.svg)
.avif)
Consumers continue to navigate high food costs and cautious spending, and some of the largest quick-service dining operators in the country are feeling the effects. We analyzed the visit data for leading QSR players Yum! Brands (YUM) and Restaurant Brands International (RBI) to assess their performance in the third quarter of 2025.
Yum! Brands emerged as a success story in Q1 and Q2 2025, with both visits and average visits per location showing moderate growth. That momentum has continued into Q3, with overall visits elevated by a modest 0.3% and average visits per location rising 1.3% – a strong showing in a period where the overall QSR sector has been showing signs of strain.
Taco Bell has long served as Yum! Brands’ primary U.S. growth engine, delivering 9.0% and 4.0% YoY same-store sales growth in Q1 and Q2 2025, respectively. And in Q3 2025, the brand continued to thrive – though visits increased at a slightly slower pace than in Q2. Through initiatives like its $3 Y2K menu and the rollout of Live Más Cafés and specialty beverages tailored to Gen Z tastes, Taco Bell continues to balance value, nostalgia, and innovation – driving steady traffic and strengthening its connection with consumers.
The big surprises of Q3 were KFC and Pizza Hut, both of which showed meaningful improvements in foot traffic after several quarters of underperformance. At Pizza Hut, the $2-Buck Tuesday promotion that ran through most of July and August drew strong weekday crowds, helping to lift same-store visits 0.6% year-over-year.
Meanwhile, at KFC, there are early signs that the brand’s “Kentucky Fried Comeback” initiative is beginning to pay off. Same-store visits increased 1.1% YoY in Q3, a substantial improvement from Q2, when same-store sales fell 5.0% and same-store traffic declined 4.6% YoY. The return of fan-favorite menu items like Potato Wedges and Hot & Spicy Wings also appears to have helped reignite consumer enthusiasm.
Restaurant Brands International (RBI), owner of Burger King, Popeyes, Tim Hortons, and Firehouse Subs, saw visits slow in Q3 2025. Overall traffic declined 3.3% YoY, slightly more than the wider QSR category, though average visits per location outperformed QSR with a smaller 2.3% drop.
RBI’s trajectory is largely driven by Burger King, which in Q3 2025 saw traffic decline by 3.6% YoY. Still, same-store visits to BK fell only 1.8% YoY, showing the brand’s success in sustaining traffic levels in a challenging QSR landscape. Popeyes experienced a modest same-store traffic decline, while Time Hortons saw a steeper drop.
RBI’s fast-casual Firehouse Subs, however, posted YoY visit growth, with overall visits up 1.6% and same-store visits holding steady at 0.6% – impressive performance even as the chain continues to expand its unit count. Part of this strength may stem from the chain’s relatively affluent customer base – according to data from STI:PopStats, Firehouse Subs’ captured market had a median household income (HHI) of $76.3K in Q3, compared to $67.0K for Burger King, $67.8K for Popeye’s, and $68.1K for Tim Hortons.
With consumer caution reshaping dining habits, even top QSR brands are feeling the pinch. Can Yum! sustain its momentum into Q4 or will broader dining headwinds slow its pace? And will RBI’s same-store visit trajectory continue to outpace the wider segment?
For the most up-to-date dining data, check out Placer.ai’s free tools.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.avif)
For much of the past few years, Shake Shack and Wingstop seemed unstoppable, riding the fast-casual boom with strong traffic, loyal followings, and steady expansion. But as consumer spending patterns evolve, the latest visitation data suggests both brands are entering a new phase. We took a closer look at their Q3 visitation trends to see what foot traffic trends reveal about their performance.
Diving into Shake Shack’s foot traffic reveals the story of a brand growing through expansion. Overall visits to the chain grew by 15.1% in Q3 2025, an impressive increase in a period of cooling consumer sentiment. However, same-store visits slowed slightly, suggesting that this growth is a result of a rapidly expanding fleet rather than increased visitation at existing stores.
These traffic metrics align with recent company reports – in Q2 2025, overall revenue rose 12.6% in the wake of new store openings, while same-store sales inched up just 1.8% YoY, buoyed by higher menu prices. Shake Shack’s ability to rapidly expand its fleet while maintaining essentially stable same-store foot traffic – even while raising prices – suggests that the chain’s higher-income customer base continues to see Shake Shack as an affordable indulgence even in a cautious spending climate.
Wingstop is also in expansion mode, adding stores at a brisk pace this year. But since mid-summer, overall foot traffic growth has stagnated, with Q3 showing a 2.8% YoY decline and same-store visits falling even more sharply.
Part of this drop reflects an exceptionally tough comparison to Q3 2024, when visits surged 24.2% YoY overall and 14.0% on a same-store basis. (By contrast, Shake Shack saw overall visits increase 19.1%, while same-store visits held roughly flat at -0.8% during the same period).
Wingstop’s YoY visit slowdown should also be viewed in the context of its expanding digital business – online orders rose to 72.2% of total sales in Q2 2025. The chain’s growing digital business helped deliver a stronger-than-expected Q2, which saw domestic same-store sales down just 1.9%, despite lapping 28.7% growth in Q2 2024.
