.svg)
.avif)
We're living through one of the most consequential technology shifts of our lifetimes. Generative AI is reshaping how people analyze information, make decisions, and do their work at a pace that would have seemed implausible only a few years ago. For industries like ours, where professionals rely on data to make high-stakes decisions about the physical world, the opportunity is especially exciting. Insights that once took weeks can now surface in minutes. Analytical workflows that once required specialized training can become accessible to anyone.
But that opportunity comes with real responsibility. The same capabilities that make GenAI so powerful also introduce risks such as bias, accuracy, privacy, and misuse - and those risks compound when the underlying technology is moving faster than the norms and regulations around it. The companies building with AI today are, in many ways, writing the operating rules in real time. How we choose to do that matters.
At Placer, we want to be clear about how we choose to do it. Placer doesn't build its own large language models (LLMs). Instead, we use well-established, trusted models from leading providers - the same foundation models that power the most widely adopted AI tools in the enterprise today. That's a deliberate choice. Our value to customers comes from the depth and quality of our data and the analytical expertise built around it, not from reinventing general-purpose AI infrastructure.
But not building the models ourselves doesn't let us off the hook for how we use them. If anything, it raises the bar. When we embed GenAI into our platform, whether as an analytical assistant, an automated summary, or a future agent that helps professionals move faster through their workflows, our customers trust us with the outcome. They're trusting us to pick the right models, apply the right guardrails, protect their data, and be transparent about what the technology is and isn't doing.
That's why we're publishing our Responsible AI Principles today. They're clear, concise, and they reflect how we actually operate.
The four Responsible AI principles address the issues we believe matter most to the professionals who rely on Placer every day:
Fairness and bias mitigation. AI systems can reflect and amplify existing biases in their training data. Our core defense is something we've been doing since long before GenAI: continuously validating our models, monitoring our AI practices and de-biasing outputs where appropriate.
Transparency and accountability. When we use GenAI in customer-facing features, we say so. We build feedback mechanisms into the product and treat that feedback as a real input to how the system evolves.
Privacy by design. Our AI tools are built to identify patterns about places and brands, not individuals. The same strict privacy measures that govern the rest of the Placer platform apply to every new GenAI feature we ship.
Security and safety. We are responsible custodians of our customers' data and are committed to safeguarding its integrity using industry leading standards.
We've also published a clear statement on how Placer's GenAI capabilities may be used and what restrictions we apply. These aren't new restrictions; they extend the responsible-use commitments that have always governed how our data can be used.
We're excited about the era of GenAI and about the value these new capabilities will create for our customers. The AI principles we're publishing are part of a broader effort across the company that’s grounded in a simple idea: trust isn't something we claim once and move on from. It's something we earn in every feature we ship.
.avif)
April 2025 set a high bar for movie theater performance, with A Minecraft Movie (April 4) and Sinners (April 18) driving significant spikes in foot traffic. Against this strong comparison, year-over-year (YoY) theater visits trended negative through much of April 2026. This followed a stronger March 2026, when releases like Scream 7 and Project Hail Mary – and easier comparisons – helped sustain significant YoY traffic gains
While the highly anticipated The Devil Wears Prada 2 (released May 1) did not generate a meaningful YoY uplift – given the difficult April 2025 comparison – it appears to have helped stabilize visitation trends, halting the declines seen in prior weeks.
Overall, the data reinforces that theater traffic remains highly blockbuster-driven, with consumers still willing to return to theaters when content feels like a must-see experience. With a slate of major releases ahead – including Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu in late May and Toy Story 5 in mid-June – the sector is likely to see renewed spikes in visitation tied to tentpole premieres.
For more data-driven consumer insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
%20(1).avif)
April data indicates positive momentum for the mall sector, with year-over-year (YoY) traffic increases across all three formats analyzed – indoor malls, open-air shopping centers, and outlet malls. This performance is particularly notable given the strong April baseline last year, when traffic rose between 3.7% and 4.3% across formats compared to April 2024.
