.svg)
Chipotle and McDonald’s are two major players in the fast-casual and quick-service dining scene. With the year's first half behind us, we take a look at how foot traffic to these dining giants performed – and what might lie ahead in the second half of the year.
The wider retail and dining world continues to work through the challenges of inflation and new tariff concerns. But McDonald is focusing on its future, with major expansion plans and menu changes in the works. The chain is bringing back fan favorites, introducing new products, and debuting a new beverage line inspired by its now-defunct CosMc chain.
And the data suggests that these changes are helping drive visits, with the chain outperforming the wider QSR segment in Q2 2025. With the chain continuing its menu innovations in H2 2025 and a major expansion on the horizon, the positive Q2 2025 trends may signal a strong H2 ahead.
McDonald's expansion strategy is ambitious, with plans to open 900 locations around the country by 2027. Where should the chain open these new restaurants to ensure they meet a ready demand?
Diving into YoY same-store visits by state in H1 2025 reveals that much of McDonald's same-store visit increases were concentrated in the western United States, with the Southwest standing out as a particularly strong locus of growth. Nevada, Utah, and Arizona in particular saw YoY same-store visit growths of 4.9%, 4.2%, and 3.4%, respectively – suggesting that diners in these states may be particularly receptive to new McDonald's restaurants.
Chipotle has been a dining powerhouse over the past few years, consistently expanding its presence while maintaining visit growth. Indeed, visits to the chain increased 0.7% YoY in Q2 2025, slightly outpacing the 0.5% increase in visits for the wider fast casual segment.
Meanwhile, visits per location trends tell a slightly different story – the average number of visits per venue fell in Q2 '25 even as visits per venue remained flat in the wider fast casual segment. Some of the dip is likely due to lapping the successful Chicken al Pastor launch and to the Easter calendar shift, which made for a difficult comparison. But the dip had narrowed to just -1.5% by June 2025, suggesting that the chain may be seeing the impacts of its latest menu additions.
But even as Chipotle's visits per location trends trail slightly behind the wider fast casual segment, the chain's overall visit growth has helped capture a growing share of fast-casual visits in recent years despite the rising competition in the segment. In Q2 2025, more than a quarter (26.0%) of fast casual visits went to the fast casual giant – a significant increase from its 20.3% relative visit share in Q1 2019.
And the chain has no plans of slowing, with a goal of opening between 315 and 345 new restaurants in 2025 – setting Chipotle up for continued growth within the dining sector.
Chipotle and McDonald’s continue to drive visit growth even as the wider dining space experiences challenges.
Will visits grow further in H2, or will economic headwinds slow down these upward trends?
Visit Placer.ai/anchor for the latest data-driven dining insights.
.avif)
Following years of volatility and multiple bankruptcies filings, JOANN – the 82-year-old fabric and craft retailer – shuttered its final stores in May 2025, with many stores already closing in April 2025. But diving into traffic trends for some of JOANN's competitors suggest that JOANN's bankruptcy and ultimate closure was not necessarily the result of lowered demand for crafting supplies.
Year-over-year (YoY) visit trends to JOANN stores were mostly stable prior to the closure announcements, and traffic skyrocketed as consumers descended on the bargain-priced fabrics and sewing supplies during the chain's liquidation sales. And since the closures, visits to other crafting retailers has skyrocketed, with traffic to Michael's – JOANN's main competitor that even bought chain's intellectual property – up 9.2% YoY in June 2025.
JOANN is not the only hobby and crafts chain to go bankrupt over the past twelve months – Party City, which had filed for bankruptcy in 2023, also shut its last remaining stores in February 2025. And though Party City's main focus may have been party supplies, the retailer also carried an assortment of arts and crafts supplies. This means that in H1 2025 two craft-forward legacy retailers permanently shut down.
So what brought JOANN and Party City down? While several factors contributed, one significant challenge faced by both companies was their size. Although JOANN had a loyal following in some circles, the retailer's brick-and-mortar footprint was relatively moderate – in 2024, JOANN received less than half as many visits as Michaels, due in part to its significantly smaller store fleet. Party City was even smaller, receiving less than half the visits going to Hobby Lobby last year.
This means that Party City and JOANN likely lacked the economies of scale and marketing dominance of the Hobby Lobby and Michaels – making it harder to stay afloat in an increasingly competitive market. And Party City and JOANN's mid-size brick-and-mortar footprint likely also made it more difficult to compete with mass merchants such as Walmart and Target.