The company continues to expand aggressively, adding more than 120 net new restaurants in Q2 alone. Still, Wingstop’s leadership has acknowledged that near-term volatility may be expected, given exceptionally strong comparisons to 2024 and ongoing economic uncertainty affecting its more value-conscious customers.
Against this challenging backdrop, both brands have found extra strength in specials and limited-time offers (LTOs), which continue to drive measurable visit lifts to their restaurants.
Wingstop’s positioning closer to the value end of fast-casual makes it more vulnerable to inflation fatigue – and makes short-term specials all the more appealing to its customers. Indeed, visits jumped to their highest levels all year during the week of National Chicken Wing Day (July 29, 2025), when the chain lured budget-conscious diners with a free wing promotion.
Meanwhile, Shake Shack saw visit upticks during the weeks of May 26 and June 23 – the first likely driven in part by its free ShackBurger offer on orders over $10, and the second by the return of its viral Dubai Chocolate Shake.
Together, these bursts of activity reinforce a key point: Both chains are navigating a market where consumers are more selective, but still willing to show up for the right product, price, or promotion.
Both Shake Shack and Wingstop have entered a more measured phase of growth in 2025. Expansion remains central to each brand’s strategy, but digital engagement and timely promotions are playing an increasingly important role. As consumers become more selective, balancing scale with loyalty and value will likely define the next stage of growth for each chain.
For the most up-to-date dining data, check out Placer.ai’s free tools.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
.png)
The quick-service restaurant category has seen mixed results this past quarter, as softer consumer spending continues to pressure much of the sector. Yet the coffee subcategory continues to thrive, with much of its success coming from smaller brands.
We took a closer look at the visitation trends for the category, across major brands and smaller ones, to pinpoint where this growth is happening.
Even with consumers tightening their belts, coffee chains are holding their own. Visits to the coffee segment were up 1.4% YoY in 2025, compared to a 2.7% drop across the broader quick-service restaurant (QSR) segment.
But digging deeper into average visits per location tells a more nuanced story: Visits to individual coffee venues declined 2.9% in Q3, only slightly outperforming the 3.3% drop across the wider QSR segment. In other words, coffee’s visit growth is being powered primarily by chain expansion rather than heavier traffic to existing units. Still, the category’s ability to sustain growth amid consumer pullbacks highlights coffee’s unique staying power – an everyday indulgence that consumers seem unwilling to give up, even as other affordable dining luxuries lose steam.
Starbucks and Dunkin’ are the two largest coffee chains in the United States by wide margins – Dunkin’ recently celebrated the opening of its 10,000th store, while Starbucks boasts roughly 17,230 locations nationwide. And despite ongoing challenges in the broader QSR segment, both coffee behemoths maintained relatively stable overall visit trends in Q3 2025. Starbucks saw a modest -1.7% decline in total visits compared to 2024, while Dunkin’ visits dipped by just -0.7%.
Dunkin’, however, outperformed Starbucks on a same-store basis, holding nearly flat with just a 1.7% decline – likely reflecting its stronger value positioning. Starbucks, by contrast, saw same-store visits fall 5.2% YoY, though the return of its Pumpkin Spice Latte once again provided a substantial lift. Both brands also experienced a slowdown in September, suggesting that consumers may be pulling back on small indulgences as they shift discretionary spending toward holiday gifts and larger upcoming expenses.
Even as Starbucks and Dunkin’ anchor the national market, smaller brands are driving much of the coffee category’s momentum – including the ever-popular Oregon-based Dutch Bros. The drive-thru brand has been on a major growth streak over the past several years, adding new locations at a brisk pace with a goal of reaching 2,029 units by 2029.
In Q3 2025, total visits to Dutch Bros rose 8.8% year-over-year, while same-store visits hovered just below 2024 levels – a modest slowdown from Q2, when total visits increased 13.8% and same-store visits rose 1.9%, consistent with strong quarterly comps. Still, maintaining nearly steady traffic amid such rapid expansion points to healthy, sustained demand and strong brand loyalty, even as the chain continues its robust growth push.
The meteoric rise of several even smaller coffee chains is also fueling the category’s growth. In Q3 2025, many of these emerging players saw double-digit visit gains, signaling that expansion opportunities in the coffee space extend well beyond the established giants.
7 Brew Coffee, one of the country’s fastest-growing coffee chains, led the visit growth pack, with foot traffic up 80.4% compared to Q3 2024 and same-store visits climbing an impressive 19.4%. Better Buzz Coffee Roasters followed with visits up 72.3% and a 2.4% rise in same-store visits – suggesting that its footprint expansion is being well-received. Florida chain Foxtail Coffee was the third growth leader in Q3 2025, with visits increasing 46.8% year-over-year, reflecting its growing footprint in states like Michigan and Georgia. Meanwhile, Black Rock Coffee Bar, which made headlines with a successful IPO last month, saw visits climb 6.5%, even as same-store visits edged just under 2024 levels.
The growing strength of these regional brands – many of which, like Dutch Bros, emphasize speed and convenience through drive-thru formats – could reshape the competitive coffee landscape heading into 2026.
While the wider dining sector is contracting, the coffee space is holding firm, with small chains helping to drive much of the segment’s growth.
