’s strategic closures.
Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba’s Italian Grill, and Fleming’s Prime Steakhouse all saw YoY increases in visits per location for three out of four quarters in 2024. Fleming’s in particular ended the year strong with a 3.3% visit per location increase in Q4 2024 – suggesting that Bloomin’ might do well by focusing on its more upscale offerings.
And Bonefish Grill saw smaller YoY visit gaps in average visits per location compared to its overall visit metric – a sign that rightsizing may have helped offset some of the broader traffic challenges.
Despite facing a challenging year, the stability in the average visits per location across Bloomin’ Brands serves as a reminder that there are plenty of ways for restaurants to pivot and succeed.
Follow Placer.ai for the latest data-driven dining insights.
CAVA and sweetgreen have been rapidly expanding, cementing their place in the fast-casual dining landscape. We dive into the data to take a closer look at CAVA and sweetgreen’s foot traffic performance and uncover the seasonal visitation patterns driving appetite for these fast-growing chains in 2025.
CAVA and sweetgreen are still firmly in expansion mode, with new store openings fueling their foot traffic growth. Last quarter, CAVA reported a 21.4% year-over-year (YoY) increase in total restaurants and currently boasts nearly 380 locations. And in the past year, sweetgreen has opened dozens of new venues, growing the chain’s footprint to over 900 locations.
Through H2 2024 and the start of 2025, CAVA and sweetgreen experienced consistent YoY visit growth – outperforming the fast-casual restaurant category every month. CAVA’s significantly larger visit growth (26.9% compared to sweetgreen’s 9.9% YoY in Q4 2024) was likely due to the proportional impact of new restaurant openings on CAVA’s smaller real estate footprint.
As CAVA and sweetgreen continue to expand, 2025 is likely to be another year of sustained growth for both restaurants.
Analyzing seasonal visit trends can reveal some of the factors driving sweetgreen and CAVA’s success.
Fast-casual restaurants generally receive more of their visits during lunch than during dinner. And CAVA and sweetgreen received an even larger share of lunchtime (12 PM to 3 PM) visits than the fast-casual average – indicating that these restaurants’ lunchtime popularity is likely a major growth driver.
CAVA also received the highest dinner (between 6 PM and 9 PM) visit share. This indicates that despite CAVA’s fast-casual designation, consumers seem to treat it more like a full-service restaurant, with patrons visiting the chain to eat a proper meal and not just to grab a convenient bite between errands. And the company’s recently launched loyalty program may well bring even more lunch and dinner visits to the chain in 2025.
Meanwhile, sweetgreen’s dinner visit share remained at or below the fast-casual average throughout the year. But evening traffic to the salad chain did increase during the warmer months – hitting a high of 27.4% between July and October – perhaps due to consumers remaining out and about later when there were more daylight hours. Consumers generally spend significantly more on dinner out than on lunch, so sweetgreen may want to fuel its warm-weather dinner boost by offering specials or promotions to attract even more evening patrons to its locations during Q2 and Q3. Sweetgreen may also choose to incorporate time-dependent ordering incentives into its new loyalty program to encourage more evening visits throughout the year.
Further analysis of visitor behavior reveals that CAVA and sweetgreen drive a significant share of weekend visits. And while sweetgreen’s dinner boost tends to occur in Q2 and Q3, both sweetgreen and CAVA’s weekend visit share increases in Q1 and Q4.
At least some of the elevated weekend visits in Q4 2024 may have been due to the many consumers that were on vacation – eating fewer mid-week meals out of the house – or grabbing a bite while doing their holiday shopping on Saturday and Sunday. Still, elevated weekend traffic in Q1 indicates that the chains have the potential to drive significant traffic during other cold-weather months on days when consumers have more time for recreation.
CAVA’s continued investment in inviting dining rooms – part of the chain’s “Project Soul” campaign – may attract unhurried diners looking to experience a cozy ambiance, while sweetgreen’s early-stage rollout of the robotic “Infinite Kitchen” may actually elevate the indoor dining experience to one that is fun and weekend-worthy.
As sweetgreen and CAVA pursue various strategies in their next phase of growth, an understanding of consumer behavior can help the chains maximize the potential of their robust visitor bases and enhance operational efficiency.
Want more data-driven dining insights? Visit Placer.ai.
.png)
1) Broad-based growth: All four grocery formats grew year-over-year in Q2 2025, with traditional grocers posting their first rebound since early 2024.
2) Value grocers slow: After leading during the 2022–24 trade-down wave, value grocer growth has decelerated as that shift matures.
3) Fresh formats surge: Now the fastest-growing segment, fueled by affluent shoppers seeking health, wellness, and convenience.
4) Bifurcation widens: Growth concentrated at both the low-income (value) and high-income (fresh) ends, highlighting polarized spending.
5) Shopping missions diverge: Short trips are rising, supporting fresh formats, while traditional grocers retain loyal stock-up customers and value chains capture fill-in trips through private labels.
6) Traditional grocers adapt: H-E-B and Harris Teeter outperformed by tailoring strategies to their core geographies and demographics.Bifurcation of Consumer Spending Help Fresh Format Lead Grocery Growth
Grocery traffic across all four major categories – value grocers, fresh format, traditional grocery, ethnic grocers – was up year over year in Q2 2025 as shoppers continue to engage with a wide range of grocery formats. Traditional grocery posted its first YoY traffic increase since Q1 2024, while ethnic grocers maintained their steady pattern of modest but consistent gains.