But if the market consolidation forces of recent years drove JOANN and Party City out of business – what to make of the endurance of tiny Blick and its 0.3% visit share? The answer to that may lie in another trend. The bifurcation of consumer spending since COVID has sustained demand for premium, quality brands and products alongside significant growth for value-oriented retail chains. And looking at the trade area median household income for the five analyzed chains highlights Blick's affluent visitor base – and suggests that the chain has successfully positioned itself as a premium purveyor of quality arts supply.
This in turn allows Blick to operate in a wholly different field where it is not competing directly with the Hobby Lobbies (or Walmarts) of the world. Instead, it has carved out a defensible niche where the defining competitive metric isn't price, but the quality and curation of its products.
The divergent paths of JOANN and its competitors highlight the new realities of the craft retail market, where operating without the scale of a Michaels or the premium, defensible niche of a Blick can create a significant liability.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Retail media networks – advertising platforms enabling third parties to promote products and services on a retailer’s websites, digital apps, brick-and-mortar stores, or across partners’ digital properties – have firmly entered the mainstream. Major chains across industries now allow sellers direct access to consumers at the critical point of purchase. And since most shopping still takes place offline, retailers are increasingly expanding their in-store retail media offerings – through digital signage, in-store audio, sampling stations, and in-app features that appear when a customer is physically in the store.
But what do location analytics tell us about the relationship between online and offline retail in 2025 – and the potential role of brick-and-mortar retail media in driving consumer engagement? We dove into the data to find out.
A closer look at several chains that are heavily investing in brick-and-mortar retail media reveals how the in-store / online mix varies by both retailer and season. Unsurprisingly, Kroger’s unique physical visitors outpaced unique website visitors (desktop and mobile) during every quarter. In contrast, The Home Depot’s in-store visitors were closer to its online traffic – occasionally dropping below it in Q1 2025. Target, Lowe’s, and Walmart fell somewhere in between these two extremes.
Interestingly, all chains analyzed attracted more physical visitors in the spring and summer (Q2 and Q3) than in the fall and winter. For both retail media networks and their advertising partners, understanding the interplay between online and offline traffic is crucial for optimizing advertising strategies.
Walmart has emerged as a leader in brick-and-mortar retail media. Through Walmart Connect, the company provides partners with a variety of in-store advertising solutions, including digital screens, in-store radio, on-site demos, and sponsored events at Walmart locations. And non-endemic brands – ranging from restaurants to financial services – can also tap into both Walmart’s online and offline retail media networks.
And foot traffic data shows that the ratio of online to offline Walmart visitors differs greatly throughout the country. In the South Central region, including Texas, Walmart’s physical stores saw 85.0% more unique visitors in May 2025 than its website. But in the Northeast, the gap narrowed to just 8.4%. So advertisers may find cost-effective opportunities by tailoring campaigns to regional traffic tendencies.
The relative size of Walmart’s state-wide markets also varies by channel. In May 2025, Texas accounted for 10.2% of Walmart’s unique in-store visitors, making it the top regional brick-and-mortar market. Yet online, California took the lead at 12.1% of total website visitors. So advertisers aiming for the biggest in-store crowd might choose Texas, while those focused on digital reach could invest more in California. Florida, meanwhile, remained the third-largest market for both online and offline traffic, grabbing about 7.0% of each.
Though offline shopping continues to dominate, the numbers show that neither channel exists in a vacuum. And given how shopper preferences differ by region and season, brands that harness both online and offline data can craft more relevant, impactful campaigns.
For more data-driven retail and advertising analysis follow Placer.ai/anchor.
The grocery segment has never been more competitive, and Aldi, Trader Joe’s, and Lidl have consistently emerged as top players. The three chains share similarities: all offer a limited assortment of groceries and tend to operate at lower price points – however, each one is carving out its own distinct path to growth.
We take a closer look at their performance in H1 2025 to uncover what might be contributing to their continued success.
Aldi, Trader Joe’s, and Lidl have established themselves as formidable players in the grocery segment, consistently thriving despite a challenging market. And diving into H1 2025 underscores their impressive success.
The three grocery chains enjoyed consistently elevated visits in H1 2025, significantly outpacing the wider grocery segment. While overall grocery visits increased by 1.8% YoY, Aldi’s visits grew by 7.1%, Trader Joe’s by 11.9%, and Lidl posted growth of 4.9% during the analyzed period. The three chains also outpaced the wider industry in terms of average visit per location growth.