For the most up-to-date dining data, check out Placer.ai’s free tools.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
%26texasroadhouse(earnings).avif)
As consumers continue to navigate economic pressures and many full-service dining chains face softer demand, two major players – Chili’s, under Brinker International, and Texas Roadhouse, part of Texas Roadhouse Inc. – are standing out for their ability to drive sustained traffic growth. Using location analytics, we analyze the two companies' recent visit performance to explore factors behind their success.
Chili’s has emerged as a standout in full-service dining, delivering strong year-over-year (YoY) growth in both overall and same-store visits in Q2 – results consistent with Brinker’s own reporting. Texas Roadhouse also reported higher traffic and comp sales in Q2 2025, and the graph below shows continued YoY gains in both overall and same-store visits in Q3.
And while both Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse are driving strong traffic, each is pursuing growth through distinct strategies. Chili’s is focused on simplifying its menu and modernizing kitchen and dining-room technology – moves designed to improve the quality of the guest experience and boost efficiency. Texas Roadhouse, by contrast, continues to prioritize unit expansion while also rolling out a digital kitchen format to enhance operational efficiency and better support off-premise sales.
In order to offset rising costs, both Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse management have announced modest menu price increases in the near future, but the key question is how their respective customer bases will respond.
Both Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse employ a barbell pricing strategy – keeping certain menu items at accessible price points while also offering more premium options. This approach enables the brands to emphasize value during periods of economic pressure while still catering to diners splurging on celebratory experiences. Each brand, however, takes a different approach; while Chili’s embraces viral deals, Texas Roadhouse emphasizes everyday value and doesn’t run promotions.
The graph below shows that the median household income in both Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse captured trade areas is consistently below the nationwide benchmark of $79.6K per year – underscoring the importance for these brands to maintain a strong value proposition that resonates with price-sensitive diners.
Between Q3 2022 and Q3 2023, the median HHI of Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse’s visitors increased by about $1K – suggesting more resilience and the means to trade-up to higher-priced menu items among the brands’ audiences.
But between Q3 2024 and Q3 2025, the rise in diners’ median HHI appears to have plateaued: Chili’s median HHI dipped slightly while Texas Roadhouse’s rose by just a couple hundred dollars. This trend indicates that both brands are currently resonating most with middle- and lower-income consumers – understandable, as Chili’s, for one, continues to emphasize its 3 For Me value play and reinforce value perception. It remains to be seen whether these brands’ strong value positioning will continue to hold appeal among lower-income diners if menu prices rise and the perceived value equation shifts – or whether they will increasingly rely on higher-income guests.
Still, a closer look at captured market household incomes by bracket shows that both chains attract significant shares of high-income diners. While the median household incomes in Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse’s captured markets remain below the nationwide benchmark, in Q3 2025 both brands were on par with the nationwide average – or even slightly over-indexed – for households earning between $100K and $150K per year.
This suggests that higher-income households already represent a meaningful share of visits to both chains – a group with the spending power to help sustain traffic and trade up to premium menu items. Targeting households with incomes up to $150K per year could further strengthen Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse’s resilience amid a potential softening in consumer spending.
Chili’s and Texas Roadhouse are both navigating a shifting dining landscape by balancing value and experience through distinct strategies. Chili’s continues to refine operations and emphasize promotions, while Texas Roadhouse leans on expansion and consistent everyday value. As economic pressures evolve, both brands’ ability to maintain strong value perceptions while engaging higher-income diners will be key to sustaining momentum and traffic resilience.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
October once marked the calm before the holiday storm, but in recent years, it has become an important launch point for seasonal promotions. And the stakes seem even higher this year as retailers aim to capture demand from price-conscious consumers; battered by inflation and wary of potential tariff-driven price hikes and product shortages. We analyzed visit patterns across several major chains that launched early-October promotions – along with activity at e-commerce distribution centers – to understand how these events shaped the opening act of the holiday retail season.
The first full week of October has become a retail battleground, as major players – Amazon, Best Buy, Target, Walmart, and Kohl’s – all rolled out overlapping promotions designed to capture early holiday demand and pull spending forward before the traditional Black Friday surge.
As the graph below shows, in-store traffic to Walmart and Target during their October 2025 sales events – which ran on the equivalent dates as in 2024 – trailed last year’s levels. Even Kohl’s, which extended its event from three days last year to four this year, experienced a modest year-over-year (YoY) decline in visits compared to the corresponding dates in 2024 – though the chain, which closed several locations over the past year, saw average visits per location hold steady at -0.8% YoY. This suggests that some shoppers may simply be cutting back, or expecting deeper discounts later in the season – particularly as tighter household budgets leave less room for discretionary spending this year.
However, Best Buy – which launched its “Techtober” event to compete directly with other major sales this October – saw visits rise 2.2% compared to the same days in 2024, when no equivalent promotion was held. This indicates that consumers were drawn both by the novelty of Best Buy’s new event and by the strong value proposition of its tech-focused deals.
Analysis of both in-store visits and activity at e-commerce distribution centers – including those operated by Amazon, Walmart, and Target – before and during the early-October promotional period offers a more nuanced view of how this window fits into the broader holiday retail season.