Open-air centers came out on top, extending a trend in place since December 2025, with visits rising 3.5% YoY. This marks a return to the top growth position after ceding the lead to indoor malls for much of 2025. Indoor malls followed with a 2.2% increase, while outlet malls lagged behind, posting a modest 0.5% YoY gain in April 2025 – potentially reflecting greater sensitivity to elevated gas prices in recent weeks.
At the same time, the average visit duration declined YoY, with all formats experiencing a shift toward shorter visits (under 30 minutes) and a corresponding drop in longer visits (45+ minutes).
This divergence between rising traffic and shorter dwell times suggests that a growing share of consumers are engaging in more mission-driven trips – visiting with a specific purpose in mind rather than for extended browsing. As a result, malls may be seeing more targeted, efficiency-oriented behavior that could concentrate spend within fewer stores per trip.
Still, this shift does not signal a wholesale move away from malls as destinations: across formats, over 40% of visits continue to last more than 60 minutes, indicating that a significant segment of consumers remains engaged in longer, more experiential visits even as quick trips become more prevalent.
April’s data suggests that malls are evolving to meet a wider range of consumer needs. The combination of rising traffic and varied visit lengths suggests that malls are successfully functioning both as convenient, mission-driven retail hubs and as destinations for longer, experiential outings. This dual role may ultimately prove to be a strength, enabling operators and tenants to capture multiple trip types and occasions. If sustained, these trends position the sector for continued resilience, with opportunities to further optimize tenant mix, merchandising strategies, and on-site experiences to align with increasingly dynamic consumer behavior.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
The home improvement category has faced sustained headwinds in recent years – from elevated mortgage rates to sluggish existing-home sales and a consumer base hesitant to take on major remodeling projects. But after a prolonged stretch of year-over-year (YoY) visit declines, both Home Depot and Lowe’s have returned to growth – and the foot traffic data suggests this shift is more than just a seasonal uptick.
Both home improvement leaders closed Q1 2026 with YoY visit gains – Home Depot up 1.9% and Lowe’s up 2.0% – building on the stabilization seen in Q4 2025. This improvement aligns with their latest financial results: Home Depot reported U.S. comparable sales growth of 0.3%, while Lowe’s posted a stronger 1.3%. And for both chains, the return to positive territory suggests a long-awaited recovery may finally be underway.
Monthly data also suggests that while inclement weather contributed to the segment's strong performance in January, the underlying recovery is genuine. Home improvement benefits from unusual weather events, and January's strong gains for both chains – Home Depot +2.5%, Lowe's +3.9% – were partly fueled by Winter Storm Fern, which impacted communities across more than thirty states. But the momentum carried into February, and while growth moderated in March – and for Home Depot again in April – neither brand slipped into negative territory.
That resilience is an encouraging signal for the category during the critical spring home improvement season, particularly given renewed headwinds like rising gas prices and softening consumer sentiment. Lowe's stronger performance in April 2026, supported by easier comparisons, may also reflect its greater exposure to DIY customers tackling smaller repairs and at-home projects as consumers redirect spending closer to home.
Interest rates remain elevated and the housing market sluggish – but those same forces may now be working in the category's favor, as homeowners staying put begin to tackle a growing backlog of deferred repairs and maintenance. The bigger question is whether that momentum eventually unlocks the large discretionary projects both retailers say consumers are still holding back on – especially amid continued tariff uncertainty and elevated prices at the pump.
For more data-driven retail insights, follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
There may be more digital entertainment than ever before, but consumers still seek out places to socialize and have fun in the physical world. And in-person entertainment venues – from stadiums to experiential viewing concepts – are attracting unique audiences that span a range of psychographic segments.
A closer look at venues in the Dallas and Los Angeles areas reveals how this diversity plays out across markets, and what it could signal for stakeholders in the business of out-of-home entertainment.
In-person entertainment includes a variety of venues and formats. In the Dallas area, legacy venues AT&T Stadium, American Airlines Center, and Globe Life Field – and eatertainment concepts, movie theaters, and “shared reality” experiences such as Cosm – are just some of the in-person entertainment options.
