.svg)
Earlier this week, we attended the National Restaurant Association show in Chicago and had the chance to speak with a wide range of restaurant owner/operators (large chains, small chains, independents, and franchisees) as well as their vendors, distributors, and other technology solutions. We’ve already seen some great recaps of the event (including one from Nation’s Restaurant News), but we thought we’d offer some of our own observations from the event.
Fierce Fight for Visits Amid New Sources of Competition
We discussed this during our trade show preview last week, but concerns about slowing foot traffic trends and increased competition with alternative food retail channels like grocery, dollar stores, and convenience stores was easily the number one topic of discussion at the event. Most operators we spoke with acknowledged flat or year-over-year declines in comparable visits, which is consistent with the year-to-date on most of the restaurant subcategories we monitor (below)
Most of the restaurant executives we spoke to at the event also noted the improvements of prepared food offerings in the grocery and c-store channels as a competitive headwind. One executive even told us that “C-stores have gone from copying QSR category innovations to setting the bar higher in many ways.” We’ve seen this in the channel shift taking place across the food retail category, which we touched upon last week.
As it pertains to competition in the months ahead, operators across all categories admitted that they were curious about the ripple effect of McDonald’s plans to launch a $5 value menu on June 25 (which will run for a month). We’re already starting to see competitors try to front-run McDonald’s $5 value menu, and there will likely be others who introduce similar promotions in the coming weeks. While these offers are likely to help QSR chains recapture some of the visits lost to other channels, these chains will likely need to continue with their value messaging in the back half of the year (especially with the rollbacks taking place at Walmart, Target, and other superstore chains) while also committing to more menu innovation than we’ve seen year-to-date.
Coffee’s Momentum Continues–With A Notable Outlier
One of the two subcategories that is seeing year-over-year increases is coffee. Some of this growth has been fueled by expansion plans of Dutch Bros, 7 Brew Coffee, 151 Coffee, Scooter’s Coffee, Philz Coffee, particularly in the South and Southeast U.S. (something we touched on late last year). Below, we’ve put together a custom chain of drive-thru focused chains versus the category average to put some context behind where the growth in the category is coming from (although the category itself as a whole continues to see healthy growth).
Starbucks–which reported a 7% decline in comparable transactions during its January-March 2024 quarter–is one of the key outliers from this category. Starbucks CEO Laxman Narasimhan called the company’s performance “disappointing” on its most recent update call. There have been no shortage of opinions on why the chain has underperformed, but our data continues to indicate that occasional visitors are the root of the softer visitation trends, much like they were last quarter. To reverse these trends, the company has already launched flavored pearls for a series of summer seasonal drinks and an improved blueberry muffin. Additionally, the company plans to launch more sugar-free customization options (including syrups) as well as a zero-to-low-calorie energy beverage.
Casual Dining’s Quiet Comeback
The other restaurant category posting seeing year-over-year growth may come as a surprise: casual-dining chains. After a slow start to the year due to weather, the category has generally seen low-single-digit growth on a year-over-year basis (something Placer’s blog team pointed out a few weeks ago). Several executives in the casual dining space we spoke with noted that they had started to see improving trends, with a few citing a narrowing price gap with QSR/fast casual chains (in other words, if consumers are going to pay the same price per entree, they’ll gravitate toward casual dining) as well as a continued propensity to spend for events/holidays (a theme we touched on repeatedly in the past).
Where is the growth coming from? There are a couple of expected categories, including steakhouses, breakfast-first concepts, and eatertainment. Asian concepts have also performed well this year, helped by growth from experiential concepts like Kura Sushi and GEN Korean BBQ.
On the other end of the spectrum, we see weakness in Mexican and Seafood concepts. Seafood should not come as a surprise given that one of other notable development in the restaurant industry this week was Red Lobster’s bankruptcy announcement. The company's Endless Shrimp promotion has been widely blamed for the company's bankruptcy filing--and our visitation data does show a spike in visits coinciding with the promotion--but there were certainly other factors such as unfavorable lease terms that played a part.
It’s been nicknamed the “Superbowl for Dealmakers” and this year’s packed ICSC Las Vegas conference paved the way for tons of pipelines. All had comfy shoes on, phones ready to scan badges, and everyone was eager to learn and network.