Value grocers, which dominated growth through most of 2024 as shoppers prioritized affordability, continued to expand but have now ceded leadership to fresh-format grocers. Rising food costs between 2022 and 2024 drove many consumers to chains like Aldi and Lidl, but much of this “trade-down” movement has already occurred. Although price sensitivity still shapes consumer choices – keeping the value segment on an upward trajectory – its growth momentum has slowed, making it less of a driver for the overall sector.
Fresh-format grocers have now taken the lead, posting the strongest YoY traffic gains of any category in 2025. This segment, anchored by players like Sprouts, appeals to the highest-income households of the four categories, signaling a growing influence of affluent shoppers on the competitive grocery landscape. Despite accounting for just 7.0% of total grocery visits in H1 2025, the segment’s rapid gains point to a broader shift: premium brands emphasizing health and wellness are emerging as the primary engine of growth in the grocery sector.
The fact that value grocers and fresh-format grocers – segments with the lowest and highest median household incomes among their customer bases – are the two categories driving the most growth underscores how the bifurcation of consumer spending is playing out in the grocery space as well. On one end, price-sensitive shoppers continue to seek out affordable options, while on the other, affluent consumers are fueling demand for premium, health-oriented formats. This dual-track growth pattern highlights how widening economic divides are reshaping competitive dynamics in grocery retail.
1) Broad-based growth: All four grocery categories posted YoY traffic gains in Q2 2025.
2) Traditional grocery rebound: First YoY increase since Q1 2024.
3) Ethnic grocers: Continued steady but modest upward trend.
4) Value grocers: Still growing, but slowing after most trade-down activity already occurred (2022–24).
5) Fresh formats: Now the fastest-growing segment, driven by affluent shoppers and interest in health & wellness.
6) Market shift: Premium, health-oriented brands are becoming the new growth driver in grocery.
7) Bifurcation of spending: Growth at both value and fresh-format grocers highlights a polarization in consumer spending patterns that is reshaping grocery competition.
Over the past two years, short grocery trips (under 10 minutes) have grown far more quickly than longer visits. While they still make up less than one-quarter of all U.S. grocery trips, their steady expansion suggests this behavioral shift is here to stay and that its full impact on the industry has yet to be realized.
One format particularly aligned with this trend is the fresh-format grocer, where average dwell times are shorter than in other categories. Yet despite benefiting from the rise of convenience-driven shopping, fresh formats attract the smallest share of loyal visitors (4+ times per month). This indicates they are rarely used for a primary weekly shop. Instead, they capture supplemental trips from consumers looking for specific needs – unique items, high-quality produce, or a prepared meal – who also value the ability to get in and out quickly.
In contrast, leading traditional grocers like H-E-B and Kroger thrive on a classic supermarket model built around frequent, comprehensive shopping trips. With the highest share of loyal visitors (38.5% and 27.6% respectively), they command a reliable customer base coming for full grocery runs and taking time to fill their carts.
Value grocers follow a different, but equally effective playbook. Positioned as primary “fill-in” stores, they sit between traditional and fresh formats in both dwell time and visit frequency. Many rely on limited assortments and a heavy emphasis on private-label goods, encouraging shoppers to build larger baskets around basics and store brands. Still, the data suggests consumers reserve their main grocery hauls for traditional supermarkets with broader selections, while using value grocers to stretch budgets and stock up on essentials.
1) Short trips surge: Under-10-minute visits have grown fastest, signaling a lasting behavioral shift.
2) Fresh formats thrive on convenience: Small footprints, prepared foods, and specialty items align with quick missions.
3) Traditional grocers retain loyalty: Traditional grocers such as H-E-B and Kroger attract frequent, comprehensive stock-up trips.
4) Value grocers fill the middle ground: Limited assortments and private label drive larger baskets, but main hauls remain with traditional supermarkets.
5) Fresh formats as supplements: Fresh format grocers such as The Fresh Market capture quick, specialized trips rather than weekly shops.
While broad market trends favor value and fresh-format grocers, certain traditional grocers are proving that a tailored strategy is a powerful tool for success. In the first half of 2025, H-E-B and Harris Teeter significantly outperformed their category's modest 0.6% average year-over-year visit growth, posting impressive gains of 5.6% and 2.8%, respectively. Their success demonstrates that even in a polarizing environment, there is ample room for traditional formats to thrive by deeply understanding and catering to a specific target audience.
These two brands achieve their success with distinctly different, yet equally focused, demographic strategies. H-E-B, a Texas powerhouse, leans heavily into major metropolitan areas like Austin and San Antonio. This urban focus is clear, with 32.6% of its visitors coming from urban centers and their peripheries, far above the category average. Conversely, Harris Teeter has cultivated a strong following in suburban and satellite cities in the South Atlantic region, drawing a massive 78.3% of its traffic from these areas. This deliberate targeting shows that knowing your customer's geography and lifestyle remains a winning formula for growth.
1) Traditional grocers can still be competitive: H-E-B (+5.6% YoY) and Harris Teeter (+2.8% YoY) outpaced the category average of +0.6% in H1 2025.
2) H-E-B’s strategy: Strong urban focus, with 32.6% of traffic from major metro areas like Austin and San Antonio.
3) Harris Teeter’s strategy: Suburban and satellite city focus, with 78.3% of traffic from South Atlantic suburbs.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