This strong H1 performance is extra impressive given how well the three chains have performed in recent years. And diving into individual metrics for each chain can further show how they are thriving – and what might lie behind their success.
Trader Joe’s, known for its whimsical and community-centric approach to grocery shopping, got its start in Pasadena, California. Since then, the chain has expanded to nearly 600 locations across the country – but California remains its most significant market. The company operates over 200 locations in the Golden State alone and recently announced plans to expand its footprint within its largest market.
Examining the visitor share among California’s top grocery chains, including major players like Safeway, Ralphs, and VONS, highlights just how well Trader Joe’s is performing in the state. While these chains maintained relatively stable visit shares over the past few years, Trader Joe’s saw its relative visit share grow from 13.2% in H1 2019 to 15.7% in H1 2025. This success underscores the value of investing in product and community – two areas where Trader Joe’s excels.
Aldi, the German grocery giant, derives much of its success from its impressive operational prowess. The chain is laser-focused on maximizing efficiency and streamlining operations in a bid to keep overhead low and customers coming through its doors. And its efforts seem to be paying off – the chain is one of the fastest-growing grocery chains in the nation. Over the past few years, Aldi has opened new stores at a rapid pace, acquiring smaller chains in pursuit of its goal of opening an additional 800 stores by 2028.
And crucially, even as Aldi expands its footprint, the chain continues to draw more average visits per location. Average visits per location were 1.6% higher than they were in 2024, 17.4% higher than in 2023, and 26.7% higher than in 2022. This signals that its new stores are being met by sustained and growing shopper interest instead of cannibalizing foot traffic from existing locations.
This model allows Aldi to grow its footprint and customer base simultaneously and demonstrates an impressive capacity to meet – and create – continued demand for its offerings.
Like Aldi, Lidl emigrated to the United States from Germany – and the chain offers a similar promise of limited-assortment products and lower prices. Diving into visitor demographics at the chain highlights where Lidl shines – and where it has room to grow. Between 2019 and 2025, the chain grew its share of suburban, wealthy, and older segments – but the share of visitors falling into the “Singles and Starters” demographic segment shrunk.
Lidl has been adding new stores in recent months, and while it has certainly leaned into its thriving suburban segment, new locations are also appearing in major cities. This push beyond its established wealthy, suburban roots suggests Lidl may be looking to broaden its appeal to a more diverse urban consumer base.
Trader Joe’s, Aldi, and Lidl continue to thrive despite a challenging retail environment – and while all chains are known for their great deals, the different price points, audiences, and focuses underscore that their success is rooted in strategies beyond their value propositions.
Will these chains continue to drive increased foot traffic in H2 2025? Visit Placer.ai/anchor for the latest data-driven grocery insights.
Summer often brings out the latest fashion trends as consumers head for coastal cities, the beach, summer vacations, and the pool. Sometimes we see new trends catch fire altogether, but summer also tends to signal to shoppers that it’s time to revitalize classic products or items already in their closets in new ways.
L.L.Bean, the outdoor lifestyle retailer and brand, has always been at the center of repeat trends. Its New England heritage lends itself to fashion moments centered around preppy or Americana dressing, and its staple products like the L.L.Bean Boot and Boat and Tote have become longstanding favorites.
Over the past few years, the Boat and Tote product specifically has had its own renaissance as consumers once again flocked to this classic style. Another trend that we can thank TikTok for, the bag became a viral sensation in 2022 as creators would embroider ironic sayings onto their bags instead of the traditional monogram offered. This year appears to be a reinvigoration of this trend, and with new inspirations coming into the fold, such as the “Boatkin”, there is plenty of runway left for the Boat & Tote to keep L.L.Bean top of mind for shoppers. The Boat & Tote also reflects the change in consumer behavior over the last few years relating to branded products and logos – consumers are opting for more subtle designs without logos that can be used for everyday activities.
L.L.Bean retail locations have certainly benefited from the virality of the Boat & Tote. Looking at 2025 traffic performance year-to-date, visits are up almost 15% compared to 2024. Against the backdrop of challenging traffic for many retail chains, this number is even more impressive.