And in the Dallas region, AI-powered trade area analysis reveals that affluent and suburban families dominate the out-of-home entertainment scene. Across every analyzed venue and entertainment category, either Ultra Wealthy Families or Wealthy Suburban Families ranks as the top audience segment – reflecting the region's family-oriented, suburban fabric.
That said, each venue or category attracts a distinct audience mix. Cosm Dallas and the American Airlines Center over-index on Ultra Wealthy Families and draw a relatively higher share of Young Professionals than other venues. This likely reflects their premium positioning: Cosm as a novelty experience, and the AAC as an upscale urban destination where higher costs may skew attendance toward more affluent consumers.
By contrast, Wealthy Suburban Families lead at Globe Life Field (home to the Texas Rangers) and AT&T Stadium (home to the Dallas Cowboys), both of which also attract meaningful shares of blue-collar suburban audiences.
And there is clear demand for in-person entertainment among Dallas’s up-and-coming and working-class consumers. Blue Collar Suburbs and Young Urban Singles segments tend to favor eatertainment venues and movie theaters – more affordable options for going out.
Greater Los Angeles offers a similarly diverse mix of entertainment anchors: SoFi Stadium, Dodger Stadium, Angel Stadium, and Crypto.com Arena – as well as a Cosm location, eatertainment chains, and movie theaters.
However, audience segmentation for in-person entertainment in the region shows a distinct profile compared to Dallas – shaped by SoCal’s urban density and demographic diversity. Near-Urban Diverse Families represent the largest segment across every analyzed venue and entertainment category, while Wealthy Suburban Families also account for a significant share of visitors across formats – particularly at Angel Stadium, likely due to its suburban Orange County location. The prevalence of these two segments suggests that urban, middle-class family audiences are the backbone of entertainment demand in the region while higher-income, suburban households play a strong supporting role in out-of-home entertainment consumption.
Two other patterns also jump out from the data.
First, Cosm Los Angeles and Crypto.com Arena’s audiences draw more heavily from the Educated Urbanites and Ultra Wealthy Families segments, which could point to a somewhat more premium-leaning audience mix at these destinations.
Second, the Young Urban Singles segment accounts for a relatively consistent audience share across all categories – suggesting broad-based entertainment preferences. With no single entertainment format commanding outsized engagement from this young cohort, operators in the Los Angeles market have an opportunity to further tailor experiences and potentially shape future demand among this audience.
In both Dallas and Los Angeles, the composition of out-of-home entertainment audiences reflects each market’s underlying demographics and urban structure.
And yet, certain consumer segments prefer particular entertainment venues or formats over others, and understanding who shows up is critical. Operators and advertisers that tailor their offerings to the dominant segments – whether through pricing or programming – may be better positioned to capture sustained demand and attain better ROI within their market.
For more insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
The U.S. restaurant industry navigated a challenging first quarter in 2026, marked by macroeconomic headwinds, unfavorable weather, and cautious consumer spending. Yet, within the breakfast-first sector, a clear narrative is emerging: The era of the traditional legacy diner is fading, making way for premium, experience-driven concepts. And at the forefront of this shift is First Watch. Armed with a differentiated culinary menu, rapid but disciplined expansion, and a highly resilient consumer base, the brand is not only defying broader casual dining trends but is fundamentally rewriting the playbook for daytime dining.
Over the past few years, the breakfast-first restaurant category has bifurcated into two distinct camps: premium and experience-driven concepts capturing visit share, and legacy diner-style chains, many of which are struggling to keep up. While Q1 2026 proved to be a tighter traffic environment overall amid macroeconomic uncertainty and unfavorable weather conditions across the U.S., several experience-focused brands and resilient fan-favorites continued growing their footprints – and their audiences.
First Watch led the pack in overall visit growth as it continued expanding its store count, while average visits per location held steady – demonstrating its ability to scale without diluting demand at existing locations – while Snooze saw a 1.1% increase in visits per location.
Conversely, the steepest laggards in the segment were legacy diner chains IHOP, Denny’s, and Huddle House, all of which saw overall visits decline as they continued rightsizing their footprints, with visits per location also modestly down. These brands are increasingly tracking closer to casual dining peers like Applebee’s and Outback Steakhouse, which have faced significant headwinds in recent months.
