Skip to Main Content

Relocators Are Gravitating Toward Older, More Established Communities, With Retirees Helping Fuel the Trend

Net Migration as a Share of Starting Population, 2024-2025, vs. Weighted Age Differential and Share of Residents 65+*

Net migration as a share of starting population vs. weighted age differential and share of residents 65+ by CBSA, 2024-2025
Metro (CBSA) Weighted age differential (years) Share of residents 65+ (%) Net migration (% of starting pop.)
Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC-0.217.31.0
Austin-Round Rock-San Marcos, TX0.511.91.0
Boise City, ID0.516.11.7
Boulder, CO-0.116.4-1.1
Brownsville-Harlingen, TX3.314.3-1.0
Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL-6.128.91.8
Champaign-Urbana, IL6.914.7-1.0
Charleston-North Charleston, SC0.516.42.0
College Station-Bryan, TX7.411.7-1.5
Crestview-Fort Walton Beach-Destin, FL-0.417.61.0
Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL-7.726.41.7
El Paso, TX2.713.1-1.3
Greeley, CO2.112.91.1
Greenville-Anderson-Greer, SC0.717.41.2
Hickory-Lenoir-Morganton, NC-4.320.31.5
Huntsville, AL-0.315.71.5
Kingsport-Bristol, TN-VA-5.322.91.1
Lafayette-West Lafayette, IN7.413.6-1.6
Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL1.019.52.7
Laredo, TX5.710.3-2.6
Merced, CA4.911.7-1.8
Miami-Fort Lauderdale-West Palm Beach, FL-1.419.2-1.4
Myrtle Beach-Conway-North Myrtle Beach, SC-8.826.43.6
Nashville-Davidson--Murfreesboro--Franklin, TN1.414.11.0
North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL-11.433.21.9
Ocala, FL-5.228.74.1
Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL-5.724.51.7
Port St. Lucie, FL-6.026.92.2
Raleigh-Cary, NC1.113.21.0
Salinas, CA2.314.9-1.0
Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA-1.619.0-1.7
Sioux Falls, SD-MN1.714.61.0
Spartanburg, SC1.016.72.1
Tallahassee, FL6.115.9-1.5
Tuscaloosa, AL4.615.0-1.6
Tyler, TX0.017.41.0
Wilmington, NC-6.823.92.2

*Weighted age differential is the age gap between incoming residents and the existing population; negative values mean in-migrants skew older. Net migration is measured as a share of each market's starting population, 2024-2025. Each dot is a CBSA; the dashed line is a least-squares fit.