L.L.Bean stores also fit the mold of the current formula that is working in retail – large format stores that offer a wide variety of experiences, assortments, and services that keep customers engaged for longer, with the average dwell time at 32 minutes. Related to the renaissance of the Boat and Tote in 2025, L.L.Bean stores recently added a bag charm bar to locations for consumers to adorn their bags in unique ways, leaning into current trends being seen across the accessories category. Concepts like the charm bar could make the difference in consumers choosing to shop in store instead of simply ordering online.
L.L.Bean’s focus on its iconic products despite the change in trends over time has served the brand in attracting new shoppers with each passing generation. The chain attracts visitors across suburban and rural families, Young Professionals as well as Sunset Boomers. Different generations of consumers have all found their way to L.L.Bean retail locations for different reasons, but the core products that remain have outlasted other trends.
For more data-driven retail insights, visit placer.ai/anchor.
Office supplies behemoth Staples has faced a challenging few years, contending with stiff competition from online rivals and evolving office visit trends that have reduced demand for some of its core products. Consumer cutbacks in discretionary spending driven by recent inflationary pressures have also taken their toll on the retailer, which has closed dozens of stores over the past several years.
But by remaining agile and pivoting towards services and B2B offerings, Staples has defied expectations – showing how retailers can succeed by staying in tune with shifting consumer needs and habits. We dove into the data to explore Staples’ recent visit growth and some of the factors behind its current success.
Last month, Staples brought back its iconic “That Was Easy!” button, highlighting the chain’s mission to simplify customers’ lives through products and solutions. But though Staples’ impressive traffic resurgence might appear to have been effortless, its current growth is the result of a carefully orchestrated pivot towards meeting the practical demands of shoppers in 2025.
In addition to its staple (pun intended) office and school supplies, Staples is ramping up its business-focused services. The chain recently began a pilot with Verizon to expand its tech offerings – with the explicit purpose of offering the telecom giant access to more small business visitors. The company has also expanded its onsite services, offering everything from print-while-you-wait to travel-related options like passport photos.
And a look at Staples’ foot traffic over the past several months shows these efforts are paying off. Since January 2025, visits and average visits per location to Staples have been consistently elevated year over year (YoY), with the sole exception of February, when retailers across categories were impacted by stormy weather and the comparison to a leap year. And as the year has worn on, Staples’ visitation trends have only gotten stronger, with June seeing a 10.3% increase in overall foot traffic and a 13.2% increase in average visits per location compared to 2024.
Despite the challenges of the past several years – and the closure of dozens of stores since 2019 – Staples’ foot traffic is also now higher than it was pre-COVID. In Q2 2025, overall visits to the chain exceeded Q2 2019 levels by 5.6%. And each open store is seeing far more foot traffic than it did before the pandemic, with average visits per location rising by 23.9% over the same period.
Location analytics reinforce the notion that it is Staples’ pivot to services and B2B solutions that is largely fueling this comeback.
August, for example, has traditionally been Staples’ busiest month of the year, as students and families descend on the chain to stock up on back-to-school supplies. But in recent years, the month has become less of an outlier, with traffic spread more evenly across the calendar.
Moreover, the number of frequent visitors to Staples – i.e. those who return to the chain multiple times per month – has grown steadily since 2019. Between H1 2019 and H1 2025, the share of customers visiting Staples at least twice a month on average edged up from 12.0% to 12.8%, and the proportion of those making three or more monthly visits climbed from 3.5% to 4.9%. This shift points to a consumer base increasingly reliant on Staples for ongoing needs rather than episodic purchases.
Staples’ recent visit success sheds light on the power of pivoting to meet shifting consumer demands. By emphasizing services and leaning into B2B offerings, Staples has transformed itself into a go-to destination for new audiences – reinforcing the importance of adaptability and innovation in retail.
For more data-driven retail analyses, visit Placer.ai/anchor.
1. The hypergrowth of Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General between 2019 and 2025 has fundamentally changed the brick-and-mortar retail landscape.
2. Overall visits to Target and Walmart have remained essentially stable even as traffic to the new retail giants skyrocketed – so the increased competition is not necessarily coming at legacy giants' expense. Instead, each retail giant is filling a different need, and success now requires excelling at specific shopping missions rather than broad market dominance.
3. Cross-shopping has become the new normal, with Walmart and Target maintaining their popularity even as their relative visit shares decline, creating opportunities for complementary rather than purely competitive strategies.
4. Dollar stores are rapidly graduating from "fill-in" destinations to primary shopping locations, signaling a fundamental shift in how Americans approach everyday retail.