Still, among legacy diners, Waffle House stood out as a clear outperformer in Q1 2026, likely due in part to its status as a regional institution across much of the South. And the chain’s operational resilience may have also played a role: While Winter Storm Fern pushed the so-called “Waffle House Index” into the red across much of the region in late January, the brand’s unique disaster-readiness appears to have enabled some locations to reopen quickly or avoid closure entirely.
Ultimately, despite a challenging macroeconomic environment, brands that leverage a differentiated culinary menu, high-touch customer service, or fierce brand loyalty are successfully navigating the highly fragmented daypart much better than their traditional diner counterparts.
While several premium concepts have successfully carved out a lucrative niche in breakfast-first dining, First Watch has redefined the category. By blending the elevated, chef-driven culinary experience of a localized brunch spot with the operational efficiency of a national powerhouse, First Watch has created a model that sees success across multiple regions of the U.S. This unique positioning provides the brand with a massive structural advantage, fueling a physical growth trajectory that far outpaces its competitors.
Importantly, visitation data also reinforces that First Watch’s restaurant classes from 2024 and 2025 have consistently kept pace with the maturity curve of recent openings. An analysis of visit-per-location trends for First Watch locations opened in 2024 and 2025 versus the chain’s nationwide fleet reveals that the class of 2024 outpaced nationwide trends, while the 2025 cohort – even when factoring in the high volume of openings that took place in Q3 2025 – has also kept pace. These are incredibly positive indicators for a brand rapidly scaling its national footprint.
First Watch has set a long-term goal of reaching more than 2,200 restaurants across the United States – an ambitious target that would more than triple its current size. Reaching this milestone is achievable, but it will require the brand to meaningfully deepen its penetration in large coastal and Sun Belt metros, where it remains under-penetrated relative to its proven suburban strongholds. Placer.ai foot traffic data across more than 100 Core Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) reveals that First Watch's unit economics are remarkably consistent, confirming the model works across multiple geographies. While newer markets like New York, Chicago, Boston, and Las Vegas currently generate lower visits per capita than the chain's core Sun Belt and Midwest suburban markets, there are significant opportunities for expansion. First Watch's breakfast-first model, strong unit-level economics, and growing brand recognition give it a credible platform to aggressively capture market share in these new territories.
Despite slowing early-spring trends, First Watch remains well-positioned to hit its 2026 same-store sales growth target of 1% to 3%. This confidence is rooted in a few key factors. First, the brand benefits from a resilient core consumer who is materially less sensitive to macroeconomic pressures than the traditional diner customer, providing a much higher floor for baseline traffic. Second, First Watch leverages reliable pricing power, as its premium positioning and highly anticipated seasonal menu rotations consistently drive check growth. Finally, the company's commitment to operational excellence through its company-owned model ensures that execution remains strong and the guest experience is uncompromised, even during slower traffic periods. By driving outsized performance from its newest units and maintaining a highly loyal customer base, the brand is not merely surviving the breakfast category's headwinds; it is actively redefining what leadership in daytime dining looks like.
For more data-driven dining insights, follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
During the pandemic and its aftermath, Americans were on the move. Millions left expensive coastal markets for lower-cost destinations across the Sun Belt, while boomtowns such as Bozeman, Boise, and Austin struggled to keep pace with the influx of new residents.
That wave of relocation has since cooled, as return-to-office mandates, higher mortgage rates, and a shrinking affordability gap between coastal cities and many COVID-era hotspots have dampened the incentive to move. But even in a slower market, domestic migration remains one of the most powerful forces shaping local economies, housing markets, and consumer demand.
This report leverages AI-powered location analytics to examine the relocation patterns reshaping the United States in 2026 – where Americans are moving, the demographic and economic forces driving those decisions, and how retailers, investors, developers, and policymakers can respond to the opportunities and challenges created by these shifts.
Which major metros are attracting the most new residents? Which pandemic-era standouts have seen growth stall or reverse? And what factors best predict a large metro area's domestic migration growth potential in 2026?