Based on the buzz in the booths, it’s clear that dealmakers were happy to be able to meet face-to-face. High-demand retail locations are staying strong and able to command higher rents. However, there are also landlords in areas with less demand willing to negotiate and toss in reduced rent or concessions. With higher costs for construction and borrowing and limited supply in hot areas, both landlord and tenants are getting creative with solutions. Some are carving up vacant anchors for non-traditional tenants or experimenting with smaller footprints and more curated merchandise. Kroger is launching new concepts within the ethnic grocery space. Meanwhile others are taking advantage of large spaces to create experiential flagships, as we noted in the panel on “Shifting Store Formats” that Placer participated in, along with Kohl’s, CBRE, and Colliers. Other fascinating panels included understanding the impact of influencer marketing and innovations that are revolutionizing the shopping experience.
In a panel on “The Office - The Effect of Flexible Work Models on Foot Traffic,” a panel including Avison Young, CBRE, and Placer discussed how shoppers are shifting their times and locations for shopping, dining, fitness, and entertainment as a result of migration and varying remote and hybrid work schedules.
Over the course of the conference, one city kept popping up in conversation and that city was Miami. Whether it was cocktail party conversation, pub crawl chit chat, or booth banter, people kept lauding how this city barely missed a beat during COVID, new residents kept flocking in, its vibrant and cosmopolitan feel, and the opportunity for new concepts and store openings here. Let’s unpack some of the things happening in Miami.
Migration
Using Placer’s Migration Dashboard and honing on our Migration Draw tool, we see that Miami’s coastal areas are extremely attractive to residents.
Some of the factors that most affect Miami’s desirability include weather, being pedestrian-friendly, and superior access to restaurants and nightlife.
There are of course some trade-offs as well, such as higher housing costs and overall cost of living than many transplants’ original locales.
Nightlife
If you want to party in the city where the heat is on, Miami's the place for you. Taking a look at the time period of 6pm- midnight, nightlife visits in Miami outnumber those in East Williamsburg, Capitol Hill, or Deep Ellum.
Return to Office
In an interesting twist, Miami also leads in having the highest rate of return-to-office. How do they manage to do that if they’ve been out partying? It’s likely a work hard/play harder mentality. Or, like many at ICSC mentioned, Miami never really closed down as much as other cities during Covid, hence there is less to recover from. Placer's Office Dashboard notes that Miami is in the lead with the highest recovery rate.
Shopping and Entertainment
For those who love all things retail, there are plenty of shopping centers and shopping areas to choose from. Brickell City Centre has seen some of the largest year-over-year increases. Meanwhile, Aventura’s April visits are up considerably compared to last year. The Miami Design District, which the Anchor has written about previously, has also been showing consistent year-over-year growth this year.
DICK’S Sporting Goods is one of the best-known names in the sportswear and sporting goods retail segment, with more than 700 stores across the country. The company, which also operates several smaller banners including its interactive House of Sport, has thrived in recent years, buoyed by a continued interest in health and wellness.
How is the chain faring into 2024? We took a look at the latest location intelligence to find out.
DICK'S was a major pandemic-era winner, sustaining visit gains through 2021 and 2022 and into early 2023. And though YoY visits slowed as 2023 wore on, DICK’s ended last year in a strong position, reporting the largest sales quarter of its history in Q4 2023.
And in early 2024, DICK’s largely held on to its gains. Like many retailers, DICK’S saw YoY foot traffic fall in January, as unusually cold and stormy weather kept many shoppers at home. But in February and March, the chain’s YoY visit gap narrowed considerably, with foot traffic hovering just under 2023 levels – no small feat for a discretionary chain in an environment marked by stubbornly elevated prices and flagging consumer confidence.
During most analyzed months, DICK’S outperformed both traditional Apparel and Sportswear & Athleisure retailers. And though the chain saw monthly YoY foot traffic drop once again in April, an analysis of weekly data shows that it entered May on an upswing.
Indeed, zooming into weekly visits to DICK’S shows that only during the week of April 8th, 2024 did the chain experience a large visit gap. And visits to the sportswear company began to trend upward towards the end of April and beginning of May – with YoY visits growing by 1.9% during the week of April 29th, and by 0.7% in the week of May 6th. The company also outperformed the Apparel and Sportswear segments in all but one of the analyzed weeks – Sportswear retailers had a slightly stronger showing than DICK’S did for the week of April 22.