The graph below shows that daily foot traffic at e-commerce distribution centers – a proxy for employee and partner activity related to inventory buildup and order fulfillment – rose above average in late September 2025, ahead of the anticipated October promotions. Meanwhile, consumers appeared to be holding back on in-store visits, waiting for expected October discounts.
Then, e-commerce distribution center activity surged during the promotional period itself (October 5–12) as orders were placed and prepared for shipment, underscoring the critical online component driving the success of October sales events for retailers.
At the same time, in-store traffic at Walmart, Target, Kohl’s, and Best Buy also increased compared to late September, reaffirming consumers’ interest in potentially cost-saving hybrid shopping options and setting the tone for the rest of the holiday season.
Notably, Best Buy’s strongest surge in visits occurred during its overlap with Amazon’s Prime Big Deal Days (October 7-8), suggesting that shoppers may have been cherry-picking deals across platforms – a sign that retailers can benefit from the heightened product awareness generated by concurrent sales events.
And Kohl’s largest visit surge of the promotional period occurred just after its main sales event, on October 10th. This post-sale visit surge appears to have been fueled by the chain’s Kohl’s Cash promotion, which allowed customers to earn $10 for every $50 spent during the sale and redeem it for a limited period beginning October 10th. This strategy effectively extended the impact of the sale beyond its official end date, encouraging incremental spending and driving traffic even after the core discount window had closed.
The early-October promotional window has evolved into a meaningful, multi-channel retail moment. As shoppers search for deeper discounts, early events continue to play a strategic role in-store and online.
Will these retailers turn early-season promotions into lasting momentum throughout the holidays? Visit Placer.ai/anchor to find out.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
As we enter the final quarter of 2025, the retail landscape has been defined by an eventful year in consumer behavior – and by more uncertainty heading into the holidays than in recent memory. The year has been marked by volatile retail traffic, reflecting a consumer base grappling with macroeconomic uncertainty, the impact of tariffs, and a growing insistence on deep discounts.
This choppiness is clearly illustrated in the year-over-year (YoY) weekly visit trends for our Placer 100 Retail Index, as shown below. But despite the turbulence, our visitation data reveals some key trends that are already painting a clear picture of what to expect this holiday season.
One notable pattern is the growing visibility of a “two-tier economy” – a theme we also explored in our recent look at the restaurant category. Affluent consumers appear confident, largely driven by the "wealth effect." With strong financial markets, a healthy housing market, and the positive impact of recent interest rate cuts, this demographic has seen its net worth grow and continues to spend on discretionary goods and services.
This confidence is clearly visible in our retail visitation data, which shows strong performance in categories catering to higher-income shoppers. Luxury department stores, specialty and fresh-format grocers, and fine-dining restaurants are all experiencing steady traffic, indicating this key consumer group is well-positioned to spend this holiday season.
By contrast, lower- to middle-income households face mounting cost-of-living pressures that have clearly impacted their discretionary spending. As shown in the first graph above, our data shows a notable softening across the broader retail and restaurant landscape in late August, September, and early October as these consumers grapple with economic uncertainty and the initial effects of tariff-related price increases. This cautious stance has prompted a distinct shift in behavior; consumers are not just pulling back, but actively trading down to more affordable retail channels. We've seen this manifest in increased traffic to value-oriented grocers, warehouse clubs, dollar stores, and off-price apparel chains as households look to stretch their budgets.
Softening visitation trends among lower- and middle-income consumers help explain another key trend – the early start to this year’s holiday promotional season, which began as early as September, well before Amazon’s “Big Deal Days” ignited the broader deal-hunting frenzy. Our data indicates this consumer segment is being highly strategic, leading to foot traffic that spikes during major sales events, but remains subdued during non-promotional periods. Consequently, retailers are caught in a promotional arms race, pushing sales earlier than ever in a fierce attempt to attract these value-seeking shoppers and, more importantly, lock in a share of their limited holiday budgets before they are spent elsewhere.
This dynamic creates a precarious balancing act for retailers. A potential slowdown in manufacturing and port activity could lead to inventory challenges, creating a perfect storm when combined with a consumer base conditioned to seek out deep discounts. This environment suggests that precise inventory management and flawless promotional timing won't just be important – they will be the critical factors separating the winners from the losers this holiday season.
Still, promotions don’t just have to be about price cuts. Pop-culture tie-ins and strategic product launches have also proven effective at driving retail traffic this year – and could be particularly impactful during the holiday season.
This holiday season, retailers will be increasingly dependent on affluent consumers, as lower- and middle-income shoppers are forced to balance "needs versus wants." This doesn't mean this group has stopped spending, but that their priorities have shifted. And to succeed this holiday season, retailers will need to meet both sides of the consumer divide – delivering value where it matters most and using strategic, well-timed promotions to drive engagement across income levels.
For more data-driven retail analyses follow Placer.ai/anchor.
Placer.ai leverages a panel of tens of millions of devices and utilizes machine learning to make estimations for visits to locations across the US. The data is trusted by thousands of industry leaders who leverage Placer.ai for insights into foot traffic, demographic breakdowns, retail sale predictions, migration trends, site selection, and more.