The latest statewide migration data shows that the slower relocation pace observed in 2024 persisted into 2025. No state recorded net inflows or outflows exceeding 0.7% of its starting population. And while several smaller states continued to attract new residents at meaningful rates, none of the nation's six most populous states saw net in-migration exceed 0.2%.
Among those smaller states, South Carolina and Delaware led the nation with net in-migration equal to 0.7% of their populations, followed by Idaho (0.6%), Maine (0.5%), Tennessee (0.4%), and North Carolina (0.3%). For most of these states, migration accelerated relative to 2024, though Delaware's inflow rate moderated slightly and North Carolina held steady.
Despite their differences, these states tend to offer a similar mix of lifestyle amenities, relatively low congestion, and opportunities for growth. Many also benefit from business-friendly climates, favorable tax policies, or housing costs that remain attractive relative to the higher-cost markets from which they draw new residents.
At the other end of the spectrum was Vermont, which saw the nation’s largest net outflow as share of population in 2025, losing 0.4% of its population to domestic relocation. The decline deepens a reversal that first emerged in 2024, when the state swung to a net loss of 0.2%, after attracting inflows of 0.8% and 0.5% in 2022 and 2023, respectively.
Vermont's reversal likely reflects a combination of factors, including return-to-office mandates and the waning appeal of remote work. Housing undersupply in the state may have also contributed, illustrating how important infrastructure investments are to sustaining migration gains over time.
Among the nation's six most populous states, Florida was the only one to see accelerating net in-migration in 2025, attracting new residents equal to 0.2% of its starting population, up from 0.1% the year before. Texas, by contrast, slowed from 0.1% net in-migration in 2024 to essentially flat in 2025, highlighting the cooling of what was once one of the country's strongest pandemic-era migration magnets.
Meanwhile, the legacy "exodus" states continue to lose residents, but at a slower pace than in previous years. Illinois and California have seen their migration deficits steadily narrow, with further improvement in 2025. Between 2022 and 2025, Illinois moved from -0.8% → -0.2% → -0.2% → -0.1%, while California moved from -0.9% → -0.4% → -0.3% → -0.2%. And though New York has held steady at -0.2% over the past two years, this marks a significant moderation from 2022, when the state experienced net outmigration equal to 1.1% of its population.
Statewide trends reveal important shifts, but a closer look at the nation's ten largest metropolitan areas suggests that broader interstate averages increasingly mask diverging local realities. Several metros are attracting residents through interstate domestic migration even when their states as a whole are experiencing little or no net migration growth.
Phoenix (+0.3%), for example, stood out as the nation's top-performing large metro in 2025, despite Arizona's absence from the list of leading migration destinations – with the majority of its inflow coming from out of state.
Dallas (+0.2%) ranked second, continuing its rebound from -0.1% in 2023 even as Texas' statewide migration gains cooled. Like Phoenix, Dallas drew a majority of its new residents from outside the state, underscoring its growing appeal as a national migration destination. Houston, meanwhile, moved in the opposite direction, falling from 0.1% net in-migration in 2023 to -0.1% in 2025. While it is too early to call this a sustained reversal, the divergence between the two metros may reflect Dallas's growing pull as a corporate magnet alongside rising housing costs and weather-related challenges in Houston.
Metro-level data also suggests that the pandemic-era "big-city exodus" narrative is continuing to fade. Los Angeles improved from -0.8% in 2023 to -0.3% in 2025, while New York held steady at -0.3% after improving in 2024. Even Miami (-0.6%), which ranked last among major metros despite Florida's continued statewide gains, saw its outflows moderate from 2023 levels. And while Illinois continued to post net outmigration, Chicago (0.0%) reached migration neutrality in 2025 after recording losses in both 2023 and 2024.
Despite Miami's struggles – and Florida’s relatively modest 0.2% inflow – a look beyond the top 10 large metros reveals that the Sunshine State is home to six of the nation's eight fastest-growing large metros nationwide.