Experiential retail has emerged as a significant success story in recent years, and DICK’S has enthusiastically embraced the trend. In 2021, the company introduced its House Of Sport concept, offering visitors the opportunity to browse athletic gear or try their hand at a climbing wall or a batting cage.
The concept quickly gained traction, expanding to fourteen locations, with several more slated to open in 2024 alone. And an analysis of visitation patterns at DICK’S House Of Sport locations shows why the model is such a powerful one.
In Q1 2024, YoY visits to the three original House of Sport locations in Victor, NY, Minnetonka, MN, and Knoxville TN – the only ones operational at the start of 2023 – increased by 4.8%. So as DICK’S continues to expand its portfolio of House of Sport locations, existing ones are also drawing bigger crowds.
The original House of Sport locations also drew more extended visits in Q1 2024 than other DICK’s locations – with a remarkable 40.7% of visits lasting more than 30 minutes. With the success of House of Sport under its belt, DICK’S has begun further diversifying its fleet with a new store format that brings an interactive retail experience to the chain’s traditional store type.
DICK’S continues to outperform the wider Apparel and Sportswear retail segments, and its expanding House of Sport concept is meeting healthy and growing demand. As the company continues to lean into its experiential offerings, will the chain’s positive momentum accelerate further?
Visit placer.ai for the latest data-driven retail insights.
As cars get more expensive, demand for repairs rises – and auto part chains are reaping the benefits. We analyzed the visit data for four leading auto part chains – AutoZone, O'Reilly Auto Parts, NAPA Auto Parts and Advance Auto Parts – and dove into O’Reilly Auto Parts’ recent growth to understand what may be driving success in this flourishing segment.
Auto parts chains are having a moment. With vehicle prices significantly higher than before COVID, many consumers would rather fix their cars than purchase new ones. At the same time, inflation has begun to subside, leaving people with more room in their budgets for non-essential maintenance and repairs.
Following a drop in December 2023, YoY visits to AutoZone, O’Reilly Auto Parts, Advance Auto Parts, and NAPA Auto Parts began to pick up in January 2024 – despite unusually cold and stormy weather that left many consumers hunkered down at home. And between February and April, YoY visits to the four chains remained nearly uniformly elevated.
On a quarterly basis, O’Reilly Auto Parts saw the biggest YoY visit increase, despite lapping a strong 2023. The chain, which drew 32.1% of total visits to the four brands in Q1, saw quarterly YoY foot traffic increase by 5.1%. AutoZone, which received 40.1% of quarterly visits to the four chains, saw quarterly YoY visits increase by 3.5%. And Advance Auto Parts and NAPA Auto Parts both saw quarterly YoY visits increase by 1.7%.
One strategy that has likely helped O’Reilly Auto Parts stay ahead of the pack is its much-touted loyalty program, recently ranked by Newsweek as one of the best in the nation.
Location intelligence shows that since COVID, O’Reilly Auto Parts has seen a steady increase in the loyalty of its customer base. And in April 2024, O’Reilly Auto Parts boasted the most loyal customer base of the four analyzed chains – with 52.0% of visits made by individuals that frequented the chain at least twice during the month. But other auto chains, including AutoZone, also enjoyed significant shares of visits by repeat customers – showing that there’s plenty of room at the top in the auto parts space.
The auto parts industry is poised for success in 2024, with leading chains like O'Reilly Auto Parts, AutoZone, Advance Auto Parts, and NAPA Auto Parts demonstrating resilience and growth. How will these chains continue to perform as the year wears on?
Visit placer.ai to find out.
We looked at nationwide and regional visitation patterns for CAVA to understand how the fast-growing fast-casual chain is performing across its major markets.
CAVA – which operated a little over 300 locations by the end of 2023 – is growing rapidly, with plans to reach 1,000 locations by 2032. The chain has seen consistent year-over-year (YoY) visit growth in most of its major markets, with a 23.6% YoY overall increase in nationwide visits in Q1 2024 – in large part due to its ongoing expansion.
CAVA is headquartered in Washington, D.C., and currently, most of its venues are located in the mid-Atlantic and southeastern United States. But the chain also has a strong presence in Texas and California and operates restaurants in a handful of additional states. Recently, CAVA entered the Midwest with its first Chicago location – and has plans to extend its reach even further. So what do CAVA’s various markets have in common – and what sets them apart?
Nationwide, the median household income (HHI) in CAVA’s captured market trade area is higher than the US median HHI – and diving into the regional markets indicates that this trend persists across regional markets.