Across segments, retail and dining expansions converge on a common set of priorities, including identifying markets with strong demand, ensuring alignment with target audiences, and leveraging local consumer behavior to drive synergy. Using AI-powered location intelligence, we analyzed five expanding brands and segments to uncover the core principles driving successful site selection.
Nationwide visits to coffee chains are up in 2026, with established brands and newcomers alike seeing their traffic increase as consumer headwinds lead some to shift their discretionary spend towards more affordable indulgences. But past visit growth does not necessarily indicate future opportunity – it may instead signal market saturation. Relying solely on overall visit trends to guide expansion could lead chains into highly competitive markets where existing supply already meets demand.
For example, analyzing traffic trends in 10 major metro areas where coffee visits increased year-over-year (YoY) in Q1 2026 reveals significant gaps between overall traffic trends and per-location demand. In some CBSAs, overall traffic growth significantly outpaced per-location traffic trends – suggesting that supply is already meeting (or exceeding) demand and limiting room for new coffee locations despite overall category growth. But in other metro areas, where overall visit growth appears smaller, per-location traffic is actually booming – indicating that the underlying demand is resilient enough to support additional coffee concepts.
These patterns highlight the importance of looking beyond topline growth to identify where true whitespace still exists.
Effective site selection matches both regional and local demographics to a brand’s target customer, supporting performance and reinforcing positioning. But even in well-aligned metros, results depend on site-level precision – locations where the trade area visitor profile most closely reflects the brand’s core audience are best positioned to drive incremental upside.
An analysis of Alo locations in the DC area suggests that the company is adopting this strategy. Within the already high-income metro area of Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, individual Alo Yoga stores are placed in centers that draw even more affluent visitors – maximizing the revenue potential of each location.
In fact, Alo's newest stores in the metro area – One Loudoun and Bethesda Row – drive traffic from households with higher median incomes than even the established area locations. This signals a clear focus on premium retail corridors and affluent consumer segments, which reinforces the brand’s positioning while capturing higher-spending customers at the site level.
Beyond driving traffic potential and demographic alignment, site selection should also ensure that a brand’s identity and operating model are well matched to the visitation patterns of prospective locations. Barnes & Noble offers a clear example. The company’s ongoing resurgence has relied in part on repositioning itself as a local cultural and social hub, with a stronger emphasis on local curation and community-driven events.
And analyzing Barnes & Noble’s 2026 openings shows a clear tilt toward centers with a higher share of local traffic than the chain average – supporting its shift away from a purely transactional retail model toward a more community-centric experience built around local curation, events, and repeat visitation. By prioritizing locally driven centers, the company’s site selection strategy not only captures relevant traffic but also reinforces its broader repositioning as a neighborhood-oriented brand.
Effective site selection recognizes that proximity to competitors can function as a demand driver, amplifying traffic rather than diluting it.
In practice, this often takes the form of clustering – deliberately locating near similar or complementary concepts to capture shared demand. Shake Shack provides a clear example. Analyzing the chain's store fleet shows that many locations sit near other QSR and fast-casual concepts, creating opportunities to capture dining-based traffic. At the same time, strong cross-visitation patterns indicate that these co-located brands share a common customer base, positioning the brand closer to consumers who are already likely to visit. And, at least for Shake Shack, this strategy appears to be working – traffic to the chain increased 19.9% YoY in Q1 2026.
Incorporating trade area analysis into site selection can also help determine whether a new location will generate new traffic or risk cannibalizing existing demand. Aldi, a rapidly expanding grocery chain, offers a relevant example.
The company opened a fourth Las Vegas store on S Decatur Blvd in October 2025, positioned between existing locations on W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd, approximately eight miles from each. And analyzing the core trade area of each of the four Las Vegas locations indicated limited visitor cannibalization over the last six months, despite the stores’ close proximity. Only 6.2% and 7.6% of the S Decatur Blvd store’s trade area overlapped with the W Craig Rd and S Rainbow Blvd stores’ trade areas, respectively.
These findings show that there is no one-size-fits-all approach to store spacing – it varies by brand, category, and market. Analyzing a company’s existing store network alongside competitor density and overall demand can help determine how closely locations can be placed without hurting performance. In many cases – especially in high-frequency categories like grocery – markets can support stores that are closer together than expected.
Physical retail is increasingly defined by a small group of dominant players – Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General – that span grocery, essentials, and discretionary categories at a scale no other retailers can match. These chains serve as bellwethers of consumer behavior, revealing where Americans are spending, how often they shop, and what drives their decisions. And understanding their visitation patterns sheds light on the key dynamics shaping both their performance and the broader blueprint for retail success in 2026.
Retail giants Walmart, Target, Costco Wholesale, and Dollar General continue to capture a growing share of brick-and-mortar visits nationwide.
• The share of physical retail traffic captured by these giants rose from 16.8% in 2019 to 17.5% in Q1 2026, signaling continued sector consolidation.
• The scale advantage enjoyed by retail giants is increasingly self-reinforcing: Larger players benefit from superior data, stronger vendor leverage, and operational efficiencies that in turn further widen the gap.