Those top-performing metros, defined as CBSAs with 500K+ residents that added at least 0.8% of their population through net domestic migration over the past year, share a similar profile: lower housing costs, retiree appeal, suburban density, and an easy drive to a larger economic hub.
Much of the growth of these Florida metro areas, however, is being fueled from within Florida itself. While major out-of-state metros such as New York (6.1%) and Chicago (2.0%) remained important sources of new residents, nearly half of the net migration into Florida's top destination metros came from elsewhere in the state. In 2025, Miami (22.5%), Orlando (13.0%), Tampa (5.8%), and Naples (4.2%) together accounted for 45.5% of the net positive migration feeding these fast-growing markets.
The migration flows feeding the nation’s fastest-growing large metros suggest that affordability remains a powerful driver of domestic relocation.
In 2025, seven of the eight top destination metros analyzed above had lower typical home values than their largest feeder markets. Lakeland–Winter Haven, FL, for example, had a typical home value of $313.4K in December 2024, compared with $404.9K in Orlando and $380.2K in Tampa – its two largest sources of net migration. Even North Port–Bradenton–Sarasota, FL – the most expensive Florida metro in this group – drew its largest share of net migration from the New York metro area, where home values are substantially higher.
The lone exception was Charleston–North Charleston, SC, whose largest source of net migration was Baltimore – a market with lower typical home values than the destination. Even in Charleston, however, affordability appears to have played a role. New York, a significantly more expensive market, ranked a close second in 2025, accounting for 6.5% of net positive migration into Charleston, just behind Baltimore’s 6.8%.
While housing costs are only one factor influencing migration decisions, the data suggests that households continue to gravitate toward markets where homeownership is comparatively more attainable than in the places they leave behind.
Typical Home Values* in Top Feeder Markets to Destination Hubs, 2025
*Typical home value based on Zillow Research’s Zillow Home Value Index (ZHVI) for Dec. 2024, immediately preceding the analyzed migration period (Jan.–Dec. 2025).
But as important as affordability is in explaining today’s domestic migration patterns, age appears to be an even stronger determinant of where people choose to relocate.
Among mid-sized and large metros (250K+ residents) experiencing significant population shifts – defined as gaining or losing at least 1.0% of their starting population through domestic migration over the past two years – households are increasingly moving toward older, more established communities.
The data reveals a clear negative relationship between migration performance and age differential – a metric calculated by subtracting the median age of the destination market from the weighted median age of its feeder markets. Negative values indicate movement toward older communities, while positive values indicate movement toward younger ones. In other words, the metros attracting the strongest migration inflows tend to be older than the markets sending them residents.
The data also shows a clear positive relationship between migration performance and retiree concentration. Metros with larger shares of residents aged 65 and older generally saw stronger migration gains over the past two years, while younger metros tended to attract fewer newcomers. This suggests that retiree-driven relocation has become an increasingly important driver of migration. At the same time, the influx of younger residents points to the broader appeal of these communities, which offer a mix of affordability, amenities, and lifestyle advantages.
Net Migration as Share of Starting Population, 2024–2025*
*Analysis includes metro areas with 250K+ residents and domestic migration gains or losses of at least 1.0% during the study period. Weighted Age Differential compares the destination market’s median age with the weighted median age of origin markets, with positive values indicating migration toward younger markets and negative values indicating migration toward older markets. Age data: Census ACS 2020–2024.
The pandemic-era urban exodus is giving way to a more nuanced migration landscape. Large urban markets are stabilizing, while growth is increasingly concentrated in smaller states, secondary metros, and intra-state corridors. Affordability remains a powerful pull, but retirees, lifestyle considerations, and local market dynamics are also playing an increasingly important role in where Americans choose to live.
To capitalize on these shifts in 2026, civic leaders, commercial real estate (CRE) investors, retailers, and developers should:
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
Physical retail is increasingly defined by a small group of dominant players – Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General – that span grocery, essentials, and discretionary categories at a scale no other retailers can match. These chains serve as bellwethers of consumer behavior, revealing where Americans are spending, how often they shop, and what drives their decisions. And understanding their visitation patterns sheds light on the key dynamics shaping both their performance and the broader blueprint for retail success in 2026.