In most states with a major CAVA presence – including Texas, Virginia, California, North Carolina, Georgia, and Maryland – the median HHI in CAVA’s trade area is 11% to 24% higher than the statewide median. Even in Florida, where the chain’s trade area HHI is closest to the statewide median, households in CAVA’s captured market are still slightly more affluent than in Florida as a whole.
But while the chain seems to attract a similar demographic across states, diving into the hourly visitation patterns in CAVA’s various markets indicates that dining habits differ between regions.
In Texas, Georgia, Florida, and North Carolina, the share of 11:00 AM - 10:00 PM CAVA visits taking place during the lunchtime daypart (11:00 AM - 2:00 PM) ranges from 35.5% to 36.9% – at or above the nationwide average of 35.4%. But in Virginia and Maryland, and especially California, the lunchtime rush is more subdued. In these states, the afternoon and evening dayparts tend to be busier than in the other analyzed states – with California in particular seeing 35.7% of visits taking place between 6:00 PM and 10:00 PM.
Identifying similarities and differences between the visitor bases in CAVA’s various markets can help the company identify ideal locations, optimize staffing needs, and tailor promotional efforts as it continues to enter new markets and open additional restaurants in existing ones.
For more data-driven dining insights, visit placer.ai/blog.
How did Mother’s Day (May 12th, 2024) impact retail and dining foot traffic this year? We dove into the data to find out.
Urban legends notwithstanding, Mother’s Day wasn’t actually created by the greeting card industry. But the occasion hasn’t become known as the “Hallmark holiday” for nothing. Every year in the run-up to Mother’s Day, shoppers descend on the chain to purchase everything from cards to candy.
Most years, the day before Mother’s Day is Hallmark’s busiest day of the year, with Super Saturday (the Saturday before Christmas) a not-so-close second. In 2023, Mother’s Day was edged out by Super Saturday, which converged with Christmas Eve Eve to create a pre-holiday shopping bonanza for the ages.
And this year is shaping up to be no different: On May 11th, 2024 (the day before Mother’s Day), Hallmark experienced a major visit spike – leaving all other Saturdays, including the Saturday before Easter, in the dust.
But greeting card retailers like Hallmark aren’t the only ones to benefit from Mother’s Day. A look at foot traffic to major industries on May 11th, 2024 shows that retailers across segments – from Home Improvement chains to Superstores – enjoy substantial visit boosts on the day before Mother’s Day. (Recreational & Sporting Goods, not so much).
For Home Improvement, Department Stores, Hobbies, Gifts & Crafts, and Clothing, May 11th, 2024 was the busiest day of the year so far, while for Discount & Dollar Stores and Superstores it was superseded only by March 30th – the day before Easter.
While the day before Mother’s Day is an important retail milestone, Mother’s Day itself is an occasion for treating mom to a nice meal out. And though grabbing a bite at a fast food joint or fast-casual fave is lots of fun – it decidedly isn’t the Mother’s Day vibe. A special occasion calls for a splurge, and Mother’s Day is Full-Service Restaurants’ time to shine.
On May 12th, 2024, Quick-Service and Fast-Casual Restaurants received about the same number of visits as on an average Sunday this year. But Full-Service Restaurants saw visits skyrocket – outperforming an average Sunday by 49.6%.
And drilling down into the data for six of Mother’s Day’s busiest Full-Service Restaurant chains shows Olive Garden emerging as a major holiday winner – with 89.0% more visits on May 12th, 2024 than on an average Sunday this year. Olive Garden drew more visits this Mother’s Day than on any other day since the beginning of the year – with Valentine’s Day (February 14th, 2024) coming in a close second.
But the Italian-American cuisine giant certainly isn’t the only FSR to enjoy a substantial visit boost on the big day: Texas Roadhouse, Cracker Barrel General Store, Chili’s Grill & Bar, Applebee’s, and IHOP saw respective May 12th visit increases of 55.1%, 51.0%, 46.4%, 44.4%, and 29.3%, compared to an average Sunday.
Mother’s Day comes but once a year – and grateful offspring nationwide show their appreciation with gifts and celebratory meals, generating boons for businesses across categories.
With Father’s Day right around the corner, what kind of impact will Dad’s big day have on retail and restaurant visits? Will Recreational & Sporting Goods brands have their day in the sun?
For more data-driven retail and dining insights, follow placer.ai.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