5. Walmart still enjoys the highest visit frequency, but the other four chains – and especially Dollar General – are gaining ground in this realm.
6. Geographic and demographic specialization is becoming the key differentiator, as each chain carves out distinct niches rather than competing head-to-head across all markets and customer segments.
Evolving shopper priorities, economic pressures, and new competitors are reshaping how and where Americans buy everyday goods. And as value-focused players gain ground, legacy retail powerhouses are adapting their strategies in a bid to maintain their visit share. In this new consumer reality, shoppers no longer stick to one lane, creating a complex ecosystem where loyalty, geography, and cross-visitation patterns – not just market share – define who is truly winning.
This report explores the latest retail traffic data for Walmart, Target, Costco, Dollar Tree, and Dollar General to decode what consumers want from retail giants in 2025. By analyzing visit patterns, loyalty trends, and cross-shopping shifts, we reveal how fast-growing chains are winning over consumers and uncover the strategies helping legacy players stay competitive in today's value-driven retail landscape.
In 2019, Walmart and Target were the two major behemoths in the brick-and-mortar retail space. And while traffic to these chains remains close to 2019 levels, overall visits to Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco have increased 36.6% to 45.9% in the past six years. Much of the growth was driven by aggressive store expansions, but average visits per location stayed constant (in the case of Dollar Tree) or grew as well (in the case of Dollar General and Costco). This means that these chains are successfully filling new stores with visitors – consumers who in the past may have gone to Walmart or Target for at least some of the items now purchased at wholesale clubs and dollar stores.
This substantial increase in visits to Costco, Dollar General, and Dollar Tree has altered the competitive landscape in which Walmart and Target operate. In 2019, 55.9% of combined visits to the five retailers went to Walmart. Now, Walmart’s relative visit share is less than 50%. Target received the second-highest share of visits to the five retailers in 2019, with 15.9% of combined traffic to the chains. But Between January and July 2025, Dollar General received more visits than Target – even though the discount store had received just 12.1% of combined visits in 2019.
Some of the growth of the new retail giants could be attributed to well-timed expansion. But the success of these chains is also due to the extreme value orientation of U.S. consumers in recent years. Dollar General, Dollar Tree, and Costco each offer a unique value proposition, giving today's increasingly budget-conscious shoppers more options.
Walmart’s strategy of "everyday low prices" and its strongholds in rural and semi-rural areas reflect its emphasis on serving broad, value-focused households – often catering to essential, non-discretionary shopping.
Dollar General serves an even larger share of rural and semi-rural shoppers than Walmart, following its strategy of bringing a curated selection of everyday basics to underserved communities. The retailer's packaging is typically smaller than Walmart's, which allows Dollar General to price each item very affordably – and its geographic concentration in rural and semi-rural areas also highlights its direct competition to Walmart.
By contrast, Target and Costco both compete for consumer attention in suburban and small city settings, where shopper profiles tilt more toward families seeking one-stop-shopping and broader discretionary offerings. But Costco's audience skews slightly more affluent – the retailer attracts consumers who can afford the membership fees and bulk purchasing requirements – and its visit growth may be partially driven by higher income Target shoppers now shopping at Costco.
Dollar Tree, meanwhile, showcases a uniquely balanced real estate strategy. The chain's primary strength lies in suburban and small cities but it maintains a solid footing in both rural and urban areas. The chain also offers a unique value proposition, with a smaller store format and a fixed $1.25 price point on most items. So while the retailer isn't consistently cheaper than Walmart or Dollar General across all products, its convenience and predictability are helping it cement its role as a go-to chain for quick shopping trips or small quantities of discretionary items. And its versatile, three-pronged geographic footprint allows it to compete across diverse markets: Dollar Tree can serve as a convenient, quick-trip alternative to big-box retailers in the suburbs while also providing essential value in both rural and dense urban communities.
As each chain carves out distinct geographic and demographic niches, success increasingly depends on being the best option for particular shopping missions (bulk buying, quick trips, essential needs) rather than trying to be everything to everyone.
Still, despite – or perhaps due to – the increased competition, shoppers are increasingly spreading their visits across multiple retailers: Cross-shopping between major chains rose significantly between 2019 and 2025. And Walmart remains the most popular brick-and-mortar retailer, consistently ranking as the most popular cross-shopping destination for visitors of every other chain, followed by Target.