Retail giants Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General continue to capture a growing share of brick-and-mortar visits nationwide.
• The share of physical retail traffic captured by these giants rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 17.5% in Q1 2026, signaling continued sector consolidation.
• The scale advantage enjoyed by retail giants is increasingly self-reinforcing: Larger players benefit from superior data, stronger vendor leverage, and operational efficiencies that in turn further widen the gap.
• As these advantages compound, direct competition becomes less viable. Instead, smaller retailers should focus on owning specific trip missions – such as convenience, fill-in, or discovery – where format, assortment curation, and in-store experience can more directly shape consumer choice.
• For CRE operators, the growing dominance of these retail giants increases reliance on top-tier anchors, potentially driving performance gaps between centers with strong national tenants and those without.
• For CPG companies, the consolidation in the offline retail space heightens channel concentration, making success with a handful of large retailers critical while increasing those retailers’ negotiating leverage.
Traffic trends across the four giants reveal meaningful divergence in performance.
• Costco and Dollar General are driving the strongest visit growth, supported by both substantial fleet expansions and rising visits per location. In 2025, visits per store exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 18.1% for Costco and 10.2% for Dollar General, with both brands also seeing steady increases in their share of total brick-and-mortar retail chain visits.
• Walmart remains the largest player by far, accounting for 9.7% of traffic to major brick-and-mortar chains in 2025. And though the behemoth’s share of visits declined slightly in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it has held steady over the past three years.
• Target’s visit share has remained relatively flat over the past three years, reflecting stalled momentum. Still, early 2026 trends point to emerging signs of recovery – with Q1 visits up 8.3% compared to Q1 2019.
• Value retail is winning, but in more specialized forms: Dollar General (extreme value + convenience) and Costco (bulk value + loyalty) are driving the strongest traffic growth and rising visits per store, while Walmart’s broad “everyday value” remains steady with slower growth. Target, for its part, is lagging – likely a reflection of the broader bifurcation in retail which has left middle-market players caught between consumers trading down to value and those trading up to quality.
• For retailers and CPG companies, the broader lesson is that value perception is becoming more nuanced. It’s no longer just about offering low prices at scale, but about how value is delivered – whether through small packs vs. bulk, or quick trips vs. stock-up missions. Success increasingly depends on prioritizing these distinct value formats and investing in channels where store-level productivity is improving.
• For CRE operators, the outperformance of retailers with clearly defined value propositions underscores the importance of mission-driven tenant mix. As shoppers visit with increasingly specific missions in mind, retailers that cater to those missions are outperforming. Tenant strategies should reflect this shift, ensuring complementary offerings that reinforce a cohesive shopping mission.
Walmart remains the dominant brick-and-mortar retailer nationwide and across all fifty states. Still, the data suggests there is room for multiple runners-up to succeed across geographies and customer segments.
• Dollar General, Target, and Costco each attract distinct audience segments. Dollar General attracts a disproportionately high share of the “Mature and Retired Living” segment, while Costco leads among family households, with Target also over-indexing with this group. Among younger “Contemporary Households,” meanwhile – a segment encompassing singles, married couples without children, and non-family households – Target commands the highest share, slightly over-indexing compared to the nationwide baseline.
• Regional strengths vary significantly, with Dollar General concentrated in the South, Costco dominant in the Northwest, and Target showing more dispersed areas of strength.
• Despite similar overall visit share, Dollar General leads in more states (26 vs. 17 for Target), reflecting broader geographic dominance.
• For retailers, the data suggests that growth opportunities are increasingly shaped by localized demographic and geographic dynamics – meaning that targeted, market-specific strategies may be more effective than uniform national approaches.
• Younger “Contemporary Households” remain less locked-in than older demographics, representing a key battleground for future growth.
• For CPG companies, this data highlights that channel strategy is really about building the right mix of retailers, since even large national players reach different types of consumers.
• CRE operators should ask "which anchor is right for this trade area" rather than "which anchor is strongest," as mismatched tenants can underperform even if they’re nationally dominant.