• As these advantages compound, direct competition becomes less viable. Instead, smaller retailers should focus on owning specific trip missions – such as convenience, fill-in, or discovery – where format, assortment curation, and in-store experience can more directly shape consumer choice.
• For CRE operators, the growing dominance of these retail giants increases reliance on top-tier anchors, potentially driving performance gaps between centers with strong national tenants and those without.
• For CPG companies, the consolidation in the offline retail space heightens channel concentration, making success with a handful of large retailers critical while increasing those retailers’ negotiating leverage.
Traffic trends across the four giants reveal meaningful divergence in performance.
• Costco and Dollar General are driving the strongest visit growth, supported by both substantial fleet expansions and rising visits per location. In 2025, visits per store exceeded pre-pandemic levels by 18.1% for Costco and 10.2% for Dollar General, with both brands also seeing steady increases in their share of total brick-and-mortar retail chain visits.
• Walmart remains the largest player by far, accounting for 9.7% of traffic to major brick-and-mortar chains in 2025. And though the behemoth’s share of visits declined slightly in the immediate aftermath of the pandemic, it has held steady over the past three years.
• Target’s visit share has remained relatively flat over the past three years, reflecting stalled momentum. Still, early 2026 trends point to emerging signs of recovery – with Q1 visits up 8.3% compared to Q1 2019.
• Value retail is winning, but in more specialized forms: Dollar General (extreme value + convenience) and Costco (bulk value + loyalty) are driving the strongest traffic growth and rising visits per store, while Walmart’s broad “everyday value” remains steady with slower growth. Target, for its part, is lagging – likely a reflection of the broader bifurcation in retail which has left middle-market players caught between consumers trading down to value and those trading up to quality.
• For retailers and CPG companies, the broader lesson is that value perception is becoming more nuanced. It’s no longer just about offering low prices at scale, but about how value is delivered – whether through small packs vs. bulk, or quick trips vs. stock-up missions. Success increasingly depends on prioritizing these distinct value formats and investing in channels where store-level productivity is improving.
• For CRE operators, the outperformance of retailers with clearly defined value propositions underscores the importance of mission-driven tenant mix. As shoppers visit with increasingly specific missions in mind, retailers that cater to those missions are outperforming. Tenant strategies should reflect this shift, ensuring complementary offerings that reinforce a cohesive shopping mission.
Walmart remains the dominant brick-and-mortar retailer nationwide and across all fifty states. Still, the data suggests there is room for multiple runners-up to succeed across geographies and customer segments.
• Dollar General, Target, and Costco each attract distinct audience segments. Dollar General attracts a disproportionately high share of the “Mature and Retired Living” segment, while Costco leads among family households, with Target also over-indexing with this group. Among younger “Contemporary Households,” meanwhile – a segment encompassing singles, married couples without children, and non-family households – Target commands the highest share, slightly over-indexing compared to the nationwide baseline.
• Regional strengths vary significantly, with Dollar General concentrated in the South, Costco dominant in the Northwest, and Target showing more dispersed areas of strength.
• Despite similar overall visit share, Dollar General leads in more states (26 vs. 17 for Target), reflecting broader geographic dominance.
• For retailers, the data suggests that growth opportunities are increasingly shaped by localized demographic and geographic dynamics – meaning that targeted, market-specific strategies may be more effective than uniform national approaches.
• Younger “Contemporary Households” remain less locked-in than older demographics, representing a key battleground for future growth.
• For CPG companies, this data highlights that channel strategy is really about building the right mix of retailers, since even large national players reach different types of consumers.
• CRE operators should ask "which anchor is right for this trade area" rather than "which anchor is strongest," as mismatched tenants can underperform even if they’re nationally dominant.
After remaining essentially flat in 2025, average visits per location to Walmart grew 3.5% YoY in Q1 2026. And the retailer’s solid Q1 performance across the U.S. underscores its unique ability to resonate across income levels, geographies, and shopping missions.
• Walmart posted year-over-year visit growth across nearly all U.S. markets in Q1 2026, reinforcing its role as a universally relevant retailer.
• The giant’s comparative softness in small parts of the Northeast suggests an opportunity to double down on region-specific assortments, urban-friendly formats, or partnerships to better match local shopping behaviors.
• Walmart’s broad-based growth shows that even as consumers are increasingly willing to visit multiple retailers to get what they want, its Superstore model has solidified its role as a primary stop on the American shopping journey – making it a uniquely reliable anchor for CRE operators.
• For smaller retailers, this underscores the opportunity to win the “second stop” – capturing trips through curated assortments and more tailored in-store experiences that Walmart’s scale is less optimized to deliver.
• For CPG companies, Walmart stands out as a highly attractive partner for broad, efficient reach, given its consistent traffic across markets.
Target’s recent performance suggests early momentum in reversing prior softness.
• Q1 2026 visits to Target rose 5.1% year over year, marking the chain’s first positive visit growth in more than a year, and suggesting that the chain’s new turnaround strategy may be bearing fruit.
• Gains were driven primarily by visits lasting 30 to 45 minutes, which accounted for 19.6% of overall visits to Target in Q1 2026 – pointing to stronger in-store engagement rather than quick, mission-driven stops.