This creates an interesting paradox when viewed alongside the overall visit share shift. Even as Walmart and Target's total share of visits has declined, their importance as a secondary stop has actually grown. This suggests that the legacy retail giants' dip in market share isn't due to shoppers abandoning them. Instead, consumers are expanding their shopping routines by visiting other growing chains in addition to their regular trips to Walmart and Target, effectively diluting the giants' share of a larger, more fragmented retail landscape.
Cross-visitation to Costco from Walmart, Target, and Dollar Tree also grew between 2019 and 2025, suggesting that Costco is attracting a more varied audience to its stores.
But the most significant jumps in cross-visitation went to Dollar Tree and Dollar General, with cross-visitation to these chains from Target, Walmart, and Costco doubling or tripling over the past six years. This suggests that these brands are rapidly graduating from “fill-in” fare to primary shopping destinations for millions of households.
The dramatic rise in cross-visitation to dollar stores signals an opportunity for all retailers to identify and capitalize on specific shopping missions while building complementary partnerships rather than viewing every chain as direct competition.
Walmart’s status as the go-to destination for essential, non-discretionary spending is clearly reflected in its exceptional loyalty rates – nearly half its visitors return at least three times per month on average -between January to July 2025, a figure virtually unchanged since 2019. This steady high-frequency visitation underscores how necessity-driven shopping anchors customer routines and keeps Walmart atop the retail loyalty ranks.
But the data also reveals that other retail giants – and Dollar General in particular – are steadily gaining ground. Dollar General's increased visit frequency is largely fueled by its strategic emphasis on adding fresh produce and other grocery items, making it a viable everyday stop for more households and positioning it to compete more directly with Walmart.
Target also demonstrates a notable uptick in loyal visitors, with its share of frequent shoppers visiting at least three times a month rising from 20.1% to 23.6% between 2019 and 2025. This growth may suggest that its strategic initiatives – like the popular Drive Up service, same-day delivery options, and an appealing mix of essentials and exclusive brands – are successfully converting some casual shoppers into repeat customers.
Costco stands out for a different reason: while overall visits increased, loyalty rates remained essentially unchanged. This speaks to Costco’s unique position as a membership-based outlet for targeted bulk and premium-value purchases, where the shopping behavior of new visitors tends to follow the same patterns as those of its already-loyal core. As a result, trip frequency – rooted largely in planned stock-ups – remains remarkably consistent even as the warehouse giant grows foot traffic overall.
Dollar Tree currently has the smallest share of repeat visitors but is improving this metric. As it successfully encourages more frequent trips and narrows the loyalty gap with its larger rivals, it's poised to become an increasing source of competition for both Target and Costco.
The increase in repeat visits and cross-shopping across the five retail giants showcases consumers' current appetite for value-oriented mass merchants and discount chains. And although the retail giants landscape may be more fragmented, the data also reveals that the pie itself has grown significantly – so the increased competition does not necessarily need to come at the expense of legacy retail giants.
The retail landscape of 2025 demands a fundamental shift from zero-sum competition to strategic complementarity, where success lies in owning specific shopping missions rather than fighting for total market dominance. Retailers that forego attempting to compete on every front and instead clearly communicate their mission-specific value propositions – whether that's emergency runs, bulk essentials, or family shopping experiences – may come out on top.
1. Market Divergence: While San Francisco's return-to-office trends have stabilized, Los Angeles is increasingly lagging behind national averages with office visits down 46.6% compared to pre-pandemic levels as of June 2025.
2. Commuter Pattern Shifts: Los Angeles faces a persistent decline in out-of-market commuters while San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters has recovered slightly, indicating deeper structural challenges in LA's office market recovery.
3. Visit vs. Visitor Gap: Unlike other markets where increased visits per worker offset declining visitor numbers, Los Angeles saw both metrics decline year-over-year, suggesting fundamental workforce retention issues.
4. Century City Exception: Century City emerges as LA's strongest office submarket with visits only 28.1% below pre-pandemic levels, driven by its premium amenities and strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center.
5. Demographic Advantage: Century City's success may stem from its success in attracting affluent, educated young professionals who value lifestyle integration and are more likely to maintain consistent office attendance in hybrid work arrangements.
While return-to-office trends have stabilized in many markets nationwide, Los Angeles and San Francisco face unique challenges that set them apart from national patterns. This report examines the divergent trajectories of these two major West Coast markets, with particular focus on Los Angeles' ongoing struggles and the emergence of one specific submarket that bucks broader trends.