After remaining essentially flat in 2025, average visits per location to Walmart grew 3.5% YoY in Q1 2026. And the retailer’s solid Q1 performance across the U.S. underscores its unique ability to resonate across income levels, geographies, and shopping missions.
• Walmart posted year-over-year visit growth across nearly all U.S. markets in Q1 2026, reinforcing its role as a universally relevant retailer.
• The giant’s comparative softness in small parts of the Northeast suggests an opportunity to double down on region-specific assortments, urban-friendly formats, or partnerships to better match local shopping behaviors.
• Walmart’s broad-based growth shows that even as consumers are increasingly willing to visit multiple retailers to get what they want, its Superstore model has solidified its role as a primary stop on the American shopping journey – making it a uniquely reliable anchor for CRE operators.
• For smaller retailers, this underscores the opportunity to win the “second stop” – capturing trips through curated assortments and more tailored in-store experiences that Walmart’s scale is less optimized to deliver.
• For CPG companies, Walmart stands out as a highly attractive partner for broad, efficient reach, given its consistent traffic across markets.
Target’s recent performance suggests early momentum in reversing prior softness.
• Q1 2026 visits to Target rose 5.1% year over year, marking the chain’s first positive visit growth in more than a year, and suggesting that the chain’s new turnaround strategy may be bearing fruit.
• Gains were driven primarily by visits lasting 30 to 45 minutes, which accounted for 19.6% of overall visits to Target in Q1 2026 – pointing to stronger in-store engagement rather than quick, mission-driven stops.
• Target’s return to traffic growth – driven by increases in mid-length trips – signals a sustainable recovery on the horizon, strengthening its reliability as a traffic-driving tenant for CRE operators.
• Target's turnaround shows retailers how increasing shopper engagement can generate growth by converting quick trips into higher-value, multi-category experiences.
• For CPG companies, the rise in mid-length visits indicates a more receptive in-store environment for discovery and trade-up, making Target an increasingly attractive channel for innovation, merchandising, and premium offerings.
Dollar General is becoming embedded in consumers’ daily routines.
• Visitor frequency to Dollar General is on the rise. In Q1 2026, nearly a quarter of visitors frequented the chain at least four times in an average month, up from 21.2% in Q1 2022.
• Dollar General is becoming increasingly local in nature: As its footprint expands, more visits originate nearby, with 28.0% coming from within one mile – reinforcing its role as a neighborhood store of choice.
• Dollar General’s visitation patterns point to a growing ownership of the convenience mission. Its expanding store density is creating a self-reinforcing network effect, where proximity fuels frequency, and frequency strengthens long-term defensibility.
• For retailers, Dollar General’s rising share of nearby and high-frequency visits shows that proximity can drive habit, making convenience a powerful lever for building repeat behavior.
• For CRE operators, the data highlights the strength of hyper-local, necessity-driven traffic, positioning Dollar General as a stable tenant that anchors consistent, repeat visitation.
• For CPG professionals, the increase in frequent trips signals a high-velocity purchase environment, favoring smaller pack sizes and products that align with regular replenishment cycles.
Costco continues to grow and diversify its audience despite higher membership fees and stricter food court access policies, highlighting the strength of its value proposition and loyalty model.
• In September 2024, Costco raised its membership fees for the first time in seven years – and more recently tightened enforcement of member-only access to its food courts. Despite these changes, visitation has remained strong, highlighting the company’s pricing power and deep customer loyalty.
• At the same time, Costco’s shopper base is broadening, with median household income trending slightly downward while remaining relatively affluent.
• Offering strong value to a relatively affluent consumer base can be a winning formula in 2026. Retailers that combine quality, trust, and perceived savings – rather than competing solely on low prices – are well positioned to drive both loyalty and sustained traffic growth.
• For CRE operators, Costco’s sustained traffic growth and broadening shopper base reinforce its value as a standalone, high-demand traffic magnet that can anchor entire trade areas and drive surrounding retail development.
• For CPG companies, the combination of high traffic and declining median HHI signals that Costco is evolving into a scaled channel reaching beyond affluent shoppers, requiring more diversified assortment and pricing strategies.