• Target’s return to traffic growth – driven by increases in mid-length trips – signals a sustainable recovery on the horizon, strengthening its reliability as a traffic-driving tenant for CRE operators.
• Target's turnaround shows retailers how increasing shopper engagement can generate growth by converting quick trips into higher-value, multi-category experiences.
• For CPG companies, the rise in mid-length visits indicates a more receptive in-store environment for discovery and trade-up, making Target an increasingly attractive channel for innovation, merchandising, and premium offerings.
Dollar General is becoming embedded in consumers’ daily routines.
• Visitor frequency to Dollar General is on the rise. In Q1 2026, nearly a quarter of visitors frequented the chain at least four times in an average month, up from 21.2% in Q1 2022.
• Dollar General is becoming increasingly local in nature: As its footprint expands, more visits originate nearby, with 28.0% coming from within one mile – reinforcing its role as a neighborhood store of choice.
• Dollar General’s visitation patterns point to a growing ownership of the convenience mission. Its expanding store density is creating a self-reinforcing network effect, where proximity fuels frequency, and frequency strengthens long-term defensibility.
• For retailers, Dollar General’s rising share of nearby and high-frequency visits shows that proximity can drive habit, making convenience a powerful lever for building repeat behavior.
• For CRE operators, the data highlights the strength of hyper-local, necessity-driven traffic, positioning Dollar General as a stable tenant that anchors consistent, repeat visitation.
• For CPG professionals, the increase in frequent trips signals a high-velocity purchase environment, favoring smaller pack sizes and products that align with regular replenishment cycles.
Costco continues to grow and diversify its audience despite higher membership fees and stricter food court access policies, highlighting the strength of its value proposition and loyalty model.
• In September 2024, Costco raised its membership fees for the first time in seven years – and more recently tightened enforcement of member-only access to its food courts. Despite these changes, visitation has remained strong, highlighting the company’s pricing power and deep customer loyalty.
• At the same time, Costco’s shopper base is broadening, with median household income trending slightly downward while remaining relatively affluent.
• Offering strong value to a relatively affluent consumer base can be a winning formula in 2026. Retailers that combine quality, trust, and perceived savings – rather than competing solely on low prices – are well positioned to drive both loyalty and sustained traffic growth.
• For CRE operators, Costco’s sustained traffic growth and broadening shopper base reinforce its value as a standalone, high-demand traffic magnet that can anchor entire trade areas and drive surrounding retail development.
• For CPG companies, the combination of high traffic and declining median HHI signals that Costco is evolving into a scaled channel reaching beyond affluent shoppers, requiring more diversified assortment and pricing strategies.
.avif)
It’s been decades since the U.S. last hosted the World Cup, and anticipation continues to build. While the matches themselves will deliver thrilling moments for fans inside the stadium, a far broader audience is expected to engage from beyond the gates – gathering at bars, watch parties, and living rooms across the country.
Drawing on insights from recent sporting and cultural events, this analysis examines how the World Cup may impact consumer behavior and audiences across stadiums, host cities, and nationwide.
In 2025, MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, NJ hosted a wide range of concerts and sporting events. And an examination of three – Kendrick Lamar & SZA’s tour stop, the FIFA Club World Cup Final, and a Week 17 New York Jets matchup against division rivals and the Super Bowl-bound New England Patriots – reveals clear differences in audience composition across event types.
Trade area analysis showed that the 2025 FIFA Club World Cup Final drew the largest share of single visitors and the highest median household income (HHI) of the three events – a pattern that could reflect the premium tickets and travel typically associated with a quadrennial championship match.
With the 2026 World Cup elevating the level of global competition, stadiums set to host matches this summer – including MetLife – may see even more dramatic shifts in their audience relative to other events.
While spectators attending World Cup matches are likely to differ from those drawn to other events throughout the year, audience shifts are likely to occur also within the tournament itself. As the competition progresses and the stakes rise, the visitor profile at host stadiums may trend progressively higher-income, as suggested by an analysis of Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, CA during the recent NFL season and Super Bowl.
During the Super Bowl, the stadium’s captured market median HHI surpassed that of every 49ers home game during the 2025-26 season – a pattern consistent with the event’s premium ticket pricing, national draw, and high levels of out-of-market travel.
And since the World Cup only takes place every four years, and necessitates international travel for die-hard fans, attendees are likely to be even more affluent than Super Bowl go-ers. Moreover, as the tournament reaches its later stages, each match becomes more significant and carries the potential to drive an even more affluent in-person audience.
Diving deeper into last year’s FIFA Club World Cup Final and Semifinal matches at MetLife Stadium provides further insight into the significance of the in-person audience that doesn’t make it into the stands. While FIFA generally places restrictions on tailgating, the behavior was still observed at MetLife and several other tournament venues in 2025. To put the phenomenon into perspective, location intelligence indicates that on the day of the Club World Cup final, combined visits to MetLife and its parking lots were 24.8% higher than visits to the stadium alone.
AI-powered trade area analysis further contextualizes the economic significance of this audience. During the semifinal matches, MetLife Stadium’s captured market median HHI remained nearly identical – just over $100K – with and without parking lot visitors. A similar pattern held for the Final, where median HHI for both the stadium-only and combined stadium-plus-parking visitors both rose above $115K, with the stadium-only figure only marginally higher.