Through analysis of commuter patterns, demographic shifts, and localized performance data, we explore how factors ranging from out-of-market workforce changes to amenity-driven location advantages are reshaping the competitive landscape for office real estate in Southern California.
Both Los Angeles and San Francisco continue to significantly underperform the national office occupancy average. In June 2025, average nationwide visits to office buildings were 30.5% below January 2019 levels, compared to a 46.6% and 46.4% decline in visits to Los Angeles and San Francisco offices, respectively.
While both cities now show similar RTO rates, they arrived there through different trajectories. San Francisco has consistently lagged behind national return-to-office levels since pandemic restrictions first lifted.
Los Angeles, however, initially mirrored nationwide trends before its office market began diverging and falling behind around mid-2022.
The decline in office visits in Los Angeles and San Francisco can be partly attributed to fewer out-of-market commuters. Both cities saw significant drops in the percentage of employees who live outside the city but commute to work between H1 2019 and H1 2023.
However, here too, the two cities diverged in recent years: San Francisco's share of out-of-market commuters relative to local employees rebounded between 2023 and 2024, while Los Angeles' continued to decline – another indication that LA's RTO is decelerating as San Francisco stabilizes.
Like in other markets, Los Angeles saw a larger drop in office visits than in office visitors when comparing current trends to pre-pandemic levels. This is consistent with the shift to hybrid work arrangements, where many of the workers who returned to the office are coming in less frequently than before the pandemic, leading to a larger drop in visits compared to the drop in visitors.
But looking at the trajectory of RTO more recently shows that in most markets – including San Francisco – office visits are up year-over-year (YoY) while visitor numbers are down. This suggests that the workers slated to return to the office have already done so, and increasing the numbers of visits per visitor is now the path towards increased office occupancy.
In Los Angeles, visits also outperformed visitors – but both figures were down YoY (the gap in visits was smaller than the gap in visitors). So while the visitors who did head to the office in LA in Q2 2025 clocked in more visits per person compared to Q2 2024, the increase in visits per visitor was not enough to offset the decline in office visitors.
While Los Angeles may be lagging in terms of its overall office recovery, the city does have pockets of strength – most notably Century City. In Q2 2025, the number of inbound commuters visiting the neighborhood was just 24.7% lower than it was in Q2 2019 and higher (+1.0%) than last year's levels.
According to Colliers' Q2 2025 report, Century City accounts for 27% of year-to-date leasing activity in West Los Angeles – more than double any other submarket – and commands the highest asking rental rates. The area benefits from Trophy and Class A office towers that may create a flight-to-quality dynamic where tenants migrate from urban core locations to this Westside submarket.
The submarket's success is likely bolstered by its strategic location adjacent to Westfield Century City shopping center – visit data reveals that 45% of weekday commuters to Century City also visited Westfield Century City during Q2 2025. The convenience of accessing the mall's extensive retail, dining, and entertainment options during lunch breaks or after work may encourage employees to come into the office more frequently.
Perhaps thanks to its strategic locations and amenities-rich office buildings, Century City succeeds in attracting relatively affluent office workers.
Century City's office submarket has a higher median trade area household income (HHI) than either mid-Wilshire or Downtown LA. The neighborhood also attracts significant shares of the "Educated Urbanite" Spatial.ai: PersonaLive segment – defined as "well educated young singles living in dense urban areas working relatively high paying jobs".
This demographic typically has fewer family obligations and greater flexibility in their work arrangements, making them more likely to embrace hybrid schedules that include regular office attendance. Affluent singles also tend to value the lifestyle amenities and networking opportunities that come with working in a premium office environment like Century City: This demographic is often in career-building phases where in-person collaboration and visibility matter more, driving consistent office utilization that helps sustain the submarket's performance even as other LA office areas struggle with lower occupancy rates.
The higher disposable income of this audience also aligns well with the submarket's upscale retail and dining options at nearby Westfield Century City, creating a mutually reinforcing ecosystem where the office environment and surrounding amenities cater to their preferences.
As the broader Los Angeles market grapples with a shrinking commuter base and declining office utilization, the performance gap between premium, amenity-rich locations and traditional office districts is likely to widen. For investors and tenants alike, these trends underscore the growing importance of location quality, demographic targeting, and lifestyle integration in determining long-term office market viability across Southern California.
Century City's success – anchored by its affluent, career-focused workforce and integrated lifestyle amenities – can offer a blueprint for office market resilience in the hybrid work era.