This suggests that tailgaters represent a significant cohort with discretionary income to spend on the broader match-day experience, even if they opt out of spending big money on tickets.
With tailgating during the 2026 World Cup likely to remain limited due to FIFA regulations, the spending power of fans just outside the stadiums could create opportunities for alternative forms of engagement. Fan zones and other nearby hospitality events may offer effective ways to capture demand.
Nearby dining and entertainment venues are among the most accessible experiences for fans in the stadium area, and these stand to benefit significantly from elevated game-day foot traffic.
Analysis of recent FIFA Club World Cup matches reveals the impact of match-day activity on local businesses. Visitor journey data from the June 25th, 2025 matchup between Inter Milan and River Plate at Seattle’s Lumen Field, and the June 28th, 2025 meeting between Palmeiras and Botafogo at Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia reveals that a significant share of stadium visitors also stopped at nearby dining and recreation venues on the day. Location intelligence also shows that, on the day of the match, each stadium-adjacent venue received a significant visit boost compared to its 2025 daily average.
This pattern underscores the potential impact of the World Cup on the surrounding commercial ecosystem. The stadium may anchor the experience, but fan engagement will likely spill into adjacent areas – creating opportunities for both organizers and local businesses. To take full advantage, restaurants and bars can position themselves as fan-friendly destinations through watch parties, extended hours, and even mobile or outdoor offerings in stadium corridors.
Previous major sporting events – including the Super Bowl – demonstrate that the impact of large-scale sporting moments often extends beyond the immediate stadium vicinity into the broader regional economy.
In the weeks leading up to the latest Super Bowl in Santa Clara, CA on February 8th, 2026, both the San Francisco-Oakland-Berkley and San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara CBSAs saw a notable uptick in year-over-year dining traffic – outperforming the nationwide average. The timing suggests that early-arriving travellers combined with locals enjoying pre-event concerts and events helped fuel demand. In contrast, nationwide dining traffic saw a more pronounced lift the following week – likely tied to Valentine’s Day on February 14.
This pattern indicates that regions hosting – or located near – World Cup 2026 matches could experience similar pre-event dining tailwinds. As out-of-town visitors arrive and local engagement builds in the days and weeks leading up to key matches, restaurants and hospitality may benefit from elevated demand – particularly when supported by ancillary events and fan experiences.
Other recent examples suggest that cities hosting major events like the World Cup stand to benefit from an influx of out-of-town visitors – particularly those with higher spending power.
Since the beginning of 2025, New Orleans has hosted a series of popular events that drove significant non-local traffic. AI-powered trade area data indicates that during these periods, out-of-market visitors consistently exhibited a higher median HHI than both local residents and typical commuters into the city.
As expected, the 2025 Super Bowl generated the most pronounced spike in out-of-market visitor median HHI among the events analyzed, but the pattern extends beyond one-time spectacles. Recurring events like Mardi Gras and major music festivals also attracted high-income visitors to the city – likely benefitting the local hospitality, dining, and retail industries.
Looking ahead to the 2026 World Cup, host cities are likely to experience a similar dynamic. The tournament’s global draw will likely bring affluent travelers with discretionary dollars to the host regions – visitors that will spend not only on match tickets, but also on accommodation, dining, and shopping. By sponsoring tournament-related festivals, concerts, and experiences in or near retail corridors, cities can amplify the economic impact of the World Cup beyond the stadium.
The impact of the 2026 World Cup is unlikely to be confined to the select cities hosting matches. Major sporting events drive large-scale at-home viewership, generating ripple effects nationwide.
The Super Bowl offers a useful benchmark. In the days leading up to February 8th, 2026, visits to grocery stores and pizza chains rose above day-of-week averages for 2025, ultimately peaking on the day of the big game day as households appeared to pick up last-minute fixings and takeout for their watch parties.
This pattern indicates that the World Cup – with its extended schedule and multiple high-stakes matchups – could drive repeated waves of elevated grocery and take-out demand as fans gather together throughout the tournament.
Of course, at-home viewing is just one piece of the match-day equation. Many fans opt for a more communal experience – gathering at sports bars across the country to watch the game alongside fellow supporters.
Recent highly-anticipated soccer matches offer a clear signal of this behavior. During the recent Allstate Continental Clásico, MLS Cup Final, and SheBelieves Cup Final, top sports bars in key markets like Los Angeles and Miami recorded visit spikes above day-of-week averages.
Not every World Cup fan will be able to attend in-person or travel to a host city, but previous match-day lifts in sports bar traffic demonstrate that fans nationwide will participate in the tournament experience.
The 2026 FIFA World Cup is set to engage a wide spectrum of fans – from casual viewers at home to dedicated supporters traveling to stadiums – shaping how and where demand emerges.
As a result, the tournament’s impact will be felt across multiple layers of retail, dining, and tourism. Stadium-centered spending, activity in surrounding corridors, host-city consumer demand, and gatherings of spectators nationwide all point to a broad and interconnected World Cup effect that is likely to shape both audience composition and behavior at scale.
